
Los Angeles — After 58 years, another wrong from the Hollywood blacklist era has finally been made right, thanks to a death-bed promise between childhood friends. The Writers Guild of America, West restored legendary writer Dalton Trumbo’s screenplay credit for the 1953 classic film Roman Holiday. The Guild’s WRITTEN BY magazine reveals the inspiring back story in its January issue.
Only a few insiders knew the truth behind Audrey Hepburn’s iconic movie debut on that famous Vespa with Gregory Peck. The scene had initially been imagined by a blacklisted screenwriter working anonymously in self-exile in Mexico. Two who knew were Guild writers Christopher Trumbo and Tim Hunter. They knew because their fathers had co-written Roman Holiday.
All their lives, Trumbo Jr. and Hunter Jr. shared much in addition to membership in the WGAW. Both are sons of famous screenwriters, Dalton Trumbo and Ian McClellan Hunter. Both grew up in the 1950s when the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) blacklisted their fathers as communist sympathizers. Both first became friends in Mexico where their parents were fugitives from HUAC.
When the boys met, Dalton Trumbo could not have his name on a screenplay. An outspoken member of the “Hollywood Ten,” he’d been labeled an “unfriendly witness,” cited for contempt of Congress, and imprisoned. To continue working, he had to recant and falsely accuse colleagues of “anti-Americanism,” or write using fronts or pseudonyms.
Before Tim’s father Ian McClellan Hunter himself got blacklisted, he volunteered to act as Dalton’s “front” writer, accepting studio payments for, among others, Roman Holiday and then secretly passing those monies to Dalton.
When Chris Trumbo grew increasingly ill in 2010, the two friends decided to approach the Writers Guild and propose that the screenplay credit for Roman Holiday be changed. They wanted it to reflect what their respective families believed: that the initial script was by Dalton Trumbo.
“Obviously, it was important for Chris Trumbo to know before he died that his father’s credit would be restored,” Tim Hunter wrote to then-WGAW President John Wells on January 11, 2011, in a letter reprinted in WRITTEN BY. “Under the circumstances I readily agreed to see if we can get it done. He died last week knowing that I would try.”
The WGAW investigated, using evidence recounted in the current WRITTEN BY, and the Board of Directors voted to restore the Roman Holiday screenplay credit. The full credit now reads:
Screenplay by Dalton Trumbo and Ian McLellan Hunter and John Dighton
Story by Dalton Trumbo
All of the credited writers have since passed away, but as Tim Hunter wrote to John Wells, “Roman Holiday was tangible proof of a friendship, a symbol on celluloid of many friendships, and the manifestation of a pact between friends during a time of political persecution.”
“It is not in our power to erase the mistakes or the suffering of the past,” said WGAW President Chris Keyser. “But we can make amends, we can pledge not to fall prey again to the dangerous power of fear or to the impulse to censor, even if that pledge is really only a hope. And, in the end, we can give credit where credit is due.
“In acknowledging the contributions of Dalton Trumbo, Ian McLellan Hunter and John Dighton to the writing of Roman Holiday, the WGA has not undone the hurt, but it has, at last and at least, told the truth. That fact is a tribute to the friendship of two fathers and then two sons and to a thing we can hold on to, which is that the friendship was stronger than and outlived the hate.”






It’s about damn time.
Beautiful–touching–healing for those involved and hope for those who weren’t…
Good they’ve finally set a wrong right, but it’s a damn shame people don’t have the courage to speak up when they see a wrong being done in the first place.
That was fast.
Is there anything in the article as to why the sons waited so long, or whether they did try earlier and were rebuffed?
No sympathy for Trumbo here. He wasn’t just a “sympathizer”, he was a member of the Party. He had no problem working with for Soviet interests, whether it was trying to keep the U.S. out of the war during the years of the Hitler-Stalin pact (yes, he helped the Nazis!), or pushing for entry once Hitler turned on Stalin. Nor did he mind playing the informant himself, as he forwarded a number of nastygrams to the FBI.
The only reason he was “fugitive” was his refusal to be publicly honest about his treasonous activities. If there’s a hell, Trumbo richly deserves a spot there with his former boss, Joe Stalin.
Oh my god not a communist with a different political perspective from you! I say fry ‘em all!
It’s fortunate that people like you are too stupid to tie their own shoelaces let alone run for public office or it would be the Red Scare all over again.
Yeah, I don’t believe in flacking for Joe Stalin and Adolph Hitler, so that IS a different perspective. You got me there, genius.
Back to your Tea Party rally, and don’t forget to kick another American on your way over, it’s the true definition of patriotism.
The Blacklist wasn’t about Communism, it was about the U.S. Government’s attempt to suppress freedom of thought, a right that you benefit from despite having no thought worth listening to.
Nowhere did HUAC propose one law to regulate speech. Their purpose in the fifties was to investigate communist influence in a very influential business. We have reams of documents from the Venona decrypts and other sources that show that this concern was real. But, hey, if you want to keep fluffing for a guy who backed two of the century’s worst murderers, well, go right ahead. I guess cheap ad hominem covers for all sorts of failings these days.
Um, sorry to intrude on your irrational, cherry-picking take on all this, but how exactly did Trumbo work for Stalin or Hitler? I mean that literally: what “work” did he do?
One of the insane things about the blacklist and your apparent support of it is that people were banned from working in Hollywood even though their actual work in Hollywood was often (and in the case of Trumbo in the 1940s) devoid of any real political bent. Or is your argument that anyone who has privately held political beliefs you find odious now deserving of blacklisting for work that’s unrelated to those beliefs?
Really? I can hope you lose whatever job you’ve got simply because I dislike your personal politics? That doesn’t seem like a really slippery slope to you?
People lose work in the private sector all the time for holding odious political and social views. Hell, that’s even more true for Hollywood. Trumbo’s work during that time constantly turned with whatever policy priorities the Soviets had. If it was drumming up opposition to Germany, that’s what he did. If it was drumming up isolationism to support Stalin’s new pal (from 1939-1941), that’s what Trumbo did. He then turned yet again, and he continued to follow the Soviet line well into the 50s. This is well past the time when anyone with eyes could see that Joe Stalin was NOT a good person.
As far as the credit goes, yeah, it should be in there if he wrote the work. As far as sympathy or popping open champagne for the little weasel, count me out. But go ahead, toast a traitor, and cloak it under the rubric of “political differences.”
You’re throwing a lot of assertions about Trumbo’s support for this or that but you seem unable to answer what I think is a simple question: where, in his work — his actual work — does any of his politics ever show up? It should be easy to answer. Look at his filmography — that was he the work he was banned from doing because of the blacklist — and tell me which films were propaganda efforts on behalf of the Stalin. Or, even easier, which films were Communist propaganda? Was it 1939′s Sorority House? Was it Kitty Foyle in 1940? Which?
You may disagree with his personal politics, although to honest, I doubt you’ve taken the time to even really research what he believed or put it in any proper historical context, but if you’re going to be disgusted by anyone who lived through the period leading up to WWII and opposed American intervention in the War — if that’s all it takes to be a “traitor” in your mind — then the vast majority of our country were traitors then and people of all political stripe, left and right, were, in retrospect, worthy of losing their jobs. That seems pretty nuts to me.
Actually, the HUAC was really about crushing the unions which were controlled by reds. But it was a studio boss collusion with the government on a labor issue. None the less, the communists in Hollywood in those days were mostly Stalinists. Stalin was worse than Hitler. I think Dalton Trumbo was a brilliant screenwriter. But he was also a fool.
A fool? Hell, even the Soviets didn’t know most of the crap Stalin did till Krushnev revealed it – atleast the Soviets that hadn’t been persecduted themselves. How in the h*** would Trumbo know it? All kinds of decent people were backing ‘communism’ in the early days – the idea that the workers should get a fair share of profits, despite the demonization of the idea by corporate America (naturally) and before they realized that Orwell’s “Animal Farm” was a more accurate picture of what was going on.
I think when your political party you’re a member of drops an iron curtain across half of Europe and you see people risking their lives to flee across a mined no man’s land to West Berlin should give you a clue that maybe you picked the wrong affiliation, unless of course, you agree with their tactics.
It’s a shame that Chris died just before his father’s credit was restored.
Great news. What a shame that those long gone whose careers were destroyed cannot receive similar redemption. But this is fantastic.
Only in Hollywood is it acceptable to “honor” those who openly undermine the U.S.
Leave it to the WGA to stand up for Traitors. Guess they have no choice, since most of the WGA ARE traitors and sympathizers. What’s next, a bust of Lenin in the lobby of the WGA? Celebration of the mass murder of 20 million plus Christians by starvation and interment at ‘death’ camps in the Soviet Union (I can’t believe that script has not been written by Clooney, or Affleck, or Damon). The same Soviet Union that Trumble and many others, supported.
No way does Trumble get credit, if it was 20 Million Jews killed in the Soviet Union.
Disgraceful.
Nuts; I meant Trumbo. So infuriated at this treasonous behavior I can’t see straight.
“So infuriated at this treasonous behavior I can’t see straight.”
Yeah, I get the feeling that happens to you a lot, Mark. Switching to decaf might help.
And I can’t stop chuckling at the fact that you were so wrong about so many things in your post that you couldn’t even be bothered to get the name of the guy you’re smearing correct.
I would say your little mistake could be an opportunity for learning and personal growth. But you don’t strike me as the type of guy who learns from his mistakes or makes an effort to do better next time.
Guys like Mark can’t learn from their mistakes since they already know the answers before they ask the question. Everything is stated as fact even if their “facts” bear little to no resemblance to reality. It’s why we have the Tea Party today, a group who would bring back HUAC in a heartbeat.
Little by little, the wrongs are righted. It does not matter what a person thinks or believes, for if we all thought alike it would be a dull world, but credit is due where credit is due.
Dalton Trumbo was an unrepentant Stalinist when he was blacklisted. How in the hell does he deserve sympathy for actions he took as an adult that were decidedly anti-American? Prisons are full of talented people that made wrong decisions. Let them serve their time, but, don’t re-write history.
“No sympathy for Trumbo here. He wasn’t just a “sympathizer”, he was a member of the Party. He had no problem working with for Soviet interests, whether it was trying to keep the U.S. out of the war during the years of the Hitler-Stalin pact (yes, he helped the Nazis!), or pushing for entry once Hitler turned on Stalin. Nor did he mind playing the informant himself, as he forwarded a number of nastygrams to the FBI.
“The only reason he was “fugitive” was his refusal to be publicly honest about his treasonous activities. If there’s a hell, Trumbo richly deserves a spot there with his former boss, Joe Stalin.”
What utter rubbish. Firstly, being a member of “the Party” generally involved attending meetings, sitting on a folding chair in somebody’s living room with a sugar cookie in one hand, a cup of fruit punch in the other and listening to someone drone on about the nobility of the Proletariat. So what?
The Soviets had spies in the U.S.; the U.S. had spies in the U.S.S.R. No one doing actual damage too either side via espionage was a screenwriter, American or Russian. Again, so what?
Lastly, the above claim that the CPUSA was working to keep the U.S. out of World War II during the Hitler-Stalin Pact is revisionism on the order of Fox commentator Bill O’Reilly’s claim (never retracted, even in the face of easily verified historical records) that it was AMERICAN troops who massacred Germans at Malmedy during the Battle of the Bulge. Apart from the America First Committee, whose members included anti-war activists of all stripes (including future Republican President Gerald Ford), and which has been lauded by none other than right-wing political commentator and former presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan, the forces in Congress working to keep the U.S. out of World War II were largely virulently right-wing Republicans, who after the war took out their wrath on those who came to be termed “premature anti-Fascists,” chief among them those who had, by coincidence or not, been members of the CPUSA.
In the end, it was all maneuvering by politicians and other who saw condemnation of certain political affiliations as a ticket to permanent employment and attainment of higher elective office — motivations and tactics that are deserving of any objective observer’s REAL scorn.
Lastly, the above claim that the CPUSA was working to keep the U.S. out of World War II during the Hitler-Stalin Pact is revisionism…
But Trumbo did work against Roosevelt in that period, and he did so in more vitriolic manner than any run-of-th-mill America Firster. He wrote about how horrid Great Britain was, you know, the one county in Europe still opposing nazism.
And in fact, Trumbo continued to follow the party line well after that period into the fifties. Sorry, I’m not going to get all weepy over a guy who thought Joe Stalin was just fine, and who supported the Soviet Union over this country.
I know it’s comforting to the liberal mind to sneer at the H8ters and bigots at Faux News, but, like it or not, Trumbo held despicable and treasonous views, and Congress had just as much interest in investigating his influence in Hollywood as they would any other industry.
Actually, leftists and rightists were opposed to entry into WWII. A lot of people back then were still feeling WWI which was fresh in their memories. And after a depression war did not appeal to many. But there are plenty of photos available online from that era of protesters from the left against WWII. Lets not forget the NAZIs were socialists and Fascism is a leftist strain not a rightist strain. It was championed by many on the left in those days. They thought it was exactly what was needed here. And some on the right also liked it too, But in the end, smarter people won that argument.
Sure, principled Americans of both left and right opposed entering the war. They were proven wrong, but their opposition was motivated by sincere patriotism, which is why their opposition ended on December 7, 1941.
The thing is, Trumbo’s opposition ended sooner, around about, oh, June 22, 1941, when he ended republishing his anti-war book, Johnny Got his Gun. Was this change of heart brought on by some miraculous premonition? No, it was brought on by Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union.
That little bit of evidence demolishes any claim that Trumbo was motivated by love of country in his opposition, unless of course we’re talking about his true country: the Soviet Union.
Trumbo would also brag to The Daily Worker that Communist influence prevented film adapations of Koestler’s Darkness at Noon and other anti-Communist films. Now why on Earth would any Congress during the Cold War be interested in such things? I guess we could steal a march from Alger Hiss and wonder how that awful HUAC managed to get into Trumbo’s study and use his typewriter.
Strange, the credit on the DVD was changed about 10 years ago. The featurette on the disc describes how they found the original background plate of a Roman vista for that particular title sequence shot in the Paramount archives, and then created the new text digitally to match the font of the other titles.
I didn’t realize they could change the credits of a movie without the WGA having made the update…
Lenin called them “useful idiots” – bourgeois liberals who promoted the party line until they served their purpose only to be liquidated in subsequent purges.
The limousine left romanticizes of a revisionist history of pursecuted artists like Trumbo, Hellman and Lawson instead of the true story of treason and cowardice.
Disgraceful! These blacklisted writers supported and promoted an Evil that hates individual liberty and led to the murder of countless millions.
Again please: support your claim. How did these blacklisted writers “support” and “promote” a politics you claim is “Evil”? And be specific please. Dalton Trumbo and Ian Hunter were actual people. What did they personally believe that you believe was worthy of their losing their ability to work? How did it ever manifest in their work?
And, by the way, how do you feel about a blacklisted writer like Michael Wilson who was, before his insane blacklisting, an American war hero?
What they did was refuse to account for their membership in a party loyal to an openly hostile foreign power. They hindered a legal congressional investigation of a crucial American industry. Most of you would be fine with this if we were talking about Nazi agents (which is what HUAC started out looking at), but you freak out over the lefty traitors.
Now why would a private business care? Well, normal people don’t like employing traitors, or in Hollywood’s case, they don’t like being seen employing them, so they hid it.
If Trumbo was such a brave and faithful believer in his cause, why not admit his Communist Party membership? Why not be a witness to his cause? When invited to give his view to the nation, he spurned his subpeona and fled the country. Given that he was a Stalinist, that’s about what you’d expect.
Um, no. You can be as committed to your politics as you’d like, but you can’t rewrite facts to suit them. Get your facts straight, a healthy debate can follow.
Now let’s get the Oscar to HARPER GOFF – the actual art director on Disney’s 1954 ’20,000 Leagues Under the Sea’! He was cheated out of it & it went to John Meehan, his assistant, instead – ONLY because Meehan had a union card, and Goff did not.
Over the years, the director of the film, Richard Fleisher, has said repeatedly, and in his autibiography, that Goff was the true art director on the film and designed every single interior set in the Nautilus, including it’s classic exterior design – with no helpl from Meehan. He was restricted, by Disney himself, to working on the “non-Nautilus” sets.
Disney’s archives confirms this – they even have the original velum blueprints listing Harper Goff as the movie’s Art Director.
When is the Academy going to correct THIS wrong? It’s only been OVER 50 YEARS!
dt was a pile of scum who deserved everything that happened to him.
The warning for posting is don’t get your facts wrong. How did the lie that Americans massacred Germans at Malmedy make onto this site? The fact; German SS troops captured nearly 200 Americans but since they were advancing there was no provision make to remove them back to Germany. They were shot dead in the snow by machine guns. That other post should be removed for the lie that it is.
As for the others; the author broke said rule by claiming that Dalton Trumbo was being pressured to “falsely” reveal other communists in Hollywood. It is that word falsely. A quick read of history confirms that there were indeed communists working in Hollywood. Trumbo knew of some of them. He would not have been falsely doing anything.
As for communists in Hollywood and trying to prevent the entry of America into the war. That is true but remember it takes more than a screenwriter to make a movie. You need a director, a producer, a screenwriter, and maybe an actor or two. Take the film “Mission to Moscow”. It was a stirring account of how fair the Soviets were during the purges of their military and intelligensia. It was all BS but it made a stirring movie. It was made in 1943 after the US entered the war and there was talk about why we were supporting the USSR. Howard Koch, the screenwriter, was responsible for writing numerous exciting screenplays that guilded the lily but made for great propaganda. The book was written by former ambassador Joseph Davies who was a great dupe for the Soviet Union and Stalin. His book and this movie showed the USSR and generous and munificent. Both outright lies.
Here’s a quote from screenwriter John Bright about Dalton and that time: “Dalton Trumbo joined the Communist Party, resigned, rejoined, and he was not a member of the party at the time of his death. He was much too bright to swallow the horseshit so rigidly and obsessively.”
So, yeah, condemn him if you must, but that’s still a separate issue from getting credit for your work. I don’t approve of what he did, but there are a lot of reasons for someone to join the CP at the time — a desire to help the poor and disenfranchised during the Depression, a desire to fight fascism which the U.S. wasn’t doing — and if anyone should have investigated at that time, it shouldn’t have been politicians. That’s what the police are for.