This is a big deal in Washington: The FCC desperately wants TV station owners to give up some of the airwave spectrum they use, so it can be redeployed for wireless broadband. The powerful National Association of Broadcasters is pushing back, skeptical that stations will be pressured to sell. But a report this morning from RBC Capital Markets analyst David Bank says it would be smart business for a lot of independently owned stations to go ahead and make a deal with the feds. He found several cases where stations recently were sold for less than the owner could have received by accepting just 25% of what wireless providers are paying for spectrum. That means it’s possible “these stations could see their values rise, based solely on the value of their spectrum.” Major network owners including CBS, News Corp, and Disney also could benefit if they agree to auction off some of the airwaves they use — but the value might not be worth the risk just yet. Bank figures that CBS’ share price would rise 1.6% if it sold half of its spectrum and received half of what wireless providers likely would be willing to pay. The impact would be virtually negligible at the larger companies. Under the same scenario, News Corp stock would only rise 0.5%, and there’d be no change for Disney. But Bank says TV station owners may be able to cut better deals for themselves as wireless companies become more desperate for spectrum — and broadcasters’ need for the airwaves diminishes. “With approximately 85% coverage of pay-TV among US TV households, and broadcast TV identities well established, an actual broadcast signal will likely be of questionable strategic advantage,” Bank says.







This is so wrong!
Because of the remaining uncertainty regarding spectrum repacking/reclamation I’m sure there are a number of small broadcasters that would entertain selling rights to spectrum, if for no other reason than the uncertainty prevents any kind of long-term business plan. But the real question is this; isn’t it quicker, better, cheaper to allow deregulation to take the place of auctions, for auctions will surely be a long, drawn-out process. Deregulation allows broadcasters to experiment with different modulation schemes, schemes that can be designed to work seamlessly with existing wireless modulation. If the government wants to extract its pound of flesh, allow the following; 1) B’casters pay a 5% ancillary revenue fee (already in place) for anything beyond basic broadcasting, such as spectrum leasing to wireless carriers 2) allow for a one-time fee to be paid to the government when a station’s spectrum usage rights are purchased by a wireless carrier, 3) maybe even increase ancillary revenue fee to 7-10% when spectrum is leased to a wireless carrier. A plan of this sort would enable spectrum availability for wireless carriers while still maintaining a free OTA TV service. If a wireless carrier came to me and said that it wanted to lease my excess spectrum I would jump at the opportunity; the wireless carrier gets its much-needed spectrum and I am able to subsidize my OTA TV station…sounds like a winner to me.
JCB posted the exact same text on another site’s coverage of the same story, but as “bbandeveywheuh ”
http://www.tvnewscheck.com/link/2012/01/17/56789/analyst-selling-spectrum-smart-for-some/comments?
This sounds like something from a shill for the “broadband” industry.
Deregulation, especially as you’ve outlined it here is likely to create more problems for reception by OTA consumers… a group of people that is increasing in size as people cut back on non-essential spending and use Free, Over The Air DTV/HD for their entertainment.
Having just added an HD LCD, I (and millions of other North Americans) don’t want to have to invest in either a brand new set with a different tuner or a “box” to receive a different modulation scheme.
Let the cell phone makers add Mobile OTA to their handsets in a way that works with our current system.
Require the cellular or “broadband” carriers work their existing spectrum more efficiently and effectively. They don’t need more room. Add more cell sited. Pack bits better.
Leave television alone so it can dig out of the expense of the DTV transition, and continue to serve the communities television stations have been serving for more than 60 years.
Over the Air transmission is becoming a preferred way for people to get their television as they re-evaluate paying for ever-increasing cable, satellite or telco pay-to-see services.
Using an indoor antenna, an existing outdoor antenna or paying a one-time charge to install an antenna brings viewers multiple DTV or HD channels without ongoing expense.
Over the Air HD signals are often better quality than the pay services, because the pay providers are reducing the bit-rate to squeeze channels into a finite pipeline.
Abandoning over the air capability for a one-time payment—even for small stations—is a shortsighted move that doesn’t serve the communities broadcasters are licensed to serve.
Consumers need to know this, and be able to tell their congressional representatives to keep Free DTV HD capable, and without interference from “broadband” encroachment.
Wireless providers have spectrum they currently aren’t using. Require them to use it, or lose it.