Freelancer Cari Lynn is contributing to Deadline’s coverage.
Add the News Corp COO to the list of Big Media execs who believe that they were simply misunderstood in the debate that led Congress to put aside the Hollywood supported anti-piracy bills. “Clearly this got turned upside down, the whole issue,” he said at a conference sponsored by All Things D. Despite the claims of opponents, including those in the tech industry, the proposals empowering the government to block overseas Web pirates “isn’t about censorship…If they did it in the U.S., they’d be shut down. So they moved it offshore. You should still be able to shut them down.” He seemed to take a subtle dig at the MPAA for not making the industry’s case more effectively as opponents turned the issue into a populist crusade. ”If you look at what went on, you’d say that was not a process to replicate,” Carey says. The creative community didn’t ”anticipate the viral aspect and message getting twisted.”
Speaking of things going awry, Carey also defended News Corp’s handling of the UK phone hacking scandal. After what he called “a difficult and challenging year,” he says that the company is “committed to put things right, cooperating with authorities.” As for how the scandal will play out, he says that UK “authorities will control timeframe” adding that News Corp “would like to move forward as quickly as (we) can.” Carey says that there’s “no substance” to the suspicion that the company may have also violated people’s privacy in the U.S.


Carey is a COO for Rupert Murdoch. Res ipsa loquitur.
Don’t worry, it will pass after the elections.
IN it’s present form? NO CHANCE IN HELL. Anyone who actually reads the the extremely (and deliberately) ambigious wording of the bill can see for themselves that there wasn’t a shred of “misinformation” involved. The shutdown of MegaUpload further underscores the fact that there is NO NEED or REASON for the existance of SOPA or PIPA. I doubt studios and record labels will EVER be allowed to have the virtually unlimited control that they want, whether they like it or not. If they’re willing to be realistic, then maybe there’s a chance…but the studios being realistic won’t happen in MY lifetime, i’m sure…
Have to agree with this. If they don’t want to be “misunderstood,” then they shouldn’t write a bill with language that does precisely what they’re saying it doesn’t do.
I think it’s amazing that those who support rampant theft have been able to turn this issue into a political argument. This isn’t about freedom of speech. It’s about bringing an end to the era of stealing other people’s stuff.
And for those who say ‘I’m the consumer, I decide how I consume stuff’ – just trying going down to your local Gap at 2AM, smashing the window and stealing a bunch of clothes. When the cops bust your ass see if you can use the same argument; it’s Gap’s fault, they weren’t making their clothes available when and where I wanted them to.
Get this through your thick skulls – movies, television, video games and music belong to someone. Because that person owns them, they can decide how, where, when and to whom they are sold. You have no rights as a consumer until you have bought the product in question in one of the ways that the vendor is happy to sell it to you.
If I decide to make a film and keep it in my closet, you have no right to break into my house to see it because I won’t show it to you when and where you want to see it. If you choose to illegally obtain the product, that makes you a thief. The only thing that is different is that instead of breaking into my house and doing something that physically feels like a crime, copyright theft can be committed in the comfort of your home on a computer. But it’s still a crime. And all the political posturing and indignation in the world is not going to change that.
Congratulations on once again so spectacularly missing the point
The creative community didn’t ”anticipate the viral aspect and message getting twisted.” That’s because they live in a bubble, pampered, and used to getting their way. But I agree with SuperPAC. This will get passed in 2013 when Congress can start ignoring the rabble rousers again.
He didn’t ”anticipate the viral aspect and message getting twisted.”
After all, Big Media wrote the legislation, vetted it through their own legal, and bought and paid for the votes in the house. It got voted down only because of misunderstandings, you will see!
My prediction: It will be rewritten by the same big media lawyers, and a sop made to other tech companies to kneecap the largest oppostion, and consumers will be left high and dry.
coming from News Corp… who sponsored SOPA
I don’t really think that studios and record labels will ever be allowed to have the virtually unlimited control that they want, whether they like it or not.