OSCARS: Jennifer Lopez Named Presenter

COMMENTS (16)

• I guess she needs a little more exposure. Umm, what does she have to do with the movies anyway? Just saying . . .

  Comment by savvydude — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:01pm PST  Reply to this post

• Bingo. The MTV awards have more credibility.

  Comment by alex — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:04pm PST  Reply to this post

• Big F**king Deal.

  Comment by derby — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:12pm PST  Reply to this post

• Yawn. God forbid we get a break from her media whoring ways.

  Comment by Already bored — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:14pm PST  Reply to this post

• Those that can’t … present?

  Comment by ger2868 — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:14pm PST  Reply to this post

• For the ABC telecast? or the telecast on Telemundo?

  Comment by captain Lashout — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:21pm PST  Reply to this post

• at least she won’t be singing.

  Comment by dee — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:27pm PST  Reply to this post

• Yet another reason NOT! to watch the oscars!

  Comment by jennifer — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:36pm PST  Reply to this post

• Actually, Jennifer is a talented actress and I wish she had concentrated on her film career instead of branching out into music. Most people mock her because she was in terrible movies like Gigli and Jersey Girl, but she has also been in some good films and worked with prestigious directors and actors and it’s not fair to focus on the negatives, as if no actor had ever been in a movie they’d rather erase from their credits.

  Comment by Chatty — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:44pm PST  Reply to this post

  • Please. She hasn’t had a good performance since OUT OF SIGHT. Before that, she was good in SELENA and had okay supporting turns in BLOOD AND WINE and U-TURN. But that’s as far as her so-called acting talents went.

    Comment by sd — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 12:55pm PST  Reply to this post

    • Jennifer should’ve gotten an Oscar nomination for her turn in El Cantante. She even said so herself.

      She was raw and gritty in it, but hardly anyone saw the movie.

      Comment by JD — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 3:35pm PST  Reply to this post

      • Oh she said she should have gotten one? Such humility…

        Comment by b — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 5:45pm PST  Reply to this post

  • I am laughing at your comment, Mrs Lopez agent. Even you are finding it hard to defend her career. JL has been too lucky to been give more than one chance. She’s done dozens of films. And still, all people can remember is her terrible acting and choice of films. That’s not exactly `focusing on the negatives.’

    Why the fck is she even at the Oscars?

    Comment by Alex — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 1:21pm PST  Reply to this post

  • ok, as long as she doesn’t sing and pretend she doesn’t like the attention she gets from her A$$. chris rock was right – “thank your a$$ girl!”

    Comment by pablo — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 10:30pm PST  Reply to this post

• Here we go again. How about some good old fashioned MOVIE STARS. Next you’ll be announcing The Kardashians are presenting.

  Comment by Bob — Monday January 30, 2012 @ 1:57pm PST  Reply to this post

• I don’t get the outrage. Is she the first person who didn’t have a movie out or who doesn’t really have a movie career that was asked to present at the Oscars? Doubt it.

  Comment by Bee — Tuesday January 31, 2012 @ 10:32am PST  Reply to this post