UPDATE, 12:10 PM: Diplomacy is the order of the day for the MPAA in its response to the White House. The trade group says it’s still willing to work on a compromise. It hopes that ”the Administration’s role in this debate now will help steer the attention to what can be accomplished and passed into law to protect American jobs,” says Michael O’Leary, MPAA’s Senior Executive Vice President for Global Policy and External Affairs. He adds: “Meaningful legislation must include measured and reasonable remedies that include ad brokers, payment processors and search engines.” Failure to pass an anti-piracy law “will result in overseas websites continuing to be a safe haven for criminals stealing and profiting from America.”
PREVIOUS, 9:53 AM: An online statement today from three White House officials indicates that President Obama sides with the tech community — and against Hollywood — in opposing proposals that give the government the right to block overseas Web sites that traffic in pirated content. The administration “will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet,” Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator Victoria Espinel, U.S. Chief Technology Officer Aneesh Chopra, and Special Assistant to the President Howard Schmidt write. Their concerns match the objections that tech companies have raised about two similar bills: the House’s Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Senate’s Protect IP Act. The trio acknowledge that piracy is a serious problem that hurts “everyone from struggling artists to production crews, and from startup social media companies to large movie studios.” But they called for new proposals that narrowly target ”sites beyond the reach of current U.S. law,” focus on criminal activity, and protect Internet intermediaries including
online ad networks, payment processors, and search engines from “unjustified litigation that could discourage startup businesses and innovative firms from growing.” The officials say that they’d like to see voluntary initiatives to fight piracy. Meanwhile, they vowed to ”continue to work with Congress on a bipartisan basis” on a compromise that ”provides new tools needed in the global fight against piracy and counterfeiting” but also preserves “an open Internet based on the values of free expression, privacy, security and innovation.”
The anti-piracy bills were already in trouble before the White House statement. Yesterday a major SOPA supporter, House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas), agreed to ditch the bill’s requirement that Internet service providers block infringing websites. Today SOPA opponent Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Cal.) said he will postpone a hearing scheduled for this Wednesday. “While I remain concerned about Senate action on the Protect IP Act, I am confident that flawed legislation will not be taken up by this House,” he says. Majority Leader Eric Cantor “has assured me that we will continue to work to address outstanding concerns and work to build consensus prior to any anti-piracy legislation coming before the House for a vote.”

With all the money the government has fleeced from society, they didn’t want to look like hypocrites, so of course they sided with the thieves and pirates.
Another victory for organized crime. Now can we please legalize prostitution and Pot?
victory for organized crime? wtf… The bill just needs to be rewritten so sites like youtube and bloggers wont get screwed over. And yes, Pot should be legalized. Dont understand your problem with this. Tobacco should be illegal.
Good.
The death of both of these is a good thing. Here’s hoping that “continuing efforts” of the future really mean what it usually does…that congress will do nothing. Congress is not savvy enough about these issues to do anything that will either make it worse and/or have no effect on the problems which are really overblown to begin with…that’s right…I said overblown…deal with it.
Online piracy via bit torrent is currently 16% of all broadband traffic. Claiming that the US govt isn’t “savvy” is absurd, particularly when it’s a White House document that you’re responding to favorably.
Response to this White House doc is typically hysterical. Which is fine for now. It says that action must be taken this year. It is stalling and demagoguery, and inefficient, but it states clearly that legislation is expected to meet the core goals of creative professionals. Frankly, if this ham-handed doc is a midpoint, I hope to see the outcome.
Piracy is a huge problem. If the White House needs time to realize that it also applies to televsion and books, that’s fine. They were, after all, responding to a petition submitted by Chicken Littles, all 50,000 of them.
What is wrong with you? Can you READ?
The administration is NOT opposing an anti-piracy bill – it’s just against DNS-TRACKING, which would allow the government to SHUT DOWN WEBSITES.
Hello? This thing on?
The Pipa/Sopa bills are an outrageous over reach. Barbara Boxer is bought and paid for by the movie industry. Piracy needs to be dealt with but these bills are an attack on our Porn…I mean Freedom.
All Hollywood has to do is hire hackers to plant viruses in illegal file sharing operations. It’s only quasi illegal to do that, and almost impossible to prove. How hard is that? Just poison the well, hollywood. There is no need for this bs legislation.
Don’t be naive. They wanted the legislation for the purpose of shutting down legitimate competition, not for the purpose of combating piracy – that’s why they purposely left out any penalties for lying about a site and gave an exemption to anyone who might get sued for a false allegation.
Note that in the article above this one about Murdoch, he says, “Piracy leader is Google who streams movies free, sells advts around them. No wonder pouring millions into lobbying.”
As Jan says, these bills really aren’t about piracy. They’re about ruining the freedom of the Internet as we know it so the studios can remain the 800 lbs. gorilla controlling *all* entertainment content to their own advantage.
Because, you know, that worked so well with the music industry.
Apparently you’ve never heard of virus-scanning documents before you download them.
Nice work Hollywood libs! Keep lining up like lemmings for this anti-business Prez. He takes your cash and eats your escargot, but just cold cocked your kids’ trust funds.
You do know that opposition to this bill has come from all quarters and across party lines, right?
The only people who want these horrible pieces of legislation to pass are the studios. And less because of piracy than a desperate attempt to shut down anyone who provides entertainment besides them. It’s about control, plain and simple.
Piracy is a problem. These bills are horrible and are not the solution.
Corporations are at the highest profits they’ve seen in U.S. history under this president – and he’s SAVED three business industries, and is trying to stop Republicans for shipping jobs overseas and has given small businesses tax cuts over 13 times, not to mention made it cheaper for them to give health insurance to their employees. You freaks can say he’s an “anti-business” president all you want – but you’re only embarrassing yourself, as there’s never been anything to back it up. Seriously, have you ever actually looked into ANYTHING that Faux News tells you, or do you just accept it like a mental patient taking medication?
Think Smith’s agreeing to ditch had anything to do with being confronted with the fact that is very own web site violated copyright of a photographer?
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/lamar-smith-says-hell-keep-pushing-so
MARC, you truly are a MORON.
Good news on several fronts…
“…agreed to ditch the bill’s requirement that Internet service providers block infringing websites…” Methinks this sort of censorship does far more to promote the very thing it is intended to discourage, even if it is just for the cat-and-mouse game itself. For some people or at least one, a cat-and-mouse game is preferable to the “stock” experience of video games, from what i hear. Apparently one can occasionally distract the cat (from nothing in particular) or at least get a sense of what or how the cat wants one to think. Of course, mice get eaten or just worn down to the very last dog-chewed bone in their bodies, too, and this has no appeal (at least to the mouse, anyway).
Why are people still thinking about SOPA, which will limit our rights, when Issa and others proposed “OPEN: Online Protection & Enforcement of Digital Trade Act?”
“The OPEN Act secures two fundamental principles. First, Americans have a right to benefit from what they’ve created. And second, Americans have a right to an open internet. Our duty is to protect these rights. That’s why congressional Republicans and Democrats came together to write the OPEN Act. But it’s only a start. We need your help: sign up, comment and collaborate to build a better bill.”
Google OPEN and compare to SOPA. See what we’ll lose with SOPA.
Romney would have supported these internet-killing bills. Guaranteed. President Obama, once again, reaffirms why he’ll be re-elected and why Romney will crawl back to one of his 12 houses, sitting on his butt and waiting for his $7 million welfare checks from Bain.