EXCLUSIVE: I have obtained new and confirmed details about the proposed union formed by the SAG-AFTRA Merger as approved by the National Boards Of Directors. To date, neither SAG nor AFTRA have released any referendumpackage details. The memberships will be asked to vote on the referendum package shortly. It is vital for each actor and performer to know how their unions will change because of the merger:
New Dues Structure:
New Initiation Fee: $3,000
(Previously $1,600 at AFTRA, $2,230 at SAG)
What you should know: AFTRA has refused to suspend its “open door policy” during the interim before merger passes or fails. Which means that from now until the effective date, anyone with $1,600 can walk up to the AFTRA cashier and join. Meaning they won’t have to pay the difference between $1,600 and post-merger $3,000. “This potential flood of newbies will absolutely kill the background community,” one of my sources says.
New Base Dues: $198.00
(Previously $116 at SAG.)
New Work Dues
For Actors
1.575% with a cap of $500,000
Maximum work and base dues: $8,073
For Broadcasters:
Tier 1: $0 – $100,000 – 1.575%
Tier 2: $100,001-$250,000 – .274% ($250,000 cap)
Maximum work and base dues: $2,184
What you should know: Between 60%-70% of SAG members will see their dues increase from $116 to $198 (or +$82). Roughly 30% or less of SAG members will see a decrease believed to be $45 purely due to the fact that they will no longer be paying two dues bills. Broadcasters are getting a huge break on the work dues percentage after $100,000 and a big break on the maximum work and base dues.
Union vs Non-Union:
Broadcasters in the new union will still be allowed to work non-union (CNN, CNBC, ESPN, MSNBC, etc…) and make tens of thousands of dollars without owing any dues on that money.
Actors in the new union will still be prohibited from working non-union.
New Entrance Structure:
Previous members of either SAG or AFTRA or both prior to merger are automatically a member of the new SAG-AFTRA union.
The three voucher system is one of the entrance requirements.
If non-union actors can prove they have been trying to organize non-union work, they can become a member of the new SAG-AFTRA union. Unclear is how they will be able to prove that or how the union will be able to substantiate the proof.
New Leadership, Old Staff:
Convention will be the highest governing body. It will meet only every 2 years.
There will be 80 Board members, including 10 national officers: President, Executive VP, Secretary Treasurer, and 7 more VPs. The President and the Secretary/Treasurer will be directly elected, as will the 60 board seats. The 8 remaining officers will be elected via convention. Executive Vice President is elected via convention. Everyone elected will be eligible to receive monthly salaries which could include assistance with qualifying for health insurance.
What You Should Know: The President is now mostly a figurehead. The Executive Vice President is the most powerful position. Although actors will make up the overwhelming majority of the new union, that power will not be reflected on the Board or on committees. Hollywood will no longer hold the majority on the new union’s Board or any of its committees even though Hollywood represents over 60% of the membership and brings in over 65% of the new union’s revenue.
All currently employed SAG and AFTRA staff keep their jobs after merger.
Pension and Health:
No study was done. Only a cursory review.
There are no laws prohibiting the merging of the plans.
Retirees are protected by federal law.
Accrued pension credits cannot be eliminated. Which means that any member who has accrued pension credits prior to merger will have those credits after merger.
What You Should Know: There is still a huge discrepancy between SAG’s and AFTRA’s health and retirement plans. No answers will be provided in time for the referendum package with regard to what will happen to the plans after the unions merge. Questions left hanging include whether the plans will be combined or frozen and what the new eligibility requirements and premiums will be. Also unanswered if what happens if SAG’s or AFTRA’s pension plans dip into the ‘yellow’ or ‘red’ zone which then reduces the guaranteed dollar value of what the retiree is expecting. Also still fuzzy is what happens to the overwhelming majority of members who have not earned enough pension credits to be considered ‘vested’ and still need to earn pension credits to reach that threshold.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


That’s really bad.
Total failure, IMO
Fabulous!!! As if we didn’t already know!!! All the worst things they could do and they want APPROVAL for this mess!!! Oh, man….VOTE AGAINST THIS OUTRAGE AND GET IT OVER WITH!!! Double dues!!! Just what I’ve always wanted…paired with a Union that is NOT a union!!! SAFTRAG…the open union busting union!!!
Still enthusiastically voting for merger.
So basically any schmuck can join AFTRA in the next month and automatically be grandfathered into the new SAG-AFTRA union? Ridiculous.
And they are. I know 2 people who have today.
I totally agree!! This is insane!
The dream was always One Union—–BUT —not this way! All the numbers must be beneficial to the performers, or there’s no reason to merge. And like those asses in Congress, why do we (the performers) have to. change, and the staff remain the same ? I reject this Idea of merger
Are you insinuating that a basic grasp of the English language, let alone even a shred of talent was a requirement to join SAG?
I realize that there is a “cooler union” thinking when it comes to SAG, but COME ON. Anyone — ANYONE — can get a SAG card just by taking a few extra steps. (I got mine in 93′ so yes, I know)
Ridiculous.
It’s much more difficult to join SAG.
So what if there’s a run on joins? It gets mostly younger, newer actors off the non-union tracks. Makes it harder for producers to cast non-union jobs like commercials if there isn’t the access to that talent. Most young people I know today want to be in the union and the truth is, with AFTRA having most of the tv, most of those people have already joined that union. I would put money on the number of people who join being minimal at best.
Don’t be so quick to judge Aftra’s entrance requirements Kevin. I busted my a– on Sag projects to try and get vouchers only to see “pretty young blonde girls” walk away with vouchers at the end of the night after they “disappeared with crew members” or chatted up their “friends” during the whole shoot day. And, although I eventually got my vouchers to become eligible to join, I actually became eligible FIRST to join Sag by having a speaking role in an Aftra show. So don’t judge. There are many people out there who got Sag vouchers that didn’t deserve them.
I couldn’t agree more.
I busted my chops for years to get my SAG vouchers also, only to see others as you did get them for unsavory/unprofessional behavior.
Nepotism & the casting couch are alive & well and living in Hollywood today.
I didn’t have to work to hard at it. About 3 years for the first commercial and about 1 year after that for the second.
Isn’t it strange how some people got their Sag Vouchers? So don’t judge Aftra.
Oh? How about ten years ago when all you had to do was stand in a picket line for a few days and SAG would let you in? SAG isn’t as exclusive as some of its members like to pretend.
Face it. If you’re actually worried about these walk-ins taking your gigs, perhaps its your own acting skills you should be focused on.
Exactly. Speaking from the current background trenches, there are just as many SAG members delaying joining AFTRA before they pounce post-merger.
Anyone who thinks solidarity, more funds, and more members is going to weaken two unions the studios use to their advantage is misguided.
SAG_Aftra merger ??? It’s NOT a merger. AFTRA is taking over SAG.Win Win for AFTRA. Initiation fee will jump from $1,600 to $3,000.To join a union that has you working for less $$$ and with fewer health benefits. Merge the health and pension? The feasibility report, is 7 lawyers saying that it will work! LOL! Really ? That’s all you got? Wake up people! Vote a big NO on this one. It is not in your best interest!
Yes, any schmuck fresh outta prison on Monday can walk into the AFTRA office on Tuesday and become a “Union” member whom I might work with on Wednesday. And that’s the truth. “Integrity. AFTRA doesn’t haz it.”
Yes, at times people have gamed the SAG voucher/eligibility system (naked boobs seems to be a popular enabler) but at least SAG has one! The vast majority of SAG members earned their right to be a SAG member. That counts for something, about which AFTRA doesn’t have a clue nor care.
And for some other posters who claim that membership in SAG is based on talent, it’s not. It’s based on professionalism and time-served (in most cases). That it’s tough to get a SAG card says something irrefutable about the holder of that card – they earned it. No AFTRA member can claim that about their AFTRA card.
Sure, people, run on down to your local AFTRA office and throw money at them so you can (if you’re lucky) earn $114/day for walking back and forth on a low-budget Nickelodeon TV series twice per week. After taxes you should have around $160 or so for your week of work. Pay your rent with that, ‘kay? “Livin’ that dream”, baby! Won’t you be disappointed if/when this “merger” fails and you’re stuck with fighting to earn your SAG membership (and paying again) so that you can have some decent union representation…?
(And I’m absolutely not referring to the current SAG administration as “decent representation”. Things need to change around here.)
DAMN! Tell it like it is. I lived on Yucca and ate shitty takeout for 5 years, I earned mine. Hangin with coke heads, sluts and morons, while answering central casting phone calls and starving while crew ate first at 5:00 AM call times freezing my ass off most of the time in Sand Canyon or Santa Clarita. All the while a victoria’s secret wonder bra could make an A cup into a C and appeal to that little prick PA with the clip board and his radio on the wrong channel, oozing schmear from the pocks on his face yelling at me while I’m trying to choke down a window breaking bagel and luke-warm coffee.
Yea, I EARNED MINE!
Have a heart any schmuck also can join SAG!!!Talent’s got nothing to do with it,
…and any schmuck can do a 5 min. webisode w/SAG actor to Taft Hartley in, or traditional “buy your SAG vouchers”…it’s the amount of $ you pay and to whom…integrity, that is within!
Why would SAG members want to merge with AFTRA what do they get? Looks like a load of crap to me.
That is exactly what im thinking. What is the friggin benefit?
If you look at the breakdowns for pilots this season, SAG is actually taking them back. SAG lost a lot over the WGA strike and then the SAG negotiations. However, I’m seeing a comeback. They still monopolize all film.
I was for the merger but now I’m rethinking this. What is in it for SAG? I’m presently both SAG and AFTRA. But I am curious, as a SAG member, what’s in it for us?
Great that you’re stopping to think, Jamie. More SAG members should ask that same question, “what’s in it for us?” And based on this preliminary report, the answer is pretty much, nothing.
The AFTRA-sympathizing SAG board (all are AFTRA members/board members, IIRC) is hoping that SAG members are scared enough to vote without using their heads – like we did a few years ago about passing the contract referendum. “Sign the contract and go back to work immediately!” Please… And how did that work out? Did anybody “go back to work”?
Of course not. There was no work to go back to (thank you, AFTRA). And the SAG board knew it. But we voted ‘YES’ anyway.
Beyond the obvious pension and health benefits questions that aren’t answered (and can’t be), turning SAG into AFTRA is not the way to a stronger union. There will NOT be more work for the same amount of people. There will NOT be tougher negotiators sitting at the table with the AMPTP. There will NOT be any advancements in organizing New Media. There will NOT be any incentives for producers to provide a decent pension structure in a “new” union.
There WILL, however, be broadcasters voting on actors’ residual income. There WILL be far too many board members running this “new guild”. There WILL be current AFTRA (non-SAG) members now eligible to audition for, and work on, feature films. There WILL be union members working non-union jobs just across the hall from the union jobs.
The ONLY benefit of merging the two unions would be that we’re no longer splitting our own work in two places; not doing enough work in one place so that we might earn pension/benefits. And that’s the huge elephant in the room which this PLAN does not, will not address – because they can’t.
In my heart of hearts I was hoping that these committees would find a way to let SAG members know that there’s a sun on the horizon, which would open the door for the fair implementation of a new, collective, stronger union. Because of the insurmountable circumstances, they have failed (though I’m sure they tried). Worse, the boards of both guilds actually approved this bile. Shows how the boards feel about the future(s) of their respective unions, huh?
This “plan” is not a plan at all. It’s lunacy.
I am tired of this same old argument that still doesn’t hold water. Can ANYONE think of an example where you have two UNIONS covering the SAME TYPE OF WORKER (and around 40% of the time the SAME PEOPLE) competing for the SAME JOBS?
We GAIN by no longer having two unions to be pitted against each other for contracts.
We GAIN by all being in ONE union where the VAST, VAST majority of members will be ACTORS (or background, or singers, or puppeteers, or motion capture, or dancers all of which are currently IN SAG and VOTING on our contracts now). The total number of evil broadcasters will be a small number compared to the total membership.
We GAIN by having ONE set of negotiators at the table (and they can be just as tough as we can arrange.
We GAIN by being a single union and have increased the power of a strike authorization.
The fact is that all actors are worse off today then before the SAG vs. AFTRA war started. We are acting under a ceasefire right now, but if this doesn’t go through it will be war again.
As long as it’s SAG vs. AFTRA the producers WIN and the Actors LOSE.
Well, since you asked (and for the benefit of anyone else still reading this topic)…
“I am tired of this same old argument that still doesn’t hold water. Can ANYONE think of an example where you have two UNIONS covering the SAME TYPE OF WORKER (and around 40% of the time the SAME PEOPLE) competing for the SAME JOBS?” Nope. You’re absolutely correct there. But it was AFTRA who started competing with SAG for jobs, by undercutting our rates and protections. You cannot deny that.
Further, there is a finite number of people trying to get a finite number of jobs – no matter whether we merge or not, that fact won’t change. What will change is that there will be another 30,000+ people (the AFTRA-only cardholders) who will be eligible to work on what are now SAG-only jobs. And those 30,000 people will have paid NOTHING for the opportunity.
And the loss goes to… SAG members.
“We GAIN by no longer having two unions to be pitted against each other for contracts.” This is true. And AFTRA perpetuated this in the first place, at great harm and indifference to SAG’s welfare. Let’s (SAG) not forget whom we’re dealing with here.
“We GAIN by all being in ONE union where the VAST, VAST majority of members will be ACTORS (or background, or singers, or puppeteers, or motion capture, or dancers all of which are currently IN SAG and VOTING on our contracts now). The total number of evil broadcasters will be a small number compared to the total membership.” The broadcasters aren’t evil. They need a union too. But they absolutely should not be allowed to vote on actors’ contracts, which include a residual pay structure. Apples and oranges.
And the loss goes to… again, SAG members.
“We GAIN by having ONE set of negotiators at the table (and they can be just as tough as we can arrange.” Great, in theory. In practice, however, AFTRA has habitually laid down in negotiations. As did the current SAG negotiators, giving us the current crap contract we all have. What makes you believe that negotiations will be ANY different with these two negotiating bodies at the table together? And without a strike authorization in their hands? The AMPTP will just laugh at them and say, “What are you gonna do if we say no?” The SAG-AFTRA negotiators will say… “Uh, we’re gonna tell your Mom!”
And the loss goes to… BOTH AFTRA & SAG members.
“We GAIN by being a single union and have increased the power of a strike authorization.” Bwwwaaaaaahahahahahah…. (see above) A strike authorization is NOT gonna happen with these people in charge of negotiations.
“The fact is that all actors are worse off today then before the SAG vs. AFTRA war started. We are acting under a ceasefire right now, but if this doesn’t go through it will be war again.” Okay, again, AFTRA started this “war”. The cease-fire is only because SAG has had no choice (under our AFTRA-centric leadership) than to play ball on the messy field that AFTRA constructed.
Further, there is no evidence that “there will be war again” if this merger plan fails. This is a negotiation between SAG and AFTRA, nothing more or less. The G1 committees and the SAG and AFTRA boards are under union leadership obligation to provide us a plan that we can agree upon. The current offering is not that plan. If we simply vote ‘NO’ on the current plan, the G1 will have to go back in and adjust some things to make it a less-bitter pill for SAG to swallow. We can vote again as soon as the plan gets better or more to our liking.
Otherwise – ain’t happenin’.
“As long as it’s SAG vs. AFTRA the producers WIN and the Actors LOSE.” Yep. And as long as the SAG Board continues to allow AFTRA to poach jobs – against SAG members’ wishes – Actors LOSE. What does that say about our current SAG Board? You know, those “Unite for Strength” people. Is this crappy merger “plan” what SAG members had in mind when the U4S people were voted in? Obviously not.
Of course with AFTRA, the producers always win. Ask any of ‘em.
Yes! We do need one union…SAG!!!! AFTRA threw us under the bus when SAG was protesting along with the writers during their strike. As a person who did background to earn health insurance, it was possible with SAG. AFTRA however, it is not. There is no possible way to earn health insurance for a family doing AFTRA background (you need $30K for a family of 3). Had AFTRA not taken away television from SAG, SAG would not be in this boat.
And going ahead and voting YES now, without any answer on a pension plan, will FOREVER ELIMINATE the membership’s rights to approve such a plan. The “trustee” and board will be making those decisions AFTER the vote, and it will be “like it or lump it” for the actors.
Does anyone out there really know what they’ve got in their AFTRA pension? Here’s a union that sent out dues notices asking how much we earned so they can decide what to charge us for dues! Well guys if you’re not keeping records on how much we earned, I venture to guess that your pension plan is just as screwed up. I vote for a full disclosure of the AFTRA pension’s books BEFORE I will vote yes for a merger.
“Meaning they won’t have to pay the difference between $1,600 and post-merger $3,000″
Does this mean that the new union will NOT force actors to pay the difference once booked on a new job?
As is plain to see, this merger plan is slanted toward Aftra culture.
Broadcasters will be allowed to work non-union gigs that pay nothing into pension and health while actors will be paying the freight in terms of keeping the pension plan healthy and paying those salaries that will be paid to the elected positions.
The president will have no power but rather the executive VP who is chosen at convention by the nasty little oligarchy as per Aftra tradition.
Actors will constitute the largest group of members and will generate the largest amount if revenue but this will not be represented by actors having the largest presence on the board.
This is taxation without representation.
This is a hostile takeover of SAG by Aftra.
Actors get to pay for everything but have little say in how the union serves us ?
FUCK THAT BULLSHIT.
VOTE THIS ARROGANT PIECE OF CRAP DOWN
AND THEN DECERTIFY AFTRA.
Don’t hand our futures over to thieves.
I think you nailed it.
Well said, my man! I did not vote for the “merger plan” or for the clowns who took over SAG. I was very surprised by the results of the vote. I have been a union man for over 40 years, and thought I had seen the worst of shenanigans (Carpenter’s union “organizing” illegal Mexican workers. Basically giving them higher paying jobs for nothing in return). Now, I also belong to SAG and I see our members getting the shaft by these sweet talking new “leaders”. If we can trust the tabulators of the merger vote, we DO HAVE THE NUMBERS TO TAKE BACK OUR SCREEN ACTORS GUILD. SEND AFTRA PACKIN’!!
Great job reporting on this, Nikki. Thank you.
From my understanding, retirement pensions are protected by federal law but at a FRACTION of what was lost.
We still find it very unsettling that the powers that be are hurtling ahead with this merger without figuring out some pretty important details first.
If broadcasters can work non union and we are part of the same union, how could the union possibly get away with punishing any actor for working non union.
I smell a future law suit.
So as a member of AFTRA I am now a member of SAG also after the merger-woohoo. There are $2600+ reasons why I hadn’t joined yet. If you can get background vouchers to join SAG, it’s really not much of an accomplishment anyway. The guild is not some upper echelon of talent that only hall of fame talent are a part of. Having extras in the union shows that no talent is necessary to join. Let’s get off the SAG-snobbery-pedestal and realize that it is nothing more than an organization of people within an industry. When the guild truly protects and supports the rank and file and not just the rich and famous will I call it a “union”.
They haven’t merged yet so you’re not a member of SAG. Don’t county your chickens. I know plenty of SAG members voting against it. And plenty of talented actors start out as extras so stop using that to judge people. Dedicated actors will work hard to gain their SAG card. We earned it. We didn’t just waltz into an office and slam money on the table.
For many of us who have been SAG for years, OUR dues will go up as a result of the merger.
No thanks.
“Broadcasters in the new union will still be allowed to work non-union (CNN, CNBC, ESPN, MSNBC, etc…) and make tens of thousands of dollars without owing any dues on that money.”
What planet are we living on?
May this wake-up the somnambulant actor community! Furthermore, if given a choice between two Unions and the producers chose AFTRA, why do you think that is? BECAUSE the terms are more favorable to the Producers! Doh! I’m not telling anyone how to vote, I’m asking that actors NOT vote for a merger until all their questions are asked and answered satisfactorily. Ubi ignus est? Last night’s Red Carpet inquiries were asked of people who are vested, invested, and let’s face it, earn a boat load of money. Do they really know (or care) what impacts 90% of the union members?
Here is the thing: nothing and I mean nothing is set in stone. Things, structures, amendments, deals can occur even after this deal goes through. It isn’t perfect. In many ways it is unfair. I’m a single card carrying SAG member who rates will go up. BUT, the alternative is continued “war” bt the two unions for work.
I say let’s move forward, iron out the kinks after the fact, and just get this thing done already.
Jim, I totally understand what you’re saying, but you have to understand that this proposal gives the current, very underhanded, leadership, the power to do “what they see fit.” That is the actual wording in the proposal. They need to “see what’s fit”, first, propose it to us, and then let us vote on it. What they’re offering us is not a plan for merger, it’s a blind merger with no plan in place. Aftra has been poaching our jobs for years and killed a very tough and important negotiation by splitting off from SAG and making their own deal, due to a personality conflict between Alan Rosenberg and Roberta Reardon. Miss Reardon was not considering us, the actors in this. She was considering herself. If this merger passes, there is a clause in the proposal that says, “if one of the co-presidents steps down, the other co-president assumes full presidency.” I guarantee that if this passes, Ken Howard will step down and Reardon, whom we did not elect, and who is extremely friendly with the studios, will be running our union. She is the reason my residual income is the lowest I’ve ever seen it and it will continue to get lower under her leadership. I met a guy at a Dodgers Game who works for one of the studios. I did not tell him I was an actor, but I asked him what he does. He said his job at the studio, is to find a way to eliminate residuals. He joked about how easy Aftra made his job during the contract negotiations, and then once SAG got rid of Rosenberg and Allen, they followed suit. These are the same people URGING us to vote for this merger. Why? We elected them to come up with a plan for merger. They didn’t! We need to merge for strength in negotiations, these self proclaimed moderates have not come up with a plan that Unites us for strength. Vote no. Send them back to the table and tell them to do what we elected them to do.
S.A.G. = GOOD… AFTRA = BAD… S.A.G.-AFTRA = VERY, VERY BAD…
Thats BS,’reality’. Even wo the analysis its clear that there are huge holes here to AFTRAs advantage. Allowing any member to work non union is enough reason to vote no on this…plus nobody still has any pension explanations. and our union will be opened for anyone to join once the merger is announced???? This is crazy.
vote NO PEOPLE!!!!
I’m vested and have been a member of SAG since 1967. I have earned a pension and am concerned about what will happen after the merger. For this reason (and others) I was against the merger when it came up a few years ago. However since then I’ve changed my mind. Why? Because so many shows went AFTRA after the last time contract negotiations came up that I realized the only way we actors can continue to have leverage is by being one consolidated union.
I think it would be best if SAG had stopped Aftra from poaching all of the shows instead of cozying up to them.
Does Joe Biden have more power than Barack Obama? Then why should the new ‘Executive Vice President’ of SAG/AFTRA have more power than the Elected (not appointed) President? What a crock!
Being Financial Core with SAG, what if I decided to join AFTRA? Do you have any idea where I would stand with SAG-AFTRA? I’m not saying I will, I’m just wondering…and what if I don’t join AFTRA?
I hear ya – Fi/Core Sag, Full member Aftra. (I hate SAG’s politics and the fact that because of the mismanagement, they’ve paid millions in union violations to the clerical unions who work at SAG)
So, am i no w a member if this merge happens?
Or do I have a choice?
If it is approved, I’d rather be fi/core.
But, i cannot vote for a merger until I know what is happening to my pension BEFORE we make a decision.
Agreed… Usually unions merge for power… Looks like we’re getting weaker … Vote NO!
Hwy Reality
What do you want to bet that the info Nikki has posted here is EXACTLY the same as what we’ll receive in our info packets from SAG and Aftra.
Albeit without the ridiculous cheerleading about “what a great deal this is and how we’ll have strength in numbers and oh, what a momentous occasion.”
The deal is crap.
It’s a disaster for actors.
Roberta Reardon once said,
“It’s all of us or none of us.”
So if broadcasters are allowed to work
mon-union gigs, so should we all be.
Actors wake up !
We’re being robbed.
We’ll pay for everything but have greatly reduced input in how the new union reps us.
So all us or none of us– unless you’re AFTRA?
I have known for awhile that this deal wasn’t going to be a good one, but, I had no idea it would be this bad. All I want as an actor is the RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHO I WANT TO REPRESENT ME! We, as actors have never been given that opportunity. I want the right to vote on which union I want to bargain for me and not be FORCED to vote for a merger that will weaken S.A.G. forever. I have been so frustrated that I started a discussion group on Facebook called JUST SAY S.A.G. If you are against this merger, join us! TOGETHER WE CAN VOTE THIS PIG DOWN!!!
There has always existed another option besides merging
SAG, a union of the actors, by the actors and for the actors,
with Aftra, a union that says it’s okay . . . to work non-union gigs !
and that is TO DECERTIFY AFTRA.
Aftra will say it’s illegal, but that’s bullshit.
it’s untenable to have two unions repping the same group of workers
doing jobs for the same corporations.
Vote down this inequitable megrer and decertify Aftra through the Department of Labor.
the workers get to choose who will be their collective bargaining agents, not the employers.
If Aftra had ever bothered to fight the good fight 30 years ago and organize cable news,
maybe their P&H wouldn’t have grown so weak and maybe then they wouldn’t have
POACHED SAG’s JURISDICTION.
It’s hard to organize labor but relatively easy to STEAL FROM ACTORS
Don’t let it be so easy.
ACTORS ! WAKE UP !!!
Well said.
I’m with Just Sayin’.
Bravo
Fight this in-equitable merger
and De-certify aftra
no union members should work non-union gigs
And what of residuals? AFTRAs contact for tv had been horrible. Also, will all wages earned in both unions in the past 6 to 12 months be joined and credited towards medical and pension?? Soooooo much to answer.
Amen to that! Absolute craziness everything us sag members worked So hard to get now just any dummy can do the same. Completely not fair. Isn’t sag supposed to be protecting us?
As a member of sag I’m voting no. I worked hard to get into the union and I don’t want some random person with a bunch of money to just buy into the union. This is insane
but on the bRight side…. Roberta Reardon finally got a TV credit : )