EXCLUSIVE: I have obtained new and confirmed details about the proposed union formed by the SAG-AFTRA Merger as approved by the National Boards Of Directors. To date, neither SAG nor AFTRA have released any referendumpackage details. The memberships will be asked to vote on the referendum package shortly. It is vital for each actor and performer to know how their unions will change because of the merger:
New Dues Structure:
New Initiation Fee: $3,000
(Previously $1,600 at AFTRA, $2,230 at SAG)
What you should know: AFTRA has refused to suspend its “open door policy” during the interim before merger passes or fails. Which means that from now until the effective date, anyone with $1,600 can walk up to the AFTRA cashier and join. Meaning they won’t have to pay the difference between $1,600 and post-merger $3,000. “This potential flood of newbies will absolutely kill the background community,” one of my sources says.
New Base Dues: $198.00
(Previously $116 at SAG.)
New Work Dues
For Actors
1.575% with a cap of $500,000
Maximum work and base dues: $8,073
For Broadcasters:
Tier 1: $0 – $100,000 – 1.575%
Tier 2: $100,001-$250,000 – .274% ($250,000 cap)
Maximum work and base dues: $2,184
What you should know: Between 60%-70% of SAG members will see their dues increase from $116 to $198 (or +$82). Roughly 30% or less of SAG members will see a decrease believed to be $45 purely due to the fact that they will no longer be paying two dues bills. Broadcasters are getting a huge break on the work dues percentage after $100,000 and a big break on the maximum work and base dues.
Union vs Non-Union:
Broadcasters in the new union will still be allowed to work non-union (CNN, CNBC, ESPN, MSNBC, etc…) and make tens of thousands of dollars without owing any dues on that money.
Actors in the new union will still be prohibited from working non-union.
New Entrance Structure:
Previous members of either SAG or AFTRA or both prior to merger are automatically a member of the new SAG-AFTRA union.
The three voucher system is one of the entrance requirements.
If non-union actors can prove they have been trying to organize non-union work, they can become a member of the new SAG-AFTRA union. Unclear is how they will be able to prove that or how the union will be able to substantiate the proof.
New Leadership, Old Staff:
Convention will be the highest governing body. It will meet only every 2 years.
There will be 80 Board members, including 10 national officers: President, Executive VP, Secretary Treasurer, and 7 more VPs. The President and the Secretary/Treasurer will be directly elected, as will the 60 board seats. The 8 remaining officers will be elected via convention. Executive Vice President is elected via convention. Everyone elected will be eligible to receive monthly salaries which could include assistance with qualifying for health insurance.
What You Should Know: The President is now mostly a figurehead. The Executive Vice President is the most powerful position. Although actors will make up the overwhelming majority of the new union, that power will not be reflected on the Board or on committees. Hollywood will no longer hold the majority on the new union’s Board or any of its committees even though Hollywood represents over 60% of the membership and brings in over 65% of the new union’s revenue.
All currently employed SAG and AFTRA staff keep their jobs after merger.
Pension and Health:
No study was done. Only a cursory review.
There are no laws prohibiting the merging of the plans.
Retirees are protected by federal law.
Accrued pension credits cannot be eliminated. Which means that any member who has accrued pension credits prior to merger will have those credits after merger.
What You Should Know: There is still a huge discrepancy between SAG’s and AFTRA’s health and retirement plans. No answers will be provided in time for the referendum package with regard to what will happen to the plans after the unions merge. Questions left hanging include whether the plans will be combined or frozen and what the new eligibility requirements and premiums will be. Also unanswered if what happens if SAG’s or AFTRA’s pension plans dip into the ‘yellow’ or ‘red’ zone which then reduces the guaranteed dollar value of what the retiree is expecting. Also still fuzzy is what happens to the overwhelming majority of members who have not earned enough pension credits to be considered ‘vested’ and still need to earn pension credits to reach that threshold.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Finally, Nikki and her Team!!!!!! If 50% of this reporting is accurate, this merger is horrible!!!! I want more information and I’m not going to trust anything that comes out of the tainted mouths of SAG or AFTRA. Or their leaders. What a load of crap they’ve been feeding people. Thank god some folks didn’t believe the hype and have initiated a law suit to force the union in doing a real impact study about our health and pensions.
Here’s the answer to those who are saying we might as well merge with AFTRA to stop them from stealing SAG work: GO TO FREAKING COURT OR TO THE NLRB AND FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTFUL JURISDiction. Digital has nothing to do with this. That’s an AFTRA myth that people, including most SAG leaders, have swallowed. SAG has jurisdiction in digital production too but did not fight for it. You don’t have to decertify AFTRA. If SAG was strong enough, it would take AFTRA to the NLRB or file unit clarification charges. It can be done. It has been done in the past. But the SAG leadership has to want to do it and they don’t because the union is run by AFTRA zombies who never want to strike ever again or stand firm during negotiations. Why is everyone so afraid of protecting our jurisdiction? I bet if SAG sent out a poll asking members is they want SAG to have control of all television and commercial contracts, they response would be “Hell To The Yes!!”" If merger goes down in flames, that’s what SAG should do. And then, armed with the support of the membership, SAG should fucking take care of business. And them the members have to vote the idiots out who have created this bullshit merger plan. It’s horrible and so are they. All of them Across the country. Ken Howard and Vaughn being the worst of the worst. We must stand together and FIGHT!!!
This is a disgrace. I hope any thinking SAG member not making money at the income level of George Clooney, Tom Hanks, Brad Pitt et all will vote this charade of a merger down! I don’t see how SAG actors benefit from this proposal. Worse still, we don’t have a clear indication of what will ultimately happen with our health and pension plans. Will SAG – AFTRA’s Board decided to once again raise the amount of days/hours/income necessary to make Health Insurance, making it once more out of reach of this struggling the most to survive and this industry, and needing the insurance the most? I was at an AFTRA caucus last evening and those seated at the table up front seemed very pleased with the notion of a merge. I think it will be a disaster for SAG to unite with the AFTRA union which consistently sells us down the river with each and every contract negotiation and continues to negotiate unlivable wages for background actors who pay dues and get little in return. The current contacts in place will remain so until 2014, which means a background actor not astute enough to join now at AFTRA’s $1600 walk-in rate could conceivably end up paying an initiation fee of $3,000 post-merger — for the privilege or earning $109/8 on a CW show. Disgusting.
How about the unions come up with a plan to help member save themselves from paying to submit to jobs that don’t even pay. Why are casting directors who want to cast union actors only going through services and not through the unions and then to the agents? No one seems to benefit from iActor. Are there any plans so we don’t have to pay for these other companies who make money off our backs to upload pics, demos? I think many of us pay for pics, demos, submitting, sides and all that adds up to more than union dues. Casting should work with agents and the unions and not these middle “services”. Save the members money.
Speaking of saving the members money, if you are combining unions you shouldn’t need so much staff. Why not reduction?
And, what about BUYING property instead of renting? We should own property.
I thought it would benefit us but now I realize we are being undersold again!!! Aftra needs to close its doors first before a bunch of people get grandfathered in like nothing!! And they won’t even disclose the health and retirement details!! That seems very shady in my opinion!! Sag needs to get on top of the game again!!!!!!
This has been coming for quite some time: The real Issue here is control of the SAG Pension Plan. Some people seem to want it…duh! AFTRA is a B-Casting union & the B-Casters pay nothing anyway… so it’s NEVER had a good Pension or Health plan. Every single AFTRA member will vote “Yes.” The famous Air-Headed leadership that was installed a few years ago are FOR this Merger… because a lot of them are producers… Duh. Producers DO NOT want to pay actors or their fokakta Pension Plan… Duh.
They are pinning their Hopes on the fact that few people will actually READ what the losses are when this Phony-Baloney Merger is passed. They are hoping most of the Actors out there are as Stupid as the people who were elected and presently serve afer lying to all the Actors in the last BIG election when Hollywood lost to a collection and cabal of BS satellite offices in the middle of the US… Leave Hollywood alone — We started this business here and it should stay here… disenfranchise all those little stupid office holder/Board Members who live in Bechuwanaland and don’t even ACT.
VOTE NOOOOOOOOOO ON THIS BULL**** PEOPLE!. LOL. I KNEW IT. I KNEW IT. THIS LEADERSHIP IS A BUNCH OF MORONS. THEY DON’T GIVE A SH** ABOUT ACTORS. LET ALONE BACKGROUND ACTORS.
THEY ARE LOW BALLING US TO THE SEWER. WE ARE ALL GONNA BE STANDING ON A CORNER WITH SIGNS SAYING “WILL WORK FOR FOOD”. VOTE NO, VOTE NO, VOTE NO!!!!
THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO WILL BENEFIT ARE CELEBRITY ACTORS!!!
I think it’s hilarious that all the wannabe elitists here are crying and complaining about AFTRA’s open door policy. Obviously AFTRA isn’t going to turn anyone away at the door because it means more money in initiation fees for them and dues down the line for the new Union. Also, anyone joining off the street most likely has no real credits or representation so it wouldn’t affect any real established, working actors. The only ones who would be affected are background really.
But like someone already mentioned, more $, more numbers = more strength and negotiating power. The less non union talent out there, the better.
Plus everyone fretting over their health and pension- it’s all protected by state and federal law. Whatever you have accrued, you keep. The merger will not affect your pensions and any changes would not be made without a member referendum down the line.
A vote for merger is in everyone’s best interest, with maybe the exception of greedy producers and insecure background performers.
If your a background actor…. Better find a day job! Anyone in their right mind would never agree to these terms…. Although, I’m sure there’s enough idiots out there to pass this merger
Has anyone read the official documents or are they just fueling the fire?
Are they crazy!!!!
I’m confident the SAG union membership is not this ignorant.
There has not been, even remotely enough proper planning and solid answers to what we are doing here. Lets not end up like we did with the internet deal – there basically isn’t one. If we wait until after the merger to fix the multitude of unanswered problems with this merger – there will be no answers. If you look back at SAG history, anything we didn’t get initially in writing …WE NEVER GOT…If you pass this at this stage…there is no more SAG as we know it.
Poorly put together and a disastrous attempt at railroading a historic union into total CHAOS… VOTE NO!
“RETIREES ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW.”
As a retiree, I’m not reassured.
Especially since the merger masterminds didn’t think it was important to have a third party research group do A STUDY on what the likely outcomes of merger would be for our pension & health plans.
Millions of Americans have seen their pensions severely reduced or terminated outright. Did the federal pension protection agency pick up the tab? (Did the welching companies get off scot-free?) How much are US taxpayers shelling out to “protect” retirees.
Exactly how were those retirees “protected by federal law”?
And are FUTURE retirees protected by federal law? Current pensioners like me MAY be spared. Our younger sisters & brothers are even more vulnerable.
But I’m forgetting the Merger message: VOTE FIRST. GET ANSWERS LATER.
Dave Clennon
As a 20 year member of both unions, this just doesn’t make sense. If SAG-AFTRA is one union, why do the broadcasters work non-union and actors union? The whole point of a merger would seem to have one bargaining power that would be able to negotiate that (CNN, CNBC, ESPN, MSNBC, etc…) pay H&W. Voting no on this.
I hope all you union voters realize that the ten-percenters, (agencies WME, CAA, ICM, ATT) have been chomping at the bit to get this merger approved for literally YEARS. They want to be able to change the charter so they will be able to charge management fees as well as agency fees and the only way they can do it is to eliminate some clause in SAG. The agencies have been teaming up for at least 10 years by paying equal shares of the legal team that has been approaching the union top brass.
Watch out, higher dues will not be your only problem. Managers are going to be steamrolled right out of the 15% business and agencies will be charging 25%.
The sound recordings code generates more than $140 million in annual earnings for AFTRA members.
I don’t think that SAG haters of AFTRA deserve any of this.
if you’re already in the union your dues only go up $80 however now you can Aftra work too if you were sag or vs versa. We get the strength of both unions now no more than just make it an Aftra project or make it a Sag project it’s 1 union. I would bet we will see a lot more stronger contracts come out in the coming year giving us a lot more work.
I’m wondering how many of the people spouting off their objections on this site and complaining about what their union isn’t doing for them attend every meeting, have tried to get elected and/or appointed to the board and put the effort into changing the very things they are so up in arms over in this forum. Put your money where your mouth is. Get involved and be the change you claim you want to see. Or shut up. Voting this merger down isn’t going to solve all the problems you keep pointing out because at the end of the day, no = no change to the unions. It’s easy to complain. You, as a union member, let the very rules you abhor happen by doing nothing but sitting by and complaining after the fact. Spare me.
“RETIREES ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW.”
As a retiree, I’m not reassured.
Especially since the merger masterminds didn’t think it was important to have a third party research group do A STUDY on what the likely outcomes of merger would be for our pension & health plans.
Millions of Americans have seen their pensions severely reduced or terminated outright. Did the federal pension protection agency pick up the tab? Did the welching companies get off scot-free? How much are US taxpayers shelling out to “protect” retirees.
Exactly how were those retirees “protected by federal law”?
Are FUTURE retirees protected by federal law? Current pensioners like me MAY be spared. Our younger sisters & brothers are more vulnerable.
But I’m forgetting the Merger message: VOTE FIRST. GET ANSWERS LATER.
Dave Clennon
AFTRA has ruined the industry for actors.
I just joined AFTRA a month ago. Not because of the merger or for some strange bragging right but because the show I’m working on made me. People have to realize that not every person who who rushes down to the AFTRA offices to join is some invalid. The majority probably will sit at home waiting to be discovered and the select few will blend in. Probably wont even notice us.
So, to loosely quote Wimpy from the Popeye cartoons…
They would gladly consider a Pension and Health Financial Impact, Feasiblity and Minority Report on Tuesday, for our yes vote for a MegaMerger today?
Until we know we must vote no (wish there was a ‘not yet’ option). A great idea whose time has clearly not yet come.
It would be nice if this new zero tolerance policy wasnt so strict for us extras.Sometimes we have issues that are out of our control.I understand that its due to the ones who’ve not taken this line of work seriously but there are some of us who do take it seriously and are passionate about the craft even if it is background,but sometimes we have issues out of our control like car breakdown;accidents.Its not right to be fired off a whim.So many of us drive for miles and miles from different counties to do this and deserve more compassion.I myself have been doing this 12 years and are union.I believe there should be a board to protect people in this similar situation.Anybody agree?
First let me say that I live and work in Hollywood and that I’m a card carrying member in both unions and work on a regular basis. There are pros and cons in every deal but I think everyone needs to look at some obvious facts. AFTRA is getting the lion’s share of T.V., SAG still the obvious leader in feature films. I ask active workers how many feature films they worked on last year. More and more features are being shot out of state with only a fraction of that type of work left for an ever increasing body of SAG actors. In my personal experience, probably 80% of my work in 2011 was under a AFTRA contract. My point being that with two unions I know I’m not going to be able to make my pension credits. Are you???? As far as membership requirements, how many of you really believe that there is going to be a rush of newcomers and background actors anteing-up $1600 in the next month when they are scrapping to make rent and next weeks grocery’s? I’m in contact with these very people, and it’s not going to happen. After that three vouchers are still needed to apply and after acceptance a hefty $3000 price tag. United we stand, divided we fall…simple as that.
“United we stand, divided we fall…simple as that.” And who divided us? AFTRA, that’s who. And why? To save their own ass by screwing their sister union, SAG.
Beyond that, your argument about pension credits is accurate save for one thing: you’re assuming something that isn’t even likely – that there will be decent pension structure in this new SAG-AFTRA union. And medical benefits? Who said anything about decent medical benefits? SAG’s P&H plan is already in place and it’s awesome, and everybody knows it. AFTRA’s plan is, well, crap. (And everybody knows that as well.) There is no way in hell that producers will agree to a decent P&H structure. Why should they? What are the new “SAG-AFTRA” union negotiators gonna do if producers don’t feel like agreeing to a quality P&H structure? They’ll whine about it, apologize that they couldn’t do better, and then agree to some crappy P&H structure anyway.
You lose.
Look, there is already a fantastic pension structure that exists for SAG members. If we let SAG die (which is what this merger plan means), this structure will never be duplicated again. SAG will lose it, AFTRA members won’t get it, and the producers will profit a TON of cash while they laugh all the way to the bank.
Worried about splitting work? Let’s look at membership numbers from a specifically SAG point of view: some simple math (the numbers are general, but close); 125,000 SAG members, 45,000 also have AFTRA cards. AFTRA – 75,000 members (the same 45,000 hold SAG cards). If we merge members, that adds 30,000 people who will now be eligible to compete for SAG film and TV work. FILM WORK! You’re damn right AFTRA wants this!
SAG members, is this okay with you? Do you really think your days of work will increase under this new union? They will NOT – they can only decrease. (More people/competition looking for SAG work.) How about your opportunities to build your pension and retirement? Do you think that opportunity will increase?
Of course not.
This is a potential agreement between two unions – SAG and AFTRA – not with the AMPTP. If SAG members have a problem with “The Plan” we can simply vote ‘NO’ and get the committees to go back and correct the shortcomings. This is NOT “all or nothing”, as the pro-merger people would have you believe. This merger plan is great for AFTRA! It will pass the AFTRA membership with flying colors, just like the past merger attempts.
And guess who’s pushing it on you, SAG members? That’s right, the AFTRA people who are running SAG.
Ultimately, what’s in it for SAG? Nothing.
SAG does not have to “be nice” to AFTRA here. This is your future pension and benefits that you will be giving away if you vote ‘YES’ to this plan.
I am also a dual cardholder. I could give a crap if AFTRA, who allows their union members to do non-union work, gets de-certified. If any of you don’t understand what a travesty this is then you don’t understand what a union is, nor how powerful a union can be with qualified leadership and a membership that supports each other.
That’s what “United We Stand” means.
I agree we need one union.
But does anyone remember how SEG members became SAG?
Why not have the actors decide to pick one existing union to represent them… preferably the one with the better contracts, SAG.
I stopped paying AFTRA dues 15 years ago because I preferred SAG work.
With the anti union sentiment sweeping this country, it would not surprise me to find out that producers of film and television find new and inventive ways to use non union talent.
Well if the internet is any indication of the future of entertainment:
NU work will flood the market, non-fi-core actors who aren’t booking gigs will have ended up wasting valuable cash and most likely squash their own dreams by trying to do “the right thing” as far as joining the union.
AFTRA is a weak union when it comes to producers, they negotiate a contract set a minimum for pay; and then renegotiate an individual productions contract and end up paying all performers less than what was originally negotiated.
Doesn’t this sound whacky for a union to do? “Hey we wanted this pay for all job, but THIS job, we’ll do it for 30% less.”
That’s absurd.
Residuals will become a thing of the past, AFTRA-SAG as one union will sign death deals for the smaller actor. We’ve already lost half our jobs to shitty Reality TV. What makes people thing AFTRA-SAG as one union will improve the job market? It won’t.
More internet projects will stay NU and until there is a proper contract made, union internet projects still can negotiate the pay 100%, there are no minimums.
Best advice to a smart creative actor: Become a producer so you can make a living. Abandon ship on these unions.
AFTRA illegally poached the T.V. shows, and no one in SAG sued them over it. They have no jurisdiction at all. According to a contract they signed on to in the 40′s they have jurisdiction over ‘live taping’ only. Having said that, the same political party that runs AFTRA has been running SAG NY for 25+ years. Their guy has been ‘negotiating’ contracts for all that time, that lost a huge number of SAG jobs. This will no longer be a ‘union’, because any ‘name actor’ that can open a film is a producer, and a union made up of limp dough hand yes sayers in charge, who will then also draw a SALARY, a first in history, is not a union but the laughing stock of the industry. This is a bad deal. The BS argument of more power in numbers only translates into salaries for the new board and officers, not in money in the pocket of members. If you must merge, merge with IATSE and the TEAMSTERS. Not with a bunch of sell-outs.