The big question following this expected announcement is whether Redbox and Blockbuster will tell Warner Bros to take a hike and buy the studio’s new discs from retailers. That’s one reason why other studios have been reluctant to push for the longer window. But Warner Bros made the announcement at the 2012 International CES because it’s eager to push low-cost rental services aside in the hope that the entertainment industry’s new UltraViolet initiative will boost sales of DVDs and Blu-ray discs. UltraViolet enables buyers of some discs to stream the movies from remote servers to digital devices including smartphones and tablets. “Since we implemented a 28-day window for subscription and kiosk, we have seen very positive results with regard to our sell-through business,” Warner Home Video North America president Mark Horak says. “One of the key initiatives for Warner Bros is to improve the value of ownership for the consumer and the extension of the rental window — along with our support of UltraViolet — is an important piece of that strategy.” Netflix VP Content Anna Lee says that it is going along with the longer delay “to ensure members have continued secure access to Warner Bros DVDs and Blu-ray discs.”


Seriously, WB — FUCK YOU!
28 or 56 (or even more) days doesn’t matter to me. I’ll just wait it out. I never buy films and rarely go to the theater. There is nothing any studio can do to change that in the era of Netflix.
When will the dinosaurs that run WB wake up to the new rental paradigm? Very few titles are worth watching more than once, so forcing customers to buy a title they would rather rent may not pay off unless the content is worth it– Wait! Make better movies instead of churning out formulaic shlock and uninspired remakes and sequels? Now there’s an idea that would sustain this new distribution model!
I’m with Velouria on this – the studios can’t do anything to sabotage Netflix short of somehow blocking them from obtaining DVDs even on the open market, and even then, I doubt I’d notice if any given studio’s products had vanished unless it’s Pixar, whose products are unique.
All the other studios just make stuff that’s interchangeable with their competitors. What do I care what studio made this or that cookie cutter shoot-em-up/car-chase extravangza? It’s like trying to tell the difference between Coke and Pepsi and a generic brand. I couldn’t name a Warner’s movie if my life depended on it, but I can actually tell the difference between Coke and Pepsi by taste, there is a slight difference, which is more than Hollywood can claim.
However, implementing a time-vs-price trade-off seems fair to me. If I want to rent a movie for a bargain-basement price, I’ll wait a year, that’s fine. In the meantime, I have a mountain of other TV shows and movies to slog through. My Netflix queue seems permanently stuck at just shy of 300 titles.
PS, Coke is more orange flavored and Pepsi more lemony, if you’re curious.
Seriouslly they think that Ultraviolet is a selling point? Seriouslly it’s a reason to not purchase there titles.
Honestly this is a very horrible idea and people are just going to start forgetting about Warner Brothers altogether…
Warner Bros. is in the dark ages. Very silly.
Is there some reason that studios can’t just “freeze” Netflix out altogether? If Ultra Violet is the way the studios want to go it seems that killing the rental/streaming business is the way to do it. The reason home video was such a great business is that you couldn’t access the material anywhere else. If you liked/wanted to see something and it was out of theater or already played it’s run on TV, the only option was to purchase it or GO to Blockbuster. As long as Netflix and other streaming services are available there is no reason for people to buy anything.
Wait, is it just Netflix, or RedBox too?
Oh, and piss off WB. If you actually release anything I care to see, I’m sure my son can torrent it for me. I’m sorry the margins from rentals weren’t big enough for you, but lets just see how 100% of absolutely nothing works out for your bottom line.
And the “UltraViolet” option is insane bullshit. The advertising reeks of desperation, the studios begging: “Tell us how we can sell you this movie and we’ll do it!” Having a film available in THREE kinds of media tells the consumer that they need to wait until something changes.
Warner is going to see sales drop with this silly bullshit. Thank god for bit torrent.
Another Suit makes another announcement…WB just had it’s own Netflix Moment and it will flop just as badly with the public!
Giant “meh.” If anything, this makes me less likely to watch their movie. When I haven’t watched their movie I won’t want to see their sequel in the theater. So f ‘em.
So WB is increasing the piracy window from 28 to 56 days?
Lame. Screw ultraviolet. Stream movies to my smartphone? Not likely due to AT&T throttling my connection every time I try and stream a movie. Now that cable companies in the US are about to start charging per gig I don’t think I’ll be streaming anything. I’m sticking with redbox.
Dear WB,
Guess what… Ultraviolet sucks. Wanna know why? Over Christmas I was given a Blu-ray of “Crazy Stupid Love” as a gift. Noticing it came with an Ultraviolet digital copy, I was intrigued and was willing to sign up and give the digital cloud based system a try… Until I read the fine print. The movie has unlimited playable on the Ultraviolet system for only three years, after that, YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR IT… AGAIN!!! What kind of bullshit is that. How is getting a digital copy that you will eventually have to pay again a value? It’s a total rip off. I will not use the UV service. I can play a DVD or a Blu-ray as many times as I want. Thanks, but no thanks.
JT
This is just another nail in the coffin of Netflix. As visitors of an industry site, you should be well aware that CONTENT IS KING. Netflix is merely the distribution pipe. There have been many before (VCR, Columbia House DVD delivery, record player etc). They all come and go because the model changes. But the content always remains. Warner Bros. will be in existence far longer then Netflix will.
If Hulu or YouTube or Apple offered the same (or better) movies and tv over streaming for a cheaper price, would you all stick with Netflix. I didn’t think so.
Yes, the drug dealer approach is reality in this biz, but you can’t deal ever worsening crap and expect the junkies to keep buying from you.
Yeah, I’d stick with Netflix.
Netflix has replaced owning DVD’s; no need to waste space on videos (mine are gathering dust) when Netflix can be your own personal movie library.
Netflix makes money because people are watching old movies, shows and documentaries and recommending obscure foreign films to friends.
Netflix is probably agreeing to this because they think it will help them in future negotiations with Warner over streaming content; Netflix has made it clear that their focus is streaming and that they’re not concerned with the future if their DVD / Blu ray business.
However, the truth lies in what you mentioned. Warner’s is going to do what Warner’s wants to do; there are no peace offerings that will curry their favor. It’s a futile and wasted effort for Netflix or any other provider to bow to these studios. Netflix, Redbox, Blockbuster, etc must succeed on their own and. Ring the studios to them. What Netflix builds that is of value is a client list, and lately they have done nothing but burn their list much like a bridge.
The lesson is to understand what your company has that is valuable. For Warner’s, that value is content. For Netflix, et al, that value is customers. Make the customers happy above all; don’t exert your efforts on trying to make the studios happy.
So, WB wants me to illegally stream?
Noted.
Will do!
What everyone is missing is that WB is doing this on purpose. Think about it…they’re putting a window on Netflix and Blockbuster…so Netflix and Blockbuster…ARE GOING OUT AND BUYING THE DISCS. Warners still wins b/c they’re getting the money either way. Shady? Yes. Smart? No. But it’s all win-win, b/c they don’t know who’s buying their movies…they just know the movies are getting bought.
Warners hopes that they can stick their head in the sand and roll back the clock to 1999 and boost DVD sales again; never gonna happen.
Sad to see Warner Bros clinging to DVD’s. What’s next, are they gonna try to bring back Betamax tapes?
I can´t believe some of this comments, a bit dramatic? sure WB is going down because of this……….not. Really people is not a big deal at all if you don´t care and are going to pretend to boycott a movie studio (most ridiculous thing i´ve heard) then why not just wait the extra days??? why get upset????? as you have mentioned there are tons of other things to watch and you can just use bit torrent as you have mentioned then who gives a shit????
Well done WB execs. Instead of making titles readily available, you will piss kids off and drive them to torrent sites and get them for free. Well played!
What’s killing this business are the immature, juvenile MOVIE CRITICS.
These guys make a sport of bashing a film (though they’ve never made a film themselves nor ever will).
Every artist should boycott IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes until there is a level of decency in the reviews and patrol of the hate and slander on the message boards.