
EXCLUSIVE: Alcon Entertainment, the producer/financier teaming with director Ridley Scott to return to the world of the 1982 science fiction classic Blade Runner, is adamantly denying a web report claiming original star Harrison Ford is in early talks to return as replicant hunter Rick Deckard. Andrew Kosove, who runs Alcon with Broderick Johnson, said he and his partner couldn’t sit by as the unsubstantiated report spread like wildfire all over the world. That’s the downside of the digital world, where reports spread virally and nobody checks, particularly if it comes from a site like Twitchfilm.com, which sometimes comes up with some good scoops. Blade Runner is the rare movie whose cult status and passionate fan base is evidenced by the fact that when I broke the story about Scott returning to direct, there were so many comments that the site crashed temporarily, and I doubt I ever got more comments on any story I’ve filed here.
“It is absolutely patently false that there has been any discussion about Harrison Ford being in Blade Runner,” Kosove told me. “To be clear, what we are trying to do with Ridley now is go through the painstaking process of trying to break the back of the story, figure out the direction we’re going to take the movie and find a writer to work on it. The casting of the movie could not be further from our minds at this moment.”
Kosove said they didn’t want in any way to disparage an iconic actor like Ford, but it certainly sounds as though they do not plan to continue his story line. “It’s like asking if we’re going to make the sky red or blue, there has been no discussion about it,” he said. “What Ridley does in Prometheus is a good template for what we’re trying to do. He created something that has some association to the original Alien, but lives on its own as a standalone movie.” Asked point blank if Ford could resurface, Kosove said: “In advance of knowing what we’re going to do, I supposed you could say yes, he could. But I think it is quite unlikely.”


Ego measuring in Hollywood continues to be a 24×7 business. Absolutely no downside to Alcon just saying no comment and letting the story go wherever it goes. The upside is people are talking about the reboot. Ford being mentioned appears to have made the reboot about Ford and Alcon wasn’t having it. This is our Blade Runner!!!! they shouted from the rooftop.
Well thank goodness for that. As a huge Blade Runner fan, I don’t want Deckard’s story to be wrapped up, the ambiguities of that character (and the loose ends) should be left well alone.
Alcon behind this really really worries me….
Bladerunner 2 — from the makers of The Blindside, The Affair of the Necklace and that Dolphin Movie.
Hey don’t be so quick to judge Alcon… you forgot to list their movie where Lil Bow Wow wins the lottery.
…or that one where Pauly Shore is a hypochondriac werewolf…
Wait, there really is a Lil Bow Wow lottery ticket movie, I thought you were just making that up. And it made some money.
I’m gonna give Pauly a call…
And don’t forget My Dog Skip or Dude, Where’s My Car !
Seriously though – the development team and producers at Alcon are a solid bunch and Ridley Scott respects them enough to work with them. Don’t shoot it down before it even gets off the ground. Ridely Scott will be the dominate creative voice on the project. I hear that he’s a decent director…
And yet they are going to call it Blade Runner so they want to have it both ways which is dishonest and unethical. Deckard was the Blade Runner. If they were honest they’d announce they were doing a more faithful adaptation of “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep” and stick to the book the way the Coens more faithfully followed True Grit in their remake and it was a remake it was very close to the John Wayne movie. Alcon comes off looking sleazy here not to mention stupid. If there were smart they would confirm the rumor and make Ford an offer to return in more than a cameo let him be the supporting actor with a younger star then they have a bigger movie but they’re too stupid to be honest and think smart.
Would it make a difference? Those that saw and loved the first Blade Runner as iconic…won’t recognize this one.
This smells like Tron 2…
let’s keep this clear. this film will NOT be a prequel to Alien!
Dude. Go PREQUEL. Roy Batty, Pris, etc. Make THEM a bigger part of that story. THEY were what made the movie cool, not Ford. Roy was the dopest villian of the entire 80′s. A different BLADE RUNNER sent down to hunt them (after the uprising) on whatever rock they escaped from in the original. Just sayin’.
Matt, I’d love to see the story of Batty, et al, in the OffWorld colony – to see all of the things Batty waxes poetic about at the end of the original, to see the replicants escaping, etc. – only problem with that is that the Hauer, et al, have aged too much – they couldn’t play the roles anymore – and as they’re replicants, it’s not like you could have another actor playing them.
I’m ALL ABOUT “Prometheus”, especially after seeing the trailer and reading the story – but I honestly have NO idea what this “Blade Runner” thing is all about. I mean – why do it? He’s already revisiting “Alien” – why revisit ANOTHER of his films – especially if they’re saying they’re still “breaking the back of the story”, etc. – if there wasn’t any story to inspire them to go back to it – why go back to it? Money? No, just leave the movie alone. I can get “Prometheus” – the story’s incredible, and it looks like Scott’s visuals are going to be insane – but leave “Blade Runner” alone, Scott. Don’t tarnish it. If you want to do another sci-fi film after “Prometheus”, just find an original story.
The story should be about Roy. We should get to see those attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion and watched the c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tanhauser Gate. Go off-world, chronicle his military career, and show him coming to the epiphany that led him back to Earth.
I see this ending badly.
It’s fine if they call it ‘Blade Runner’. Deckard wasn’t THE Blade Runner, he was A Blade Runner.
And even though I like the idea of a Roy Batty prequel, a sequel would be interesting as well. Maybe not a Deckard storyline, but maybe a view of the future showing whether Replicants are so plentiful that no one can distinguish them from humans anymore, and maybe everyone doesn’t even know if THEY are human…or maybe don’t even care? A story involving the last known human?
The possibilities are endless. I for one am interested in a new Blade Runner…just as long as Ridley doesn’t cast Russell Crowe again.
Amen!
Jondo, I wouldn’t mind if Sir Ridley cast Crowe… he’s a great actor and the two work well together. But, not to start any rumors !!! no one is saying this is happening.
But talking about Harrison reminds me of another recent story about Crowe supposedly doing Robocop… which he immediately denied on Twitter even as the rumor was catching fire in the blogosphere, and is still being repeated by some.
Doesn’t anyone check facts anymore?
They’ll be clever and call it REPLICANT or ANDROID (an early pre-production title for the original) or something.
REPLICANT has a nice (if generic) touch to it. Nevermind that Van Damme already abused it for one of his DTV clunkers.
When you break the back of a story it’s crippled it no longer functions. Phil Dick wrote so many books there are dozens of his stories that are yet to be filmed and they all have very strong spines that should not be broken. This is Alcon trying to make a fast buck. They don’t really care about the world of Phil Dick and they don’t know what they’re doing here they saw that the title was available and they jumped on it for the hype. The mystery is why Ridley is associated with this group of hucksters. Sir Ridley you can make any movie you want to make. Do something new and different. Find another great sci-fi story to make instead of this.
Alcon is the worst choice for this project. If you look at the body of work from the Alcon team, it’s apparent they have poor taste. Hopefully Ridley will steamroll the producers and deny them any sort of creative input.
Well, I’ve been dying to revisit that strange but fascinating world for years now. So as long as the story takes place in Los Angeles I will be satisfied. And wouldn’t it be great if they used miniatures instead of CGI? If both Syd Mead and Doug Trumbull are participating in the project it can turn out very well.
Forget about Harrison Ford… what about Sean Young? Will she be back?
“Blade Runner” is the second-greatest science fiction movie ever made (after “2001: A Space Odyssey”).
I hope that this sequel-prequel-whatever will never be made, by Ridley Scott or anyone else.
Paging McG…
You people work in Hollywood, right?
I absolutely loathe you.
I love film. I love the movies. And I’m aware that the entertainment business is first (second, and third) a business. But is nothing freaking sacred to you people? Will you cannibalize every film classic out there for the sake of a buck? Will your endless “rebooting” (how I hate that term) of classic movies – genuine American cultural landmarks – that ultimately produce subpar, stupid films tarnish and lessen every classic film ever made? Is there a Casablance reboot in the works? Maybe a re-imagined Godfather?
Yes, the industry that I’m crapping on was indeed responsible for creating such great works of art. And while I’m not going to romanticize the Hollywood of yore, unlike today’s industry, it wasn’t run by marketing executives. I loathe your lowest-common denominator industry – endlessly dumbing down America for the sake of an easy dollar. We’re five minutes away from OW MY BALLS (look up the reference – it’s from a film, it turns out), and you idiots are to blame.
Vin,
Well said, and while I agree with you to a large degree, there are a few things to consider:
1) The classic movies that are being ‘rebooted’ (yes, I hate that term too) aren’t going away. No one is destroying their memory, they’re just taking a different, updated slant on it (I do, however, hate remakes that are basically shot-by-shot. I see no reason for those).
2) Some older films, while good, have lost or are losing their meaning and relevance to a new audience. Almost always, the impact they had when released will NEVER be the same – times change. So even if something isn’t ‘rebooted’, the original film won’t have the same impact. Newer generations will simply shrug, or not even watch it due to lack of interest. If the story and message is important, why not rekindle it in a new way to increase interest?
3) It’s always interesting to see a new breed of filmmakers tackle a classic take on something: it clearly shows whether they have true talent or not!
So, while my heart skips a beat whenever I hear something is being re-booted, it doesn’t make me angry anymore. Rather, it makes me sad…sad that an industry that was once built on taking chances and ‘rolling the dice’ has become so lacking in original ideas that they have to pillage their predecessors work. That’s sad.
That’s why all the new, more interesting ideas will come from independents and garage filmmakers!
Vin: I say this as a comics fan but comics have done a lot of damage to Hollywood. That said, I’d watch this and give it a chance. Fingers crossed they’re still in touch with what made the original film work.
By all means, do the next “Bladerunner” movie.
However, do not treat it as a “post Harrison Ford” piece, but rather, a “Bladerunner” concept, the idea being, Bladerunners are a group, a concave, an elite team of police special operatives whose job it is, to “retire” replicants. Not an easy job. Bladerunners are VERY human, and as in Deckard’s case, with no knowledge of any martial arts, just a big ass gun, wits, and experience, gets his ass kick multiple times, and still accomplishes his goal. Now you just expand on the idea.
The one main idea you should keep is keeping the entire storyline to a night setting.
The possibilities are very exciting.
Just don’t get too carried away with the CG. Just look what Scott pulled off way back in ’82. Creative genius.
Possible title: “Blade runner the execution”