EXCLUSIVE: As the leading background actors casting company in the United States, Burbank-based Central Casting is one of the largest employers of union actors. It was
established back in 1925 initially as a wing of the major Hollywood movie studios, and by the 1970s came to dominate the field of extras casting. Last Thursday was ‘Union Day’ at Central Casting, so the pro and con SAG-AFTRA merger camps headed there to stage informational meetings with background actors about the merger. Naturally both sides of this dispute wanted to present their case directly to these background actors because, since 1992 when the Screen Actors Guild absorbed the Screen Extras Guild, they have made up SAG’s most taken-for-granted voting block. But here’s what happened, according to my eyewitness accounts: Central Casting invited the pro-merger camp inside its building for an extended lobbying session. But Central Casting ejected the anti-merger camp from the headquarters. I’m told that a complaint was made after the incident to the U.S. Department Of Labor. This matter raised disturbing questions about just who is for and who is against a SAG-AFTRA merger and why. “If both SAG and AFTRA are loudly claiming that employers are afraid of merger, why did one of the largest employers of union actors open up their business to SAG and AFTRA staff and leadership to tout the ‘benefits’ and ‘leverage’ of merger?” one perturbed actor at the meeting emailed me afterwards. “And, secondly, why is Central Casting getting involved in union business?”
Eyewitnesses tell me that the anti-merger pair who went to lobby at Central Casting was former SAG National Board member Michael Bell and the former SAG First Vice-President Anne-Marie Johnson who is both a current AFTRA National Board member and a current SAG National Board member. Neither is registered with Central Casting. They handed out to the actors lined up outside of Central Casting’s offices informational fliers opposing the merger and explaining how their side thought it would negatively impact the background acting community. Then the pair came inside the Central Casting building at the same time that representatives from both SAG and AFTRA entered to speak to the background actors in favor of the merger. This group included current SAG First Vice-President Ned Vaughn, current AFTRA Treasurer Matt Kimbrough, and several SAG and AFTRA staff people. None are registered with Central Casting.
As the pro- and con-merger groups and background actors assembled indoors, an AFTRA staff member saw Bell and Johnson and ducked inside Central Casting offices. Next, one of Central Castings executives came out and announced that representatives from both SAG and AFTRA were there to discuss merger. He then announced that anyone in the room who was not “registered” with Central Casting had to leave the building. He repeated it twice. Eyewitnesses tell me that he directed both announcement to the anti-merger pair, Bell and Johnson. “They were asked to leave,” an eyewitness told me. “Politely but the point was made.” The other group which also were not members of Central Casting were not asked to leave. Many said that was the first time any such announcement had ever been made on a ‘Union Day’. I’m told that Bell and Johnson calmly walked out of the building and stayed outside to lobby those background actors who’d arrived too late to attend the inside meeting. An hour later the meeting inside the building ended and the pro-merger groups left Central Casting without staying to lobby the background actors outside.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Central Casting, again with the sketchy activities!
So, just to recap here, the pro-merger camp is claiming employers don’t want to deal with a single new merged union under the current merger proposal, but this HUGE employer clearly showed a pro-merger bias.
Doesn’t Central’s action put the lie to the pro-merger argument? If large employers like Central Casting think the merger is good for business, then doesn’t that mean they’re not at all scared that the new single union would actually have teeth?
Doesn’t this also bolster the anti-merger argument that non-actors like broadcasters – who, BTW, are free under the proposal to continue to work non-union and not pay those wages into health & pension funds – would have too much say in the new merged union?
The only possible reason employers would love a new merged union when they’ve made so much hay playing two unions off against each other is that they know the new union’s structure would make it damn near impossible for the actors to vote for a strike.
And I have this much to say in advance to anyone responding to my comments. Give me specifics from the proposal to prove me wrong. Ad hominem attacks only prove you’re ticked that I’m right and have no actual cogent opposing argument.
I’m not quite sure how CC benefits either way. Maybe they just want to help put an end to the alphabet soup nonsense?
If I’m being naive, help me out.
This employer is different than the “employers” to which you refer. The casting company does not dictate who they hire as far as from which talent pool. i.e. SAG, AFTRA or non union. The just hire from the pools that they are required. This company is also hired by signatory producers or non union producers, just as the background actors are. The real employers are the ones who hire Central Casting. This story is very misleading. Is that intentional?
This is so wrong… in so many ways!!!
AGAINST THIS MERGER???
JOIN US ON FB AT JUST SAY S.A.G.!!! VOTE NO!!! WHILE YOU STILL HAVE A VOTE!
Interesting. Central just got hit with a prohibition of charging BG registration fees. SAG was instrumental in getting the City Attorney to act against companies like Central. I wonder if Central is trying to suck up to SAG in fear of having more trouble made for them.
Central should have less shows then any other Independence casting company because they hired their regular mostly, sadly they have 95 percent of the shows in LA. Sucks
Eew…don’t know if I like the fact that Central Casting is involved in this mix. I agree w/JM. Sketchy. Up until recently, I loved (sarcastic) how they always cast their friends, family, and favorites for Aftra and Sag shows even if those people were non-union. Now, I hear on the background availability lines that you “must be Sag” or “Paid up Aftra” to “submit for this show”. Seems like both unions are clamping down on CC. Let’s hope the new union keeps a watchful eye on them.
Yup! There are also many non-union extras on sets today holding union vouchers they are not entitled to solely because they are “pretty young things” that some Central Casting agent has a personal (not professional) interest in.
It’s not really Central that hires these “favored” people. The requests mostly come from the shows themselves (friends, wives, hotties to look at…) and Central abides by them. Central could care less if a non-union person works on a union voucher – they’re just filling in slots on a list that production gives them.
Favors and nepotism have always been a Hollywood staple. Never gonna change.
CC isn’t the only casting agency doing the friends/family/brown nose casting on projects
It’s done here in hawaii as well by Katie Doyle Casting / Rachel Sutton Casting/ Doversola Casting as well & sad part is neither union is doing anything about it
Yep I was a CC registered actor & Cenex back in the 80′s & yep there was that type of casting going on back in the 80′s
Just goes to show there really isn’t any real “PROFESSIONAL” casting in the business
Kind of like the old “Catch 22″ back in the 80′s to get in SAG
I was lied too back then by SEG & told that there was a cut off date for being eligible to join SAG & that I was ineligible & this was before 1992
So I’m uneasy with the merger
Central Casting is an employer. You register and are EMPLOYEED to work for a specific shoot, on a specific location. You fill out I-9′s, W-2′s, etc. they are paid to provide the talent. it’s a real job even though some people don’t treat it as such.
You should probably have worked for them or do work for them before posting about their legitamacy.
The only people who want this merger are dual-cardholders and the AFTRA membership at large. Yes, that’s most of the people but if everyone would just stop and think for a minute (and cover your ears from the bleating pro-merger propaganda) here’s a different solution that won’t harm SAG at all: just vote ‘NO’ on the merger and then demand that AFTRA get folded into SAG. We should have no problem doing this. This has always been SAG’s position in the past but you know who has been against it? The AFTRA board, that’s who. The AFTRA board who stabbed SAG in the back and started this competition for jobs and benefits in the first place. And we’re supposed to reward them by giving up what SAG has worked and sacrificed for decades to achieve?
This actor won’t be doing that.
Rolling AFTRA into SAG alleviates two obvious problems: first, it solves the split earnings P&H issue as well as the competitive work issue.
But the biggest positive out of this alternative idea is both unions won’t have to “die” to create a new one – SAG can continue with it’s stellar P&H plan. In this case, only AFTRA would “die” (as an actors’ representative, but could go on with the other non-performer members if it so chooses). To merge as per “The Plan” means that AFTRA, as we know it, would die anyway.
Turning SAG into AFTRA is NOT the way to merge all actors under one roof. Ms. Reardon needs to step off her power trip box and do what’s best for her own membership for a change. Starting over with a new P&H plan is NOT the way to help her actors grow with their careers.
Interesting.
So for those of you who say “we have no other choice but to approve the merger”… here is your other choice. And it’s a much better choice.
Not really true this time around. I’m a dual cardholder and I think merger is a HORRIBLE idea. It benefits SAG more than AFTRA this time around… but both unions have massive in-fighting, so I don’t see how bringing that together will make that go away. This is a giant mess, and an obscene waste of union dues.
That’s a good idea. Or just “merge” the P&H into one plan administered by a third party like TIAA CREF or Calpers. Every time you work SAG or AFTRA you get a credit with the plan and start building your retirement. You could choose from several health plans. The initiation fees and dues could fund this. It would also make it harder to embezzle!
Sure, one union might be stronger in negotiations, but no union can defeat the law of supply and demand. If the new union strikes, the producers will just go to Canada or New Mexico for a year until the film community here gives up.
First off casting directors don’t want a strike just as much as actors don’t. No work = no money for both parties, plus casting directors get paid by production a % of everyones day rates, so the less we make the less they make. You’re just hearing Central Castings name and reaching for a conspiracy because of all the crap there going through right now (and maybe they extended an olive branch to the unions just to soften the blow of that whole situation).
The reality is that the last strike really did a number on SAG, when AFTRA went ahead and negotiated a deal without us and made us look weak. We went from having the leverage and upper hand, to losing a ton of jobs and projects that turned AFTRA (at least here in NY anyway). Its business 101 maintain the leverage, maintain the power… I think a lot of the people who oppose this merger are older or more conservative and are used to the way the business used to be. Unfortunately things just aint the way they used to be! With technology moving at such a rapid pace, newer mediums are being created everyday and the compensation for those mediums are being negotiated on at a way lesser rate then they should be. We need to stop the bleeding and I feel like if we team up (the 2 unions) then we cant be pitted against each other any more.
Now I get that there are those people who worry about “how the pension is going to work” or “What the health plan will look like” or even “how to deal with more competition”. The reality is that our health care sucks regardless and the people who are working now are the same people who’ll be working even with a merger. Thats why its called “show business” cause its a business!!! If you cant get work then maybe you need to step up your game and get better at your craft, or stop relying on doing extra work to make a living!!!!
I Still haven’t heard 1 real reason why there shouldn’t be a merger and until I do this is where I stand.
Please enlighten me
Peace
17 year SAG member and Background artist!
“I Still haven’t heard 1 real reason why there shouldn’t be a merger and until I do this is where I stand. Please enlighten me
”
Okay.
Merging these two unions under this Plan/Agreement will NOT fix the most important issue – P&H. You said, “The reality is that our health care sucks regardless and the people who are working now are the same people who’ll be working even with a merger.” Perhaps you’re talking about only AFTRA’s plan, which absolutely sucks. Otherwise, I don’t think you know what you’re talking about with regards to this issue. Are you aware of how good the SAG P&H plan is? The medical coverage benefits alone are worth the price of admission. If we merge under this proposal, SAG’s awesome P&H plan will never be seen again. SAG’s current P&H will just wither and die, and will be replaced with something far less beneficial to union members.
Also, merging the two unions will add ~30,000 people who would then be able to work what are now SAG ONLY jobs – films, filmed TV, etc. Is that what SAG members want? I’ll answer for you, ‘NO’.
Further, the New Media issue: “…the compensation for those mediums are being negotiated on at a way lesser rate then they should be.” They’re not being negotiated at all. And do you know why? Because AFTRA agreed to that non-existent New Media proposal a few years ago while SAG was still fighting on it for their members. AFTRA will NOT be fighting for fair, or even better compensation in New Media. There will be no “Strength in Numbers” at the negotiation table with the AMPTP. That’s just how AFTRA is and has always been. The biggest reason we have the better contracts that we have (both unions) is because AFTRA was always riding SAG’s coattails in negotiations. Without SAG standing their ground and fighting at the negotiation table, AFTRA would have disappeared long ago.
So there you go – a bunch of reasons for SAG to not merge with AFTRA. Yes, we should get all actors under one roof but not on AFTRA’s terms, which is what this Plan is.
If enough of us vote ‘NO’, the committees will have to go back and change the plan so it appeases ALL members fairly and equally.
With the lack of work with SAG and the fighting between the two Unions, There is almost now way to get enough work to make benefits. Its hard enough the only way to get work is through calling services. Casting companies no longer put work on thier job lines. With out the merger of some type, very few get benefits. The merger has to be done right or have SAG take over AFTRA. AFTRA did stab SAG in the back. They had agreed negotiate mutually but did not. AFTRA pulled out. Just work together. The background complain but do not vote. Only 25% of both union members vote.
Also, merging the two unions will add ~30,000 people who would then be able to work what are now SAG ONLY jobs – films, filmed TV, etc.
Can’t wait to get a crack at those myself!
I am glad that someone “gets it”. I am for forcing the 2 unions to be in the same room and finally be able to learn to live with each other, and work out their differences. With 2 unions they will always be competing for the work and passing blame to the other. We NEER UNITY. The constitution, which you all should have read by now, is composed of the best of the 2 unions constitutions. Pensions will not be compromised–again read the Feasibility report by 7 attorneys who specialize in mergers. Until the plan trustees can fully study their options, which they will only do after a merger, and would then be obligated to act only in the best interests of the participants of the plans, the plans will remain exactly as they are. Combining the health plans is much easier to do and would most likely result in significant savings, which could result in lower premiums and/or better benefits. SAG cannot just take over AFTRA. They were trying a few years ago. Thant didn’t go so well did it? The merger plan includes much of SAG’s governance and election procedures, but includes recognition and provisions for all the categories that AFTRA covers in addition to Actors– singers, dancers, stunt , performers, broadcasters, Etc. If we don’t merge, this time, both unions will be financially challenged with all the duplication of services that will continue. It just doesn’t make sense NOT to merge. Dues will have to go up as well as qualification for benefits. We have 2 boards of directors, 2 elections, duplication everywhere! Millions of $$ are wasted which could go to fighting non-union production and organizing. I don’t want to loose either of my unions. I want to be part of one new union that includes the best of both of them, so we can face the REAL enemy, which is the 5 conglomerates who own all of our employers, and non-union work. We are ALL performers. We need to be united. We need to be together. I truly believe that this can only happen with ONE UNION that covers All performers. SAG/AFTRA. I want to be a member of that!
Incorrect – no one is losing their jobs at SAG and AFTRA. So, yes, there STILL WILL BE double of everything in the corporate offices.
That remains to be seen. I was at the Feb 10 NY meeting @SAG. Duplication and efficiency came up a lot, with hard percentages.
If you have no self esteem and if you do not think of yourself as a professional ACTOR then by all means vote to kill SAG.
I am a professional ACTOR and a proud member of SAG since 1966.
I have contributed many thousands of dollars in dues and the producers have contributed many thousands of dollars to SAG’s P&H
plans. My whole life’s work and my health is in jeopardy if The Screen Actor’s Guild is murdered by “Show Business” people like yourself.
I am also a proud member of Actor’s Equity. I am also a member of AFTRA, who abandoned SAG at the 2008 negotiations and sold out the actor’s of both unions. This, after 3 decades of joint collective bargaining.
SAVE SAG – VOTE NO!
… And then Mom came home and made everyone go to their rooms. In the end, the pro-merger camp got a 10 minute time out.
Now SAG officially sucks at BOTH representing the best interests of their membership AND dirty Chicago-style politics. SAG, you make Rod Blagojevich look like a pro.
First of all I would like to say that I am a Background Actor and that I have been since… before I care to admit. I have been in many TV shows and films. I have done this largely through the agency of Central Casting. Do I like this fact? No, but Central is the de facto agency (because of it’s size and history) for background in LA, NYC as well as other cities. This should not be, because of the (quite rightfully so) anti-monopoly laws of our country.
I have not joined either SAG or AFTRA, not because I don’t want to — SAG, because I have yet to get that required third union voucher allowing me to join, and AFTRA because I have not been able to afford to (joining either union limits your ability to work because of negotiated limits with the Studios) — and so therefore theoretically I have no true ability to have any acceptable opinion.
The reason that I know that this merger will take place is the following: SAG’s influence is waning (even though yes, SAG has been at the forefront of most of the concessions wrangled from the Studios) because SAG had traditionally been the union of Film and AFTRA the union of TV, Radio, and now New Media. This is changing due to the Digital Revolution and the nature of how each Union is defined and what it defines. When a new production company comes along these days, either film or TV, it has the option of going SAG or AFTRA, but because most new production is being shot on digital and not film, they are going with AFTRA (looser restrictions on what they can/must do on set).
Do I think that the merger is a good idea? Not really. Do I think that this is going to happen? Yes, most certainly. And unfortunately for a lot of my friends who are currently SAG and against this merger, this is going to happen, and because of said Digital Revolution. It’s just easier to make a “film” with digital than it is with film. That’s why another giant, Kodak, is soon to be extinct as well.
The legality of the action that Central took is both understandable, as well as completely illegal and monopolistic. Kissing up the new mega-union? Most likely; and trying to stall off any further legal actions by said union. And that is most definitely against the anti-monopoly laws. It is influencing an election which should be a separate action from any business of Central.
And I also hope that Nikki does not release my minimal information to Central, or otherwise, my being a BG Actor would be even more infrequent than it is now (meaning none).
You and “17 year SAG member” above answer your own concerns and have made up your minds, but with inaccurate information. Yes, I realize that you can’t vote as you’re not a union member. But there are many BG who share some of your misinformation. Here’s the deal…
IF the merger goes through it won’t be because of new media [sic] needs or concerns. I know that you meant to say new medium, as in hi-def digital tape. (“New Media” is a completely different conversation.) However, those of you who believe that the jurisdictional lines are drawn based on the recording medium – film vs tape = AFTRA vs SAG – you are all simply wrong. The jurisdictional line is very clear, though it had been ignored by SAG for a long time as AFTRA grew and grew into the monster it now is. And those definitions have not changed, but nobody on the SAG board (who are all AFTRA affiliated) will fight for it.
As for the debacle @ CC today, I’m pretty sure the pro-merger people insisted on having CC remove the conscientious objectors. That’s how they’ve been consistently playing this game – “There is only ONE way to save the actors, and that’s MERGE under this new plan! There will be no discussion with detractors, we will block all dissenting information so that SAG members won’t be confused with…” the truth.
Where do I even begin, BO? In all your years, you haven’t been able to pick up 3 SAG waivers OR get an AFTRA show to waiver you so you can go on AFTRA’s installment plan?! Seriously? Are you in LA or NY? Not that it really matters. But these hurdles are minor in LA.
I will end my aftra plan payments March 1, get grandfathered into this brand new world paradigm, and put “85/10″ and “105/11″ rates behind me. Of course, I may also work 75% less, given all the extra people clawing to get those SAGAFTRA BG jobs, which will NOT be going up anytime soon. It’s a mixed blessing. But how much more Non-Union bg work do you really want to do, unless you have a huge income stream elsewhere (spouse, parents, etc)?
“In all your years, you haven’t been able to pick up 3 SAG waivers OR get an AFTRA show to waiver you so you can go on AFTRA’s installment plan?!”
Pro, how long have you been in the business? Been doing Background for a long time? SAG Vouchers are given out like candy to the sweet young things that are expected to either kick back or lay (on their) back(s).
“But these hurdles are minor in LA.” Glad you think so. You’re an “officer” or ND type. Right? Oh, and btw, there are currently close to 100k BG “actors” in town. CC was registering 150-200 new “looks” a week, and has been for years. Easy to get work/vouchers? What did you do to get yours?
As far as AFTRA goes, no, I’ve never worked an AFTRA (“must join”) show. I’ve never made the kind of money to afford that working on BG wages as a character type. Got to spend money (can’t afford the loans) to make money.
If getting BG work (and vouchers) was easy, there’d be even more competition for work (which is already crazy enough).
“But these hurdles are minor in LA.” Right.
FYI. I was there, witnessed the whole thing from start to finish. The account described above is 100% accurate.
Simple solution: kick background performers out of the merged union. Breathing scenery is not acting. Getting into a union on the three voucher rule dilutes the talent pool for the sake of raking in more dues and votes. Reform SEG!
Reality show performers dilute the talent pools of every skilled and talented professional actor in any union.
Background actors are needed, even if they only have one line as they provide dimension and color to the production. And if there are actors who do this work to bring a paycheck in the house, so be it. Everyone deserves to eat and have a roof over their head. \
I totally agree with you. The large bloc of vocal extras is hurting SAG because they generally have different priorities. Perhaps SAG needs a vote to reduce the weight of its background “actors” in important decisions like merging with AFTRA. Many extras don’t like AFTRA because AFTRA never patronized them — or needed to.
Chris,
If you weren’t such an obvious internet troll scumbag, I might actually be offended by your comments.
The militant SAG extras don’t like others joining a union they got into — without the “Taft Hartley” nonsense — when SEG merged with SAG. Many of them seem to have a gotten a big head about being in SAG. I think it’s called greed. There’s nothing about their “brothers and sisters” in the other acting union. Instead they try to make out that being an extra is somehow more important than being a broadcaster in AFTRA. Perhaps SAG should have merged with AFTRA before merging with a bunch of extras?
YES on merger!
“…militant SAG extras…”? It’s people like you and comments like this that really show what kind of a person you are. “Greed”? Really? Most BG aren’t even making a living doing BG work, much less qualifying for benefits. I would say there are relatively few BG actors from the SEG days. Yes, SEG was a union. And yes, SAG and SEG needed each other. A win-win at the time. A very high percentage of them earned their union card, paid the initiation fee and pay their union dues, just like every other SAG member. So what’s your problem with BG?
Background extras are the largest, therefore most powerful, voting block within SAG. Don’t forget that.
I can’t tell if you’re more ignorant or arrogant. Probably equal parts of both. Hope you’re proud of yourself.
Stop all your whining and just merge, already. Nobody gets everything they want in a negotiation, so stop being so “red state/blue state” about it. Suck it up and do the merger. The employers would love to continue the “divide and conquer” strategy. Strength in numbers. Strength in a united front.
Obviously your not an actor and probably a board member or AFTRA staff member whos been told to burn that mantra in your defected brain cells. Strength in numbers, strength in unity….your now getting sleeepy!!
Give the producers time,everything will become NEW MEDIA and union people will be getting new media rates like 65/8 or 97/8,we need the competion between the 2 unions
I don’t know if this has been previously covered but as a paid member of both unions do I get two votes?
Yes. Both unions will vote independently, and (at least SAG) must pass by 60% of those votes counted. AFTRA will pass this easily, as always. SAG – much too close to call because people are asking questions for a change… and not getting very good answers.
YES
Our SAG leadership is not protecting us. It is clear we will not have the fine Medical and Pension we have now if we allow this merger to happen. The real facts are not being made available to SAG memberships. We must tell our fellow union members what is at stake here.
HAHA! I hope people know that that Ned vaughn and matt kimbrough are afraid of anne marie johnson because AMJ is speaking the TRUTH!!! They avoid her because AMJ knows Screen Actors Guild like the back of her hand in her sleep. UFS is like the mob. They started this fight, this “deviseness” in 2008 when they decided not to “bargain” with SAG for actors needs. And yet all Ned Vaughn keeps preaching is we have no “bargaining strength” if we don’t merge, “its the producers pitting us against each other.” You all know thats a lie!
Its AFTRA and the UFS leadership that is pitting us against each other because they are NOT transparent people!!! They relied on the lawyers to answer members questions at the so called “informational” meeting the other day at SAG. Hello!!!
Why couldn’t they answer questions? And they sat there and lied that they worked really hard unpaid. Reardon was paid a stipend and kept silent about it. VOTE NO on this merger folks.
Oh and notice that theyve already launched a website called Sag-aftra One union before weve even voted on it!!!! They made all the aftra staff wear these One union buttons. Thats like going to an audition and telling casting they’re going to cast you in the role regardless how bad an actor your are.
So our votes are not going to matter, they don’t really care how we vote?? I wouldnt be surprised if voting is rigged. Thats why we need to throw this back in there face and VOTE NO!!!!!!!!
Rigged?! Come on, you know better.
Aftra president Roberta Reardon doesn’t know what is good for actors or any performers because she has never worked as an actress. She is invisible on any professional sites like IMDb.
This merger is for her ego, and to appease the companies.
Staff remains, contributions will continue to be split.
Merger solves nothing.
NOT true. Disparagement of fellow performers is not becoming.
Central Casting has always been a place where favoritism has played a ‘Central’ role; I was told by reliable sources years ago that ‘gifts’ were important to succeeding in re this company — Makes sense today!
Central Casting is an independent operation – it’s not necessary (or logical) to claim that they represent the producers. They are very likely just acting in their own self-interest (as they always do) – just think how much easier a single union would make their lives! They have to keep track of a zillion different union regulations and paid-up member statuses for every individual in their system for TWO UNIONS. Of course they’d like to see single union; it’s a no-brainer as far as I’m concerned.
Can’t pay dues if I don’t work
Sure you can, and you will: $198/annum. Get used to the new normal. Which one(s) are you in, btw? I’m just AFTRA.
So many extras got into SAG with vouchers, which was started during the joint SAG-AFTRA commercial strike of 2000…Why? Because the rest of the background “community” who worked in film and TV couldn’t be bothered to support those of us who mainly worked in commercials on camera and/or as voice over artists. We had to “buy” non-union peeps to walk on our picket lines. Put in time and you got a voucher. Get three vouchers and you’re in SAG. Shameful! BTW – all you sanctimonious “SAG is for actors” actors, a question: If I do a v/o for a commercial that airs on TV (SAG), that makes me an actor, right? But if the same v/o airs on the radio (AFTRA), it doesn’t? Ditto with the membership buy-in argument. Yes, you can go to 5757 Wilshire and buy into AFTRA. But to get into SAG, it’s a little more difficult isn’t it? Right – you have to go to Burbank and suck up to someone at Central and get vouchers before going to 5757 and handing a check SAG. So can we just drop the holier than thou “I’m an actor” BS and take a good, hard look at how organized labor has been attacked and how our wages and benefits have gone down over the last 10 years? Not only in our business, but nationwide. Strength in numbers people. And if you don’t believe that, you’re living in another world.
Auditioned on 24 MAR as a non-union BG at an open call by CC. This morning I joined AFTRA. Vote results announced nex week, and the merger WILL be approved. Then EVERY actor will need 3 waivers to get a card under the new SAG-AFTRA. No more entries unby simply paying the fees to AFTRA as is the case today. So, at age 62, proud to be a union member… probably would have taken years for me to get 3 waivers under SAG, as I’m neither young nor pretty nor related to a producer. Sure hope the SAG and AFTRA folks can get along better then the Democrats and the Republicans.
After all the debate for and against the merger, the event finally took place and everything is business as usual. As a casting director in Hawaii I see no problem with the merger. The only issue that I am currently facing is with actors who are not registered with any agent or agency but are part of the union demanding that they be considered for roles because of their union affiliation. What’s up with that? Union membership does not mean one is guaranteed a role in any shoot. Bottom line, if the casting director does not know you or like you, you can never get hired, even if you are a union member.