Feb. 3-5 Weekend Actuals
1. Chronicle (Fox) NEW [2,907 Theaters] PG13
Friday $8.6M, Saturday $10.1M, Sunday $3.3M, Weekend $22M2. The Woman in Black (CBS Films) NEW [2,855 Theaters] PG13
Friday $8.3M, Saturday $9.6M, Sunday $2.9M, Weekend $20.9M3. The Grey (Open Road) Week 2 [3,207 Theaters] R
Friday $3.1M, Saturday $4.8M, Sunday $1.4M, Weekend $9.3M (-53%), Cume $34.6M4. Big Miracle (Universal) NEW [2,129 Theaters] PG
Friday $2.3M, Saturday $3.9M, Sunday $1.6M, Weekend $7.8M5. Underworld Awakening (Screen Gems/Sony) Week 3 [2,636 Theaters] R
Friday $1.7M, Saturday $2.7M, Sunday $1.1M, Weekend $5.5M (-56%), Cume $54.3M6. One For The Money (Lionsgate) Week 2 [2,737 Theaters] PG13
Friday $1.7M, Saturday $2.6M, Sunday $911K Weekend $5.1M (-55%), Cume $19.6M7. Red Tails (LucasFilm/Fox) Week 3 [2,347 Theaters] PG13
Friday $1.5M, Saturday $2.6M, Sunday $666K, Weekend $4.7M (-54%), Cume $41.2M8. The Descendants (Fox Searchlight) Week 12 [2,038 Theaters] R
Friday $1.4M, Saturday $2.4M, Sunday $731K, Weekend $4.6M (-29%), Cume $65.5M9. Man on A Ledge (Summit) Week 2 [2,998 Theaters] PG13
Friday $1.5M, Saturday $2.2M, Sunday $621K, Weekend $4.4M (-46%), Cume $14.6M10. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close (Warner Bros) Week 7 [2,505 Theaters] PG13
Friday $1.2M, Saturday $2M, Sunday $609K, Weekend $3.8M (-46%), Cume $26.7M
SUNDAY AM, 5TH UPDATE: I’m back in front of the computer tonight. It’s been a bigger-than-predicted box office this Super Bowl weekend — $110M moviegoing overall which is +33% from last year as February starts out hotter than tracking showed for these low-budget genre films. Friday night numbers seesawed into the wee hours of Saturday morning until Fox’s scifi found-footage spectacle Chronicle came out ahead by $300,000 over CBS FIlms’ Daniel Radcliffe thriller The Woman In Black. By Sunday Fox is clearly #1 for the weekend with grosses $22M vs $21M respectively. Trust me, no one in Hollywood projected either movie would get near $20M so this gives new meaning to the term ‘overperform’. Best, both films are a low-cost/high-reward bonanza for the two studios, especially because budgets were kept low as well as the marketing spends. Better yet, both films managed to attract the elusive young audiences who were missing for the last six months of 2011. ”What is great is that young people went to both movies in droves,” an exec tells me. Though it’s the weekend’s biggest budget debut, Universal’s Big Miracle is a disappointment – only an $8.1M weekend which is less than the $10M execs hoped for. Last week’s big winner, Open Road’s The Grey, is showing a solid hold. Full analysis coming.
Top 10 (based on weekend gross)
1. Chronicle (Fox) NEW [2,907 Theaters]
Friday $8.6M, Saturday $10.2M, Weekend $22M
Fox Filmed Entertainment chief Tom Rothman is one of the more controversial execs in Hollywood. When he gets it wrong, he gets it very very wrong. But when he gets it right, others copy him. I’m told that Rothman had a specific POV going into Chronicle: something original and fresh and strong that connected with young audiences who’ve been missing from the multiplexes during 2011. And he wanted it made with new storytellers and new actors. Now this weekend’s good reviews, ‘B’ CinemaScore, and young-skewing numbers (exit polls show 57% of filmgoers were under 25) indicate Mission Accomplished. Another in a successful line of found footage movies since 1999′s The Blair Witch Project, little 84-minute and mild PG-13 Chronicle cost just $12 million to make in South Africa and Canada with tax credits is from first-time director Josh Trank who also directed some scenes for the Paranormal Activity 2 DVD and screenwriter Max Landis, the son of infamous John Landis. Produced by John Davis and Adam Schroeder, the film plays like a personal documentary from an unseen amateur filmmaker as it chronicles the story of 3 teen angsters with telekinetic powers. Best of all, the pic takes aim at smug Seattle. Fox was hoping to open to an $8M weekend, so the $22M result should make the arrogant Rothman even more insufferable. His studio owns international, too, where it will top the UK, Australia, others. How it’ll fare on Super Bowl Sunday remains the only question mark, but Fox stresses that the audience is not just males. (And the big game, by the way, has a 50/50 male/female audience.)
There’s so much interesting, not the least of which is the marketing. Fox sold the movie with zero newspaper ads. And used Twitter quotes instead of review quotes, even though reviews were strong. There also was an all-Skype press junket tapping into the tech theme from the movie. The first trailer on YouTube garnered more than 6 million views in a week and extraordinary social feedback. After the trailer launched on MTV.com in October, Fox found that the conversations/engagements it spawned was more than 15 million interactions in just 2 days on Facebook. (“That’s like everyone in greater LA talking about Chronicle 15 weeks before they can see it in theaters,” an exec tells me. “This was a huge signal for how people were responding to the materials.” The recent viral stunt – ‘Flying Teens’ on YouTube – exceeded all expectations and video was featured on national and local news outlets. Online influencers played a huge part: in early January Fox held a digital press summit and debuted never-before-seen footage to a select group of digital press. A custom film-themed video was released by DeStorm called “If DeStorm Had Telekinesis” which included a cameo of that other YouTube star Mystery Guitar Man. On January 8th during the Atlanta Falcons-New York Giants game, Fox sponsored the first ever motion picture-themed QR-coded “billboard” which flashed onto TV screens.
2. The Woman in Black (CBS Films) NEW [2,855 Theaters]
Friday $8.3M, Saturday $9.5M, Weekend $21M
“Little scrappy CBS flms definitely seems in a better place because it did so much more with so much less,” a rival exec tells me. “Less people… Less money… Less of everything except Tom Rothman bellowing.” Then again Les Moonves is no wallflower and he’s seeing some light at the end of his movie-side tunnel. CBS Films acquired the U.S. distribution rights to gothic horror The Woman in Black for just $3M, aggressively beating out bidders that included Summit, The Weinstein Co, and Relativity. Then kept its marketing spend to only $14M under guru Terry Press. It’s all part of the struggling film studio’s newly aggressive business plan of acquisitions under COO Wolfgang Hammer. And it’s working: this third acquisition deal is CBS Films’ first hit. (Best previous opening was The Back-Up Plan‘s meager $12.2M.) Audiences gave pic a so-so ’B-’ CinemaScore but it didn’t matter. Now all studios should take another look at Daniel Radcliffe who clearly has an enormous following and strong post-Harry Potter drawing power. After ubiquitously stumping for the film, Radcliffe may well be responsible for this pic skewing younger. Not only hasn’t he slept since December, but he did a ton of interviews all while doing two shows a day in How To Succeed In Business On Broadway. The vast majority of social media chatter about the film mentions Radcliffe, and CBS Films connected with his existing fan base for the strongest Facebook and Twitter numbers for any film opening this weekend.
Director James Watkins (Britain’s Eden Lake) helmed a script by X-Men: First Class scribe Jane Goldman based on a 1983 novel by Susan Hill that was previously turned into a hit stage play and 1989 miniseries. The film is a co-production between Cross Creek Pictures, Hammer Films, and Alliance Films and produced by Simon Oakes, Richard Jackson, and Brian Oliver. (The initial impetus: Oakes, President/CEO of Hammer, was in the process of re-launching the historic brand.) Marketing began with a 60-second trailer on Twilight Saga’s Breaking Dawn Part 1 to reach women. “We identified our target of young females and didn’t waste a single dollar,” one exec tells me. “We knew we had a movie that played so we let screenings and publicity attract the other three quadrants.” The film unit made the most if its access to CBS promotional support (on TV and online) which is worth more than gold these days.
3. The Grey (Open Road) Week 2 [3,207 Theaters]
Friday $3.1M, Saturday $4.8M, Weekend $9.5M (-52%), Est Cume $34.6M
4. Big Miracle (Universal) NEW [2,129 Theaters]
Friday $2.2M, Saturday $3.9M, Weekend $8.1M
Why does anyone hire Drew Barrymore for anything? She’s box office poison. Just hearing her screeching through that trailer was torture to my ears. (Though a studio exec told me it was one of the better testing.) And didn’t anyone understand that crusty grey whales are not cute? Geez, get a clue. With the biggest budget of this weekend’s opening films — $40M — the Working Title film came in $2M less than ever the studio’s low expectations. Universal was so embarrassed that it didn’t even bother to give me a marketing report. This pic was all about counterprogramming the Super Bowl and its campaign obviously targeted moms and girls who would most likely interested in this true-life adventure tale. The film also opened in Russia and Portugal this weekend and begins rolling out in the rest of the world on February 9th. Not much else to say about yet another Uni disappointment.
5. Underworld Awakening (Sony) Week 3 [2,636 Theaters]
Friday $1.7M, Saturday $2.7M, Weekend $5.5M, Est Cume $54.3M
6. One For The Money (Lionsgate) Week 2 [2,737 Theaters]
Friday $1.7M, Saturday $2.5M (-55%), Weekend $5.1M, Est Cume $19.5M
7. Red Tails (LucasFilm/Fox) Week 3 [2,347 Theaters]
Friday $1.5M, Saturday $2.5M, Weekend $5M, Est Cume $41.3M
8. The Descendants (Fox Searchlight) Week 12 [2,038 Theaters]
Friday $1.4M, Saturday $2.3M, Weekend $4.6M, Est Cume $65.5M
9. Man On A Ledge (Summit) Week 2 [2,998 Theaters]
Friday $1.5M, Saturday $2.2M, Weekend $4.5M (-44%), Est Cume $14.7M
10. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close (Warner Bros) Week 7 [2,505 Theaters]
Friday $1.2M, Saturday $1.9M, Weekend $3.9M, Est Cume $26.7M
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
New ‘Man Of Steel’ Television Spot #6


I saw Woman in Black at the Grove last night and loved it, great seeing HAMMER back on the big screen. Excited to see Chronicle as well. Good weekend for movies!
I’ve seen the play in London, and saw the film last night in Marina Del Rey. Honestly, I wasn’t expecting it to be very good…and was pleasantly surprised. Much better than the play, and a great ‘scary’ film. Kudos to CBS Films!
Hate to disagree with you but Woman In Black wasn’t good, it was GREAT!!!
Daniel Radcliffe carries the film effortlessly. Easily better than the one from 1986 which is pretty great itself.
Props to both films for actually looking good…
And god marketing campaigns too… I saw the trailer for Chronicle and wanted to see it. These days, that’s really rare.
Who is HAMMER ? Is that an actor or the writer???
Here’s to smart business models! Cbs films bought that movie for nothing andspent even less on marketing. See Insurge…it is not briain surgery.
What’s the deal with all this profit, though? Every week I seem to hear about record profits; “the box office is up such and such percent” is commonly heard from Nikki and others.
I thought online piracy was killing the studios?
What gives?
CHRONICLE will be huge. Word of mouth will really be big on this one, it’s a great film and people don’t really get how good and how dark it is from the trailers.
Chronicle was the worst movie I saw so far this year. Granted its only Feb. Poorly strung together script & poor camera work played off as artistic??? Character arch is more like a spike. Painfully slow first 30 minutes and shameful final 30. My popcorn was the highlight of this film!
Are you kidding me? the movie was great. The chemistry between the leads was awesome and the final fight was the best super powered fight since Superman 2. This is why is overperforming and will continue next week as well. I’m seeing it again!
Oh Planty McPlant, you have a lot to learn about staging these things. LOL.
I agree, Chronicle was a sloppy mess of a film. The ‘found footage’ conceit was an annoying drag on the narrative, forcing one character–the cousin’s minor love interest–on the film solely for the purpose of installing another camera toting person in to support this lame and illogical device. It was a good idea very badly executed, with no real semblance of an ending.
It’s already huge. Blew the roof off its expected grosses and will have legs if the reactions in the theater where I saw it were any indication. And yeah, it was awesome.
im dying to see Woman in Black but there is a big snowstorm here so ill probably wait to see it a couple days.
So good to see Hammer back in action. Can’t wait for Vampire Circus 2!
Was this a joke? I’m a Horror fan; should I check out VAMPIRE CIRCUS?
Definitely not, but I think PARANOIAC is underrated.
Alright, I’ve added it to my NetFlix queue. Thanks.
HORROR OF DRACULA’s their high water mark. What a brilliant film. And still (for my money) the best Dracula flick ever made.
Took my daughter to “Big Miracle” at a matinee as she was a big, big fan of “Dolphin Tale” (also, she’s home sick and we needed an outing). She was bored thirty minutes in and asked if we could go home early. For a film that’s been aimed at kids, it’s really just a romantic comedy with whales as the “bit of business.” I thought it was fine but not really a kid-friendly movie if that’s what you’re expecting.
I see BM making $20 million in three weeks and straight into the $5 bin @ Wally World #DrewBarrymore #BoxOfficePOISON!!!!!!
I wonder if moms who aren’t interested in football will take the kids to Big Miracle on Sunday.
So much for those Oscar bounces on the nominated films… That’s fine, all that matters is progressive politics and not the films themselves anymore.
Yawn. Don’t you have a Rick Santorum rally to attend?
Don’t you have anything else to contribute other than childish political jabs. (He thinks hard, hurts himself).. Didn’t think so.
Nasty ad hominem of the week! Congrats!
Inspiring that a studio doesnt have to overspend to have competive success, proven by The Woman in Black.
Chronicle didn’t break the bank either.
Kind of surprised that “Miracle” opened so poorly. Guess whales aren’t the new penguins after all.
“Chronicle” deserves to have great legs (and will). “Woman in Black” doesn’t (and won’t).
Here’s hoping “The Vow” over-performs next weekend and beats Denzel (I can’t take Ryan Reynolds seriously anymore after last summer’s godawful “Green Lantern”), “Journey 2″ (snooze) and the cynically minded 3-D “Star Wars” retrofit.
But that would mean supporting the godawful Channing Tatum-head over Denzel. Not going to lie, I’m a sucker for romantic movies and kind of want to see The Vow, but it’s going to take ever fiber of my will to endure Tatum-head’s scenes.
@shane a. your an idiot
i hope that safe house over performs next week and beats that F****** of S*** Chick Flick. The Vow Which One Of The Main Stars is one of the worst actors ever F****** Channing A**face Tatum and Rachel McAdams who’s is one of my favorite actress of the last decade choose to pick this crap of a film. this is not the notebook this not 2004 and Channing Tatum is no Ryan Gosling…….. where in 2012 a**hole.
I’ll see The Vow just to spite vile people like you.
And please use spellchecker.com if you don’t have Microsoft Word to check your spelling and punctuation.
Please don’t call someone an idiot when your own post requires a redneck translator.
Vow is great for the industry, it’s going to pull in everyone that went to see Dear John and every other Sparks book to film. Star Wars really is a waste of time, and I’ll disagree with the OP, I am really looking forward to Safe House. You either like RR or you don’t. Green Lantern didn’t affect my opinion of him one iota. The latest trailer gave too much away, but it still looks like one helluva ride at the cinema.
RE: Tatum, have you seen him in Haywire? He was the only redeeming feature in the entire movie. And he built a huge cushion after “Recognizing Your Saints…” He’s a talented, good looking guy, but haters gonna hate.
Confused by your statement, everyone knew the whales were drowning weeks before, chronicle is doing well, but spent 2x as much as Woman.Both considered sucesss, it just impressive to see a small studio compete and have sucess.
In case you forgot what it’s like to soil yourself, go see TWIB
You can’t take Ryan Reynolds seriously, but you’re good with Channing Tatum?
Lot’s of women have secret and not so secret crushes on Channing Tatum. He loods sort of like the guys on the covers of romance novels. Plus he’s rich and a good sport.
You got it backwards. Most women despise Channing Tatum as a fugly meathead. Just take a tour around Tumblr or any of the popular female websites. The guy is the worst actor ever and a butterface.
I CANT believe how good Chronicle was!!!
Ben, then what do you suppose accounts for its less-than-spectacular “B” Cinema score? (Haven’t seen the flick myself, so I couldn’t even guess)
Daniel Radcliffe will probably never be that big time leading man thanks to his twee looks, but an ENTIRE GENERATION has a great affection for him and will always be interested in what he is up to. He’ll never be truly unemployed a day in his life and will always have offers piled up, even if it’s not the blockbuster flashy roles of mainstream leading men. All of Radcliffe’s future agents will have the easiest job in the world.
You mean like Mark Hamill?
Nobody watched Hamill grow up, nor grew up alongside of him. That comparison doesn’t make any sense.
Mark Hamill didn’t grow up alongside his audience.
And he also quit live-acting and became a successful voice-over actor, so there’s that.
Chronicle’s opening is great news for Little Landis and Woman in Black is great news for CBS Films. With too many small studios dropping like flies it’s good to see a successful buyer rise to fill the demand.
Goodwill for Harry Potter plus old fashioned scares = good business.
My guess is anything that looks like a paranormal type movie these days will make money, you could have put joe schmoe in it and it wold ave made 20 mil.
Assuming both WOMAN IN BLACK and CHRONICLE end up doing very well, studio execs will debate incessantly as to why these low budget films made lots of money. What do both movies have that made them so profitable?
After much hand-wringing, a major studio head will come to this conclusion: these two movies aren’t making money because of their concepts or plots or characters or direction. That’s bullshit sissy stuff.
The reason they’re big is because both film has a “K” sound in the title. “CHronicle”. “Woman in BlaCK”.
PEOPLE WANT HARD SOUNDING CONSONANTS!
The after-effects will be immediate. Projects with titles that have too many vowels will be shelved (“Nobody wants that a-e-i-o-u shit!”) Agents will immediately try to attach their A-List clients to the “tough parts” of the alphabet. Three studios will have competing projects all based on the letter “X”.
All of these movies will cost $300,000,000 dollars apiece and will be considered mandatory tentpoles…
…until someone breaks the bank with a film about punctuation.
This is one of those attempts at humor that make me cringe and want to hide out of embarrassment for the writer. You have a sort of old-man-no-one-listens-to-at-the-bar sense of humor.
I’ll keep a bar stool warm for you, then.
I think you just cracked the secret blockbuster code
Bravo.
Hugh Grant in “Comma Chameleon”
Lea Michele in “The Woman: A Period Piece”
Keanu Reeves in “Exclamation Point”
And what about those sequels…”Semi Tough 2: Semi-Colon”; and “Inception 2: Interrobang”?
+1
Really shocked about WiB. Didn’t think Radcliffe had much star power outside of the Potter series. But I guess, unlike the Twilight actors, people do want to see more of him in other movies.
it has nothing to with radcliffe. it was a horror film, these usually do well. esp. when there is nothing worthwhile opening with it.
So far, he’s the only one who’s bothered to get out there and show us that he IS an actor, and not JUST a young Hollywood flash in the pan. I went to see it because of the story and the idea of it being a ghost story, but after this and seeing him in “Equus” a few years ago, I can say I think he’s going to be the ONLY one of the HP lot who really succeeds in finding a thriving career … because he’s GOOD!
I like Daniel..
but Rupert has done some interesting things in INDIE films. Has a great range. I don’t think he has gotten the credit he deserves. He is just more low profile than the other 2 leads. I loved Harry Potter. Never saw a full Twilight film. So to me it is Apples and Oranges (this is in reference to the comments comparing the two franchises)
Harry Potter to me is the kind of Franchise that will stay the test of time. There will other generations of readers and movie goers that will fall in love with the characters too. So that is timeless
I haven’t followed Emma. BUT Rupert is my favorite.. love him.
He sold out eight shows a week of HOW TO SUCCEED… at $100-150 a ticket for nine months, and both times I went, the theatre was filled with teens, who normally wouldn’t be caught dead at a Broadway musical, much less one that was 50 years old. He ain’t goin’ anywhere except where he wants (which at this point is mainly theatre).
Also unlike the TWILIGHT stars, the POTTER kids can act.
I disagree on Emma Watson.
Okay jealous obsessed pattinson hater (sooooooo transparent) – not everything is a competition against pattinson & co…you might be obsessed with slamming Rob, but others are not…you do know Radcliffe is in a ‘ring’ like, ‘paranormal’ like wide releasing HORROR movie, the Twi kids have done indie flicks and period indie flicks releasing on very few theaters. Everyone knows they haven’t really been tested with larger wide releasing movies. So take your ‘mean girling,’ obsessive hate for pattinson and Stewart elsewhere. Your tear stained Edward Cullen body pillow needs washing loser. Lololol
I feel I must correct SoTRANSPARENT. The Twilight actors were actually in movies that had larger budgets than ‘The Woman in Black’…. Not simply ‘indie flicks’ as you claim. Abduction had a budget of 35 million and was actually released in more theaters than TWIB. TWIB’s budget was only 13-16 million. ‘Water for Elephants’ had a budget of 38 million… so it definitely wasn’t an indie flick and was shown in nearly as many theaters. I think TWIB was shown in 35 more theaters which really doesn’t make much of a difference. So yes, those movies would be considered ‘wide’ releases.
One thing you might be right on though…. is that audiences might just be more interested in Radcliffe’s film. Perhaps he just picked a better script with more general appeal. However, Rob is going to be starring in a Cronenberg film so that could do really well and Dan is going to be starring in an indie flick called ‘Kill Your Darlings’ where he could really show his acting chops…..so who knows what will happen in the future. They could both do very well.
Radcliffe has presence, unlike Taylor Lautner and he can ‘disappear’ into character roles unlike Robert Pattinson. The jury’s still out on Kristen Stewart… perhaps “Snow White and the Huntsman” will determine her post-Twilight bankability.
And the reason WiB and Chronicle made money is because… well, they didn’t cost that much to make ($13-$15M apiece) and in WiB’s case, didn’t cost much to market either. And the word-of-mouth is pretty good on both.
I think studios are finally starting to realize that people want good movies with good plots, not just big-budget CGI fests with overpaid stars. Look at Universal’s first-look deal with Blumhouse and Paramount’s new Insurge label — they realize that low-cost movies can make serious dough. Give me ten low-budget films that are good, as opposed to five mediocre tentpoles.
I saw Woman in Black last night. The movie was okay, it was a horror movie. I did not see any “acting” from Radcliffe, just a guy reading his lines. He showed little emotional range. I know some like to rag on the Twilight actors, no matter what. And I agree that Lautner has not shown any acting chops. But Pattinson and Stewart have. Pattinson was really good in Water for Elephants.
Want to praise Radcliffe – praise. Why its necessary for you to abuse others? By the way, on Tomatoes many don’t agree with you)))
Agree completely…Good films can be made without having an enormous budget. Radcliffe also has major presence, although his looks may hinder him. Emma Watson and Kristen Stewart are kind of on the same level-both have played the same sort of characters, so it is a bit unfair to judge them until they take on different types of roles. Watson has the Perks of Being a Wallflower and Stewart has the Snow White film. Lautner is just painful…Not holding out a lot a hope for Pattinson, he has taken on a few very different roles and yet always come across as the same pouty, wooden guy.
There was nothing pouty about Pattinson in Water for Elephants. You just show that you are biased. Pattinson got good reviews for Water for Elephants and it did well at the box office too.
I was joking, but I did enjoy Vampire Circus. Not their best, but a lot of fun nonetheless.
Oh silly universal you simply can’t do anything right at all! Just get rid of that donna langley she’s a hot mess and has no clue what to do!
Predict: ‘The Woman in Black’ will be be a worldwide hit. It has a tremendous pedigree. The book has been read and loved by millions. The play is a genuinely terrifying two-hander which has had audiences screaming in London for 23 years. It is a tourist ‘must,’ which has also been been successfully performed in many other countries. It stars Daniel Radcliffe who has an enormous fan-base. And its been made by Hammer Films.
Can’t wait to see it.
So why is everyone shocked that it has opened so well?
Tell you what — the screening I saw tonight was only about 50% full, but there were more screams (followed by nervous laughter) and edge-of-chair sitting in “The Woman In Black” than I’ve seen in a long time. Studios don’t quite know what to do because the adds can’t show some kind of torture device or 19-year-old tarted-up never-was actress screaming in fear. This movie is all about dread and genuine fright and suspense, and there’s a 20-minute-or-so scene with Radcliffe alone in the house that is freakin’ AWESOME. I have a feeling you’ll see Saturday stronger than Friday on this; I can’t imagine word of mouth could be negative in ANY way. Other than a mildly disappointing ending and some lengthy exposition, it’s a corker of a good thriller, even if it sometimes relies too heavily on the old PERCUSSION THUMP to scare. Mostly, it’s waaay better than that. Yeah, you’ve seen ghost stories before, but it’s been a long time since a good one was told WELL. Bravo to the makers!
$20 MILLION FOR WOMAN IN BLACK – GO TERRY PRESS!!!!
How strong is that breath on the back of Debbie Miller’s neck? Terry Press footprint on her throat? Congrats CBS Films! Can you release more than 3 films a year (Salmon Fishing in the Yemen on 3/9 and 7500 on 8/31)? Good thing they have reduced their staff! Better have deep pockets, patience and commitment…studio has a long way to go…
They also have Seven Psychopaths, Gambit and The Words. Get a clue before you post such a nasty comment.
I heard Debbie had little to no influence on the marketing of the film, apparently they have some new peeps?
@D.Z. That’s because the Potter trio of lead actors are actually likable and more importantly, talented, unlike the cardboard cutouts that lead the Twilight travesty.
LOL
I think you should check EL&EC’s friday number…