
Netflix’s first original series, the acquired Norwegian fish-out-of-water dramedy Lilyhammer starring The Sopranos alum Steven Van Zandt, launched yesterday. How did it do? We may never know as the video streaming is refusing to disclose figures. In a memo, Netflix’s chief content officer Ted Sarandos explains why. While instant viewing is less and less important for most TV networks, especially premium cable ones which, like Netflix, doesn’t rely on commercials, I still think that Netflix should provide cumulative streaming data over time, especially as it paints itself as a viable alternative to pay cable. As for the future of Lilyhammer, it probably doesn’t depend on its performance on Netflix as it launched big in its homeland and reportedly has Netfix already on board to co-produce a second season. Here is Sarandos’ memo:
Many of you have asked us to disclose day-after viewership numbers for our new original series “Lilyhammer,” which Netflix members in the U.S., Canada and Latin America could watch instantly beginning yesterday. Let me explain why we won’t.
We have over 23 million streaming members and they’ll have the opportunity to discover Lilyhammer not just yesterday, today or this week, but over the course of several years. Some members have loved the show so much that they’ve already watched the entire eight-episode first season; we put all the episodes up at once for that reason. Over time, other members will hear about Lilyhammer from their friends or discover it through our recommendation engine, based on the shows and movies they’ve enjoyed in the past.
At Netflix, we are all about giving people choice in the way they enjoy TV shows and movies. They can watch one episode or all eight back-to-back. They can start in the living room on their Smart TV and end in the bedroom on their iPad. We don’t show commercials so we don’t have to deliver audience numbers to advertisers. We do have to deliver a great experience to our members.
We’re confident Lilyhammer will build a sizeable audience on Netflix and we’re excited to be at the forefront of change in the way consumers get their entertainment.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


Yes, it’s a whole new world. A lot of people are going to have to unlearn old modes of thinking, or they’ll keep making basic mistakes like judging Netflix according to broadcast metrics.
Great point. Netflix’s narrowcasting business model is much better for the artiste type than the old broadcast/box office model and its demands for big, big numbers that steamroller creativity.
I can see major directors doing much more nichey and experimental things for Netflix (I almost wrote “movies” or “TV shows” instead of “things,” but even formats that broad are irrelevant labels now). They have the ability to target the audience who is interested in this or that niche, combined with global reach that turns even a niche into a pretty sizable business.
Netflix is repurposing TV series like Lilyhammer now, but what they really need to do in terms of original content is make stuff that you’d never see in the movie theaters or on TV, because the audience or maybe even the format isn’t suitable.
Why do people think they need to release numbers. It has no bearing on the show and the only people who can do anything useful with the info has it
Just want to say. As a Norwegian, I really miss Sopranos, and besides Mr. Gandolfino, Steven van Zandt was my favorite characther. To watch him in a Norwegian serie, is so great. So far three episodes has been showed in my country, and I cant wait to see the rest. Thank you mr. van Zandt. In me you have a big fan, and I really hope to see “Lillyhammer” part 2.
Good show. I just watched all eight episodes, I highly recommend it. It’s unique, entertaining and well written. IMO, it’s better than 3/4 of the crap on TV.
a way to test the popularity is the number of classifications. which is in all the videos. Of course not everyone is watching and then sorts, but this number serves as a basis to compare …
“The Numbers” is a concept completely meaningless to Netflix, since I can browse when I feel like it and not have to TIVO or record some show at a specific time or miss it forever. “The Numbers” is a concept created by Network TV to please advertisers. The last time I watched Netflix, I didn’t see any. It matters not if the show had ONE viewer. I haven’t watched it, not yet anyway, because I don’t feel like it. I may watch it tomorrow. I may watch one episode at 4am Thursday. It doesn’t matter. Therein lies the beauty of the business model. “The Numbers” are totally irrelevant. It’s an orange– and people want it to be an apple.
This show is great. My husband and I watched all eight episodes within a few days and really enjoyed it. If you liked SVZ in the Sopranos, you’ll definitely like this – although the two shows are definitely different in many ways. Lilyhammer is charming, funny, well-written, and definitely worth watching. As to the comments about not knowing it was released, whenever I logged into my Netflix account in early February, an ad kept popping up for it. They were also advertising it on the paper flaps of that hold the DVDs they send out. In any event, I highly recommend this show. You won’t be disappointed.
we love it, can’t wait for season 2
though Netflix make it seem different, Lilyhammer is a NRK financed Rubicon production but hopefully Netflix can afford the next round. I suspect the reason Netflix wont release information on total streaming stats is that it will raise the cost of purchase for them.
Thare is gold in them streams