Paramount says the son of The Godfather author Mario Puzo is tarnishing the legacy of the studio’s films by attempting to publish a new sequel to the original novel. So it’s suing the Puzo estate in U.S. District Court in New York to stop publication of The Family Corleone later this year. The complaint filed late last week says Paramount bought the copyright of Puzo’s novel in 1969 and allowed Random House to publish a sequel, The Godfather Returns, in 1994. The studio said a second sequel, The Godfather’s Revenge, was published in 2006 without Paramount’s approval, and “far from properly honoring the legacy of The Godfather, the unauthorized The Godfather’s Revenge tarnished, and in the process, also misled consumers into believing that The Godfather’s Revenge was authorized by Paramount,” the complaint reads. The studio is also seeking damages saying the estate is infringing on copyright and trademarks — like those famous puppet strings — by using them to promote the new book. The original 1972 Godfather film won three Oscars and was co-written by Puzo.


I’m confused. Is Paramount now bringing an action regarding the 2006 novel, or is this an entirely separate novel? If the former, isn’t the six year delay an issue? If the latter, isn’t the fact that Paramount allowed the 2006 novel to be published and distributed without their consent an issue?
I would think the reading public associates the Godfather books with Mario Puzo, not Paramount Pictures.
The Godfather Legacy? Can the viewers sue for the third film then? I mean, wasn’t the third film just an exercise in nepotism and getting a paycheck? The first film does not even hold up anymore, although the second one is genius. But hey, good job Paramount, go after Mario’s son, make him go broke. I’m sure Mario is proud (cue him rolling in his grave). Quick question for the brass at Paramount; How the hell do you sleep at night? Takes the word “scumbag” to a whole new level.
Your comment became irrelevant when you said The Godfather doesn’t hold up.
Paramount never knew what to do with The Godfather when Robert Evans bought the book rights they wanted to do a cheap mafia movie with Ernest Borgnine as the Godfather. Coppola had to convince everyone that Marlon Brando and Al Pacino were the right actors to star in it. And even then they second guessed Coppola at every step they had no faith in the film and thought it was terrible. They knew the book was a best seller but they never realized the movie would be such a big success.
“The first film does not even hold up anymore”
Hey, go sleep with the fishes.
I am far from an IP lawyer, but wasn’t there a law passed in the US that, upon the death of the original creator, the copyright returns to the estate from who ever it was sold to?
I am pretty sure I have heard of it in music, I gather it was a form of reparations about all the artists scammed out of their publishing.
Anyway, who cares?
Nope.
“It’s not personal, Sonny. It’s strictly business.”
“…don’t ever take sides with anyone against the Family again. Ever.”
Paramount has zero chance of winning anything here and they are idiots for suing Puzo Jr. over this. Paramount has done nothing with the Godfather since 1990. And the part three they did was terrible it was a waste of time and money. They are the ones who have tainted the Godfather legacy due to their own stupidity.
Paramount should have been much smarter all these years they should have used the sequel novels as the basis for telepics for CBS or Showtime but they are too stupid to realize the value of the title. I hope Puzo counter sues them for a lot of money he’ll win with a New York city jury.
Actually idiots in charge, Paramount has used The Godfather property since 1990; they’ve created several video games since the release of the last film. About five or six years ago, Paramount, along with EA, released a Godfather game which eventually led to different editions spanning something like 7 different platforms. A sequel game was also created, and most recently, a Facebook game as well.
If you want to talk about ruining the legacy of the property, go beyond Part III, and point your fingers at these video games. I’m not singling out video games as a bad medium, but I find it hard to believe that Paramount says this new book, written by the creator’s son, will tarnish the property, when they themselves put out various mediocre games based off it (not to mention a Facebook game!).
I believe it was Coppola who ruined #3. Too bad genius doesn’t last a life time … unless you’re Kubrick.
they rushed Coppola to do the third film in order to save Paramount from bankrupcy.
I have three words for you: “Eyes Wide Shut”.
I have three words for you too: “That Movie Rocked”.
I have two words for you: “Thank you.”
Paramount most likely purchased film rights to the original novel. But Puzo likely retained literary rights. IF that’s the case, then Paramount isn’t claiming they own the literary rights to the sequel novels. They’re claiming that the estate publishing sequels devalues their film properties. Which seems like it qualifies as Paramount busting a move. This is conjecture, of course, based on the details of the rights agreement they entered with Puzo. Thoughts, anyone?
“…misled consumers into believing that The Godfather’s Revenge was authorized by Paramount”
Really? You think people would care in the least whether the book was authorized by a movie studio or not? I’m willing to bet that only a handful of people who read the book even know that Paramount made the Godfather movie, let alone own the rights to the books.
exactly. the Paramount suits are dellusional.