
Is this week a glimpse into the near future of what broadcast TV’s fast national ratings will look like? All week, HUT (households using television) levels have been on par or even slightly higher than last week (with the exception of Valentine’s Day.) And yet, there have been massive across-the-board ratings declines every night. If the total number of people sitting in front of TVs has been roughly the same and they were not watching broadcast shows, what were they watching? Certainly not cable series, many of which also posted declines this week. I think a footnote in the HUT definition may hold the key to the puzzle. In addition to live viewing, it also accounts for people watching pre-recorded shows on playback.
The theory is that a blockbuster TV event like the high-rated Grammys on Sunday created a “tsunami effect,” with people catching up on previously recorded shows as well as possibly replaying the Grammys, instead of watching that night’s programs. That perpetuated for a few days, especially with Valentine’s Day in the mix when many people were out, creating an additional backlog of shows on their DVR. The theory is supported by measurements that registered a higher-than-usual level of playback viewing this week. It also could explain the biggest head-scratcher that was the Monday ratings, which featured the most extensive across-the-board ratings declines, including in the unflappable CBS comedy block, which had been heavily promoted during the Grammys the night before. (BTW, Nielsen’s explanation in response to queries from the networks about the lower Monday ratings was that it was Lincoln’s birthday. How many of you remembered that Monday was Lincoln’s birthday?!) Also in support of the playback theory, things began to go to normal last night in the 9 PM and 10 PM hours. There were still inexplicable net losses at 8 PM — CBS’ The Big Bang Theory did a 5.0/15 in 18-49, down 11% from last week, Fox’s American Idol (4.6/13) was down 12%, while NBC and ABC were on par with last week in the hour — Wipeout (1.5/4) was flat, while 30 Rock (1.4/4) and Parks And Recreation (1.7/5) were close to the demo delivery of an hourlong 30 Rock last week (1.6/4).
But at 9 PM, things began to stabilize. Yes, ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy (3.1/8) was down 23% to a season low and CBS’ Person Of Interest (2.9/7) and NBC’s The Office (2.2/6) and Up All Night (1.5/4) were down 12%. But last week, they aired against The Finder on Fox (2.3 in 18-49) vs. the second hour of American Idol (5.0) this week, so the total 18-49 rating in the hour remained approximately the same. Ditto for 10 PM, where CBS’ The Mentalist (2.8/7) was down 7% and a Grimm rerun (0.7) fetched half the rating a Voice encore did last Thursday, but ABC’s Private Practice (2.6/7) shot up 18% from last week with a Grey’s Anatomy cross-over. If the theory is correct, people should be all caught up on their DVR viewing by the end of the weekend and Live+Same Day ratings should return to normal next week, while Live+7 numbers for last week should spike. If not, Nielsen will have some serious explaining to do.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


Or Nielsen messed up and won’t own up to.
With DVR’s, On Demand, Streaming,& Full Season DVDs what do the network expects? Hell, they don’t even bother program original shows on Saturday anymore. When I was a kid Saturday night was the best of the week, “All In The Family”, “The Mary Tyler Moore Show”. There were three networks, now there are 200 and they cannibalize each other showing the same shows. The nights of 40 million viewers for a show are long gone.
I’m just gonna throw this wild hunch out there…
People don’t watch TV LIVE anymore. Why rush home when you can watch on DVR, iPad, iPod or etc a few days later when you have time to view it and enjoy your favorite shows. How is this confusing for networks/Nielsen to understand?!
I think when you live in an suburban market it’s easy to think that, but typically people in the boonies and smack in the middle of the city can’t afford hefty cable bills let alone a DVR. It may seem that way to you because as people we tend to surround ourselves with people like us, but remember when television made the switch to digital broadcasts? The US Government delayed the much-publicized switch from analog to digital because there were so many Americans who weren’t prepared and hadn’t purchased digital receivers. If you were like me, you didn’t have to do anything because you either subscribe to cable/satellite and had an HD television. Now if that many people weren’t prepared for the switch and even more than that number needed a digital receiver but had already purchased one, then there are several people who watch their television live.
The problem isn’t how we consume our television; it’s that we consume it at all.
Nielsen citing Lincoln’s birthday as a reason for a decline in viewership makes me think that they have no idea what they’re doing and only fuels my belief that their system is either a sham or shady or both.
What’s shady about a monopoly on information? Or a sham about using a few thousand as a sample size for hundreds of millions?
In an industry full of fraud, this one’s the most damaging to the media companies. At a time when more and more profit comes from the television side, not having the full numbers is an embarrassment.
killertv you must have slept through stats class in college. a few thousand is more than enough sample to represent hundreds of millions within accepted margins of error and confidence levels.
Maybe if all they had to choose from were three networks that sample size would work. At this point, the number of channels almost outnumbers the sample size.
Only if that sample is a fair indicative of the larger group, which Nielsen households are not.
What do you mean? I know our family wasn’t watching TV on Lincoln’s Birthday. We were too busy having our Lincoln’s Birthday Feast and exchanging Lincoln’s Birthday gifts. The only sad part is having to now take down and put away our extensive Lincoln’s Birthday decorations.
HAHAHA
The government took out Megavideo and the other streaming sites ran for the hills. Meanwhile, many recent episodes are only available on HuluPlus or are not available at all. If someone missed last week’s episode, there’s no way to catch up, and so they don’t want to see the new one.
Reap what you sow.
There are plenty of other streaming sites out there, just saying. You just have to look. Granted, Id say megavideo was the easiest to find but it doesnt take too much to fine other sites that work well. But I will say I can kind of see your point about the availability of episodes. If you dont know where to go to stream and only use sites like hulu, the 8 day wait for new episodes is annoying and honestly, i think people forget there was a new episode if they cant watch it right away the next day. Its happened to me. And then I just get away from the show.
Um, you’re speaking of MegaUpload, right? According to my teenager, that didn’t affect the torrenting community one bit. The only sites that closed up shop were unscrupulous hosting sites, that tried to walk the fine line between legitimate file storage, and pirate back door. There is more money in hosting legal content than illegal, so it wasn’t a tough decision. Most active torrent sites run free of charge, and are funded either by donations, or click-through revenues. They are also hosted and registered outside the US as well, unlike MegaUpload, so they have little to fear from the FBI.
I’m guessing Linsanity’s effect on the New York market is negligible…Tuesday’s game versus the Toronto Rapters peaked at a 7.4 in the middle of primetime there for MSG. That’s still 843k households though.
wow, they can really say it because its Lincoln’s Birthday ? Thats not even a holiday anymore for anyone. Its Presidents day now and thats next week. Sounds like people should stop paying Nielsen for services not rendered
It’s the new model–crap shows, long hiatus breaks, cancel good shows after a short time, but keep horrible ones on for 5-8 years.
People are much more selective and in my opinion turning on Network fare and instead going for other sources. 200 channels of nuttin’–save jewels like Breaking Bad, Homeland and a few others.
I rewatched me some Adele performing at the Grammys several times. Man I love that woman’s voice.
Well the Oscars are 9 days away, should be interesting to see if the same thing happens again.
Ditto what everyone above me said. It’s right on the mark.
Seriously-Lincoln’s birthday as an excuse? Hell,I don’t even miss my shows for the birthday of someone I know-let alone a dead president’s birthday! Basically, I tend to agree with what Chris wrote: most of us don’t watch tv live anymore. With next day viewing,tivo,& so many different options available to us:The television viewing landscape has changed immensely,and,these networks are going to have to adapt also. One more thing: I have mentioned this before,and,I’m going to mention it again-the networks make it almost impossible for people to watch programs live-BECAUSE OF THE RIDICULOUS SCHEDULING! Case in point:your favorite program ends-you may hear:next week on such and such-or-something like:in two weeks on such and such,BUT, as a viewer-if they don’t say anything-then you know you are screwed,because,it means the next new episode is (A)in 3 weeks, (B) in one month,or,(C) only god knows when! My major point being:how can these networks treat tv fans this way,and then have the nerve to be surprised when people migrate to cable programs,watch d.v.d.s,or watch their programs online. Television schedulers are totally screwing the fans,and,ABSOLUTE NOTHING will change if we keep bending over and taking it!! Thank you.
Just about everything I watach is on dvr. That way I can skip all the 5-minute long annoying commercials. I have the dvr set to record my favorite shows, and watch them when I want.
Exactly what I do… why? Because TV scheduling is ridiculous. Why are so many good shows on at the same time Sunday night? There are days when all I watch are recorded shows I’ve saved because there’s nothing worth my time being broadcast. I’ll often watch cable shows without advertising live, but rarely network live TV.. the ads are ridiculous and repetitive so I record so I can skim past quickly. Advertisers may not like that, but I don’t like watching 4 minutes of ads every 5 minutes.
For a few years, my household was one of the Nielsen thousand. But they haven’t contacted us to do it again for 3 years.. why? Too much cable, DVR and streaming viewing?
Evan, I do the same. It’s been a couple of years since I have watched my favorite shows live. I DVR the show or watch it on Verizon Fios on demand. Many times I record two shows at once. Spoiled much? I don’t think I could return to regular TV viewing again.
We never watch live TV in our household as well – only shows recorded on our DVR. Even when watching sporting events, we start watching via the recording an hour into the game. We can’t stand watching commercials anymore, and can never go back to live TV.
In fact, we experimented with cord-cutting – bought bunny ears and hooked up a spare laptop to the TV to stream shows from Hulu, Netflix, or Amazon. It was incredibly irritating to have to wait a week after an episode airs on TV before we could catch it on HULU. But even more irritating was not being able to skip through the ads on HULU. We tried living without cable and DVR for about a month, and just had to go back to using our DVR.
As much as I’d like to cut the cord (we can afford it, we just don’t want to pay the ludicrous amounts charged), until we can find a more convenient solution to watching shows online without the pesky ads, I’m afraid we’re tied to cable TV.
The scam that is Nielsen continues. Really, it’s like looking at a cafe of people on laptops, and guessing that they are all reading email. When digital distribution would allow for transparent ratings knowledge. Now, who is MORE scared of that? Networks or the tide of people making bucks from the Nielsen scam? Nielsen is not accurate. Why is that fact not tilting the various parts of the industry yet?
I’m pretty sure I have never seen Vampire Diaries “live”, and that I have seen every single episode (save last night’s.)
I knew it! (looks to sky, fist in air, yells) Lincoln!!!!!!
Grammy’s just had the highest ratings in 30+ years. Audience is out there, just haven’t been watching television this week.
i dont watch any of the shows mentioned
Lincoln’s birthday was their explanation? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
And Hollywood is paying Nielsen for their horrid services? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Nielsen is incredibly antiquated – where’s the soundscan for tv viewing numbers?
The only time I ever watch live TV is when there is either some kind of breaking news, or a sporting event. And, 99% of my sporting events I watch, I watch on DirectTV. I can’t even remember the last time I sat down to watch a live entertainment program. Over a year, at least. I can’t be alone.
Eventually, the networks aren’t going to need the local broadcasters anymore, are they? National networks will have too many options available to them to deliver content to the consumer without paying the middleman that is the local broadcast channel. Then what?
For the record, Lincoln’s Birthday is the 12th anyway, not the 13th.
Neilsen’s Lincoln response highlights their increasing irrelevance.
It will be interesting to see the +7 Numbers for this week.
Well Whitney has become the highest rated sitcom on NBC so take that bitches!
Why not just track viewers habits with all the new flat screen tvs? This should have been in place years ago. Heck the internet tracks your every move, so why not throw in tv at this point since we’ve basically handed over our privacy?
Nielsens are a joke. A monopoly that’s outlived its usefulness. Get rid of it. Lets sample what every tv set is watching.