BREAKING… Refresh For latest… U.S. and Chinese negotiators announced an agreement today to significantly increase the number of U.S. films allowed to be shown in Chinese movie theaters and provide a more equitable share of revenue for
American film companies. It will put into place a mechanism that will allow over 50% more U.S. films into the Chinese market. The White House is boasting that it’s a “breakthrough” to resolve outstanding issues related to films after the United States’ victory in a World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute last year. Immediately walt Disney Company President/CEO Bob Iger hailed the pact: ”China is one of the most populous countries in the world, and this agreement represents a significant opportunity to provide Chinese audiences increased access to our films.” (More reaction below.)
According to WH stats, last year, Chinese box office revenue was up to $2.1 billion. Much of this revenue came from 3D titles. This agreement allows more American exports to China of 3D, IMAX, and similar enhanced format movies on favorable commercial terms, plus strengthens the opportunities to distribute films through private enterprises rather than the state film monopoly, and ensures fairer compensation levels for U.S. blockbuster films distributed by Chinese state-owned enterprises. The agreement will be reviewed after 5 years to ensure that it is working as envisioned. If necessary, the United States can return to the WTO to seek relief.
According to the IFTA, China also has agreed that licensing arrangements should be negotiated on commercial terms comparable with other markets proportional in size. Additionally, the pact encompasses key provisions that are considered standard practice elsewhere, including audit rights, approval of sub-licenses, consultation on marketing campaigns and the ability to designate a choice of law when disputes arise. Moreover, censorship rejection cannot be enforced as a material breach of the Agreement. Instead, the licensor and China’s State-Owned Enterprises will now work together to find a solution when these situations arise.
China has also agreed to affirm that no law or regulations can prevent other Chinese enterprises from actively engaging in the distribution of imported films. In fact, the Chinese government will now promote the entrance of other distributors into the marketplace.
The United States initiated the underlying WTO dispute in April 2007 to address significant market access concerns relating to China’s treatment of films for theatrical release, as well as other cultural products. A WTO panel found in a report issued in August 2009 that key Chinese film import restrictions were inconsistent with China’s WTO obligations. In December 2009, after China appealed, the WTO Appellate Body rejected China’s claims and upheld the panel’s findings. China promised to come into compliance by March 2011, but informed the United States at the deadline that this would not be possible. The two sides have been making efforts to resolve their differences since that time.
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden: “This agreement with China will make it easier than ever before for U.S. studios and independent filmmakers to reach the fast-growing Chinese audience, supporting thousands of American jobs in and around the film industry,” said Vice President Biden, who spent the day in the Los Angeles area with Vice President Xi Jinping of China. “At the same time, Chinese audiences will have access to more of the finest films made anywhere in the world.”
U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk: “U.S. studios and independent filmmakers cite China as one of their most important world markets, but barriers imposed by China and challenged by the United States in the WTO have artificially reduced the revenue U.S. film producers received from their movies in the Chinese market,” said United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk. “This agreement will help to change that, boosting one of America’s strongest export sectors in one of our largest export markets.”
MPAA Chairman/CEO Chris Dodd: “This is a major step forward in spurring the growth of U.S. exports to China. It has long been a top priority for the MPAA, and it is tremendous news for the millions of American workers and businesses whose jobs depend on the entertainment industry. This landmark agreement will return a much better share of the box office revenues to U.S studios, revising a two-decade-old formula that kept those revenues woefully under normal commercial terms, and it will put into place a mechanism that will allow over 50% more U.S. films into the Chinese market.”
Independent Film & Television Alliance President/CEO Jean Prewitt: ”For Independents, this agreement is momentous. Our sector has been unable to benefit fully from the existing revenue-sharing importation quotas and has had limited avenues through which to distribute. For the first time, through this Agreement, there is a promise of creating a commercial foundation that will allow independent producers to participate more fully in the Chinese marketplace. In addition to improving the existing revenue-sharing regime, under the terms of the Agreement, China has committed to allowing new local companies to engage in local distribution, to introducing transparency into censorship and importation decisions, and to offering terms and conditions equivalent to comparable markets such as France and Germany. Most importantly, these changes will accelerate the development of a competitive marketplace in which both the U.S. and the Chinese independent film industries can flourish.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Glad to hear it, and I hope this means more than just a few more big dumb Hollywood action movies.
I wonder what the data is on collections from Chinese distributors, theaters, tv, etc. for US, or any other foreign films sold in China. Does Fintage have local offices there and do they ever collect overages on independent films distributed there thus far? Curious about this, and about how this will turn out over the cycle of films being distributed in China since Chinese box office has started to emerge (i.e. 2006/7).
Couldn’t they have put in a word on anti-piracy enforcement?
Will this help or hurt the piracy problem with regard to China ?
As i am reading this all i am hearing is:
blah blah blah more money for us… Unfortunately i doubt this will mean a increase in quality of the films being made…
Just a few comments…
The original 20 movie quota was for movies imported from all over the world–not just from the USA.
So, 50% more could mean only 10 more US films, maybe–or a total of 30 non-PRC movies to be imported on better terms.
Notice the emphasis on 3D? As a Stereographer, I say “Yay to that!”
But it looks like the imported US titles will likely be Hollywood 3D tent-poles. And as an independent filmmaker, I ask if this would really help the rest of us?
Still, I agree that it’s better than before.
Best thing to happen to human rights in China since… Maybe ever… The more western films the Chinese population sees the more they will demand to see and the more freedoms they will come to expect. Art only coexists with freedom. Michael Jackson, Madonna and Speilberg had as much to do with bringing down the Berlin wall as Reagan, if not more.
Of course when they decide they want to pave the gobi desert to put up metroplexes and decide to invade Iran and Iraq because they need the oil for the bulldozers we’ll blame their love of western movies for the end of the world.
Don’t kid yourself, the chinese government will block every film that says anything against them, directly or indirectly. They’re are doing this pact just because they can make lots of money without having to do nothing. Easy money for both sides.
So now there will just be more cam bootlegs being distributed
Amen.
I love how Libs spin anything they do to help US business as providing jobs but if Repubs do it it is feeding greedy corporations. Biden is classic, everything out of his mouth is about how he is helping jobs. Nothing about the bottom line to Hollywood firms. Increasing distribution doesn’t necessarily mean more jobs, just more revenue.
It’s likely that three quarters of the current Hollywood product is unsuitable for Chinese screens. The authorities are sensitive to American political statements made by comic book and action movies and American comedy does not translate well. Chinese audiences can be baffled by depictions of children as sexy sophisticates and by adults who look and act like teens. The Chinese want to build their own film industry not import American product. They will enlist American companies to help them do this.
@Dave: The Chinese are interested in truthful depiction of American life. They perceive that it is more commonly found in independent film than in Hollywood product.
Dude, you’re an idiot. Tell me the last time modern china invaded anyone. Also, could you list me Hollywood’s biggest hits in china in the past few years? Transformers. Noe that Hollywood has a safe bet for bullshit movies, and with dream works making a deal with china, you can expect the very best in bullshit works to hit our screen both in u.s. and over here in china.
Human rights. Get out of here with that mess. U.s. would rather spend money overseas than on their own people. Don’t criticize when your she*t ain’t close to perfect either. American people were working hard and with little pay too during the industrial revolution. China’s going through that now.
Under the new agreement, the box office split remains ludicrous. China keeps 75%…distributor keeps 25%. Shameful. Simply shameful.
This agreement should help the piracy problem to some degree, by giving Chinese audiences easier legitimate access to American films. However, I doubt access is the chief motivation vs the allure of getting something for nothing.
No doubt the beneficiaries will be the kind of mass-market sludge that Hollywood produces because it’s palatable to a global audience. One way to ensure that palatability is to strip away any actual intelligent content, so that no one could possibly be offended by the resulting mush.
I agree with you that access, or lack of, is probably not the chief motivator in China for piracy. It’s definitely a combination of factors and one of those may be the price of tickets in China. Lately there have been numerous reports in the news contrasting movie ticket prices in China as a percentage of their income versus the rest of the world. In urban China the price of a ticket accounts for roughly 2.3% of one’s monthly disposable income whereas in the U.S. it’s only .5% . And that’s just in the urban areas where on average incomes are a minimum of 3 times higher than that of rural areas which by the way is where the majority of people still live in China.
The Chinese don’t give a shit about truthful depiction of American life, talk about wishful thinking. They go to the movie theater same as anyone else – to be entertained by 3D robots shooting rockets at each other.
And the Chinese government loves this, because you’d have to be very imaginative to get any political message out of 3D robots shooting rockets at each other.
American comic book-based movies don’t have strong or pointed political messages – Captain America being one of the most pointed in recent memory. But politics-free Thor did better globally. That goes to show that messages can’t compete with mindless action on the world stage. Sorry, indy film producers.
Comic book heroes are often vigilantes and that is contrary to the Chinese authority’s collectivist mythology. It doesn’t matter what the Chinese people would like to see.
I think increased market access for distributin is only a small piece of this puzzle. Wait for the announcements of U.S. companies setting up more co-production deals and production facilities in country – and watch California union jobs ship off to China Foxconn-style.
Are you saying there are still California union film jobs left? Tom Short gave back most advances the IA once had. And I thought the jobs were all stolen by Canuks, anyway. The downfall of all our domestic unions was when Reagan forced new laws through to screw the Air Traffic Controllers–thus obviating all US organized labor.