EXCLUSIVE: I’ve learned that Scotland Yard has informed Hollywood music agent Julie Colbert that her cell phone calls were
intercepted because she represented Welsh pop star Charlotte Church. The WME tenpercenter who works for music clients in film and television was back and forth between Los Angeles and London when the hacking occurred, my insiders say. That’s because, at the time, Church was working closely with the crossover agent and even staying as a guest in Colbert’s home for several months to get away from the paparazzi constantly trailing the singing sensation. ”Scotland Yard told Julie, ‘Your number came up as one of the ones that was hacked,” an insider tells me. I understand that Colbert hasn’t decided yet whether to file a claim because of the hacking. That might prove touchy because her agency William Morris Endeavor Entertainment does a lot of business with News Corp subsidiaries like Fox Broadcasting, Twentieth Fox TV, and the Fox Filmed Entertainment Group.
No information was provided Colbert exactly who did the hacking: News Corp’s journalists or private detectives. But Bloomberg reported earlier today that Glenn Mulcaire, the former News Corp private detective who hacked phones for the company’s News Of The World, had an unidentified WME agent’s numbers as well as Charlotte Church’s New York publicist Kevin Chiaramonte of Paul Freundlich Associates among thousands of pages of notes seized by police. That agent, I’ve learned, was Colbert.
Church told an officially UK inquiry into press ethics in November that the evidence includes “many pages of names, numbers, notes, addresses, pin numbers and the fact that my mother and I were each a ‘project.”’ Church sang at News Corp Chairman Rupert Murdoch’s wedding in 1999 when she was 13 years old. Now 26, she settled a lawsuit this week against Murdoch’s company days before the first trial over the phone-hacking scandal was scheduled to start. Terms will be disclosed at a London court hearing next week.
Besides Church, recently Jude Law, Steve Coogan, and other high-profile showbiz figures have settled. News Corp still faces possible claims by more than 800 likely victims identified by police. The presence of the U.S. phone numbers in Mulcaire’s notes may interest U.S. prosecutors and also may complicate News Corp efforts to contain lawsuits to the UK. Meanwhile, News Corp is launching a new Sunday edition of The Sun to replace the News Of The World which was shuttered because of the scandal.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


in a word – Inevitable. This vile adventure will spawn even more ugliness and corporate capitulation. Bring on the schadenfreude. LA, NY and DC have a renewed guilty pleasure.
Yes.
Let’s hope rolling over is not inevitable:
“I understand that Colbert hasn’t decided yet whether to file a claim because of the hacking. That might prove touchy because her agency William Morris Endeavor Entertainment does a lot of business with News Corp subsidiaries like Fox Broadcasting, Twentieth Fox TV, and the Fox Filmed Entertainment Group.”
Touchy, eh? Quite a euphemism for potentially turning away from principle, decency, integrity, and justice on account of business.
Hope that proves not to be the case in the case, but who could call it surprising if otherwise?
Mafias tend to stay protected and prevail when everyone is afraid and/or getting their cut of the action.
I’m sorry this happened to all of the victims. The Guardian’s Nick Davies who exposed all of this is a true hero.
When you first learn of someone listening in on your private calls, it rocks you back on your heels. Then you start thinking of every conversation that was or could have been breached — parents, doctors, friends, and, in my case, sources. As a journalist, I got scared for people I spoke with and for myself, wondering how the information would be used. You worry about the safety of others.
And you get very angry. Then every time you pick up a phone, you think twice. Every time the phone rings, you hesitate.
Invasion of privacy is a horrible thing to deal with.
Horrible reality check for you then:
Obama Administration Asks Supreme Court to Dismiss ACLU Challenge to Warrantless Wiretapping Law — 2/17/12
Today, the government asked the Supreme Court to overturn an appeals court ruling that allowed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the 2008 FISA Amendments Act to go forward. That law gives the government unprecedented authority to monitor Americans’ international emails and phone calls.
“It’s crucial that the government’s surveillance activities be subject to constitutional limits, but the administration’s argument would effectively insulate the most intrusive surveillance programs from judicial review.”
oh hell yes game on
They rep me. They make a lot of fucking money from my commissions. Seriously. If they don’t bother to file, I will drop them.
At a certain point, you either have morals or you don’t. Ari is a lot of things, but he is (despite what the rest of you may think) not a scumbag. At all. Think back on the Mel Gibson crap if you have no recall. In the long run protecting the relationship with your clients (be they me or Charlotte Church) is far more important than a single buyer. Fuck Rupert and fuck Fox.
here here
Indeed, let’s think back to that. Mel has an “in vino veritas” moment and spews unimaginable hatred. Jodie Foster, Robert Downey, jr and some other folks of solid rep think he’s an addict who’s got a problem. Note no one but Ari wants to drum him out of the business.
Let’s think back to a similar “in vino veritas” incident w/ Chris Albrecht, when he violently attacked his GF at the time in Vegas following a high profile HBO event and was immediately arrested. His history of abusing women comes out: office affairs, threats, etc. for which any mortal TWX employee would’ve been terminated on the spot, leaving Bewkes no choice but to fire him after the drip-drip-drip of revelations.
Anyone remember who Albrecht’s big defender was, the guy who served as his character rep and said he needed another (third?) chance? This rehabilitation and subsequent big gig at Starz were orchestrated by your idol, Ari.
Moral of the story: get drunk and spew hatred – death penalty from Ari. Get drunk and become violent w/ women – Ari gets you a gig!
Bottom line: they’re both talented addicts who need help, and Ari is a hypocritical scumbag.
So come down off your high and mighty perch.
BS comment. “They rep me.” Sure.
I applaud your sentiments and pledge.
As for Ari, well, we’ll see. The soapbox (respectful nod to our hostess Ms. Finke) is always there waiting should he elect to tee off.
Slamming Gibson didn’t require sticking even a neck hair out; calling out Newscorp corruption, on the other hand, would demonstrate remarkable courage and I would heartily salute Ari under such refreshing circumstances.
Holding my breath? No.
I applaud your position, but realistically, Fox probably has too much money involved with WME for Ari to have the balls to, at least, give the impression WME is seriously concerned.
This is an ugly, painful and frightening process which hasn’t even hit the bottom. Do others really believe Fox properties are the only ones doing this? Fox just got caught in the henhouse… but, it isn’t the only fox on the planet.
And, Anita, I fully understand the fear and paranoia this experience is causing many people regarding invasion of their privacy…very troubling, indeed.
Anita, the one thing here is that there is not any proof that they listened to this person, just that her number appeared on a list of those talking to Charlotte Church. This is an ugly mess, but it now seems WME is trying to capitalize on this idiocy.
James, when a person picks up a phone and dials a number and the person picks up on the other end, that completes a usage record. To obtain a usage record, you need a warrant. Any other means of finding out a usage record: hacking a phone, stealing a phone bill, hacking the BPP1 database at the service provider, etc. is an illegal activity. The very fact that they knew Julie Colbert’s number had connected with Charlotte Church’s number is “proof” that they obtained that information. That part of it is still criminal, at least as the laws are defined here in the United States.
How do you know there is no proof? Do you have inside information that the results of specific hacking were not used in published articles which could not have been obtained anywhere else, e.g. contract terms, travelling information, etc. for Church. Any investigator is going to cross-check information furnished by victims which was later published or utilized in an unlawful way.
Where was she physically when the hacking occurred? Was it an American area code? I would think these two facts would be very relevant. She has to press charges. How will W.M.E. look if she doesn’t? Ari Emanuel being Rahm’s brother, etc., Fox News business be damned. Newscorp is beginning to look like a conglomerate of media in-breeding incest – with one side of the company they build you up, with the other they electronically rape you, only to start the cycle all over again with somebody else after your life or career has been put through the ringer. Cynical doesn’t cover such thinking and it starts at the top. A yin/yang gangbang of the pursuit of embarrassing information via single corporate entity one stop shopping.
Yes. And worse, they use such dark methods for de facto bribery and blackmail and slander while playing political kingmaker, trafficking in influence over individual pols and governments for their own increased power and enrichment which, in a vicious cycle, allows them to then soak up more power.
Why does a smart businessman clutch a newspaper like, say, the New York Post, which loses money ever year? Every. Year.
Because that sum is trifle next to the money that can be made by wielding the power of that megaphone against your enemies and for your friends.
Oh yeah, Israeli spies control the USA spy agencies, that’s how they got away with assassinating JFK. They spy on everyone, all of the time. They spy for the National Security Agency and Homeland Security, tom make sure that when they steal your work, the profits go securely into Israeli bank accounts. Duh.
Like the Nazi era, there will come a time when some individuals will look back with pride on this time period IF…IF…they possess the strength of character to refuse this sadistic exploitation regardless of risk regarding career, social standing, and the tender affections of Rupert Murdoch. These variables are temporal – they really aren’t that important, even to a talent agent.
If Murdoch’s gremlins invaded U.S. ‘airspace’ – yes, I think a cel phone signal now qualifies as ‘air space’ – we are now officially the victims of a systematic ‘intelligence’ operation.
As an American, it is incumbent upon this woman to trigger an FBI investigation of the Murdoch cabal. Parenthetically, she may also end up having Naomi Watts portray her in a well-lit independent film.
CALL…YOUR…LAWYER!
meh.. When’s the movie coming out?
Rupert Murdoch is like some sort of James Bond villain meets Citizen Kane.
“That might prove touchy because her agency William Morris Endeavor Entertainment does a lot of business with News Corp subsidiaries like Fox Broadcasting, Twentieth Fox TV, and the Fox Filmed Entertainment Group.”
If it were to come to pass that WME’s agent testifies against News Corp and News Corp retaliated against WME, then News Corp would be guilty of “retaliation against witness” under federal Racketeer Influenced and Corruption Organizations Act (RICO), (18 U.S.C.A. § 1961 et seq. [1970]. If they did this more than once, i.e. there is more than one victim out there who has been hacked by News Corp in the US – and – News Corp tried to retaliate against them through intimidation, you would be able to prove a pattern of racketeering activity. This would open News Corp up to triple damages from its victims.
Just say’n.
Oh, so Julie’s phone was stolen? Is that why she doesn’t return phone calls? She’s surely not bury guiding what’s left of Charlotte Church’s career.
I don’t know about James Bond villain but he’s definitely a global William Randolph Hearst but even bigger. Being “global” is a big part of the strategy. That’s an important point : certain businesses running at local deficits (in Murdoch’s case this means specific countries!) contribute to overall power base. If it’s been happening in America a question is : how is using a cell phone not like TV or radio signals in that you’re leasing inter-state air space (just like the FOX network) therefore would these not be crimes applicable to the F.C.C. in addition to all the other laws potentially being broken?
I’m an independent who appreciates Fox because I refuse to drown in the sea of Leftie BS. Yes it’s disgusting to tap phones, but it’s nothing new to this town.
The pendulum goes BOTH WAYS. If you believe Murdoch should step down, then by comparison, you believe Eric Holder should do the same.
Thank you the poster who mentioned Obama’s request to repeal the ACLU’s wiretapping case. And don’t forget about that new NDAA he signed at the stroke of midnight on December 31st. You all deserve what you voted for.