
EXCLUSIVE: Setting the leads for Arthur & Lancelot is proving as elusive as pulling the sword from the stone. Colin Farrell, who’d been in early talks to play Lancelot in the latest configuration of the David Dobkin-directed film for Warner Bros, is out. Scheduling is the reason, I’m told. There is a lot of prep and training required for the action heavy role of Lancelot, and it didn’t work out. Warner Bros, which rejected the project because it cost $20 million more than the $110 million that the studio was willing to spend, got back in the mix with the idea of pairing Farrell with Gary Oldman (for Merlin) and an actor to play King Arthur (I heard the studio approached James McAvoy and other actors). Warner Bros, which paid $2 million to acquire Dobkin’s script last summer, is eager to make the movie and cast will materialize quickly, I’m told.
This is the second cast configuration. Warner Bros, which dated the film for a March 15, 2013 release, had cast Game of Thrones’ Kit Harington to play Arthur and The Killing‘s Joel Kinnaman to play Lancelot. Even though Kinnaman was subsequently cast in the title character of MGM’s Robocop remake and Harington returns as a major character in the second season of the HBO series, the studio was being nervous about a big budget with unproven stars.


The script is horrible. This will never get made.
This is a Wb project right? Affleck will be attached by the weekend
Excuse me, but Colin Farrell is no longer a box office draw, so the switch from the “unknowns” was unnecessary. Hollywood creates its own conundrums.
Affleck is like Leo, attaches to everything so no one else can get it – like a hen sitting on eggs with no intention of hatching most of them.
wow, bud, that was a good one.
Hope Warner corporate reads this. This movie will bomb here and overseas. Yet they plan to make it. From the director of the change up. Are you kidding me? Warner shareholders should take note of this project. This after string of boms like Arthur, red riding hood, new years eve, happy feet two, sucker punch, incredibly loud and green lantern. Amazing.
No offense to David Dobkin, he’s a capable journeyman director, but…why in the world would a studio entrust him with a $110M budget?!
My perception: the two so-called ‘unproven’ (yet well known on TV) young stars were the ones who generated 100% of the excitement for this movie, then WB got arrogant and greedy thinking it was the movie itself causing the interest, and so dumped the two young guys for ‘bigger stars’. Then ‘big star’ Farrell generated less than zero public interest and was too out of shape. Well, WB blew it. One ‘unproven’ actor landed a sole lead in a major action movie that has good credibility (robocop). The other ‘unproven’ lead was just on the cover of Entertainment Weekly, reflectng his huge fan base. It has always irritated me that WB drags the names of two good and popular young actors through the mud as their excuse for their own mismanagement of this poorly planned movie. The guys are lucky to have been dumped.
“Farrell generated less than zero public interest and was too out of shape.”
Colin Farrell is in fantastic shape right now.
I’m not starring in it either. Where’s my headline?
Script is horrible. Smart move Colin.
Why is anyone even talking about this. Have no clue who the unknowns were, and Colin Farrell is done. Not sure what happened to his career…guy that was supposed to be a major superstar, and never made the jump.
Sword-&-sorcery movies rarely do that well financially. The Lord of the Rings is an exception, not the rule. That must be one hell of a script.
I’m glad Colin pulled out, this sounds like rubbish. Just do Dead Man Down, Colin! That’s gonna be a good one.
Thank you for the good news. So relieved Farrel is no longer involved.
“Colin Farrell is done. Not sure what happened to his career…”
Yeah, I feel so bad for him. It must be awful being in a position to pick and choose between giant blockbusters (Total Recall) and smaller, more independent films (In Bruges).
People on this site ignore reality and make up their own version of the truth in order to validate their opinions.
As for this news, David Dobkin making an historical epic fantasy comedy sounds like a colossal waste of money. I’m guessing Your Highness didn’t cost anywhere near $110 million to make, starred James Franco and Natalie Portman… and still bombed.
What are Warner Bros. thinking?
Yes, Michael, because I can even remember the last commercial thing Farrel was in? …Fright Night remake? Oh right, that flopped. Nicholas Cage gets to choose his projects too but gets the choice of crap commerical projects like Ghost Rider or “indempendent” movies which basically pay nothing and they are glad to have a “name” attached regardless of quality. And by the way, Colin, is that you? Denigrating someone else’s post because only YOU know the FACTS? Please….get over yourself.
Colin Farrell is done? hahahaha. He has a blockbuster coming out soon, Seven Psychopaths (a Mcdonagh movie) in November and he’s currently shooting Dead Man Down with Noomi Rapace. Yeah, he is so over. Pffft!!
David Dobkin is a hack director. Why he is awarded this high profile film is beyond me.
FilmFreak, the facts speak for themselves. He is the star of a major blockbuster coming out soon. Whether that film turns out to be worthwhile is irrelevant – the fact is he was offered a lead role in a big project, accepted it, and was paid for it. Saying his career is over is not a fact, nor is it the truth. It’s an opinion you had (seemingly based on how well his last film did). I stand by what I wrote, regardless of you trying to paint me as being egotistical… or Colin Farrell.