EXCLUSIVE: We’ve learned the deals are done for this big-ticket New Regency/Paramount co-production Noah which Deadline has been scooping first
for nearly a year now. A formal announcement should come this next week. The once hoped-for spring start is now July, sources say. Russell Crowe is set to float the boat as Noah in Darren Aronofsky’s edgy Biblical re-telling of Noah’s Ark. At one point Christian Bale coming off The Dark Knight Rises was Aronofsky’s choice for the title character. But the dates didn’t work because Bale was committed to doing the Terrence Malick-directed Lawless and Knight Of Cups being made back to back. It took several more months for Aronofsky to fix on Crowe which is great casting since he’s one of those larger than life actors able to take on such an iconic role. Crowe also teams up again with familiar names: Arnon Milchan’s New Regency which made L.A. Confidential, and Gladiator scribe John Logan who rewrote the Noah script by Aronofsky and Ari Handel. Aronofsky and Logan are repped by CAA which was steering the project, and Crowe is repped by WME.
This is Aronofsky’s follow-up to his Oscar-nominated smash Black Swan. Noah now joins a bevy of Biblical films including Steve Spielberg’s gritty Moses re-telling for Warner Bros. (Interestingly, Aronofsky briefly flirted with helming Exodus, a Fox/Chernin Entertainment-produced
telling of the story of Moses.) ”Since I was a kid, I have been moved and inspired by the story of Noah and his family’s journey,” Aronofsky said during Noah’s development process. “The imaginations of countless generations have sparked to this epic story of faith. It’s my hope that I can present a window into Noah’s passion and perseverance for the silver screen.” Aronofsky even dropped out of helming The Wolverine for his ambitious dream project which he initially envisioned as a sprawling fantasy epic that could cost north of $130 million. Then again he generated one of the most profitable movies in recent memory, Black Swan, which grossed $315M worldwide on a $12M budget. Aronofsky and Scott Franklin are producing with Mary Parent who’s based at Paramount.
This is one of the first signature filmmaker-driven projects from Milchan’s ”new” New Regency now headed by CEO Brad Weston and president of production Carla Hacken. Since restructuring the company, Milchan has reinserted himself as an active chairman who’s rolling up his sleeves again. The aim is to return to the kind of edgy films Milchan used to make, when he produced and funded pictures that included L.A. Confidential, Heat, Fight Club, and JFK. Though New Regency is partly owned by News Corp, whose 20th Century Fox distributes and often co-finances Regency-generated films, Paramount won a bidding battle to partner with New Regency and formalized a deal to co-finance Noah after CAA began shopping the package. The film fits into Paramount’s mandate to make films with global appeal.


Worried about this one: Aronofsky so skilled when it comes to the small, intimate (low budget) film, but give him big themes and big budgets and… — . But good to see these tales being mined. Hopefully it won’t be about “faith” so much as the human capacity to let one’s imagination run wild.
If it is about imagination rather than faith there may be a bit of a logic problem. Is Noah to imagine that the world will be flooded instead of being told? Will he rely on his imagination as a rationale to construct a huge barge in the midde of dry land? Will he imagine that pairs of unclean and seven (as I recall) of the clean animals show up at the ark he builds? Imaginary bursting forth of underground water?
Perhaps the problem is that there are too many who prefer to imagine that God,Jesus Christ and faith are myths, as it was in the days of Noah…
They are. One day the bible will be next to greek myths on a shelf someplace.
You keep telling yourself that champ, and maybe someday, in your heart, you’ll really believe it.
i believe it. the bible is already, to many people, an artifact. i was brought up a christian and, while i still believe that jesus was an amazing prophet and radical (and clearly a filthy socialist by today’s standards), i wouldn’t consult the bible for spiritual advice any more than i would consult the koran.
This may happen, and it will have no bearing whatsoever on the Bible’s truth or falsehood. Have you ever looked into the historicity of the scriptures?
The bad news is this: we have evil inside us, and we (you and me) have done evil things. You are an evil person, as am I. God, being perfectly good, hates evil and cannot allow it to exist, eternally speaking. Therefore he must eradicate all evil. This includes the devil, fallen angels, and evil humans who rebelled against him by ignoring him and following their own, evil plans (albeit we aren’t always doing this intentionally–it comes very naturally to us to do evil; we have evil in our hearts).
The good news is this: God is also perfectly compassionate, merciful, and loving. Because of this, he chose to eradicate evil by having his son, being fully God (and therefore completely good), become a human being. His son (Jesus) lived a perfectly good life on earth. Then he died, and “became” evil on our behalf (being God and therefore infinite, he is able to bear an infinite amount of evil on himself). He died, was buried, and then God raised him from the dead on the third day.
The challenge is this: If you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved (from destruction with the rest of the evil things in the universe). You will have peace with God, who will exchange your former, evil life for a brand-new one, governed by Christ, the loving and compassionate embodiment of God–the same God who graciously brought Noah and his family through the flood,and saved a race of people who had been in rebellion against him.
If you want, you can tell God right now that you want to turn away from your sins (your ancient book of “myths” calls this “repentance”), and put your trust in Jesus. If you call on the name of the Lord (again, Jesus), you will be saved. God has promised this!
Well put! Thank you for taking the time to explain a very important but so often ignored subject.
Amen, Bro.
Profound words for profound times….
Baruch Ha’Shem!
be Bless’d in Yeshuah, Settecase……
Bro. Chuck
The bad news is this: we have evil inside us, and we (you and me) have done evil things. You are an evil person, as am I. God, being perfectly good, hates evil and cannot allow it to exist, eternally speaking. Therefore he must eradicate all evil.
Which is why in the Flood God destroyed all the animals and infant children and trees, etc., as well, because, as we all know, animals and trees are evil and God hadn’t yet figured out how to selectively kill only certain people like He later did when He killed the Egyptians on the first Passover night while sparing the Israelites.
the problem with theology, as with any large subject, is it’s hard to explain adequately in a comment post…
It’s not so much that we all have “evil” inside us. Just the potential for it.
You left out Acts 2:38 – a very important step…Harmony and context…
oldagg
You write so well and succinctly. Thank you for sharing it with us!
Since the Author of the Bible (God) is eternal, and His Word (the Bible) is eternal, I think that the only thing sitting next to the Greek myths on a shelf someplace will be your urn…
Yep.
So you say.
such words of wisdom Bubba!
It’s already on that shelf if your IQ is over 110.
seriously: My Intelligence Quotient is 127. I am a Believer and proud Christian. Don’t generalize, it shows your ignorance and lemming like properties.
Seriously!, IQ of a 110? What are you a 6th grader? I’d bet $10,000 my IQ is higher that yours. But I don’t let it get in my way!!!! It is your faith in your “IQ” that keeps you from seeing the truth. To think that humans are the pinnacle of intelligence is to prove yourself a fool. The intelligent scientists of our day are not even beginning to wrap their high IQs around the complexity of life and the universe. And they are coming in droves to the fact that there is a higher being. I know Him and you can too. It used to be the fool who believed in God….NOW the tables are turning and more and more the FOOL denies His existence!!!
An ignorant comment. Everyone knows there are highly intelligent people who hold the Bible as a revelation from God.
The Bible is an anvil that has worn out millions of hammers…
And that place will be your house, and the shelf will be in your library. Other than that, the bible will remain where it’s always been
@Anonymous Over 2000 years of presence on this earth. Doubt dude or dudette!
It’s been 2000+ years and the Bible is still here just as it was then, and faith in Jesus Christ is still growing strong. Wishing for the Bible to fade into history is simply not going to make it happen because God’s Word will never fade away.
Yeah, your buddies had 2000 yrs to discredit it…another 2000 free for all is nothing. take you all on. Good luck you will need it..like all the liberal theologians…and vitriolic atheist.
Jewish/Christian scripture/beliefs were around thousands of years before Greek culture was ever thought of. It has stood the test of time. The fact that you think it’s recent proves you are not qualified to make any public judgement on Christianity or religion in general.
since greek gods were worshipped since around 1000 BC (that’s Before Christ) christian scriptures and beliefs might have been hard to find then. someone isn’t qualified – and it’s you.
Right next to the Atheist’s Bible.
let’s see now…the Bible is over 3000 years old and is stil the number one seller.Any idea on when your prediction may take place?
To the true believer, the Bible will forever be the inspired Word of God and will NEVER be relegated to some forgotten shelf.
That diatribe has been used for 2000 years. The Bible is still here and even more relevant. Voltaire made a similar comment that the Bible would be done in 100 years. He’s dead and his house is used by a French bible society. I love irony.
yes. unfortunately, the world is full of people who need to be told what to think. the bible and the koran are two sides of the same coin. both blindly followed by those who would impose their religion on others. i’d prefer we read jeffersons version of the bible – where he cut out everything that wasn’t directly attributable to jesus – what happened to following his teachings anyway?
If that be the case then, there will be no shelf to put it on. I am no holy roller but, the world would be a better place if ego’s that are so convinced that there is no higher power were put on a shelf instead.
Well said jprbos. Especially since all those who doubt the existence of a Supreme Being have yet to prove that they DON’T exist.
Yeah, in my house! Next to my crocheted quote: “50 years after my death the Bible will be obsolete – 1728″
Ha! They’ve been predicting that for 2000 yrs. now and God’s anvil has only grown in popularity.
You can’t say that they are myths. You have ZERO evidence that they are. Born-again Christians however have the real Holy Ghost living in them that testifies to the FACT of Gods word. The Spirit in us is alive, real, palpable and its existence CANNOT be denied. TRUE Christians could no more deny the FAC that they breath in and out than they could deny Gods existence. IMPOSSIBLE!! But Gods word is proven again with the verse that says “The fool says in his heart, there is no GOD”!! Keep on being a fool.
And another superstitious belief system will take its place.Look at all the posters who worship a zombie half-god, half-man. People will lazily believe anything instead of working towards a pursuit of knowledge. Making a film out of this ridiculous fable is just fleecing the gullible.
Wow, I am excited. The only worry that I have is too much artistic license being taken. The Story of Noah stands on its own and needs little if any embellishment. It is as fresh today as it was 5000 years ago.
When it was copied almost detail for detail from the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Corroboration is a wonderful thing, isn’t it?
–Mike
Well, someone’s obviously not read either the Epic of Gilgamesh, or the story of Noah. You probably think the story of Jesus is just a re-telling of the Osiris myth as well. That’s some brilliant internet scholarship you’ve been reading.
Check your facts. the E of C was written after the flood. Nice try though.
Which is an impressive feat given the fact that it supposedly only happened 4300 years ago…
Yeah! really fresh the story who chase couples of all species and convinces them to go into his home made boat and stay there for a cruise. Pity the film is not made in Odorama!
You got that right.
WELL SAID!
“In the days of Noah” Jesus didn’t exist as a matter of myth or faith. Noah was Old Testament and would have pre-dated Jesus by thousands of years. Any Christian allusion would be an anachronism in the Noah context. The Noah epic is Hebrew.
well said brother
If the movie makers are going to take the risk of making a film based on the faith of Noah and the faithfulness of God then, they should at least risk telling the story the way it was written according to the Bible, as fact; because it is indeed fact!
If a movie about Noah should not be about faith then Days of Thunder should not have been about racing and Seabiscuit should not have been about horse racing.
If Aronofsky and/or anyone else doesn’t get it then the movie should not be made. The story of Noah IS the definition of faith. It is the very point of the story.
yes, and Noah is the definition of faith as much god asking abraham to sacrifice his son for Him.
The trouble I see with Noah story is God itself, I mean about the nasty god of the old testament that says things like (from wikipedia) “Foolish shepherd! Now thou implorest My clemency!”
it might be a good movie after all
Well, if you’ve ever seen an actual NASCAR race, you’d know that Days of Thunder was completely fictionalized and outlandish. Spinning out at Daytona with one lap to go and then going on to win the race is just as much of a mythical notion as the idea that every animal on Earth is a descendant of passengers from Noah’s Ark.
The Bible says only the types of creatures “in whose nostrils was breath” were taken aboard for preservation (some other types likely as food). Nothing from the sea needed to be aboard, insects would have been able to survive the flood on floating log mats, carrion and vegetation. Not all subspecies seen today would have been needed, just the representative kinds – from whom todays subspecies descended. Large animal adults would not have been needed, but male and female juveniles, which would take up much less space. The ark was massive, and could well accomodate its cargo – along with many more people, had they heeded Noah’s warning from God.
Love the idea of watching Noah/Russell Crowe through the desert trying to find a couple of polar bears and penguins, and monkeys ans alligators, and of course, tropical birds and snakes, and so on.It coul get another Oscr for Crowe if he does it without laughing at all.
On several occasions people (like yourself) were and have been astoundingly arrogant enought to make other intelligent utterances like: ” the world is flat, women are inferior, there’s no cure for polio”. Guys like you ALWAYS have ALL the answers, right ???
Well actually, Days of Thunder wasn’t about racing at all-
It was about regurgitating an already-tired formula and template that had proven successful four years before-
Days of Thunder was about squeezing as much coin from the unsuspecting public who actually thought they were paying to see a fresh, new concept- Wrong!
“Days of Thunder” or it is called by real NA$CAR fans “Top Car”, should have been called, because of all it’s inaccuracies,”Days of Blunder.”
Nothing wrong with a dose of faith. The story is about it.
If you make a religious-based movie NOT about faith, why both making a religious-based movie at all?
That would be illogical.
Why make a religious-based movie? To marginalize and demean the story and believers.
You know the narrative.
… OR to suggest the story doesn’t mean what we were told it meant.
not about Faith? you really shouldn’t be posting words online, you don’t understand them. is there a sandbox nearby?
Right…because we wouldn’t want a story from the Bible to be about faith, would we?
What kind of idiot would say something like this. If there ever was a story about FAITH, it is Noah’s.
Hopefully it wont be about faith? are you kidding me?
I think you kind of missed the boat there mister. Pun intended.
wish darren luck. i think this is a major gamble with crowe whose last 6-7 films way underperformed. american audiences have deserted him.
*The horror, the horror…*
“..american audiences have deserted him.”
Huh? Deserted him? Never! I am having all the fun in the world only now just “discovering” him. Did you see the footage of the concert he did in Texas on YouTube? That arena was filled!! They didn’t look like they were deserting him either.
This American audience loves him — will see it just for him.
Waterworld?
I see a disaster of Biblical proportions – don’t do it.
That was almost clever. Almost.
Man of Steel, Les Miserables and now Noah ? Someone’s about to pull off a comeback…it was about time, he is an excellent actor.
How a studio could trust $100+ million to a guy with a mustache like that is beyond logic.
That’s funny
He totally should’ve cast Mel Gibson.
I KID!
Badass
I love the idea. If it is a well-acted, beautifully told movie (which no doubt it will be), it’ll be a movie that people of faith and people of little faith can both enjoy! Here’s hoping for more Christian support for this one like how the faith community supported The Blind Side. I can’t wait!
Without Charlton Heston, movies of such scope and magnitude cannot succeed.
I miss him too…. :^<
Awesome! Darren and Russell are a perfect combo!!!
He’s doing this instead of Wolverine? No!
Take yourself more seriously why don’t you.
This will bomb.
There’s always some jackass on here who has to predict that a new project is going to “bomb” long before the cameras have started rolling.
Just like “PASSION” bombed ??
Right… What’s a cubit?
“How long can you tread water?”
Good pull. I’m in my early 30′s and have tried to tell people how funny that skit is, and they’re response is always, “???” Bill needs to do one more greatest hits standup for todays young adults.
Will never succeed without Charlton Heston (aka Moses, aka Judah Ben-Hur); no one alive can play the part of Noah, may as well cast Pee Wee Hurman.
Might I suggest two:
1) First, the obvious: Sean Connery (should have played Gandalf in LOTR!)
2) Just as good, not as obvious: Patrick Stewart (I can just imagine at the onset of the flood: “Number One – ENGAGE!”)
Crowe is the only actor who can!
Maximus ? Jack Aubrey ?
Minus all his troubles, I’m still not disagreeing with the comment earlier about Mel Gibson. Absent him, Russell Crowe is the only actor out there with the balls to pull it off.
I’m bored already
Can’t wait to see Aronofsky make his dream project come to life. If someone of Darren’s caliber is putting everything he has in to this film, it is sure to be epic. I feel the present day Ten Commandments in Noah!
hollywood ain’t exactly a place one would call tolerant towards Christians……in fact, hollywood doesn’t really like Christians all that much
there’s a sucker punch in this project somewhere
stay tuned
This is Old Testament, that’s why it’s getting made IN the Hollywood system (same goes for the Moses film). Gibson had to go OUTSIDE of Hollywood to get Passion made.
Hollywood likes Christians if they’re paid enough money to act like they do. And, it doesn’t HAVE to be an overtly religious film, it can be told instead with spirituality, akin to how The Fountain turned out.
Not sinse they realized recently that most of Hollywoods movies are terrible, and that Christian based films are bringing in more money then ever before.
Old Testament=before Christ=before Christianity
When will people stop equating everything in the Bible with Chrisitanity. This is a Jewish tale as is the Old Testament. But then again, Jesus himself was Jewish.
Because Russell was so great on a boat last time in Master & Commander. Guess CAA couldn’t force an actor to do it.
Crowe gave a fine performance in Master and Commander, but the film underperformed at the box office. I think you are confusing box office success with creative success.
I love and have read all the novels by P. O’Brian.
The movie Master and Commander was not even close to the novel. And I don’t mean just the events in the story. The main character (Aubrey) acts nothing like the one in the novel.
There are 20 novels in this very long story. I have read them all at least 15 times.
They are that good.
The New York Times called them the best historical novels ever written.
Do yourself a favor and actually read Master and Commander.
I absolutely agree w/ your statements re Patrick O’Brian! Im fact I’m thinking of reading through them again.
But also I think Crowe did a great job capturing Aubrey’s wit/grit/and spirit. I love that movie even if it mashes multiple novels together and turns the Americans into Frenchmen.
Great article
A great story in it’s own… can’t wait to see what Darren is going to do with it.
Sounds great to me. I like the idea of Aronofsky, who has such a history of making edgier films, tackling a project of this scope and scale. Crowe is a great actor and can command an audience with a film like this… it’s right up his alley. I believe this will be a winning combination.
The great flood is told in stories from many ancient cultures, among them, the Greeks. If the film is successful, it will at least share Western culture with the world. There’s a positive in that.
Greece is an eastern culture, as is Christianity, Islam, The Epic of Gilgamesh (the oldest writings known to man, which mention the flood), etc. The story of the flood is hardly Western Culture. Western Culture is an expansion/distortion of Eastern Culture.
Not only in Western mythology and holy books. I’m pretty sure that all cultures all over the world have a similar story to tell. My guess is that it goes back to the end of the ice age
Bored Already? Are you kidding me, Aronofsky is the most creative and edgy Director of our time. Give this guy 130 million and an epic story as Noah’s Ark, and watch the crowds Flood into the theaters!
I’m flabbergasted to see that there are so many naysayers out there. Filmmaking is storytelling and Aronofsky is a master of it. Budgets only allow the scale of a director’s visuals to increase. Give an amateur 200 million and you’ll get really pretty looking garbage. Give a true artist a budget he has actually earned and that is required in order to capture the scope of a story of this magnitude and strap yourself in. We finally get an epic that worth watching. It’s about time a studio grew a pair of balls and gave this guy a proper budget instead of pissing it away on all the big budget hacks that are out there creating the garbage that is the status quo of big budget fare! Open your eyes. Russell Crowe and Darren Aronofsky shouldn’t happen? You people are out of your minds. Go ahead and order Cowboy’s vs. Aliens on demand and when you’re finished ask yourself if you want to see “Noah” then.
This.
hear hear!
I agree with your comment 100%. Aronofsky is one of the best directors out there. I am always interested in his movies and I am already bouncing up and down for this one. He deserves the big budget and has earned it. For example Studios are giving big budgets to awful movies like THIS MEANS WAR, which was terrible. Russell’s movies have not under performed and audiences have NOT deserted him. I believe audiences have deserted Reese Witherspoon (no offense to anyone).
Russell Crowe is probably one of the VERY few that can pull this off. Gladiator, Master and Commander etc etc. I smell another oscar for him and the first for Aronofsky come 2014 oscars. Go Russell and Darren!!!!!!!!
So YOU’RE the one who saw that WAR movie!
I hope that the Cold Feet cast and the Madagascar one and of course Uggie the dog coul have a part too. I bet an oscar for him now.
This is a 200 million budget or more and why does it have to be “edgy” what does that mean? How is the Biblical story of Noah edgy? Because Aronofsky is directing it?
Bill Cosby did the best Noah ever back in the 60′s his comedy album was the funniest thing ever much funnier than Evan Almighty which was extremely expensive.