Freelance writer Dominic Patten is a Deadline contributor
UPDATE, 3:31 PM: ABC’s VP Litigation Jean Zoeller said on the stand today that she would “absolutely not” tell anyone to delete or erase any correspondence or documents related to Nicollette Sheridan being fired from Desperate Housewives. Zoeller’s testimony came in direct response to potential bombshell testimony earlier today by Michael Reinhart, the Housewives crew member who said he received an email telling him to “possibly” delete any correspondence and documents concerning Sheridan leaving the show. Reinhart said he deleted the email immediately and court officials are examining the hard drive.
Under questioning from defense attorney Adam Levin, Zoeller, who sat at the defense table every day of the two-week trial, told the jury she sent out four document preservation memos to make sure everything related to the matter was maintained. Those were sent out to ever expanding distribution lists on June 30, 2009, twice on April 6, 2010 — when Sheridan filed her lawsuit — and again on July 6, 2010. Those who received the emails were asked to “forward on to other people with knowledge of the matter.” Zoeller said that she sent the first of the memos because she “became aware of a claim Ms. Sheridan had against Mr. Cherry and Touchstone Television, also known as ABC Studios.”
Zoeller was followed on the stand by Alex Myers from Disney’s Electronic Discovery department. Myers detailed the extensive and pervasive efforts by the company to harness all correspondence and documents on the Sheridan matter on company computers and servers as well as personal accounts and computers of staff members and contract employees.
PREVIOUS, 10:41 AM: Longtime Desperate Housewives construction coordinator Michael Reinhart said today that he “was trying to get the truth out” when he took the stand in Nicollette Sheridan’s wrongful termination and battery trial. Reinhart was added as a last-minute witness after he left a voicemail for Sheridan’s lawyer Mark Baute over the weekend saying he was inadvertently copied on an email that indicated ABC planned to delete references to the killing off Sheridan’s Edie Britt character. He says that email came after Sheridan filed her initial lawsuit against against Housewives creator/executive producer Marc Cherry, ABC Studios and ABC.
In halting testimony, Reinhart — whose voicemail said there was “definitely a conspiracy to cover up correspondence” related to Sheridan’s firing — said that the only words he recalls now from the spring 2010 email are “Nicollette Sheridan,” “IT” and “delete”, though he did confirm the bulk of what he told Baute on Sunday. Judge Elizabeth Allen White ordered Reinhart’s computer to be brought in for forensic examination. He testified that he “received an email, possibly in error, regarding possible deletion of information on hard drives in relation to this trial.” Reinhart, who expressed in court and to Baute concerns about “retaliation” for bring this information to light, said he immediately deleted the email because “I felt it wasn’t intended for me, I didn’t feel it was my business and I didn’t want to make it my business.”
This last-minute testimony in a case expected to be wrapped up today could pose problems for all concerned. White has given the defense half a day to examine Reinhart’s computer. Depending on what they find, the case could extend further in the week, risking a possible mistrial.
Earlier in the morning in a hearing outside the presence of the jury, Reinhart said he contacted Baute on Sunday because the email had been “gnawing” at him for a year and a half. Visibly uncomfortable on the stand, Reinhart told the judge and jury that while he might have been confused about what the email was about, he felt it was important information to reveal to Sheridan’s team because he wanted “equal footing for both parties.”
Reinhart, who said he spent part of Sunday and Monday avoiding a subpoena and the media, told defense lawyer Adam Levin that he told his wife and Housewives production designer Erik Carlson as well as another crew member about the email. In court, it was also revealed that in trying to convince Reinhart to come forward, Sheridan’s lawyer offered to help him find work for himself and “my crew” if Reinhart was blacklisted by potential employers after Housewives ends for good in the next few weeks.
New ‘Man Of Steel’ Television Spot #6



Cannot wait to see the results from the analysis of Mr. Reinhart’s computer. Fascinating turn of events here.
AND a sincere round of applause for him having the courage to step up and speak out.
Same here. It would be fantastic if they could recover the email somehow.
Thing is, why didn’t he keep/copy the email? I’m pulling for her, buy even I think this looks suspicious.
Would you keep an email that is mistakenly sent to you for a couple of years on the off chance there is a trial about the contents of said e-mail?
But why would you then leave the VM and then duck service of process? To me it’s either come forward 100% or stand silent. And I know the “consequences” of coming forward.
Dude will be fine. No one will shun him. All good.
Something is just not right here. He doesn’t have the email, is not really sure what it said and waits until the end of the trial to magically appear. Obviously, he worked with Sheridan and is on her side. As much as I despise Cherry and ABC, I call bullcrap on this. If they can find the email on his computer, then that’s evidence. Otherwise it’s bullcrap.
Based on the amount of time that has passed they will find nothing on his computer. If it had only been deleted in the past few months there is a slight chance of retrieval of something related to the e-mail, but if it is over a year it is doubtful there is even a trace of evidence that any e-mail existed let alone what its contents were.
The lawyers would have kept printed copies of the e-mails in their files, if the messages were favorable to their case.
I have like 17 years worth of email.
Ha! Right back at ya!
This guy is screwed. He just risked everything. Wow.
This is utter bull. This guy just turns up out of nowhere, knowing full well about the lawsuit for the past two years like the rest of us have, and only now has he decided to speak. This whole thing is clearly an invention of Sheridan and her lawyer in an attempt to cast suspicion on the studio, or get a mistrial becuase they know they won’t win this. At least Cherry has been cleared of any wrongdoing as far as the claims of assault and battery went. Sheridan was pretty desperate to even try that one.
It’s so cliche’. Right before the verdict, the lowly construction coordinator steps forward, ending his career, to stand up for the wealthy actress. Can I get a tissue?
There’s a wood joke in here somewhere.
the only words he recalls now from the spring 2010 email are “Nicollette Sheridan,” “IT” and “delete”.
I bet they will find an old email sent to him from ABC Studios “IT” department requesting that recipients not “DELETE” any emails concerning “NICOLLETTE SHERIDAN” leaving the show.
This guy would actually be on the distribution list since he was the Construction Coordinator and would have been informed of production needs for the final episode.
There is NO “smoking gun” here. totally laughable.
That way, Sheridan’s lawyers got his testimony in and tried to cast doubt on the defenses case AND he hasn’t perjured himself because, from what’s reported, he really didn’t specifically nail anything down (pun intended!!).
Now this gets interesting and what they end up discovering on his hard drive is going to be key to this case…stay tuned.
They don’t have to find anything on his hard drive as long as the jury believes his testimony then Nicolette will win. He seems like a very honest conscience-stricken and extremely reluctant witness. Could he be a fabricated dramatic last minute surprise witness? Sure but something like that would only happen on TV in Desperate Housewives and this is real life.