UPDATE, 7:50 PM: Tribune confirms that its stations and WGN America will vanish from DirecTV at midnight in their local time zones. Tribune “simply cannot get fair compensation from DirecTV and we cannot allow DirecTV to continue taking advantage of us,” the company’s broadcasting president, Nils Larsen, says. Tribune adds that up to now DirecTV hasn’t paid a fee to carry the TV stations and says that it “is asking for an agreement that is similar to those that DirecTV already has in place with hundreds of other broadcasters and program providers.” Larsen notes that DirecTV subscribers can still watch the broadcast stations “for free in HD with a TV antenna or through an alternative pay-TV provider.” DirecTV says that having the stations go dark is ”the last thing we want to do but we have no choice.” It asked Tribune to allow the satellite company to “keep the channels up while we try and work this out, it’s the only right thing to do for the customers and we hope Tribune will give us the OK to do that.”
The announcements come as a surprise — particularly after DirecTV prematurely announced this morning that it had a deal with Tribune. Pay TV programmers and distributors frequently play a game of chicken with retransmission consent negotiations, but typically settle before things get out of hand. If the stalemate continues, then we can expect to see lawmakers and the FCC become involved. Regulators are already weighing proposals that might curtail blackouts when there’s a contract impasse. And there’s sure to be an outcry from baseball fans in several major cities as the season begins: Tribune stations broadcast the Chicago Cubs and White Sox, the Philiadelphia Phillies, the Washington Nationals, and the New York Mets.
PREVIOUS, 1:07 PM: Things seem to be spiraling out of control. Negotiations are continuing by phone and email, I’m told. But DirecTV and Tribune are digging in their heels, and engaging in a battle of dueling press releases in the hope that the other side will bend to public pressure. If there’s no agreement, then at midnight about 6M DirecTV customers could lose local programming from Tribune while 14M might lose pay TV service WGN. One great irony in all this is that Tribune’s CEO is Eddy Hartenstein, who founded DirecTV and ran it until 2004.
The satellite company says it’s “extremely perplexed.” It supposedly had “a handshake deal on Thursday with an agreed upon rate for (Tribune’s) channels.” It adds that Tribune’s ”actions are the true definition of ‘bad faith’ in every sense of the term.” But Tribune says “there has been no agreement of any kind, handshake or otherwise, on Thursday or any other day.” Tribune didn’t respond to DirecTV’s taunt that the broadcast and newspaper company’s “ability to negotiate a reasonable retransmission agreement” may be complicated by its bankruptcy process. ”Threatening station blackouts to extract an exorbitant fee for all of Tribune’s content may provide an improved return for certain banks and hedge funds, but is not in the interest of its viewers and is not a cure for bankruptcy,” DirecTV says. Tribune says that if its stations go dark then “it will be because DirecTV is unwilling to reach a fair agreement.”
PREVIOUS, 11:47 AM: Did DirecTV speak too soon? Tribune says so. “Tribune Broadcasting has not reached an agreement or come to terms with DirecTV on any aspect of its contract, which expires at midnight tonight,” the company says. ”Any statement by DirecTV to the contrary is inaccurate and misleading.” Stay tuned.
PREVIOUS, 9:37 AM: You didn’t really think DirecTV would lose its Tribune stations at midnight tonight, did you? Tribune warned this week that there was a “strong likelihood” that its 23 stations in 16 markets — including lots of Fox and CW affiliates — would go dark on DirecTV when the current contract expires. But, like most retransmission consent renewal disputes, the companies reached an agreement at nearly the 11th hour: DirecTV says today that it accepted financial terms Tribune offered in a phone conversation on Thursday afternoon. The companies didn’t announce the terms. “While we have been negotiating in good faith for two months, we believe Tribune’s viewers and our customers are best served by making sure the local stations remain on our service without disruption first and will then negotiate a separate agreement for WGN America,” DirecTV SVP of Programming Dan Hartman says. Tribune’s importance goes beyond the network shows it carries. Its stations also provide local broadcasts for the New York Mets, the Chicago Cubs and White Sox, and the Philadelphia Phillies.

I’ve seen local and cable channels pulled from cable and satellite providers with no deal reached before. I’ve seen the blackouts last anywhere from 21 hours to an entire month.
It’s only KTLA in Los Angeles market – so no Friends or Family Guy reruns? Tribune will hurt themselves way more than DirecTV.
This also affect the CW in New York
In case you haven’t noticed KTLA is the CW affiliate in Los Angeles, in the Seattle area the Tribune outlet is the FOX affiliate, most of the Tribune stations are either The CW or FOX affiliates with the exception of New Orleans which is an ABC affiliate, so this DOES affect many viewers in many cities.
A few years ago Dish Network had a problem with Fisher Broadcasting in Seattle that lasted 8 months, so no ABC for 8 months.
These stations are more than just old reruns of Friends.
Plenty of FAMILY GUY reruns on Cartoon Network’s Adult Swim.
#@&% Tribune/KTLA for trying to raise my satellite bill.
And KTLA Morning News Sucks.
i think both sides are in the wrong.. i also believe that an agreement will made very soon
I lose my local cw which is just above the home shopping channels in terms of caring and wgn which is one of eight places I record family guy reruns. Play hardball directv.
It would be nice to see Tribune do something. It goes both ways and it seems like Tribune is being greedy. We will miss watching KTLA but I’m not blaming Directv for this one.
The only thing I watch on KTLA is the morning news, Monday-Friday. I might find that another station has a morning show I enjoy more than KTLA’s, and never go back even if DirecTV reaches an agreement with Tribune. I agree that this will hurt Tribune more than DirecTV.
I don’t think any pay tv service should have to pay for rebroadcast rights of any free over the air station unless it’s to customers outside of the channel’s region.
The FCC needs to do this for the the actual customers. Why should I have to pay DTV or Comcast to get free channels and yes we do pay because those fees are passed on to us.
Pay channels is another ball game
Wrong…I live in the Eastern Time Zone and have DirecTV. It is currently 12:27am, and I still have my Tribune owned local channel and WGN America still on the air. Both of them haven’t been removed/turned off.
If DirecTV is smart, they let Tribune pull their channels as Tribune, led by Field Marshall Zell and his henchmen, have failed to negotiate in good faith with them. Just another situation by which a desperate company such as Tribune, still mired in bankruptcy protection fo several years now, is trying to rake in every extra dollar they can for their programming, such as Cubs games and such. That bankruptcy thing can’t end quick enough and they oust Sam Zell and his minions right out the door.
Actually, Tribune is only asking for the exact same things that all the other networks already get. I don’t think they should have to let themselves be taken advantage of just because people are not informed. I will cancel directtv tomorrow if the won’t agree. I can watch all my shows online anyway.
So what division of Tribune do you work for?
The Abject Panic Department.
My mom still has DirecTV at her house, and this isn’t the first time a station has battled them, nor will it be the last. However, it sucks when viewers are caught in the crossfire of what basically boils down to money. We don’t have Tribune stations in my area, but we do have an independent station that was removed three years ago, due to contract issues (the station’s fault, not DTV’s). Three years later, still no resolution. As much as I enjoyed that station, that one bummed me…
Buy a pair of rabbit ears. Problem solved.
Actually, not. Since the switch to digital it takes more than just a a pair of rabbit ears. And when you consider satellite providers overwhelming provide service to rural areas where digital signals won’t reach (such as where I live) it’s either satellite or nothing (and no we also don’t have high-speed Internet).
If you have an hdtv already it does just take a pair of rabbit ears.
And if you have an old TV you just need a digital box, when the switch happened they were even giving out $20 coupons to subsidize them, I got two of those boxes for about $25 each. So no, it doesn’t take much for most people.
Well, goodbye DirecTV service!
Going dark at Midnight. Will anyone notice? Tribune is a disaster in so many ways. And Diret TV is on the verge of becoming non relevant. Has anyone really looked at the programing that is being foisted upon the customers. Every month, less and less real content, more and more re-runs and another twelve shop at home/religious networks added. I’ve already cut back and am seriously thinking of dumping Direct completely. And no I am not going to Dish, or Cable. They are just as bad, or worse. Once it made economic and entertainment sense. No more.
You’re right, Ish – I failed to notice. As did everyone else.
Broadcast stations should not be able to charge retransmission fees for their signals, which they use PUBLIC AIRWAVES to distribute. If they want retransmission fees, then they should become CABLE stations. But for them to charge fees for signals that they use PUBLIC AIRWAVES to distribute is absolutely asinine.
AS A FORMER EMPLOYEE FOR KTLA IN LOS ANGLES I DO KNOW THAT BOTH MR.ZELL AND TRIBUNE CARE NOTHING ABOUT PEOPLE AND QUALITY OF PROGRAMING. THERE ONLY CONCERN IS PAYING AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE AND CHARGING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
.
But why is the rum gone…