
EXCLUSIVE: Just about every studio in town waged a concerted courtship for the movie rights to the E.L. James salty romance novel Fifty Shades Of Grey, and all but one today is feeling the sting of being jilted after the author and agent Valerie Hoskins went to the altar with Universal Pictures and Focus Features. Rumors raced all weekend that with 10 studios bidding, numbers passed $5 million upfront against a back end 5% or higher. Neither Universal nor Hoskins would divulge how much Universal co-chairman Donna Langley paid — when I broke the story this morning, I’d heard that it was a bit higher than the $3 million against 3.5% Sony paid for The Da Vinci Code, but many suitors figure it had to be around $4 million against as much as 5% of gross. If the picture sparks a trilogy, that is life-changing money for the former TV executive-turned-author. Since this was the wildest book auction in years and so many heavy hitters spent the weekend obsessing over it, I wanted to get the play-by-play from Hoskins, the British agent who, it turns out, is a real spitfire. I caught her just before she boarded a plane back across the pond with James, who left with a seven-figure publishing deal in one pocket, and a seven-figure movie rights deal in the other.
DEADLINE: Hollywood hasn’t seen a book rights auction like this since…
HOSKINS: It was not an auction.
DEADLINE: Generally, when a property is placed on the block for bids and sells, it’s considered an auction, no?
HOSKINS: My understanding of an auction is something that goes to the highest bidder. I can’t think of a better word for our process but it was not an auction.
DEADLINE: Does that mean you left bigger offers on the table?
HOSKINS: No comment.
DEADLINE: During this auction, the book was characterized in a number of ways that included ‘Mommy Porn.’ What would you call it?
HOSKINS: It’s a love story. People fall in love and they rabidly have sex, because that’s what you do when you fall in love. You do, you do! It’s a love story, a romantic one. I don’t really like the phrase ‘Mommy Porn.’ I guess I don’t mind it that much, but I don’t like it.
DEADLINE: I’d never heard the phrase before this.
HOSKINS: It has been created for these books, I think.
DEADLINE: The book was under the radar until The New York Times wrote an article and then every studio had to have it. Did you feel the palpable wave building?
HOSKINS: It escalates things, doesn’t it? I suspect the article, which appeared on March 10, was pretty significant, but even by then there were already a lot of people on it, producers and studios and the book scouts had done their jobs, those wonderful people in New York. Basically, I was getting lots of expressions of film interest and told everybody the same thing. We would sign the book deal first, that we didn’t want any preemptive offers. Erika’s primary career is as a writer and a film might happen and it might not. I’d previously said to Erika that I thought the best way we could make a decision, because of the level of involvement she wanted to have, was that she come out here, see the whites of their eyes and then make a decision based on the people as much as the offers.
Related: 9 Suitors Trying To Get In Bed With ’50 Shades Of Grey’
DEADLINE: Is that the reason you flew here rather than make the deal by long distance phone call?
HOSKINS: When we saw most of the studios, it was on the lot, because I wanted E.L. to have that unique experience of seeing things that happen on the lot in a professional capacity, which was fun.
DEADLINE: She was a TV exec, so she certainly has some knowledge of the way things work and wasn’t a complete outsider like J.K. Rowling…
HOSKINS: She was a head of production, so she tends to be very good with a budget, I think.
DEADLINE: If not the highest offer, what was your client’s priority?
HOSKINS: The priority was collaborative spirit. I sent out a term sheet of what we wanted, and the priority was that somebody came back with something that was truly collaborative, rather than, we are going to buy your book and take it away from you. All of the offers fulfilled that to a degree, but the Universal offer fulfilled it 100%, and it was done with a sense of quiet confidence. We felt very safe, that what we were being offered would be backed up by the fine print. The goal was to protect the material and its manifestations into movies. To make sure that, as E.L. said, she would be all over it like a rash. It is very sensitive material. It could become sleazy, it could become cheesy, it could end up looking like porn. It needs to be classy, sexy rather than full of sex.
DEADLINE: Studios largely have gotten out of the prestige film game, but Universal has Focus Features. How important was that?
HOSKINS: We didn’t set out with that intention, but that’s what we arrived at in what was an organic process. There used to be Paramount Vantage, Warner Independent, but I think the Universal Focus relationship is quite unique at the moment. In choosing Universal and Focus, we worked out what we wanted for the movie and that was the same corporate structure and arrangement that we have with our wonderful publishers at Random House and vintage. Random House is all there with the money, the distribution, and we’ve got the same with Universal. Then Vintage and Focus Features have a certain imprimatur to them. It all seemed to be a very good marriage.
DEADLINE: You clearly aren’t going to tell me how much was paid. Was this a deal that guarantees three movies?
HOSKINS: I am not going to comment on that, but this is a collaborative venture. They wouldn’t have made the offer they made if they didn’t intend to make this, but nobody can guarantee making three movies and I wouldn’t expect them to. What happens if they make the first one and it is crap? That won’t be the case, but…
DEADLINE: You met a bunch of producers along with studios. Brian Grazer did Da Vinci Code and has the Universal relationship. Have you figured out who that will be?
HOSKINS: No, we haven’t. What we will do is sit down with the folks at Universal and say, these are some people that we liked and they’ll have some they like. It’ll have to be within reason, because based on the proposed budget of the film, this is not going to have a Harry Potter budget.
DEADLINE: I’d heard from several suitors that the ability to make the movie for around $30 million was a big draw. Is that in the ballpark?
HOSKINS: I don’t know really, we haven’t really talked budget. I think it does need to be done for a price.
DEADLINE: You asked for approvals on things like director, script, lead actors. But I understand you didn’t make a deal like many do, guaranteeing you will be in production in a short amount of time. Didn’t you want that?
HOSKINS: Nope. We made clear to everybody, if we didn’t get something that we were 100% happy with, we were quite happy to go home without the movie deal. That would have been fine. We got a great publishing deal and there was no pressure on us. We did this deal because we wanted to. We did have people saying, we will green light this in 12 months. Well, that’s really not interesting, because you could be green lighting a shit movie. From our point of view, what was important was getting everything right, having all the right components and particularly the right script, the right director and cast. If you have to wait for any of those elements, then it’s not helpful if you’re putting time pressure on it.
Related: Will Steamy Novel ’50 Shades Of Grey’ Climax In 7-Figure Movie Deal?
DEADLINE: How would you describe what going through the last week was like for you and your client?
HOSKINS: Hysterical. In retrospect, it was huge fun. We weren’t nervous about it at all. Until Wednesday or Thursday, Erika was still doing copy edits on the final book. She was under a lot of pressure and very tired. The people we met with were just fantastic. It’s a privilege to sit down with someone like Brian Grazer, one doesn’t often get that opportunity. The movie-making people were really great. It was also a privilege to see how both men and women had been touched by what is in the books. And it was a privilege to go through the process we went through this weekend.
DEADLINE: Did Donna Langley have any advantage, three English ladies sit down to tea and discussing the home country and all that?
HOSKINS: No, we didn’t choose her because she was a Brit, not at all.
DEADLINE: After Deadline broke the news, other buyers initially groused about having been beaten out and they said it must have been because Langley made the biggest bid. A little later, they came around and said, Donna won this, good on her. Why did you choose her?
HOSKINS: For me, she has a quiet…there’s a confidence in her when she says, we can deliver on this kind of material and we have in the past. They have amazing distribution worldwide, just fantastic. We’ve seen particularly with Working Title, and the way they market and distribute that romantic material, they do it well. And this is a big romantic love story.
DEADLINE: Every time I write one of these stories, our commenters keep referring to Twilight fan fiction. Did this start as something like that and evolve into something else?
HOSKINS: Yeah, it did. I hadn’t heard about fan fiction until earlier this year but if you look it up, and go to a particular website, people post their own fiction online. Harry Potter has the biggest, where people write their own stories with the same characters and locations. This did start as Twilight fan fiction, inspired by Stephenie Meyer’s wonderful series of books. Originally it was written as fan fiction, then Erika decided to take it down after there were some comments about the racy nature of the material. She took it down and thought, I’d always wanted to write. I’ve got a couple unpublished novels here. I will rewrite this thing, and create these iconic characters, Christian and Anna. If you read the books, they are nothing like Twilight now. It’s very 21st Century, don’t you think?
DEADLINE: What did you do to celebrate last night?
HOSKINS: Koi for some sushi, and my second martini of the week, and then we went to the Bar Marmont for a bit of wine. The community here, the people were really great, and any of those studios could have delivered, they are all fantastically good at what they do.


Rewritten? Nothing like Twilight?
Taken from: http://jamigold.com/2012/03/when-does-fan-fiction-cross-an-ethical-line/
- both Edward and Christian were adopted.
- both Edward and Christian have a deep, dark, dangerous secret that no one is privy to, except for the heroine and by extension us
- both Edward and Christian are rich and more sophisticated than the heroine
- both Christian and Edward have stalker tendencies and are domineering
- Both Edward and Christian have reddish/bronze tinted hair
- Both Edward and Christian give the heroine a car
- Both Edward and Christian are piano-players
- Both Edward and Christian have a loving supportive adoptive family comprised of Carrick/Carlisle (the father), Grace/Esme (the mother), Elliot/Emmet (the brother), Mia/Alice (the sister). The remaining two members of the ensemble, Jasper and Rosalie discussed below.
-Jasper and Rosalie/ Ethan and Kate in FSoG. Rosalie and Kate are both blonde, beautiful and a high contrast to Bella. Kate and Elliot end up together as a couple which is reminiscent of them also being a couple in Twilight (Rose and Emmet).
- Jasper and Alice are a couple in Twilight, Ethan from FSoG ends up setting his sights on the proto-Alice character in FSoG, Mia. BOOM! there you go, your whole Twilight Cullen cast/ensemble, reloaded.
- Both Twilight and FSoG have the couple following the arc of initial attraction, hero attempting to separate himself from heroine by stating he’s not right for her, heroine pursuing relationship, heroine finding out dark secret, heroine still pursuing relationship, couple briefly parts/breaks up and then reunites, couple marries, goes off to exotic/romantic honeymoon, heroine gets preggers prematurely, hero reacts extremely negatively, heroine still has kid. Hero eventually comes around about kid.
- Both stories are set in Washington state.
- Jacob/José (Twilight/FSoG) both dislike the hero because they want to be with the heroine. The heroine is not interested in Jacob/José but Jacob/José continues to pursue her until he gives up and realizes that the heroine chose the “bad guy” over them.
- Anastasia is essentially, Bella (more so than Christian being Edward, where there are more differences). She has pretty much all of Bella’s mannerisms. She talks like Bella, she acts like Bella, she says the same things Bella would. She is highly clumsy and uncoordinated, she is quiet, reserved, not popular, odd one out, like Bella. She bites her bottom lip like Bella. She feels a bit like a fish out of water in the presence of the Greys just like Bella feels in the presence of the Cullens. At most she is a proto-Bella but essentially the same character at the core.
- Both Bella and Ana have a bit of an excentric mother that lives somewhere else and has remarried several times (at least twice from what I remember).
- Both Bella and Ana have a father that they love, that lives by himself (is a bit of a loner), that has a great relationship with them, even if slightly distanced. The main difference is that Ray (FSoG) is a stepfather to Ana, while Charlie (Twilight) is blood father to Bella.
- Both Charlie and Ray have a love of fishing.
- Both stories feature a stalker (Lauren/Leila) who stalks Bella/Ana and wants to hurt/kill her.
- Jasper and Rose pretend to be twins in Twilight. Ethan and Kate (their parallels) are twins in FSoG.
You have to add:
Mothers in Twilight and FSoG are described as “harebrained”. (This is rather interesting because I don’t see the word ‘harebrained’ used very often.)
Christian saves Ana from getting hit by a cyclist in similar manner that Edward saves Bella from getting hit by a van.
Christian inquires about Ana’s family structure in a very similar manner as Edward asks Bella about hers.
Description of how they touch being electric is almost exactly the same.
Then there is the way that Ana goes on ad nauseum about how lovely, beautiful, handsome Christian is that is not so different of how Bella does same with Edward. (This is hallmark complaint against Twilight so I consider this pretty unique to Twilight.)
The similarities really are threaded through the story. She took from the book, film, and fan myths. Apparently this is all legal because one cannot copyright archetypes or situations but still, there is something that doesn’t smell right in what she’s done.
One more thing:
Most Edwards in Twilight fanfiction world are more Robwards than Edwards. So when they find an actor “with long fingers” for this,paint his hair red and put him behind a piano who is he going to resemble?
I wonder how they plan to not make this cheesy, because this works only if it’s cheesy. This can not be a serious story. People are reading it because it’s cheesy story.
Thank you! I can’t decide if people are just being deliberately obtuse or if they really lack basic textual analysis and comparison skills. There’s a difference between follow a standard plot structure (e.g. “the hero’s journey” or “boy meets girl”) and using familiar archetypes. But that’s not even remotely what James has done with this story. Her story compares to Twilight in the details.
I knew it! They picked Universal because of Richard Curtis and Working Title.
I’m struggling to see where the theatrical audience for this nonsense will come from. This stuff makes Tweo Moon Junction look like The King’s Speech. Maybe they’ll do a “Showgirls” and turn it into a camp classic. Or better yet, sell it to Skinemax and be done with it. You’re grandma may read this stuff, but she’s not going to go to the multiplex to watch it.
That’s my thinking too — how will they retain the story without becoming another Shame or 9 1/2 weeks? And if that’s the intent, it’s a little discomforting that Hollywood is pursuing it so badly instead of focusing on more meaningful scripts/movies. But I know it’s about making loads of $ at the end of the day.
I have to say though that reading BDSM etc. in the privacy of your home, is vastly different from going to a theatre to watch it.
Closer took home a nice paycheck with racy material and a fraction of the buzz. Twihards will purchase anything that has the slightest whiff of Twi in it; look at what they did for Hunger Games. Ain’t sayin’ it’s right, but we live in a mad world where fanfiction sells for millions.
She took it down and rewrote it? She had the fanfiction posted on her own site after ‘taking it down’ and was pimping it to studios publicly while still posting it as MOTU with Edward and Bella. The ‘rewrite’ consisted of changing characters names. It’s disgusting.
Someone did a software comparison of the “original” fanfic and the rewrite and came up with a figure of 89% similar.
So basically, she changed the names, eye color, what car Bella drives and that’s pretty much it.
The utter fantasy that this book was significantly rewritten for publication is utter BS. I sure hope her agent is just blowing PR smoke and not that she really believes this.
I love how she’s trying to distance herself away from Twilight. The Twilight fans are the reason this book even got published in the first place. All of the supportive and amazing feedback James (Icy) received from the fandom is just going to be forgotten and ignored now that she’s got her multi-million dollar book and movie deals. It’s sad that someone could do something like this.
Seriously – what is wrong with James becoming successful off of something she did creatively. Other than having character names as MoTU, this was never a Twilight retell so stop being so envious of someone else’s success. Support and feedback are fabulous things many authors get from people around them. Don’t be bitter because you were one of her fans that provided suggestions and don’t pretend that if you wrote it and it went viral – you wouldn’t jump on that boat… we don’t believe you.
Stop. She owes this book’s success to Twilight. It wouldn’t exist without the pre-existing fanbase who embraced it only because it featured characters they already knew and loved. The characters, relationships, pre-existing fanbase, were all Stephenie Meyer’s. Without her, this book would never have been written and it certainly wouldn’t have landed a real publisher.
so she jumped off of Twilight? Big Damn Deal… There are thousands of same old same old stories out there but this one was different – other than naming the characters Bella and Edward – the story was her own… get over the jealousy.
If you want to say that Twilight is the same-old-same-old, then what does that make Fifty Shades? Original? Please. You need to get over your stanning.
It is a fanfiction of a story that by your own words call the same-old-same-old. And it isn’t even original in being a BDSM romance novel either. There are better written BDSM novels out there.
This is a sales job. A good sales job but a sales job nonetheless.
What is seriously wrong is that whatever isn’t Twilight in this story is fanon aka the stereotypes found in other Twilight fanfiction. She took all her “creativity” from the fandom. That’s not genius. It’s just clever stealing.
You having a one on one interview with the author’s agent isn’t helping me to stop thinking that they’ve taken you for a ride.
This movie is never getting out of development.
“If you read the books, they are nothing like Twilight now. It’s very 21st Century, don’t you think?”
That’s a joke, right? Firstly, Twilight was published in 2005 so that makes it, technically, 21st century.
And secondly, no, Fifty Shades is not 21st century. It isn’t even 1980s Harlequin Presents. It is “A Pirate’s Love” circa 1978 when the hero “rapes” the heroine and says she brought it on herself.
This is a story of contract abuse by a ‘damaged’ guy on an unsuspecting young woman. It isn’t just a badly written book; it is a badly written regressive book.
Maybe it wouldn’t bother me so much if I didn’t know that Universal killed some good projects. But since I do know that, for them to then pick this ethically questionable (in its origin and weak content) property just boggles the mind.
Could not have said it better myself. Thank you Elizabeth. It’s depressing that dreadful crap like this sees the light of day and worse is so “popular”. Look at the audience though… It’s 21st century alright– 21st century Harlequin romance dreck with kinky sex to amp it up and make it “21st century”.
thank you for calling a spade a spade. This is straight up YA-reading level, cheesy, gender-stereotype-based, Harlequin romance with a sprinkle of *light* BDSM to entice those who have never ventured outside of the missionary position. It makes BDSM seem like a psychological disease which needs to be cured with the vanilla love of the heternormative heroine, while at the same time positioning the heroine’s inferiority in terms of wealth, sexual experience, power and age as sexy in and of itself. I mean a 21-y-o VIRGIN? REALLY?!?!
My prediction is the film will bomb anyway because *most* of the women who are reading this re-heated Harlequin Presents romance and are enticed by it as something *new* and *different* are probably the kind of suppressed people who will not show up in the theatres to proclaim their love of BDSM.
And more than anything, let’s be honest – the studios don’t love it because it’s a masterpiece or a breakthrough in modern romance or a transgressive exploration of female sexuality – they love it bc of the ebook sales numbers and the Twilight fan-base and the subsequent buzz by popular publications like the NYT.
Let’s not start talking about how one character inspires other because I have seen Twilight characters descriptions in novels that were published way before Twilight (back in 2001 to be more specific)… I could write a list just like the one above. In fact I have done it… too bad no one noticed it before.
James has made it a lot more interesting than Twilight childish stories actually are.
Are you dense? Of course there are coincidences and inspired-by characters, but when you publish something AS TWILIGHT FANFICTION, it’s hard to argue coincidence or inspired-by influence only. Nice try, James minion.
If you want to read the original stories–Master of the Universe Parts 1 & 2, google search– MOTU, pdf, fanfiction and links will pop up.
Although everyone points out the similarities of this book to twilight..no one mentions how fsog gives every woman what they want…a lovestory with great sex. I love the characters. By far this trilogy is the best I have read. I am beyond excited a out the movie..
No one has mentioned it because the books are mediocre at all levels except perhaps hype.
If you want a love story with great sex, then go pick up any Stephanie Laurens historical. Interesting love stories with great dialogue and searingly sexy love scenes. Or maybe Lora Leigh’s Elite Ops series. The premise is often ludicrous and editing is as shoddy at times as James’s but her males are alpha, her heroines are feisty, the sex scenes go on forever and she didn’t start out in fanfiction.
Yeah it’s a love story and the sex is so graphic (loved reading it) but its unreal??? Some of the positions(?) I’m thinking, no way that would hurt(What Edward wants) and it’s uncomfortable.
I don´t see why an author can´t turn his fic into a book… so why the comment about the similarities…
this is a good writer and I´m happy for her…
The writer and agent have maintained that James’s story is wholly original. The catalog of similarities indicates otherwise. The fanfic version is almost 90% similar to what was finally published. That indicates that not much beyond name changes. That indicates that the published story still maintains a lot of Twilight traits.
Perhaps it is legal (or Meyer just doesn’t want to challenge it), but it is disingenuous of her and her agent to act like it is completely original because it isn’t.
Robert Pattinson and Jennifer Lawrence. I hope the author looks into that casting.
I’m hoping Myers has been waiting patiently for James to get paid and will then sic the lawyers on her. Surely there are some intellectual property rights being violated? If there is money to had I am sure the lawyers will figure out how to get it.
It will be interesting to see if Stephenie Meyer and Little, Brown sue.
Who’s going to watch this filth? Seriously, what’s the demo for this?
the demo is sexually-repressed housewives who have never read erotica or watched porn – in other words a bunch of people who will never show up to watch a feature, soft-core porno in a multiplex due to the same stigma.
The problem is that everyone when they write fanfiction adds in a little disclaimer right at the start stating that it isn’t their characters and they don’t intend to make any money off it. Anyone can piggyback off another authors work, build up a fanbase on a story inspired by them, then, once people are hooked, act oh so humble by pulling the story (and whoring it around to the highest bidder even though they weren’t supposed to be interested in making money off it in the first place) and changing the names. It’s unethical and against the spirit of the whole fanfic idea. If she is so talented and original, she could have pulled her story and then went and written an entirely different story – one that incorporated the lessons she’d learned. She didn’t do that though , exploited Meyer and Meyer’s fanbase and now pretends its completely different when all evidence refutes that. It’s embarrassing that some of her little zealots won’t acknowledge that there is a serious problem with that approach.
“The problem is that everyone when they write fanfiction adds in a little disclaimer right at the start stating that it isn’t their characters and they don’t intend to make any money off it.”
Exactly correct. Every fanfic author does this, acknowledging that the characters within the fanfic are taken from the author’s original works. They do so to indicate that it is derivative and as such, frankly, they shouldn’t be making money off of it.
I don’t understand… how much are they thinking this R movie will make to justify the price of the script?
Since when people go in droves to see an R rated sexy drama?
Does someone has any track record? Seriously, just curious.
The last R rated sexy movie I remember, and this dates me, Basic Instinct.
Is that Term Sheet up anywhere? Would love to see it.
The Plot: Ignorant young woman with virginity still intact and a case of low self-esteem meets a controlling, manipulative, hot, young billionaire who identifies as a dominant in order to justify the fact that he’s a paternalistic control freak.
Yay! Oh, yay! It’s just such an original and imaginative take on heterosexual relationships, don’t you think? It really offers some new insight into sexuality and power.
NOT.
So true! And yet, there’s a certain master-slave component to the relationship that could be exploited in a complex way if they allowed the material to really explore the feminine psyche — the power of the anima.
On the other hand, what are the chances that this book, written by a woman, for a female audience, is going to be adapted or directed by a woman?
Nil.
Rumor has it that James Schamus will adapt and Ang Lee will direct. So now we will have a male fantasy of a female fantasy, written and presented by men for women…
Sounds uncomfortably like the Congressional Hearings on Contraception a few weeks ago: an all male panel discussing an entirely feminine issue…
Plain and simple, they’re hoping this has a “Basic Instinct” type draw.
It won’t!
A literary agent that hasn’t heard of fanfiction?
I think it is really sad that people feel it necessary to tear down another person’s success. These books were an amazingly fun read and help people to connect with a part of themselve that I don’t most even know existed. I also rwad and enjoyed the Twilight series, but fell in love with this story and Christian and Ana for very different reasons! Things can start out as one thing and become something completely different. I think people need to get over the comparison and move on! To each his own…if you love the series..great. If you don’t…get over it and move on! Stop raining on the rest of our parades!
I just want to know how I can be an extra or be in a scene in this movie.