

EXCLUSIVE: Nickelodeon has promoted veterans Jenna Boyd to SVP Animation Development and Brian Wright to SVP Live Action Development. In his new role, Wright will oversee all live-action development and pilot production for Nickelodeon, Nick at Nite, TeenNick and international co-productions, reporting to Nickelodeon Group president of original programming Marjorie Cohn. Boyd will oversee the development of all new animated series and the recently announced comedy shorts program, reporting to Nickelodeon president of animation Brown Johnson.
Related: Nick At Nite Picks Up Scott Baio Family Comedy To Series
On the live-action side, Wright and Nick’s VP Original Programming Margy Yuspa will split the duties held by SVP Tracy Katsky, who left the network in November, with Wright overseeing development and Yuspa focusing on current series. Similarly, Boyd will work closely with Rich Magallanes, upped in January to SVP Animation, Current Series. For the past two months, Magallanes had been sharing top animated current series duties with fellow SVP Roland Poindexter, who is now leaving the network. Boyd fills a void left by the December departure of Birkner Rawlings, who served as VP Animation Development. Boyd, who started at Nickelodeon as an intern more than 15 years ago, most recently was VP Live Action Development, where she oversaw a slate of scripted and unscripted programming, including the recently greenlighted Wendell & Vinnie Nick At Nite pilot starring Jerry Trainor. Wright, who started his TV career as a crew member of the NBC comedy Scrubs, joined Nickelodeon in 2007. In his previous position as VP Live Action Development, he shepherded a number of projects that have gone to series, including Big Time Rush, Victorious, Supah Ninjas, How To Rock and, most recently Nick’s Marvin Marvin and Nick At Nite’s first original scripted series, comedy Daddy’s Home starring Scott Baio.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


I don’t get it. How is this move supposed to fix the ratings woes at the network? It’s all the same people.
You’d think with the ratings crisis at Nick that they would’ve hired from outside the company to improve their offerings. Aren’t there execs at Disney Channel who would’ve taken this job?
The entire Disney team except for Gary Marsh pretty much all came from Nick. The kids world moves in 7-10 year cycles. Nick was on top for 20 years. The new Disney team’s development started hitting the air in 1999 and it took just over 10 years to build the brand to a legit #1 contender.
Nick’s issues are based on laziness more than anything else. In time, the cycles will swing in the other direction again.
SB
I’ve developed at Nick, Disney, and staffed on numerous shows. I have to say that my best experience was at Disney, where the executives actually know their brand and direct you toward the promise land. The Nick execs are nice people, but there notes felt discombobulated, and nearly impossible to address. I’m surprised that Nick decided to promote these execs, but maybe they’ve improved their skills?
Not likely — I had a miserable experience with Nick. But Phil and Nikki over at Disney Channel were really easy to pitch to and seem to want to make the best SHOW possible, rather than just kiddie TV or Dan Schneider rehashes. Their notes were much more thought out than those I got from Nick.
I am sure they did go after other executives for this job, including Disney people. But did you ever think that those execs didn’t want to walk into a minefield? Kids’ TV is extremely niche, and if you’re at Disney, the one kids’ network that is having success, why would you leave unless Nick offered up a fat multi-year contract? Sumner Redstone isn’t going to coughing up the dough to buy out the competitor’s personnel. Give it a year or two, and if these executives fail, I’m sure you’ll be seeing a sea change.
There are several reasons why a Disney exec would want to work at Nick. You wouldn’t be forced to micro-manage your shows and drive your showrunners crazy with incessant, job-justifying notes. You’d be free to offer your own opinion rather than parroting your paranoid boss. And you’d get to work on shows that aren’t ridiculously broad, unbearably bright, sweeter than saccharine and largely awful. (Other than Good Luck Charlie).
Nick hasn’t developed as many shows as Disney and Disney’s marketing machine is the gold standard. But I like seeing Nick showing faith in their people and hiring from within.
Other reasons a Disney exec would want to work at Nick:
- Opportunity to get promoted
- Much bigger paychecks
- Being able to develop a show and not be solely focused on making it a franchise
- not having sexual orientation play such an important part of your career
- Opportunity to get promoted
I was unaware that they had a development team, except the armored truck drivers who drop off the loads of cash off at Dan Schneider’s doorstep. Which baffles me because Victorious sucks. Drake & Josh was fun though.
Rich Magallanes is a great guy!
What happened to Roland Poindexter? Was he forced out??
Kids TV animation development is a small world. Today’s Disney exec, is yesterday’s Nick exec, is tomorrow’s Disney Jr. Exec. It’s also cyclical if you haven’t noticed. Today’s ratings champ, not so much in 18 months.
I just pitched a show to them that they passed on. When I told my 6 year old son and 9 year old daughter they passed my kids said “It’s better and funnier that all of the bad stuff they have on their network.” I think that says it all – to program to kids you must KNOW kids. Disney has it right with their prank shows… need to program to the physical comedy and both male and female audiences, not just female. Best of luck.
Not to rain on your parade, but if every studio picked up what a writer’s children thought was best…you see the issue. Good luck. You have 3 more places to pitch it. Then you can make it and put it on Youtube and prove how good it is.
Late to this parade, but what are the three other places? Nickelodeon, and… ?
I hear ya. I pitched them a show to them and got laughed out of the room. I couldn’t understand it, my mom thought it was the best show she’d ever heard about.
no, the prank shows are the worst part of disney. that’s the last thing they need. they’re doing good with their other comedies.