Feds Probing SAG P&H Embezzlements/Cover-Ups Allegations
BREAKING 7:30 PM… EXCLUSIVE… MORE DETAILS… Whistleblower Craig E Simmons today filed a wrongful termination lawsuit
against his former employer, the Screen Actors Guild Pension & Health Plan. And the fired high-ranking executive makes explosive allegations against CEO Bruce Dow who is still apparently employed there. These accusations have been informally leveled against Dow and the SAG P&HP for months now, but for the first time Simmons puts them into the record via his legal complaint. (Read the 19-page lawsuit here.) If true, they beg for a complete and independent investigation as well as housecleaning at SAG P&HP which governs more than $2 billion in assets on behalf of SAG members.
Simmons was executive director of SAGP&HP human resources and held other top titles, and is a lawyer. One of his attorneys on this lawsuit is the well-known Greg Smith, who is currently running for LA City Attorney. The complaint alleges that Simmons was wrongfully terminated after reporting illegal conduct by CEO Dow. Simmons repeatedly talked and wrote to SAG P&HP trustees and execs and claimed Dow was swindling the organization out of multi-millions. The lawsuit filed in LA Superior Court today alleges that:
– Dow underreported the amount of money embezzled by a former employee,
– Dow was sending insurance business to his wife and pocketing part of the premiums,
– Dow was paying his brother-in-law for doing no work
– Dow was using insider investment information to benefit the International Church Of The Foursquare Gospel where he was a practicing member
– Dow asked Simmons to lie to the trustees and to the Department Of Labor to coverup wrongdoing,
– Dow is guilty of “obstruction of justice”.
These claims are separate from Simmons’ already public allegations made in letters to the trustees about a former SAG P&H Plan employee who embezzled millions from the organization and apparently was never made to account for the missing money or his fraud.
SAG P&H bigwigs and their surrogates have been trying to move heaven and earth to discredit anyone making allegations against the organization, especially while the SAG-AFTRA merger is being voted up or down by the Screen Actors Guild membership right now. The merger plans right now contain no blueprint for how the two unions’ pension and health plans will be conducted because of no formal study by SAG and AFTRA leaders.
Present SAG Guild leadership likes to point out that the SAG P&H Plan is run separately from the union. But some of SAG Guild’s officers have been SAG P&HP trustees. For instance, at the time Simmons was fired, David White was President of the Board of Trustees of the SAG P&H Plans and the National Executive Director of the SAG Guild. Duncan Crabtree-Ireland is a Trustee of the SAG P&HP and the General Counsel of the SAG Guild. John McGuire is a Trustee of the SAG P&HP and the Senior Adviser of the SAG Guild.
UPDATE: In January, SAG P&HP said Dow had requested a leave of absence just as the scandal surrounding him was starting to become public. No investigation was ever announced. In my opinion, even the appearance of a coverup must stop immediately and an independent probe begun.]
In documents filed today by his attorneys asking for a jury trial, Simmons alleges that he was wrongfully terminated on March 25, 2011, because he wouldn’t cover up Dow’s alleged multi-million dollar embezzlement scheme of the SAG P&HP. The firing of Simmons, who had been at SAG-PPHP since summer 2008, came just over two months after he had been promoted to HR Executive Director on January 14, 2011. Under the complaint of Labor Code and Public Policy violations by SAG-PPHP, Simmons is seeking punitive damages “in a sum which is an amount appropriate to punish and set an example of said Defendants, to deter such conduct in the future and to set an example for others”.
The lawsuit says that, in the beginning of 2011, Dow was under investigation from the Department of Labor in regards to funneling “SAG-PPHP insurance business to his wife and pocketing a portion of the money on the insurance premiums” and providing a “phantom job” to his brother-in-law. This came, the complaint says, after Simmons had earlier reported to Board trustees Leah French and Duncan Crabtree-Ireland that Dow was “underreporting … fraud incidents by millions of dollars” in regards to another employee stealing from the fund.
In January 2011, Simmons says that, as various other SAG-PPHP employees were being interviewed about the matter by the Labor Department, Dow asked him to “lie to the Department Of Labor investigator by affirming that Dow’s brother-in-law was an employee of SAG-PPHP.” Simmons says he “refused” that request. Simmons says he also refused Dow’s request not to tell the Board about being interviewed by the DOL. Simmons alleges that Dow arranged for “another Plan Executive Amanda Bernard to be interviewed” instead. There is no indication in the suit what Bernard did or did not tell the DOL.
Simmons says that, nearly a month and a half later, he was called into “a previously unscheduled budget meeting” on March 9, 2011 to be confronted by Dow, COO Christopher Dowdell, and attorney Marc Allaira. (Simmons says in the lawsuit he was also investigating Dowdell “for misconduct” at the time.) The meeting went badly, according to the lawsuit, and “Dow attacked Plaintiff’s credibility and integrity by making false accusations of misconduct against him”. Afterwards, Simmons was suspended from his job and “escorted off the premises”.
The suit goes on, Simmons was never “disciplined” or had any complaints about his job performance the entire time he was at SAG, yet he was fired on March 25, 2011. That was the day after he says he spoke to an unnamed SAG-PPHP Board Trustee about “Dow’s illegal and unethical conduct” and arranged a meeting “the following week to further discuss these issues”. Simmons says he was “informed and believes that Dow was informed of Plaintiff’s complaints to the SAG-PPHP Trustee and terminated him in retaliation.”
I’ve previously reported exclusively that, since he was fired, whistleblower Craig Simmons has been telling federal authorities what he knows about the Screen Actors Guild Pension & Health Plan scandal. During October 2011, November 2011, and December 2011, he testified under oath during three sessions in Los Angeles with the FBI, IRS, Securities & Exchange Commission, Department Of Justice, and Department Of Labor inside the Federal Building in Westwood. My information is that the authorities were taking copious notes while Simmons spoke. Insiders also told me that federal investigations are now ongoing into not just one embezzlement and cover-up inside the SAG P&H Plan but also another fraud and cover-up there which makes two scandals altogether. I understand the FBI asked Simmons not to go public about the probes and he has not spoken publicly about his whistleblowing. [See Simmons' letter here to the SAG P&HP 36 Board Of Trustees, and Simmons’ letter here to the Department Of Labor, which led to the federal probes.]
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Well, thank god a full due dillengence was done *before* the merger plan was put up for a vote.
Oh, wait…
LOL — well done, guy and all that have posted thus far. Second.
Official pro-merger propaganda has frequently reassured us: If — worst-case — the S.A.G. Pension fund goes belly up, Don’t Worry. The federal government will pay your pension benefits!
Well, the federal government agency responsible for paying your pension would be the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation — PBGC.
But the PBGC is in trouble itself, according to a recent article in the Chicago Tribune.
“[T]he PBGC [is] an insurance-like agency of the federal government that is funded not with tax money but premiums from companies that have defined pension plans.
“However, the agency itself may be in need of a bailout. It is running a deficit of $26 billion, which would become about $35 billion if it takes over [American Airlines'] pensions. Its funding, via premiums set by Congress, is not enough to cover the cost of the failed pension plans it is responsible for, [PBGC Director] Gotbaum said.”
February 28, 2012|By Gregory Karp, Chicago Tribune reporter
Well, we writers are nervously watching you actors trying to decide whether or not to commit suicide. If this vote goes down in flames and you guys DON’T merge, it’s going to drag every union in town down in flames as well. AFTRA will accelerate its existing negotiating position of “We’ll go first and sign a horrible deal in order to starve SAG to death,” and this city works on “pattern bargaining” where the first union to sign a deal dictates the terms of everyone else’s deals, so when AFTRA tries to hurt SAG, they end up hurting the DGA and the WGA as well. No one’s happy about your little 2 actor union war, that’s for sure.
I think it’s important to remember, though, that SAG’s P&H plan, like any union’s P&H plan, is operated by a separate group of executives, half of whom work for the STUDIOS. If SAG’s P&H plan was truly hit by a thieving scumbag (and that’s far from certain yet… the FBI investigates a LOT of things that never result in arrests, or worse, in the arrests of innocent people – just ask Leonard Peltier — allegations aren’t necessarily facts) then there are a LOT of people to blame, but half of those people work at Sony, Paramount, etc. What’s THEIR response to these charges? Why weren’t THEY doing their jobs? Did they possibly know and ignore the problems in order to help kill SAG? Questions abound.
How do you know when a producer is lying?…his lips are moving.
Thank you, Craig Simmons.
Thank you Craig!
You will be vindicated!
So many are behind you!
PEEEEEP!!!!!
And the unraveling continues…
SAG-AFTRA mergerites should do the right thing and stop the vote (that is, if the judge doesn’t do it for them). They claim that the handling of the P&H has nothing to do with their proposed merger plans. But the truth is that the P&H (or lack thereof) is at the very heart of the merger. If they persist in pushing this merger down our throats while this new information exists right in front of their faces!, then it’s clear that they are NOT doing what’s best for the membership, which I never doubted for a second.
Watch. They’ll deny, deny, deny…
they haven’t done ‘the right thing’ since the beginning of this mess. it’s shocking and criminal. our union is being broken from the inside. thank you all you idiot rush-to-mergerites. i notice all of your careers have suddenly gotten in good shape. boy the producers in town are really afraid of all that power our combined unions are now going to have — NOT!
Justice? Anybody interested? Anybody care?
If, in a honest world, Simmons has some tangential impact on Judge Otero in the separate “due diligence suit” and Otero orders a full pre-merger impact study as “recommended in the SAG constitution,” Otero places a “hold” on the vote, the merger takes 2-3 months.
Problem? That impact study means the REAL SAG P&H books, NOT the cooked ones – get a full view.
Meaning? MERGER WILL BE DEAD.
And why? What those of us who have had the living SHIT kicked out of us, for over TWO years have been saying: This merger is about MONEY, not what’s “best for actors.” It NEVER was about that.
It was about getting to the announcing of the “yes” vote March 30th, from a largely disengaged, purposefully misinformed story SAG didn’t want ANYONE to see, in favor of a set of hollow talking points: “STRENGTH IN NUMBERS!” “WE CAN’T BE DIVIDED!” “ALL OF US OR NONE OF US!” – then, IMMEDIATELY, SAG would be dissolved as a legal entity, never again able to fight back. SAG – a BUSTED union – by people with the fucking BALLS to say THEY are “pro-union.”
The SAG-AFTRA producer compliant sham/hustle of a “new union” would VERY quickly re-incorporate in Delaware (Delaware?), no longer, since 1937, incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation, in California in, as it remains so today.
Why Delaware? Well, take your pick, there is SO much low lying fruit.
It’s the Cayman Islands tax haven for corporations in the lower 48. There’s that.
How about – “we will move, under DELAWARE corporate law – to IMMEDIATELY indemnify all the major merger players from in BOTH SAG and AFTRA – from ANY retro-active, or future prosecutions for fiduciary malfeasance, in the run up to merger.” (aka, theft, fraud and embezzlement).
LOVE THAT!
“Incorporated in DELAWARE NOW bitches! Kiss our corrupt asses!”
Well, hopefully, not so fast, if Judge Otero rules SAG HAS to do a proper pre-merger impact study, merger is over, and then SAG must clear house of this invertebrate leadership, move to IMMEDIATELY regain ALL SAG jurisdiction via a Unit Clarification Petition to the NLRB, and get RID of AFTRA – ONCE AND FOR ALL – NEVER TO THREATEN SAG EVER AGAIN.
And if we have to strike to get a fair deal in new media, which is the FUTURE, A FAIR, SIMPLY, FAIR DEAL we MUST have? – that TV, movie and net deal actors MUST have, to have any shot at all at a decent living, if they beat the same old odds, and get work – they will at least be assured, they are once again, going to be taken care of – and PAID salary and residuals – be able to qualify for a manageable P&H plan – where ALL their income goes to THAT ONE PLAN – being SOLELY represented by ONE KICK-ASS union, SAG, that, among other things, in the event of threat of strike, or strike, tells TOM-FUCKING-HANKS, and his A-list pals, what to do, NOT the other way around.
As it should be. THAT’S true UNIONISM! The rich and powerful actors? HELP the powerless, and less powerful actors. That USED to be the character of the “A-list” – up until THIS debacle. Cowards. Except for a relative handful, like Ed Harris. Strong UNION man, and not afraid to put his ass on the line and tell it like it is in the face of the overwhelming majority of his meek A-list brethren.
Let’s yank THEIR chain and tell THEM to get THEIR priorities straight if management has rank and file’s backs up against the wall next time.
Sorry George Clooney, we don’t really care that you want to “walk out of here with a guarantee you won’t strike and interfere with the movies I have in my pipeline.” (2008)
Clooney’s EXACT words to Rosenberg, Doug Allen, and Anne Marie Johnson, when they attempted to gain his support in 2008 to ward off THAT disastrous contract. You know, the right thing to do?
George is big in the Sudan, and I greatly admire his work with aiding and stopping or trying to bring world attention and military and food and medical aid to these tragedies of unimaginable proportions. He deserves enormous credit for that work.
But, as a SAG union actor of great influence? SAG, the union where he got his start, WAY before he became a writer, director, and the biggie – PRODUCER? Not so much. Plays heroes, but, when asked to do just a LITTLE to help get the SAG rank and file a fair contract in 2008? “I have other concerns,” said George. “Mine.”
These top, pro-merger players, in both SAG and AFTRA? Some of them are thieves and liars, who have been STEALING actors money in the tens of millions for YEARS, and the merger-zombies say “Oh, this has nothing to do with merger, this SAG P&H stuff!”
What fucking PLANET do these merger-zombie fools live on? Welcome back to earth. Specifically our lovely California Federal Court system.
We’re close, let’s hopefully, get this done, then GET TO WORK.
KICK THEIR ASSES CRAIG SIMMONS. YOU HAVE BRASS BALLS.
People who are sincerely pro-merger for the right reasons can regroup later and structure a merger plan that would actually be good for actors. Much as some folks would love to see AFTRA decertified, that’s going to be kind of tough to do (if it were easy, don’t you think Alan and Anne-Marie would have handed Roberta Reardon her hat a couple of years ago???).
In the meantime, Matt’s otherwise correct. It seems pretty clear that there are other issues that need to be ironed out, and that’s probably going to wind up happening in the courts.
Precisely, Michael.
A “No” vote leaves the door open for a better, more transparent merger effort by SAG “leadership” in the future.
A “Yes” vote, in this round, will take us down an irreversible path, where we may discover, too late in the game, a lot of un-palatable aspects of the merger that SAG “leadership” neglected or “forgot” to mention.
Vote “No”.
Matt,
Fucking, THANK YOU!!!!! I’m thinking a lot of SAG members agree with what you’re saying.
Matt, I’m not questioning your references and quotes by G. CLooney, but I would like to read up on those for myself.
Can you cite dome reeferences for us?
Thanks.
Go to ru4sagmerger.com for a first hand account of the meeting where it transpired.
It is absolutely shocking to me that there is ANYONE in SAG that would not see this as a huge victory for us. It is shocking that ANYONE in SAG would not want to shake, Craig Simmons, hand, and say, thank you. It is shocking to me that ANYONE in SAG would want this merger to go forward without finding out the truth about the state of our union.
We need truth, transparency, and the modicum of decency it would take for our leadership to put this merger on pause.
Well then be shocked because i just had a get together with 25 of my working actor sag card holding member associates and we will all be voting yes and making sure that anyone and everyone we know vote yes on this merger.
One Union VOTE YES
Thanks Nikki for the update. The truth can be found out even though the town is asleep in most of the media circus. The mess continues until it hopefully is cleaned up. Yeah it will take a while to clean the house of SAG.
I read this and am shocked and dismayed.
Over on sagwatch, the very first commenter says *YAWN*.
*YAWN*…? Are you f^*#ing kidding me?!?!?
A top executive of the P&H Plan tries for months to get the powers-that-be to acknowledge that bad stuff is going on at the Plan. They dismiss him every way they can. He goes public – Risking everything. Now files a lawsuit. And there are people out there saying *YAWN*?
The Plans head of IT gets caught red-handed stealing who knows how much (the current figure is “somewhere around $2million) and has yet to be prosecuted and these “yawners* aren’t concerned?
These same *yawners* are also the ones pushing this bad merger with AFTRA.
Team Simmons.
Thanks, Nikki. Was wondering if you were going to follow up on your earlier post.
I’m only sorry this case wasn’t filed sooner. If it had, maybe some of those who still believe all is fine with the world would have had their ignorant minds forced open to just think for a moment something wrong is going on. Instead, the members are told by idiots like Gabrielle Carteris, that George Clooney and Tom Hanks support merger. Well, isn’t that great for those two multi millionaires who haven’t needed the protection of SAG or SAG’s health insurance in decades. Both are covered through the DGA. SAG is just an after thought for them. Yet every week news about corruption inside and out of SAG and the plans are published but the merger zombies keep their ears closed and their eyes blocked.
If merger passes, in a years time members are going to discover that they still aren’t qualifying of P&H although they were promised something different. And they won’t be able to do a thing about it. Sure, they can try to vote the bumps out, but have you taken a look a the new constitution? The power players made sure that it will be virtually impossible to unseat those in power. Especially in Hollywood. So, for all of those who have voted yes, hoping for better days to come… you’ve been hosed. Just wait to see what the upcoming commercial negotiations will bring, with the brilliant Allen Lulu is charge.
The criminal activity that’s gone on and continues to go on at the Plans is all connected to this merger. They are inseparable. And get this… go on over the SAGAFTRAMINORITYREPORT.com and read the final filings of SAG. They are claiming that all of their propaganda and rhetoric about merging and how merger will make it easier to qualify for P&H was all just ‘opinion’ and not FACT. That’s funny, I don’t remember reading on any of the merger zombies pro-merger literature the disclaimer of “This is just our opinion. It shouldn’t be perceived as FACT.” The only disclaimer I remember seeing was the one posted by AFTRA right before the Opposition Report. They are now claiming that all of their statements, and postcards, and rah rah was only to assist the membership with their own, independent decision making process.
These are some f&^*%^ up liars.
TEAM SIMMONS ALL THE WAY!!
Oh Boy — Everyone is involved in this… all the high-ranking SAG leadership that’s promoting Merger…. Even SAG’s bigtime lawyer, Duncan Crabtree Ireland.
…AND they want Merger…. And they want to move SAG to Delaware (where stuff like this can be hidden?
We have a den of scofflaws here, ladies and gentlemen, and they have been caught with their respective hands in the ‘Cookie Jar’ …a not too unexpected place for Union Officials to have their respective hands even in the best of times… and times today in America mitigate that thefts of this sort come to light!
When the ‘tide is out,’ one can see all the stuff formerly hidden on the beach by the water…
The Tide Is Out!!!
Clean house at SAG… and while you’re at it, check out AFTRA, too!
One prays that Judge Otero and his Court take note of the ominous nature of this Fraud and one prays that this Court stops this Cover-Up Merger…
Craig Simmons is a hero. He could have gone about his business after Bruce Dow had him “walked from the property”. He could have looked for another job and put all of this behind him. But No! That is NOT what he did. He decided to fight for a bunch of actors and their rightful investments based on a sense of justice. He is the type of lawyer we need in this corrupt world.
Mr. Simmons, I expect that you have taken quite a beating in this situation but I hope you always remember that doing the right thing is always the right thing. It may not feel that way at the time but it is a great thing to be able to lay your head down at night and know that you know that you did the right thing.
Actors deserve a union that will protect them and give them hope for their futures. To me it is inexcusable that the merger is even being CONSIDERED in the midst of this scandal. The union leaders are NOT DOING THEIR HOMEWORK and that is exactly what the Bruce Dow’s of this world hope for.
Wake up people. Your future has been stolen.
Stop the merger now!
Team Simmons, all the way!
I voted yes on the merger but now, after seeing all of this info, would have voted NO!!!! I hope they stop this merger so that there is full disclosure.
Dear Anonymous “Yes” voter:
Immediately request a replacement ballot and vote “NO”.
Please, PLEASE tell all your friends not to make the same mistake. They will listen to you more than they would have if you had always been on the No side.
When I’m passing out flyers and trying to engage with members, I can see their attention suddenly get sharper when I tell them that I voted for merger in 2003.
Thanks for your honesty.
This would make a great movie of the week.
So we should definitely Merge with all this going on. All we need now is to let AFTRA; and the AF of L bamboozle us out of the rest. Any fool can see we should Merge without an Impact Study.
Official pro-merger propaganda has frequently reassured us: If — worst-case — the S.A.G. Pension fund goes belly up, Don’t Worry. The federal government will pay your pension benefits!
Well, the federal government agency responsible for paying your pension would be the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation — PBGC.
But the PBGC is in trouble itself, according to a recent article in the Chicago Tribune.
“[T]he PBGC [is] an insurance-like agency of the federal government that is funded not with tax money but premiums from companies that have defined pension plans.
“However, the agency itself may be in need of a bailout. It is running a deficit of $26 billion, which would become about $35 billion if it takes over [American Airlines'] pensions. Its funding, via premiums set by Congress, is not enough to cover the cost of the failed pension plans it is responsible for, [PBGC Director] Gotbaum said.”
February 28, 2012|By Gregory Karp, Chicago Tribune reporter
Is anyone bothering to look into CEO Bruce L. Dow’s relationship with The Foursquare Church – The Pentecostal church founded by Aimee Semple McPherson – The President and Treasurer resigned because of a 2004 $14 million dollar ponzi scheme (L.A. Times).
Dow is on the Board of the Church, as well as on the Board of Anthem Blue Cross of California – the SAG health insurance plan – as well as on the Board of Delta Dental – the SAG dental plan. Both of which have been regularly narrowing coverage of the SAG membership. If the Feds refuse to look into this situation, then a Grand Jury should be impaneled as soon as possible. There’s a $2 billion pension plan at stake here! VOTE NO!
Just like the Federal Government, were being taken over by a cult. As Harry Truman said:
“There’s nothing new in the world, except the history you don’t already know.”
And during Jefferson’s second term in 1807; his biggest threat was from the Evangelical Fundamentalist.
Comic Books; Robots, Vampires, Zombies; and the Screen Actors Guild National Board.
What disappoints me is that anti-merger operatives can’t, don’t, (or don’t want to say out loud) that this merger vote is to merge the unions themselves – office staffs, contract enforcement, etc. – NOT the pension plans. Once SAG & AFTRA merge THEN WE ADDRESS MERGER OF THE PLANS or creation of a third plan, or whatever measured decisions we reach once we see complete feasibility studies. But SAG & AFTRA can’t study each other’s plans without merger. They get that, but you don’t want to admit it. I believe they yearn for the old days in the trailer when the SAG cash rolled in. Want to see any more of it? Better merge these damned unions or your SAG earnings will be a wistful memory.
Complete bullshit from the merger-zombie propaganda cup of pig swill.
OF COURSE YOU CAN STUDY THE LIKEY CONSEQUENCES OF MERGING THE SAG AND AFTRA PLANS.
Do you simply think to continue to lie and say increasingly bizarre versions of “You can’t do ANY actuarial (you, know, with numbers?) pre-merger study of the likely impact on trying to merge the plans, and the effect on SAG and AFTRA members in the new SAG-AFTRA” – is going to continue to be taken at face value?
Why don’t you just go all the way with it? I think, given the increasing disarray of the merger movement, you should double down on the rhetoric:
“You CANNOT IMAGINE, WONDER, SURMISE, PERUSE, CONTEMPLATE, or otherwise allow yourself even the THOUGHT of how this might work, UNTIL AFTER SAG AND AFTRA MERGE – OR YOUR HEAD WILL LITERALLY EXPLODE.”
One of the two major selling points of the merger of SAG & AFTRA has been the eventual merger of the health and pension plans. “No more split contributions!” (The other major selling point has been “more bargaining strength.”)
“No more split contributions” means some form of plan merger after the union merger. We cannot separate plan merger from union merger, however much we might want to believe that plan merger will be “taken care of after we merge the unions.”
The problem we must address before union merger is this: How is it mathematically possible to merge AFTRA’s seriously inferior health and pension plans with SAG’s? There is a finite amount of funding for each plan. How can we possibly fuse the two plans without seriously decreasing the benefits SAG members now receive? And if we can’t fuse the two plans, how can employer contributions ever go into the same pot?
The pro-merger administrations of both unions know that this is a serious problem. They tried to paper it over with their “Feasibility Review.” The review consisted of the opinions of seven lawyers which were spun into an “Executive Summary.”
I’m not willing to make the leap of faith into the merger void based on such skimpy evidence.
(PS: Don’t count on the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to start sending us checks if the SAG plan fails or benefits are drastically reduced. The PBGC is already running a $25 Billion deficit. And it’s only source of funding is the premiums paid by the very pension plans the PBGC insures. [Chicago Tribune, Feb. 28, 2012].)
I cannot help but to think of the ENRON pension disaster.
Craig, I trust you have ALL rights on your story. Watergate. And BRAVO!