BREAKING… SHOCKER! RICH ROSS OUT AT DISNEY
“It was a very difficult decision. Very. But his team lost faith in him. The town, as you know, never wanted him to succeed. And it was just the wrong fit,” a Disney insider tells me, explaining Walt Disney President/CEO Bob Iger’s decision announced today to fire Disney Studios Chairman Rich Ross. Iger began discussions several weeks ago with Ross to end his tenure.
But, after 2 1/2 years in the job, Ross’ own slate of movies had not even bowed: Peter Hedge’s The Odd Life Of Timothy Green (August 15th), Tim Burton’s Frankenweenie (October 5th), Sam Raimi’s Oz The Great And Powerful (March 8th, 2013), Gore Verbinski’s The Lone Ranger starring Johnny Depp under the Jerry Bruckheimer banner (May 31st, 2013), Maleficent (March 14th, 2014) starring Angelina Jolie. The rest of Disney’s release slate consist of Pixar/Walt Disney Animation, Marvel, and DreamWorks pics. Disney strenuously denies there are any problems with Ross’ upcoming films. Instead, insiders strenuously complain about Ross’ personality:
“He had an ‘awareness’ issue,” a Disney source explains to me. “Sometimes people, when they’re put in a different place, they manage it well. And sometimes they don’t. It has nothing to do with the slate of his upcoming films. They’re fine. It’s just about leadership and management. Rich didn’t make the transition. He got caught up in the trappings of the job rather than the specifics. What it became about was we saw him making stupid mistakes. Focusing on things that were not important like parties and celebrities. People that were doing business with us in the film business not only internally but externally were complaining that they were having a hard time doing business with him.”
Rare indeed is the movie mogul who isn’t arrogant. But as much as Ross’ style and substance were the problems, and of his own making, so was his situation, which wasn’t. Because the Walt Disney Studios has become unmanageable. Among Ross’ most vocal detractors were Disney’s mega-shareholder Marvel Entertainment CEO Ike Perlmutter, Pixar/Walt Disney Animation Studios chief creative officer and mega-exec John Lasseter, mega-producer Jerry Bruckheimer, and DreamWorks mega-filmmakers Steven Spielberg and Stacey Snider. The fact is that these powerful personalities — oh, hell, let’s call them what they are: major-league pricks — have come together in one place making so many demands on the parent studio that it’s hard for anyone who finds himself nominally in charge able to keep them all satisfied. Interestingly, Ross’ predecessor, the famously people-pleasing Dick Cook, did for a time and maybe could have continued well into the future. But Iger fired him, too.
Ross arrived at a watershed time for the studio: shortly after Iger entered into the 2009 deal with Marvel. The comic book, TV, and film entertainment company’s Israeli owner Ike Perlmutter is not just a notoriously tough custumer but a budget-obsessed megalomaniac besides a recluse. He has taken control of Disney’s consumer products division already (firing here, fixing there), and my sources tell me he is making Iger’s life miserable with back-seat managing of everything, especially Walt Disney Studios. (“Iger has real problems with Ike. That’s the real story,” one of my insiders tells me. ”Bob thought he could handle him. But Ike is uncharmable.”) Lasseter had the full force of then mega-stockholder Steve Jobs behind him, and singlehandedly caused the film studio to back the loser live action picture John Carter. DreamWorks, of course, drove two Universal and Paramount crazy with their constant complaining before it started to give Disney the same mistreatment beginning in 2009 and continuing through War Horse. Meanwhile, Jerry Bruckheimer’s films were falling out of favor at the box office. Now Bruckheimer is pissed that, after all the hits he’s delivered in the past, under The Lone Ranger‘s ‘favored nation’ deal negotiated with the studio to deflate a bloated budget, he (+ Depp + Verbinski) get paid big bucks only when Disney recoups.
And then there is Iger himself, infamous for firing top executives just when they’re about to turn their divisions around. Back in 2004, he inexplicably axed ABC Entertainment Television Group Chairman Lloyd Braun and ABC Entertainment Television President Susan Lyne only to be embarrassed soon after when the duo’s programming made ABC into the #1 network. It’s well-documented that Iger hated their Desperate Housewives and Grey’s Anatomy and Lost. But he also succombed to complaints about Braun’s personality (and Lyne just found herself collateral damage). Same thing happened after Iger inexplicably fired Dick Cook. The then Walt Disney Studios Chairman wouldn’t be around to see Disney reap the rich worldwide rewards of films Alice In Wonderland, Toy Story 3, and Pirates Of The Caribbean 4. And that was a case where Cook had the right personality for the job – except for the fact he obeyed his filmmaker’s demands over Iger’s.
History has shown Hollywood’s parent companies often wait a beat or two before firing its movie moguls for being boobs. Sony axed the self-promoting and self-immolating Mark Canton just before he gave the studio a history-making box office gross. Universal at least waited until the much-dissed Marc Shmuger released a string of film disasters before showing him the door. And Viacom didn’t react prematurely when TV-turned-movie guy Brad Grey was the target of slings and arrows for his preening personality during his first years as chief of Paramount. By 2011, Paramount led all studios in market share (but not profits).
In fact, as recently as yesterday, a rumor swept the Disney lot that Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige would be replacing Ross on the eve of the May 4th release of that Disney-owned studio’s hotly anticipated and surefire blockbuster The Avengers. (“He’s a creative. I don’t know that Kevin wants a desk job,” an insider tells me today.) But already under the studio’s umbrella are other possible Ross replacements: Snider, Lasseter, Participant Media’s Ricky Strauss recently named Walt Disney Studios’ worldwide marketing chief, and yes even Bruckheimer who cut his teeth as a Paramount exec. Names of outsiders like Mary Parent are in the mix as well. In the meantime, the studio will be topped by Ross’ production head Sean Bailey and president Alan Bergman who are also in the running. With Disney’s earnings report coming May 8th, Iger must surely announce Ross’ replacement before meeting with Wall Street analysts. And Iger firing Ross shows investors that he’s blaming someone — however fairly or unfairly (see story to come)– for Disney’s recently announced $200M writedown of John Carter. Even though the film wasn’t greenlit by Ross (it was greenlit by predecessor Dick Cook and championed by John Lasseter), it was still overseen by him and mismarketed by his studio — and became one of the most public and expensive film failures in Hollywood history. As a Marvel insider tells me, “We all expected Rich to not make it. But no one expected it to be this quick.”
When Iger was fitting Ross with the studio’s glass slipper, the Disney chief loved this guy who managed the company’s global kiddie’ TV business — a total of 94 family-inclusive entertainment channels and feeds available in 163 countries and 32 languages. Camp Bob hailed the hiring as a ‘creative’ choice back then. But Disney’s culture is so cult-like and cut-throat that even when the Mouse House promotes from within it distrusts insiders as well as outsiders. Immediately Ross was labeled an “incredible political maneuverer and quite a back-stabber” who’s “into retribution”.
True, even his detractors found it hard to deny that Ross had made major moolah for the company and needed to be promoted before somebody finally stole him. (And many tried. Which is why Viacom should put Ross in charge of its flagging Nickelodeon where he worked once upon a time.) Ross’ specialty was branding and synergizing and coordinating different parts of the Disney machine. He also placed #5 on Fast Company‘s 2009 list of the “100 Most Creative People In Business”. Iger even promoted Ross to Marvel’s Perlmutter as the Disney exec most knowledgeable about tween boys because of Disney XD. But film vets scoffed, “he’s a TV guy”.
With Iger’s blessing, Ross was in charge of pretty much firing everybody and then replacing them. His choice of Sean Bailey as his No. 2 was out of the box yet quietly popular. But his hiring of MT Carney was decidedly not. After more than a year and half in the job, and speculation since her arrival that she was going to be canned, MT Carney was officially ousted in January as President of Worldwide Marketing. She had been handplucked by Ross despite her having no movie biz experience. (Instead she had experience promoting packaged goods.) Like with Ross, the knives were out for her from Day One by Hollywood’s tight-knit film marketing community which didn’t want outsiders to succeed on its turf. But she was a disaster, and Ross did himself in by choosing her.
Ross also found disfavor by seeming to publicly take credit for Cook’s movies. (He said by way of an apology that he was only marketing them to the hilt.) Ross then demonstrated a frustrating slowness to make his own mark on studio filmmaking by taking way too long to start greenlighting pics. Now that he’s ousted, his legacy consists of only Prom. Will his other movies become blockbusters or bombs?
NEXT: What Went Wrong With Rich Ross And John Carter
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Hire Kevin Feige.
Hire a franchise creator (a disney one) I nominate Charles Segars! Top fan site on the web, ownes and runs a cable network, created National Treasure franchise…share holder value people!
Yes! Charles is great.
Love Charles. Great guy, great taste.
What about Nina?
Pirates, Wimpy Kid, Hunger. Pretty good franchises.
Would she even want to come back?
Best man for the job!
May Rich Ross become the Ovitz of 2012. With the same exact career trajectory.
All readers: ever hear of the “peter principle” definition? Look it up. Seems it’s become contagious in this business as of at least the past 15 years; that goes for many other industries as well but mostly in entertainment from what I’ve been reading & experiencing lately.
Very well said, I actually really enjoyed this article and felt that it truly spoke to the roots of the issues. Thank you for taking the necessary time to write a decent article documenting the rise and fall of Mr. Ross. This is the kind of writing I look forward to when I read deadline.
Agreed. Very good analysis.
I’m not sure I agree. This article predominantly defends Ross. “Awareness issue”??? Isn’t that a euphemism for prick. So why not just use the word. After all, it was used on other moguls in the same piece. I don’t think I’ve known anyone so unpopular as Rich Ross became within minutes of him taking the job, and it was for very good reasons. RIP.
Rich Ross was the most toxic executive to grace Hollywood in quite some time. He was universally hated by the creative community and also by his “extraordinary Walt Disney Studios Team” that he decimated and alienated along with everyone else. Anyone who worked at Disney channel knows he had nothing to do with its success. There are people that have been fired– and two still at Disney Channel- that deserve all that credit. In fact, Disney channel only became number one again after Rich left. Coincidence? If I happened to be a media company that didn’t control its own board like Iger clearly does (and who should answer for this s**t too) I wouldn’t touch this p.o.s. manager with a ten foot pole. Nickelodeon can’t be that stupid. All they’d have to do is pick up the phone and ask how the Walt Disney studios experiment went– and how the people who really made disney channel the disney channel feel. Or they can look back at any celebrity party or awards show over the last two years and start to ask themselves where Rich got all the time while his extraordinary new hollywood business model was going up in flames.
Actually, not true. While I am no fan (he is a world class prick) he did absolutely have much to do with the Disney Channel success around the world. He had a vision to grow the channel and willed it into prominence in market after market, carefully and relentlessly grooming all of its properties. He was truly a force to be reckoned with. The problem is, that style did not translate to the studio.
He was in a nearly impossible situation with the kinds of movies he was making. Lone Ranger. It was a no-win situation. What to do? Push forward with a ridiculous budget and please your film makers or piss of Iger? He pulled the plug and pissed off a slew of high profile talent, agents etc.
WIth Carter, he was again in an impossible situation. Let’s face it. Lasseter can have whatever he wants and he wanted to see JC get made. Stanton admits that he wanted to make the movie in an animation style, by watching reels and redoing footage as needed. Since he was Lasseter’s guy, he got what he wanted. Do you really think Rich is gonna call John and Andrew and say he’s cutting the budget? Iger would support Lasseter, not Rich in that show down. That’s how you explain the budget. Rich did f up by hiring Empty Carnie. But it is also true that Andrew and John had approval on all of the marketing materials. So maybe they can say they didn’t like anything they were seeing. So why not outsource? I still don’t see Rich in control and thus responsible there.
The real problem, and the problem for anyone in that position, is that it’s a no win situation for anyone. Why on earth would Kevin who loves his job making Marvel films go and put himself in that situation? Apart from money and the veneer of power, why would anyone?
And don’t get me wrong, I shed no tears for rich, he is a world class prick, but as pointed out, most studio chiefs are.
Well said, I worked for the prick at Disney Channel. He came in acting all sweet and then fired everyone. I was in my twenties and he went after me because I was part of the old regime that he fired. All I can say is Karma is a bitch but I love her dearly..
Fully agree. Without seeming like an ass-kisser, this is the kind beautifully informed, multi-angled article only Nikki can write. It could use a bit of a trim and a second glance at some sentences, but it’s about 1,500 words long and she still banged it out in a few hours. Well done.
Steve McPherson, Andrea Wong, Rich Ross are all Iger executive picks who failed for similar reasons.
McPherson was deeply abusive to employees, mercurial and cruel. Iger and Sweeney empowered him and would have left him there until there was a law suit and the sad tale would go public. Andrea Wong was sent over to ruin Lifetime by Iger. She was referred to as “Bob’s girl.” She was cruel, unreasonable and arrogant. Rich Ross suffers from these same attributes also empowered by Iger.
Lets get real here. Bob Iger chose Rick Ross. The buck stops there.
wonder what happens to Rich’s buddy Michael Riley, clearly in over his head, embarassing in meetings.
He has been riding Anne Sweeney’s coat tails since the early 90′s beginning with FX. She is the only reason he got as far as he did. Obviously, she woke up or couldn’t over-turn Iger’s decision
I agree. Very informative and useful. Great to learn how this industry works.
Great story Nikki! I love feel-good stories like these.
The studio is in need of executive talent.
Bring in some new blood with big experience.
Drain the swamp.
Kevin Feige is not a studio head… sorry. He’s a fan boy with a great job/library and a nice guy.
There’s plenty of blame to go around. I fault Bob Iger (i don’t own stock or else i’d make a big stink!) DIS stock at $42.40 NYSE today.
Rich Ross was just an easy escape goat target.
Its a business, how can they(especially Bob Iger at the top) justify spending $100′s of millions on 1 movie like John Carter?
Sure take risks but calculated ones.
Bob Iger is no Harvey Weinstein!
I miss Michael Eisner
OMG! Don’t be a tard! Eisner almost killed the company. He came in with Frank G. Wells and, while it would be rude to say that the wrong guy died, certainly the brains of the operation went down in that helicopter crash. Michael Eisner??? We’re talking about a guy who was so stupid, at one point, he wanted to market a Disney branded car. I sh*t you not.
Mind you, I’m not defending Iger – much less Rich Ross. In fact, most of what’s been said about Ross is accurate: fish-out-of-water TV guy, vindictive, arrogant boob, etc. but the real problem here is the size of the company. Disney is completely shareholder driven and that leaves little room for quality movies. Films are just a very small spoke in a gigantic wheel. And when you approach it like that, you end up hiring the High School Musical guy (a project that only came to pass thanks to yet ANOTHER fired exec (Denice Carlson) to run a bona fide movie studio. More than anything, the colossal idiocy of Iger’s hiring of Rich Ross was an insult to the studio and the company as well.
Great summary of the situation, Nikki.
It’s about time. The guy is an arrogant prick who has treated so many talented individuals with such disrespect. Soon after he arrived on the lot, morale completely changed and I felt terrible for his execs. I’ve been trying to figure for the last two years why no one was writing the real story on him. Better late than never, I guess.
If you put Rich Ross in any elementary school in the country he would never win most talented kid in the class.
What Disney doesn’t get is that they are different than all of the studios. Their head needs to not just understand the business, but literally be able to direct/write/or create something that is as genius as a director. I’m not saying they need to hire a director… director’s are horrible business people. But it’s a blend of it all.
Ross should have been fired in the board meeting where he said with a smug grin “we suck at live action movies we always have”…. Bruckheimer is no longer a power that can get Disney out. They need a visionary… it might be Lasseter if he even wants the job. Who knows.
And everything about why John Carter failed has come true. Poor marketing. Deliberately trashed when reviewers said the movie wasn’t bad.
And, it should be noted, that most of the negative reviewers focused more on the negative aspects of the budget and marketing campaign rather than the film itself. It was a pure marketing failure.
If plants keep repeating the big lie, do they imagine sheep will believe them? 51% Rotten Tomatoes. #1 critique: Poor Pacing Issues. #2 critique: Dud Leading Man. Planty liars are tiresome and fool no one.
Give me a friggin’ break, “not a plant.” The movie is much better than all of you so-called experts say. Rotten Tomatoes is not the end all be all source. It has a bunch of critics nobody has heard of. I don’t trust many of the critics they have and usually disagree with them. I tend to look at their audience numbers more and the percentage puts it at 68 for “John Carter” and it’s even been higher. The critics who couldn’t follow it must’ve done drugs at some time and have brain damage. I had no problem following the film and it made sense to me and other friends of mine who saw it. The acting was good (great in Lynn Collins’ instance), the music score timeless and moving, the visuals remarkable, and the CG Tharks are perhaps the most believable animated characters done to date. It’s so sad that so many people listened to you and other nay sayers talking crap. I hope it does really well on DVD like other movies that tanked on the big screen that suffered from poor timing, bad marketing, critics, etc. and had sequels green lit because they made tons of money on DVD.
I just watched the John Carter trailer and a couple of John Carter clips on IMDB. I was reminded of two main criticisms I had when originally watching the trailers for this film:
1. Any good fish out of water story has to show that the character is SURPRISED to be a fish out of water. Not ONE SECOND of the trailer ever shows any surprise by John Carter that he can bound around, swing giant boulders, and basically have Superman-like powers. Oh…and the dude’s ON ANOTHER PLANET…how about a little surprise at that?! The first Matrix movie did a wonderful job of showing a character react to an absurd change in circumstances, at one point throwing up. Granted, for pacing sake they had to have Neo get used to the idea relatively quickly, but at least they showed a reluctance to accept the reality of the situation, letting the character grow into the new reality. When a regular Joe from planet Earth is suddenly on Mars, you gotta give us some transition shots – especially in the trailer – showing the character coming to terms with the new and bizarre situation. Instead, we see a Braveheart-like attitude from a John Carter acting like this is what he does every day. A modern viewer will be like: “This guy’s from the Civil War-era — there’s been no airplanes, Roswell, or moon missions. The first THIRD of a movie like this should have the guy coming to grips with all of this alien stuff.
2. The superpowers that John Carter has make no sense, or at least no explanation is given in the trailer. He can pick up a giant boulder tied to a chain and bound around like Superman, presumably because the gravity is different on Mars. But in a clip on IMDB, he crashes a Star Wars-like vehicle going conservatively 60 miles per hour, and he is then hurled….10 feet. At that speed he should have been hurled a minimum of 60 feet, if not more. Plus, if he somehow weighs less on that planet (explaining how he can bound around), wouldn’t he be thrown to the next county from such an impact? These multiple contradictions aren’t even slightly explained in the trailer. When I originally watched the trailers, I just kept thinking, “This is silly.”
3. (I know I said 2) The clip on IMDB shows off some bad green screen lighting. John Carter is in an action sequence on his Star Wars-like vehicle, and he just looks like a guy in front of a green screen. The lighting is awful. Some of the CGI is convincing, but this one element stands out as poor.
Sorry, fanboy. But the rest of us human beings thought John carter stunk.
@Ken
Let me guess Ken, you like movies such as Transformers and G.I. Joe, who had slick advertising campaigns and were sheeer trash in terms of story and acting?
JOHN CARTER is by far the best movie I’ve seen all year. Total thrill. But the ads were so dull, I would not have seen it if I didn’t have some small hunch there was something there due to the pedigree of Andrew Stanton. That was by far the worst marketing campaign I have ever seen for a feature film. It was like anti-marketing. Get those people to sell the new hate figures, ala bin Laden, Saddam, Kony, et al.
Finally someone speaking the truth. The walt Disney company is not being managed by iger. It is being managed by Ike and Lasseter. They blame everyone else. Lasseter doesnt like anyone who doesn’t believe that cars 2 is the best Pixar film of all time. Lasseter and his flunky Jim Morris also gm of Pixar and coincidently producer of that horrific film john carter blame Ross for the marketing of their film. They of course take no ownership of a crappy film. They simply run to iger to complain. And iger now being chairmen and CEO don’t want to end up like Eisner. So he let’s his these cry babies have a scape goat
I blame iger. If he wanted a yes man as chairmen of the studio he should have simply kept dick cook
Crappy film? Stop reading internet review sites and talk to people who have seen it. I personally saw it three times and each time the majority of the audiance were more than satisfied with the movie. Only internet nerds on blog sites who never read the books or even watched the movies trashed it 6 months before it even came out.
The Avengers will do alright, but we all know if we want a real superhero movie we will see The Dark Knight Rises.
A superhero movie that tries to not be one?
nice try. But we all know TDKR is going to topple the avengers
If by “topple” you mean “make more money” I wouldn’t bet against The Avengers, if I were you.
You think there Features department is screwed up, you should see how poor the TV department is run. It’s painful. Bunch of morons with Titles….
Disney is overdoing camp. It’s getting kind of sticky and gross.
Soon even Disney will realize even popcorn movies will need to have ‘event-heavy’ storylines – a lot going on, so you feel you got your money’s worth. Nothing really happens in movies anymore – the audience is at least a few steps ahead, they all have ADD anyway an now they’re foul tempered and bored. Sludge like John Carter won’t make the grade anymore.
Disney needs to focus on
- Dr. Strange (another weird druggie role for J.Depp, Potter meets Barbarella)
- Black Panther (Coming to America meets Batman, with voodoo)
- reconfiguring and modernizing the ‘Touchstone’ romcom formula to exclude the ugly aspects of modern media – cutlet faced skank actresses, too much blue screen (even in romcoms), the gay pet friend, dumb female victim dating scenarios, and dull male fantasy tropes. Produce for no more than 50 mil and bombard the fraus who actually buy tickets for these rituals with ‘empowering’ marketing as the genre is reinvigorated
- a Dr. Syn reboot
Yes to all this, esp Syn!!!!!!!
No one could ever possibly follow the brilliant Dick Cook. The man is class personified. I don’t believe Ross was ever considered long-term material. Just a transition exec until the right person is found for the long haul.
Oh how right you are. Dick Cook was a man you wanted to please. He was the heart of Disney, pure and simple.
I’ve seen THE AVENGERS will do far better than “alright”.
There isn’t a bigger prick in this business than Ike Perlmutter (and yes, I realize what a big statement that is). He’s trying to gut Disney like he gutted Marvel (with it’s whopping 40 employees pre-acquisition). Fuck that guy
Indeed. Stories about him pulling paper clips out of trash cans, and the like, are legendary.
I have a couple friends at Marvel, they all hate him. I just brushed it off until seeing these comments…
this sounds like the tail wagging the dog – Disney bought Marvel & Pixar right?
“the most expensive film failure in Hollywood history.”
Hyperbole much? It’s not even close.
The secret to Disney was always Gary Marsh. Not the best manager either, but he truly has always been (with a few key execs along the way) the vision behind the Dis Channel’s success. Gerry Laybourne (who knew Rich was an empty suit) set the tone and the mission, and Gary made it happen. Rich’s sole contribution (and a big one) was bringing music to the Disney brand when it needed a dose of cool. Rich always liked the parties and the fancy travel…. and of course taking credit for others work. If Nick came after him, it would be a massive mistake. Nickelodeon needs a reboot, but not from Rich who came from Nick originally and is officially now our of tricks in the very small bag of his.
Rich never met an exec he wouldn’t enjoy firing… I wonder how he’s feeling right about now.
SB
You are not totally accurate about Rich/Garry. True, Garry was the steadfast lieutenant who dutifully delivered great content, but Rich was the force of nature with the vision to use that content to grow the channel to the world-wide juggernaut that it has become. He micromanaged how content was placed all around the world. That dogged attention to detail and travel was the key reason Garry did not immediately fill his shoes when Rich left. Garry didn’t want to do what rich did. But then they gave the job to that Carolina Lighthouse or whatever her name was. And Garry realized he had to do it because she was no rich.
I think he has a huge opportunity to go shake things up at Nick.
Should be interesting.
Not even the knuckleheads at viacom are dumb enough to let Rich “shake anything up”. This guy is done. That’s what happens when you stab everyone in the back both above and below you. He’s pissed off just about every powerful force in hollywood.
Of course there is the one in a million chance that some exec at viacom performs harakiri on themselves and their own career by voluntarily choosing to infect nick with the same cancer that disney succumbed to. You never know, maybe some poor sap there will believe that the guy can “reinvent cable television” the same way he “reinvented movies” at disney.
I couldn’t agree with you more. Having worked with him a lifetime ago, I can honestly say that I’ve never met anyone in life who enjoyed sinking a knife into the backs of their “trusted” colleagues more than Rich. He fancied himself a Godfather of sorts and reveled in the feeling that everyone had to kiss his ring daily. If you dared to challenge him and–as a result of that–eventually lost your job, you were reminded weekly by the old guard that you’d “know best if you never say a bad word about Rich. He’s listening and can ruin you.” Seems his level of paranoia and insecurity seems to have gotten worse over time. Shame, really.
Gary was always the backbone and workhorse of the Channel and anyone who didn’t have their head up Rich’s a** at the Channel knew that. He never truly got the recognition for the turnaround that happened there that everyone knew was mostly due to him.
I can think of no better situation that exemplifies karma coming back to bite someone than this. I hope Rich is doing some serious soul searching on his break. Even a massive ego like his has to be extremely bruised by this spectacular and epic failure.
Thank you for telling it like it is. Or, rather thankfully, like it was.
Iger is 8-10 months away from going away – the internal power struggle over what will be the future of Disney will be awesome.
Hang on tight kids! The stock is going to be a bumpy ride!!
Yes to this. Won’t happen. But yes to this.
Stacy Snider is the the right person
nina? please come back. we’re sorry.
Sarah B is right about Gary Marsh. Rich Ross’ smart move at the Cable Networks was letting Gary do his creative thing. Gary’s smart move was letting Rich be the smiling front man of the company. Together they had each other’s back, built a massive success and never allowed the writers/directors/actors any real power in the operation.
But this synergy won’t work at a movie studio where the huge outsize egos like the ones Nikke mentions suck all the air out of the room.
You are right about that bit of synergy. Well done gentlemen, you gave no credit to anyone else. Well done.
I think we’re missing the point.
Who comes in, was Rich an ass, who’s to blame for John Carter… None of that is the point.
Bob Iger f***ed this up. I don’t understand why more people aren’t complaining (LOUDLY) about HIS string of recent failures.
He blew up the studio, and did it so poorly he’s had to blow it up 2 years later. So for stockholders, it’s another 2 years of poor performance blamed on the decisions of the last guy.
But don’t forget… Bob has also blown up Consumer Products and Digital with poor results. STILL unable to turn a profit in the digital space with his “company of the future.”
But his real job is the stock price, which was $35 in 2001 and is $43 11 years later AFTER BILLIONS spent on acquisitions or self-investment (ABC Family, Pixar, Marvel, two shots at California Adventure.)
With all the indiscriminate firing, Bob seems like a guy who really holds people accountable for their job performance.
Except himself.
No need when you’re both Chairman and CEO.
They need someone who loves movies and is a good movie picker.
So why not bring back Nina Jacobson who has certainly shown she hasn’t lost touch with the market and that she can really pick movies. (um…Wimpy Kid…Hunger Games)