Insiders tell Deadline that the May 10th fundraiser at George Clooney’s Malibu Studio City home has sold out for $6 million and raised over $4 million for the accompanying raffle. But is this Hollywood fundraising giving red meat to Republicans starting to lambast Obama as the ‘Celebrity President’?
On Saturday, Clooney told the Wall Street Journal that his fundraising dinner, co-hosted by Obama bundler Jeffrey Katzenberg and organized by his political right-hand Andy Spahn, would raise $10
million for the president’s re-election. “Which is about double anything that’s ever been done before,” Clooney explained to the WSJ at the White House Correspondents Dunner. (Where Obama greeted the actor with a “Hey, George”). News reports confirm that the $10M is the largest amount ever for a single Obama campaign event. And that exceeds the sum that the Obama campaign raised from the entire entertainment industry in the 2008 presidential race when Hollywood types were slow to embrace Obama as their candidate over Hillary Clinton. But today’s political media outlet The Hill reports:
Republicans are once again seeking to portray President Obama as a ‘celebrity’ — an out-of-touch leader who hobnobs with actress Eva Longoria, considers Oprah a pal and ‘slow-jams’ with comedian Jimmy Fallon before an adoring crowd. Linking Obama to Tinseltown is a strategy that failed to work in 2008. But three and a half years into the Obama administration, Republicans believe they now have enough material to work with to make their point.
In the last few weeks, a string of Republican advertisements have tried to puncture Obama’s likability. First came a Republican National Committee
ad that mocked Obama for appearing on “Late Night with Jimmy Fallon,” where the host referred to him as ‘Preezy of the United Steezy.’ Then American Crossroads, the GOP super-PAC, released a spot titled ‘Cool’ that took aim at the persona of a beer-drinking, Al Green-singing, fly-swatting president. “After four years of a celebrity president, is your life any better?” the ad asks, after ticking off a slew of statistics aimed at the 20-something set.
The emerging Republican strategy comes on the heels of the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, where the likes of Reese Witherspoon, Zooey Deschanel and scores of other Hollywood A-listers flocked to hear Obama speak. During the dinner, a string of boldfaced names including Martha Stewart and actors George Clooney and Kevin Spacey all approached the dais where Obama was seated to wave. Before the dinner began, Obama mingled with actors Paul Rudd and Elizabeth Banks at a private reception, a source tells The Hill. In a couple of weeks, Obama will attend a fundraiser at Clooney’s home in Los Angeles, where the actor told The Wall Street Journal he expects to raise around $10 million for the president’s campaign.
Some Democrats say labeling Obama a celebrity is a failed strategy that didn’t work in 2008 and won’t work now. “We’ve seen this movie before,” said Jen Psaki, a former administration official who served on the 2008 campaign. “This is nothing more than a distraction from having a conversation about this issues.”
Hollywood moguls are still smarting over what they see as the Obama Administration’s betrayal of Big Media by siding with Silicon Valley and opposing that congressional piracy legislation (Stop Online Piracy Act). The studio chiefs individually and as a group drew a line in the sand on the piracy issue with the Obama re-election campaign and were refusing to give any more donations.
Katzenberg since the blow-up has tried to mend fences with the studio heads, but he hasn’t wielded influence around Hollywood for years nor is popular with his colleagues who are still hanging back. Make no mistake about it: those moguls who do show up at the $40,000-a-person dinner are doing so only in deference to Clooney, notObama. Especially since SOPA looks dead for 2012. I wouldn’t be surprised if some moguls quietly test the GOP waters when Mitt Romney’s campaign and its fundraising partners hold a fundraising event in Los Angeles for May 31. But Romney’s candidacy is being promoted around the movie biz by another unpopular Hollywood name, ousted MGM studio chief Harry Sloan. Meanwhile, just a few hours remain until the winners are picked for the Obama-Biden raffle until tonight’s midnight Federal Elections Commission deadline. The gimmick is that each donation is an automatic entry for a chance to meet Clooney and the President on May 10th in LA. Even a $3 contribution could score an invite to ‘Obama, Clooney, and You’.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.



$10,000,000 would go a long way to help save Darfur… just saying.
tell that to Mitts super pacs
Mitt tithes 10% of his salary to the LDS which is used for charity and deeds of need. Neither Obama or Biden even give a fraction of a percent to charity, but then they expect everyone else to give for them like true liberals.
Darfur “this guy”!!! How about 10 million to help the poverty stricken here in the United States!!!!
Jimmy Kimmel was Right – why is this administration terrorizing medical marijuana patients while they promote alcohol, cigarettes and prostitution at the White House?
President Obama knows what he is doing
He was so funny on Fallon and much funnier than Kimmel…
It is good that he is getting all of this “Hollywood” money so he can win the Presidency and get the much needed Health
Care Bill for those who do not have insurance..Everyone deserves health insurance so they can take care of themselves and their families
Except for the fact that he already had his healthcare bill passed into law, or were you not paying attention?
Clooney’s Malibu home? Since when? I was so pumped to have Obama visit Studio City. Dammit!
Obama has had more fundraisers in 3 1/2 years than Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush – combined. Why does he need so much moolah? His record, of course.
Ain’t gonna help.
“Obama has had more fundraisers in 3 1/2 years than Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush – combined.”
Source?
^ Dana Milbank column, Miami Hrald 5/2/2012.
Because he is dealing with GOP and Romney who are liars, hypocrites, flip flopers and liars who do not care about the future of this country except themselves. You are not very smart, open your eyes.
Wait! The GOP are “liars, hypocrites, flip flopers and liars who do not care about the future of this country”?
..and the Dems are so much better. The only difference between the Democrats and Republicans is that the Republicans don’t lie about not caring about you. The Dems lie right to your face, and you believe it.
I will make sure to boycot Clooney’s movies from now on. Actors should not mix up their fame and their politics. If they do, we have the right to stop supporting their movies
I’m sure he’s weeping right now, upon learning he’s lost you.
Why? He helps out for the good cause by using his power as a celebrity. You right wing nuts are laughable. You want to take this country back to the old days full of bigotry, racism, and inequality.
GOP’s principles have been proven wrong and not working. Time to wake up. I for one will support Clooney’s movies. Go ahead and boycott his films like an idiot. No one cares.
Given your stated POV here, I doubt you’ve seen a Clooney movie in years. Don’t try and pretend otherwise.
where is this different than the koch brothers ? Hope your boycotting their products
People like to bitch when celebrities make bold statements regarding politics. Celebrities are people like you Lotus and have every god-giving, amendment granting right to their freedom of speech and support of whatever cause they so choose to give support to.
If you like an actor’s movies, you should go see them regardless. You go for entertainment and to see fictional stories, not to shape your life.
If you have your own political viewpoints that may contrast with the celebrities you admire, you have every right and should find ways to support them yourself. Do not project your views onto your idols and be disappointed when you find out their own views may differ. They certainly will not let contrasting political ideals affect their appreciation for you as a fan.
Rather than boycott and spend negative energy dwelling on what a celebrity does in their personal time, use that energy in support of what you believe in.
I’m sure he is shaking in his customer-made baby seal leather boots.
Clooney has been an outspoken activist for years and I’m confused how someone visiting and commenting on a showbiz site wouldn’t know that already.
I have heard others speak of doing the same thing, I believe it is a good idea, too, Producers might think twice if they don’t make the profits.
I agree… See how these actors feel when 50 percent of Americans voice there opinions by not attending there movies. Polls indicate it’s a 50/50 race meaning about 50 percent of the Americans still have some morals and values …maybe we should speak out by not supporting those actors who don’t support our way of thinking… We can always read a good book or go to church.
I have more respect for the dems throwing a fundraiser with a crowd of people talking to each other rather than Koch Bros. just writing a $10 mil check
Right, monique. You think Clooney and Katzenberg haven’t written checks for $10 million to help push America off the brink? They have.
The Democrat party is the party of the rich. Nice try.
Wonder how many of the 99% ers were invited?
You do understand that Clooney is in the 99%, right? I know Drudge wants you to think otherwise but the real vitriol should be sent to CEOs who are taking cash which used to go to local businesses.
Clooney has a net worth of $160 million. You really want to claim he is a part of the 99%?
Clooney hasn’t been in the 99% since he started cashing those ER checks, and that was a while ago.
Well said.
Obama is an arrogant elitist so he’s perfectly at home with all the other limousine liberals. Barack and Michelle have taken more vacations and spent more taxpayer money on their vacations than any other first couple in history. Obama has gone golfing more times in four years than Bush ever did in eight years. They think they are entitled to have the most luxurious of everything all at our expense. They live to exploit their White House flamboyance. This is why the Obamas will be looking for a new place to live after November. They have gone so far overboard with all the power perks that people are fed up with them it’s an ostentatious and disgusting display of wealth that is not theirs to exploit. They don’t pay for anything they live to take expensive vacations.
An elitist? Fighting for middle class is not really an elitist. Obama is a liberal president who cares about people and saving this country. Millions of jobs have been created under his job, Osama Bin Ladin was captured under his watch. DADT was repealed under his watch, and what have GOPers done? Obstructionism based on racism, they have been attempting to make sure Obama become a one term president. You right wing nuts are transparent. You’re damn right, I am a liberal and a democrat. I am better than those of you racist and narrow minded, right wing morons who only care about rich people and nothing else. Who is the elitist? You are.
Oh, yeah, an elitist… a black kid with a single white mom who earned his way into Harvard because he was smarter than then the next kid… he grew up poor, and worked hard… after law school he turned down huge offers from countless law firms — he went back to the hood and worked with kids… When he was elected to the Senate, he was broke… was he was elected to the WHITE HOUSE, he had a funky apartment in DC and drove an old Dodge Dart… He and Michelle were still paying off student loans fifteen years ago. Obama made some money because he wrote a few books people want to read… How did Mitt make his money? Oh, yeah, restructuring companies and firing people — and Bain financing security cameras in China; camera used to suppress human rights.
You anti Obamaites are desperate idiots… it is going to be fun to kick your ass next November.
You’re an idiot. Sorry to be rude, but you need to get your facts straight BEFORE you go on a public tirade. It’s a well known fact that Bush had far more vacation days than Obama did after the same amount of time in office. 61 vs. 180 according to this article. I looked at other articles too, which had similar figures, so let’s not go off on how CBS News must have liberal bias.
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-18563_162-20093801.html
See, when you want to make bold statements, it’s necessary to cite sources. I learned that in 6th grade.
Cost of golf + vacations versus cost of war in Iraq?
You really gonna make the argument that Obama is the one wasting taxpayer money?
“Barack and Michelle have taken more vacations and spent more taxpayer money on their vacations than any other first couple in history.”
Source? I’d like to see the numbers and also compare past presidents, especially taking inflation rates into consideration.
“They don’t pay for anything they live to take expensive vacations.”
What a fascinating fantasy. I’m pretty sure if Obama was the luxury-loving sloth you have convinced yourself he is, he could find better jobs than law professor, Senator, and President.
Either Obama is an elitist that doesn’t care about poor people or Obama is a socialist that wants everybody to have health care and unemployment.
Pick one, you can’t have both, you moron.
President Obama has worked much harder than Bush, who, if you care to recall, preferred his time clearing the bush around his ranch than he did in the White House. So get your facts straight. Bush took more vacations than any President, and when he was at “work” Cheney was doing his job.
Whine all you want, Republicans. You know the writing is on the wall. Four more years. Now run along to the men’s room. Don’t keep Larry Craig waiting.
Yep. the writing is on the wall so why not take these same dollars and use them for good instead of influence? Clooney, 2016!
Bravo!! GOP will lose power for the long run. No, they are anti women, anti Obama, anti middle class, anti everything.
It is backfiring. Well said.
Kinda homophobic there, Freedom Fries.
This is so annoying. Republicans bitch about Obama being a Celeb Prez, but hold up an actual Hollywood actor turned president as their shining beacon on a hill. Hypocrites!
Not really. Reagan didn’t publicly trade on his Hollywood celebrity, which was honestly limited even at the height of his career as an actor, when he ran for President. He had already been the multi-term Governor of California. Honestly, how many films starring Ronald Reagan do you think the average voter could have named in 1976 or 1980?
Exactly. GOPers are a whole bunch of liars, racists, and hypocrites who are out of touch.
The GOP would love it if Hollywood supported them, but most there don’t.
Haven’t seen a George movie since “Oh Brother…”, the reason is obvious. He, Mr. Hanks and others can get their salary from somebody else.
The GOP (a.k.a. The Party of Reagan) deserves endless awards for its ability to outmessage the Democratic Party effectively, for sure, because pretending that Reagan (and all the other Hollywood Republicans) did not ride fame-first into office is hilarious. Obama certainly wasn’t “famous” in 2007 so we penalize him for being liked by Hollywood liberals (who, you’ll recall, he lost to HRC in ’08) And with Citizens United the new law of the land, you wanna criticize Obama for using his supporters to gain pocket change compared to the BILLIONS of dollars available through, let’s face it, the private corporate sponsors of the REPUBLICAN PARTY, INC.? If you look at the money race, it’s not even close. And it’s not gonna be, even with countless more small donors in the Democratic Party.
Just because both major parties are undeniably corporatist doesn’t mean we get to equivocate and pretend they’re not a stark choice between the two.
Clooney is the guy in Hollywood. It’s time to break this taboo.
in principle i agree that we should boycot actors who support politicians, but i just could’t bare not seeing any more chuck norris films.
Would you prefer he got his campaign funds from pharmaceutical companies raking in tons of dough and literally banking on republican tax cuts to propagate their continued gluttony?
Please…. No matter whose side you are on this is all part of the game… Boycott Clooney movies because the guy has an opinion and he is willing to stick his neck (face) next to it? Your loss!
Every Democratic president is the “celebrity” president, because nearly all those in Hollywood with money are liberals.
I have no problem that Clooney supports Obama. But I do have problem with celebrities who talk about issues that they are ignorant about in a political environment. Actors and actresses should keep their political views to themselves.
I’ve met Mr. Clooney, and he is a great man, with conscious awareness and caring about what happens to people who cannot speak for themselves. His personal wealth has not been created by stealing from the poor and downtrodden, as that of the Wall Street criminals, i.e., the Goldman Sachs, AIG, and all the rest. He’s is fearless to support who and what he believes in. I greatly respect him.
George Clooney supporting gay marriage is ‘fearless’??? As ‘fearless’ as Perdue voting for fried chicken.
It’s hilarious that you won’t go to see Mr. Clooney is a film, yet you are willing to hand over your 401K to Wall Street bankers who have ripped off the whole world for their own profit. Of course, I know some of your friends and family may be out of work and losing their homes as well, but you continue to be willing to pay your taxes so that the BANKERS don’t have to??…Brilliant!
“It’s hilarious that you won’t go to see Mr. Clooney is a film, yet you are willing to hand over your 401K to Wall Street bankers who have ripped off the whole world for their own profit. Of course, I know some of your friends and family may be out of work and losing their homes as well, but you continue to be willing to pay your taxes so that the BANKERS don’t have to??…Brilliant!”
I guess Clooney is willing to pay his taxes so the bankers don’t have to since he is raising funds for Obama who voted for TARP. If people were truly upset about Wall Street bailouts neither Romney nor Obama would win.
This is an obscure but obvious way of painting a picture of an Obama that is too “Black” to lead America… full of two steppin’ brag n’ swag… and an attempt to appeal to the tastes of the American people that says, “We’re America… and we don’t want to be associated with any of this ‘Black’ business.”
Is that all ya’ got Mitt?
You are so right! If the Repubs had celebrity friends, they would be using them! All they have are washed up, gun-toting, wannabe singers that wish people ill…Like that Ted Nugent…No one did anything about his tirade, did they?
People elect the government they deserve.
You should get your facts straight, the president who took the most amount of “time off” or vacations was George Bush (100 days as an example from the time he took office in 2001 through August 2001). Your comments and descriptions are incorrect, you don’t like the Guy fine, but resorting to these types of mischaractorizations & particant bias is the reason why I don’t watch mainstream news & would rather not see it in this outlet.
Both parties align themselves with individuals who have deep pockets, so for the GOP to pretend that Obama is doing something wrong by accepting a fundraiser from the Hollywood elite makes them hypocritical at best, and at worst, like they’re whining because they don’t get to hang out with the cool kids at school.
It’s the same mentality that’s driving the GOP’s feigned distaste regarding the observance of the anniversary of Bin Laden’s death. The GOP wants to play it down because it didn’t happen under their administration, and they’re resentful they can’t get political leverage, as a result. We all know how Republicans want to pretend Democrats don’t have the stomach for military action, and the taking down of OBL has thwarted that particular angle for the upcoming election.
I’m exhausted with these petty skirmishes that are distracting the country from the real issues, i.e. the economy, immigration and foreign policy.
Seems like a lot of 1%’s to me.