
Lawrence Kasdan has done something he never dreamed of: He’s gone indie and he doesn’t think he’s going back. The four-time Oscar-nominated screenwriter of such blockbusters as The Empire Strikes Back, Return Of The Jedi, The Bodyguard and Raiders Of The Lost Ark and writer-director of such acclaimed films as Body Heat, The Big Chill, The Accidental Tourist, Silverado and Grand Canyon among others is back with Darling Companion. It’s his first new film in nine years (since 2003′s ill-fated Dreamcatcher) and the first time in a 30-plus-year career that he has worked without a net.
A studio-bred filmmaker from the beginning, Kasdan says no studio would go near his latest project, co-written with wife of 40 years Meg Kasdan, and he totally gets it. That’s why at age 62 he decided he had to go it alone because Companion, aimed at older audiences the same age as its director, has got to be a true gem (considering the multi-Oscared cast) and rich, if rare, entertainment for that largely forgotten sector of the audience the industry routinely dismisses — and who can’t find anything to see starring people their own age. This kind of smart (by design), sophisticated adult comedy rarely comes along these days unless it’s got Woody Allen’s name on it, and even those are mostly populated with younger actors.
Related: Specialty B.O.: ‘Darling Companion’, ‘Downtown Express’, ‘Marley’, ‘Moth Diaries’
“I have a feeling the (independent world) is where I’ll be working if I continue to work because Hollywood obviously has turned their back on this kind of movie and maybe you’ll understand why when the movie’s released (it opens today in NY and LA in just four runs) if no one shows up. This is a movie where people in their 60s are the centerpiece of the movie, and it just isn’t gonna happen at a Hollywood studio now. It’s never gonna happen,” Kasdan said of the film with a superb ensemble cast of 60-plus-aged actors Diane Keaton, Kevin Kline, Richard Jenkins, Dianne Wiest and Sam Shepard, along with a couple of younger thesps Elisabeth Moss and Mark Duplass thrown in for a few scenes. It is loosely based on an incident where the Kasdans’ dog disappeared while they were vacationing and suddenly turned up three weeks later. The script takes that premise and turns it into a film about the pitfalls of long term relationships , marriage and finding new spark in life even if you’re well past AARP eligibility age and spend a lot of time talking about aches and pains.
“The concerns that are in the movie about mortality, and children going off, and the fraying of a long relationship, those are things you wouldn’t get in the door of a studio conference room. And you can tell when you go to look for a movie to see on a Friday night, you know what your choices are and Hollywood studios have said ‘we’re not interested in this kind of movie’. So that leaves independent film and that’s fine. It just means you have to work really fast and you have to find people who are willing to work for very little money, and we were very fortunate with this great cast. It makes you feel good when great actors and craftsmen and crew show up for essentially minimums because they like the material,” he says.
But Kasdan, who hasn’t had a major hit in a long while but clearly had the midas touch for a strong 15 year run between 1980 and 1995 or so, seems
to be interested now in things the mainstream Hollywood in which he has always worked is definitely not. He admits he didn’t even try to take this to one of the majors. “We never took it to a studio. When we finished the script and looked at it we knew. There hadn’t been a studio movie like for ten years. We didn’t want to have the kind of jokes that pass for jokes in Hollywood right now. We weren’t gonna make fun of people. We didn’t think if you were 60, you were old. I do think Hollywood thinks that way. You tend to see people past the age of 50 caricatured as being old. We don’t feel that way. We think this is as vibrant a part of your life as any other,” he says adding that if no one shows up for this he and Meg won’t be shocked. “If it strikes some chord that would be delightful and we’d say ‘well someone else is interested in colonoscopies and psa’s’.”
Kasdan says it is unintentional but the film does seem to be a part of a trilogy that began in 1983 with The Big Chill (a Best Picture nominee) and continued in 1991 with Grand Canyon (for which he and Meg shared an Original Screenplay Oscar nomination) to 2012 and Darling Companion with ads that use the selling point it is from the director of those two other films even though they came out 30 and 20 years ago respectively. ”I think there’s no question all three of those movies caught us at a certain time. We were exactly that age in our 30′s when we made The Big Chill. And in our 40′s when we made Grand Canyon. And we are at the unmentionable age right now where these people are. I think it wasn’t what we wanted to do but you look around, see what’s happening to your friends and people you know and changes you’re going through. We’ve been married 40 years and it’s possible to take people for granted after a while. That’s what happened in the movie to those characters. They love each other but it’s just a long haul,” he says though it doesn’t appear the Kasdans have the same problems . They are true collaborators personally and professionally. In fact Meg was the Music Supervisor for the iconic soundtrack of Big Chill which sold 7 million copies, and he points out their two scripts were organic since he says everything has written has always gone through the filter of his wife anyway.
Sony Pictures Classics is releasing and first unveiled it as the opening night film at this year’s Santa Barbara International Film Festival. Kasdan said he thinks they are the perfect boutique operation
to handle it as it opens slowly and expands on a weekly basis into more markets. “We’ve never done that before. On those big studio movies – some of mine have worked and some haven’t – on Friday afternoon they give you a call and say either ‘congratulations’ or they say ‘it’s all over, you just wasted two years’. So we are hoping this is a slightly different experience. If we don’t do well the first weekend, maybe we do better second weekend. We’ll spread across the country until we find suckers willing to go,” he laughed. “Sony Classics does it on a shoestring and that’s how they are successful. Michael Barker and Tom Bernard are very respectful of the filmmaker and we believe they are gonna do their best for this movie.”
If younger audiences stay away, Kasdan can take heart there is at least one important place it should play well, and where the film’s demo hits the bullseye: The Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences. A recent study says the median age of members is 62. Bingo! It shows there tomorrow night in the prime time Saturday night slot.
Awards Columnist Pete Hammond - tip him here.


It’s too bad that even in tv the demos seem to be more important 18-49 than a high number of viewers. Maybe instead of the bachelor suit, we can sue the networks or advertisers or movie studios for ageism.
not sure i follow this. the networks and the studios serve up product for the audiences willing to pay for it. the people with disposable income that spend it on advertisers reside in 18-49 for television, and even younger for films. Kasdan admits there is no paying audience for this kind of film.
Studios and networks have convinced themselves there isn’t a paying audience, so they create drek aimed at kids, then they complain that adults don’t watch/buy…well, DUH.
I’m so damn tired of the myths this industry won’t examine. For a personal example, I’m a boomer. I’m typing this on the same $1,200 MacBook Air that I watch television shows on. TV set? Haven’t owned one of those antique things in years. But as far as the industry is concerned, people my age never go out, and sit home watching TV on “sets” in the living room. As I said below, I’m stunned by how much money this industry leaves on the table. It’s just as dumb as the fashion industry which can’t admit that the average American woman is middle-aged and not a size 0.
Go where the money is, kids…
not true. I’m 41, educated, lots of disposable income. I also work in entertainment marketing and I don’t watch the junk that I frequently have to market. I resort to indie movies and foreign films. 18 year olds with disposable income? That’s BS and we all know it. Advertisers blindly covet a young demographic, not always to their benefit.
More like, there is a paying audience–educated retirees, a not-insignificant and growing demographic–who don’t fill seats in the theaters today precisely BECAUSE THERE ARE NO FILMS FOR THEM TO SEE…or, rather, very little in the way of thoughtful, mature fare that appeals to them. Hollywood can’t be bothered. And by the way…what an 18-year old likes is rarely the same as what a 49 year old likes. Marketeers made up that magical demographic…
I’ve never understood why Hollywood persists in leaving money on the table. Executives still act like it’s the 1960s when young people had money. Now, young people have no jobs and crushing student loans, yet they’re still the “desirable” demographic.
My retired parents, who hate just about everything in theaters these days, will be first in line for this movie, because finally someone’s made a film that appeals to adults. There are *millions* of adults. When is someone going to figure out that ka-ching?
Exactly. The boomers are the largest segment of the population with the most disposal income and were brought up in a culture of GOING TO MOVIE THEATERS.
Any smart studio boss, save for Disney should start a division with budgets of 5-7M for exactly this type of material. You can get amazing talent that has foreign value and your lead actors will be happy to do the talk show circuit to promote these films.
On Golden Pond
I know two people who will show up. Me and my wife (69/64).
I don’t want to tar and feather the great Lawrence Kasdan as a posterboy for baby boomer narcissism, because he’s one of the greats. But…I don’t think he was complaining about (or even noticing) the lack of movies for and about people in their 60s back when he was in his prime. Just saying. They weren’t exactly cranking them out every weekend back then, either.
A lot of people don’t think about getting involved with cancer activism, either…until they (or a loved one) actually get it. Just human nature.
Cheers to Larry and his newfound freedom. Hell of a filmmaker.
I went to the premiere. May be the worst movie I’ve ever seen. Almost walked out. Shockingly bad considering the talent involved.
One can gripe about the “studio’s ageism” all one wants, but as Marley And Me will attest, there is always an audience for family movies with lovable pets at their center. But it needs to be a good movie. This one is not.
A great drinking game is to be had in that every time a character, no matter their age, walks aimlessly through the woods yelling “Freeway!” one must take a drink. Even the most seasoned alcoholic will be passed out before the third reel. That way, at least, one is saved from the treacle of the last act.
Great to see kasdan back. Hope he keeps making movies:)!
How did he get it funded? That’s what I want to know. I’m glad he’s making a quality film. My worry is that kids of a younger generation have no clue what a truly great film is because they’ve been fed crap big Hollywood budget movies with no plot and nothing but explosions. So they actually think that Twilight, the movie is a great film. It was okay. It was entertaining but it was no ET or Gone with the Wind or The Color Purple or Rear Window.
I am encouraged that today any kid with a high-def camera and a great script can beg borrow and steal his way into making a film. Everything’s going the way of VOD anyway so the distributions the same. They can Kickstarter their way into a decent micro-budget and maybe Julia Roberts or Chris Pine won’t be starring in their film but maybe they don’t need them. They may even be able to talk a local cinema with a digital projector to showing their film and if it does well, that could lead to others. The opportunities to make a film are easier than ever but it still comes down to a great film.
Couldve used him on the final drafts of the Star Wars prequels & Indiana Jones & The Crystal Skull.
Actually, he DID do some script doctoring on CYRSTAL SKULL. Didn’t help much.
Care to back this up with some info or data? I’ve never heard this.
Smart Hollywood is dead, but isn’t Fox Searchlight releasing the Exotic Marigold Hotel with a bunch of Brit seniors?
Take heart, Kasdan. Most of the cast of “The Expendables” was in their seventies.
Hip Hip Hooray, A movie about real people that we of a certain age can identify. A movie about real life where you can get involved. I am so happy that this is happening. I hope more directors choose stories like this.
Love you, Larry, but honestly, you helped create the blockbuster mentality.
A blockbuster becoming a blockbuster because you created a genuinely great movie is not the same as “creating” a blockbuster. Blame those who copied, because Kasdan is certainly not one of them.
Lawrence Kasdan deserves all good things.
This is the kind of movie that gives movies about older people a bad name. The problem isn’t the old people. The problem is that movie is badly written and supremely boring.
This story sounds beautiful. I’m 25 and I’ll go see it because it was made with care, love, talent, brilliance and heart. Kudos to the pioneers who keep it real.
I have not seen this film so can’t speak to it but most of the movies about older people these days are so bad. Take IT’S COMPLICATED. Maybe one of the worst pieces of shit ever made.
Maybe some of these great filmmakers who are “past their prime” can find a way to keep making new material for us oldsters
After all, there ARE other markets to cater to these days. (direct to video market now and everyone is scrambling to figure out how to open up that futuristic streaming market)
We ARE out there and we WILL spend our cash- we just want to see a good story
Personally I’ve had my fill of over budgeted talking robots
The STAR WARS films would have been more interesting had all of the cast been in their 60s.
I’m as much a Kasdan fan as the next Hollywoodite. But there’s some blatant inaccuracies and false claims in this story and PR piece.
In the beginning of the article, it says “Kasdan says no studio would go near his latest project”, then later “He admits he didn’t even try to take this to one of the majors. ‘We never took it to a studio.’”.
18% on Rottentomatoes as of right now!
With his reputation, wouldn’t you think Kasdan would be a critical “darling” yet mostly they all say it’s a terrible film and script. Maybe the reason no studio would touch it, or he didn’t take it to a studio- whatever the truth may be there – is because the script sucks.
You know Kline signed on due to their past relationship. Well, after TILDA wasn’t picked up, there ain’t a lot roles out there for the wonderful Keaton, so she signed on, so then the rest probably signed on with those two names.
A bad Woody Allen film is still a bad film and the same goes for Kasdan, despite his rep.
I agree we need more films with older characters. And IT’S COMPLICATED ain’t what we need, but that was a “Hollywood” film that got made with older stars!
What we need is more films like Sarah Polley’s AWAY FROM HER – extremely well made films about older characters. Or BEGINNERS (Plummer’s character was fabulous) and Mills script brilliant.
Instead of The Black List, there should be a Gray List. Of all the scripts that float around town, there must be some good stories that appeal to real adults and won’t cost a gazillion to produce.
This is the worst publicity I’ve ever seen.
Building excuses for failure before the fact don’t obviate the need to make a good movie.
My take: human stories are human stories.
If something’s funny, it’s funny.
If the drama is real and the characters real, then people of all ages will connect, unless they aren’t human.
If this script is any good (and plenty of Kasdan’s scripts aren’t)
then it will find an audience.
There is Karma at work here too. Older actors are cheaper. Character driven drama is cheap to produce.
No kids in the audience. No special effects. No CGI.
If this doesn’t make money, take a look at the script, not the genre.
I saw this flick several weeks back at a screening. Forget the beloved older demographics, it’s a terrible movie. Really embarrassing for the stars. How he did it is a miracle!!!
You cringe for the great Diane Keaton and Weist. But it’s really embarrassingly amateurish. The script is sophomoric and very cable channel – at best.
PLEASE DO NOT CALL THIS AN INDIE. It’s Lifetime without the drama and gay man…maybe the dog is gay?
If a screenwriter submitted this as a SPEC script it would be used for kitty litter. I’m angry that this is passed off as something “needed.” You’ll NEED your $12 back!
Don’t insult older audiences by saying we have to make this for you. LK- Direct TV pilots but don’t be MY DARLIN’ COMPANION ever!
PS: Thank you for RAIDERS best ever!
Larry Kasdan is a living legend and has earned a lifetime pass several times over.
He deserves respect and consideration on anything he decides to do, even if it’s not everyone’s cup of tea and isn’t going to set the box office on fire. If he can find someone or some way to finance his passion projects, good for him.
Tip of the hat to you Mr. Kasdan for an unbelievable body of work.
I saw this movie recently and thought it was brilliant.
True, it doesn’t move at the lightning fast rat-a-tat speed some moviegoers are accustomed to these days, but if you’ve been paying attention to Mr. Kasdan’s most personal films, it fits right in. The story even mentions that it’s an unofficial extension of a trilogy with “Big Chill” and “Grand Canyon” representing different parts of Mr. Kasdan’s life.
“Grand Canyon” faced the same type of criticisms when it was released and is now considered a classic by some.
P.S: I’m in my 40′s and found much to admire in this film.