Despite reports that have spread like wildfire on showbiz websites, we hear from multiple sources close to Catching Fire that director Gary Ross has not formally withdrawn from The Hunger Games sequel. Ross is off on a family vacation and couldn’t be reached, but these internet reports that described his withdrawal as definitive are simply not accurate.
There have also been reports about a tense standoff between Lionsgate and Fox over the sequel services of Jennifer Lawrence, who will reprise her role as Mystique in the sequel to X-Men: First Class. That has also been somewhat overblown; Fox had an option deal on Lawrence way before she signed on to play Katniss Everdeen in The Hunger Games. That put Fox in first position. Since Lionsgate has a Catching Fire script done, Fox allowed them to go first.
As for the notion that Ross would simply toss away the opportunity to return and direct Catching Fire because of a salary squabble, the logic seems flawed. The Seabiscuit director knows the benefit of riding in a winner and not switching horses midstream. Ross lobbied hard to get The Hunger Games and turned it into the biggest hit of his directing career. Before that, he developed several serious historical dramatic projects under his deal at Universal that didn’t get off the ground. Staying for a sure-fire hit and a sequel that audiences actually want to see makes a lot of sense for Ross, particularly given how active the filmmaker has been in the construction of Catching Fire.
Ross and author Suzanne Collins have been working on this since last November. They drafted Slumdog Millionaire screenwriter Simon Beaufoy back then, when the Hunger Games post production schedule became too arduous for Ross to see through a plan to write the outline and then pen the sequel script with Collins. We’ve heard that Ross developed a tight bond with everyone involved in the film, including cast. Unless the deal making completely implodes, we expect to see Ross behind the camera when the sequel gets underway.


errm ross is not the cinematographer. sure he will peek behind the cmaera now n then but…
Run almost any prominent director’s name through Google Images, and you’ll find most of them have posed authoritatively next to a camera. It’s an inevitable cliché of on-set photography.
It says, “I’m makin’ a movie, dammit!”.
Pedantry at its finest.
Dang. So the sequel might be just as awful as the first one with more oppressively ugly cinematography, bad editing, and mediocre performances? Maybe the script will actually be better and the characters well written this time. Somehow I doubt it.
geez, what movie did you see? The masses and I loved it!
Yeah, so what??
The “masses” LOVE the Kardashians. Does that make them interesting? Does it validate their monopoly on our culture? Puhleeze, child. If you make a crappy film people will still come. There’s no way I was going to miss seeing HGs. Just because I paid my $14.00 does not make my experience worth it.
Take your word over Roger Ebert and Peter Travers? Where’s your Pulitzer, genius?
You are just jealous because it took all of ‘Wrath’s audience last week.
Agree. Ross has such weird tone and sluggish timing. The book had such terrific dramatic moments that should have been a slam-dunk for the adaptation — Katniss being HUNGRY and gobbling up the lamb stew at the Capital banquet, Peeta’s self-serving skill in propaganda/PR and Katniss’ Cinderella makeover. These are just a few examples much less the completely boring GAMES and the decision to make the children’s deaths completely devoid of any emotion or pathos. Hey, Ross, it’s called a film — why don’t you intercut Katniss&Petra’s family as they watch, riveted and horrified, as their young, innocent, loved-ones fight for their survival. Hey, you can do that bc it’s a FILM! It’s called building out your story and taking it away from the books first person narration.
I didn’t feel anything when these kid’s died on screen w Ross’ lame (and sudden) MTV fast-cuts and lack of building out the contestant’s characters. Brilliant. Not.
You lost me at “Petra”.
Agree completely. Loved the books but the movie was badly directed and done on the cheap. They really need a new director and a much better budget next time around if they want to do justice to the second book.
Yeah, he missed those BIG DRAMATIC moments such as Katniss eating stew. Oh wow you’re a genius. I’m sure your take on the movie would have been oh so very brilliant.
Who cares about these jealous “art” critiques?! It’s all about the business. People loved it. It’s making tons of money and that’s what counts. If you’re so good at it, why aren’t you making films we’re all watching? Get real!
Sooooo edgy you are.
Why would he — his name’s been over studio grids for over a decade. This is the first major film he’s ever had. Enjoy it, G!
Do you mean “off” the studio grids? Also, I think SEABISCUIT counts as a “major film” in terms of box office, awards nominations, etc. Of course, “major film” could mean anything.
Seabiscuit was a fuckin’ dud, dude.
I don’t care if you were on a notes call for it or got to grab the producer’s coffee. It was a dud and forgettable as everything else Ross has released.
If your taste is so bad that you didn’t like Pleasantville I don’t know what to tell you.
Lionsgate would be smart to keep him. Unlike most franchises, this one doesn’t blow.
Guess that means we can look forward to more shaky cam and faux-gritty stylings in place of actually knowing how to shoot an action sequence in which the audience can see what’s happening.
I agree. Action directing is a definite skill. And character action directing is a fine-art.
Well, THAT is comforting.
Nikki it would not make financial sense for Liongate not settle
with Mr. Ross. Why would liongate risk a production deley because
they do not want to pay the director who made the studio its biggest hit.
makes sense. The reasons given seemed difficult to believe. However Summit/Lionsgate did change directors for Twilight, so it’s a possibility.
Oh, I hope he’ll rid off the shaky cam, it was a terrible idea, there was no sense to it.
THANK YOU for the update guys, I was waiting to finally hear the scoop from you. It simply makes no sense that an official backout from Gary would have happened while he’s on a family vacation. The details of the IndieWire story just don’t add up, including the reason given for Gary backing out. It still could be that he wants to back out, but the idea that a major decision would be made while he’s on vacation is just weird. We’ll see what happens come Monday (or whenever he returns from vacay) …
They don’t think they need to pay Gary as much as he deserves for the sequel. They will do anything to make extra money. Gary needs the sequel more than they need Gary. He should be allowed to direct both parts 2 and 3 and he deserves a fair amount of profit participation but he won’t get this because these are now The Greed Games. Summit would be happy to see a dozen directors fighting each other to the death in the forest and they will hire whoever survives.
like they did with the Twilight franchise. Katherine Hardwick: out. Or Marvel does it with its own franchise: Kenneth Branagh: out, Joe Johnston: out. Jon Favreau: out (almost after the first movie). Looks like studio greed has overrun any integrity.
I’m mystified as to why Gary Ross “deserves” a fair amount of profit participation. He’s a hired gun doing a job many other directors could do directing someone else’s script from someone else’s novel (yes I’m aware he has a script credit). If they didn’t have him they’d have someone else making more or less the same movie. The Hunger Games was going to happen with him or without him. Suzanne Collins deserves a fair amount of profit participation. I can’t think of any of individual in the process who does, maybe other than her editor.
I’m so bored!!! All this noise for lousy films made by really smart people. What a drag.
Yes, the movie has been a huge hit, but it’s hard not to ignore how almost every review singled out the directing as the weakest part.
Yikes, I meant hard to ignore. I need a nap.
To Behind the Camera –
Directors actually look through the camera quite a bit. Especially on a big film. So that picture is a fairly accurate representation of what Ross does.
Thank you Nikki! I’ve been saying those reports yesterday smelled of something funny, especially since everything Gary has ever said indicated he was “committed” to Catching Fire. It would make no sense to switch now, he helped bring Lionsgate their biggest film ever, why fix what isn’t broke?
Besides he had a hand in ever major casting decision, he knows how to cast these roles and many of the actors came on board because of his involvement with the project (as well as the source material). Woody Harrelson (Haymitch), Donald Sutherland (President Snow) and Jennifer Lawrence to name just 3.
The majority of the fans want him back, he treated this book with respect and made one of the best book to film adaptions we’ve ever seen. We just hope he stays on for the full ride and gives this series “one vision”.
If this film was faithful to the book, they I am really going to pass on reading them.
Dear Garry Ross, PLEASE if you direct, PLEASE DON’T DO THAT SHAKY CAM CRAP! It’s stupid and despite how “artistic” you claim to be. Please invest in a tripo or steady cam this time. And please try using other regular lenses instead of a MACRO lense every time. We don’t need to see the wrinkles and pores of every character. We want to actually see the character in their entirety. Please go back to good ol’ classic filmmaking so we as an audience can enjoy and understand what we’re seeing and not have to leave the theater to go throw up. Thank you.
Gary is an overrated writer and a very underwhelming director. It was a bad choice that worked out but not one Lonsgate needs to repeat. Sorry Gary, your spin and politics are catching up to you mean old man.
THE HUNGER GAMES was not a hit because of Gary Ross! Please, please, use whatever you have to to get rid of him as director! The shaky camera work, the quick cuts…all were disastrous visually and story-wise! This movie was probably going to be a hit no matter what, based upon the popularity of the book, the great casting and the brilliant marketing campaign. If he’s being a pig in the negotiations ( he was braying on NPR a few weeks ago about holding out on his next deal), call his bluff! Or find another way! Get rid of him! Please!
I dunno why all these shaky cam complaints – it’s a good way to translate the first person POV from the book.
I thought Gary Ross did a good job on the movie (some pacing issues, but now I’m just nitpicking) and would love to see him continue with his vision to the end. Seeing how involved he’s been with the development of the sequel, it would be weird to just cut all ties and quit. Everything’s possible I guess, but hopefully he’ll stay on.
Because, dear DK, the shaky-cam apparently was looked at only on video monitors, and not on the big screen. Please believe me when I tell you when shaky-cam is done that way, it will nauseate the theater audience.
(OTOH, because it looks okay on video monitors — the BD and DVD crowd won’t notice as much.)
A probably better way to do the shaky-cam thing is to make it more like the “48 Hours” style of shooting pioneered by a news guy working for CBS by the name of Darrell Barton. The idea is not what the first person sees, or the audience sees, but what the *camera* sees.
nighty nite, all.
Hearing rumors that a certain director famous for his comic book films is in talks to direct ‘Catching Fire.’ Lionsgate loves him, he’s become available, and he’s got a great relationship (working and persona) with Lawrence already. As long as the money is right…
No need to rehire Gary Ross and spend the extra money. Lionsgate/Summit will save by bringing in someone new and actually make a GOOD movie. Wouldn’t be surprised if the Summit guys try and implement this.
Even if he hasn’t “withdrawn”, Lionsgate needs to “move on” with someone else. And enough of this giving him credit for the film being a smash hit. My dog could’ve directed this to at least $150 million domestic. This series needs a visionary director, and competent as Ross is, he is not a visionary. The movie’s biggest flaw was its visual style, and that needs to change going forward. They don’t NEED Gary Ross as director like, say, the Avatar sequels NEED James Cameron. I don’t understand this. My suggestion: Mr. Joe Wright, an immense talent with both visuals and actors, who just showed (HANNA) he can turn a young girl into a viable action star.
Don’t tell me after the success of the first one that there aren’t some A-list directors offering their services on this thing.
if your dog can direct i’d love to talk about a reality series for animal planet told from the pov of the once upon a time celebrity dog family on hard times and about to have a litter. a dog director would be perfect, help us get the real, intimate stuff that humans just can’t get.
The masses loved Twilight too. And The Phantom Menace when it first came out. What’s your point?
Not sure who you’re responding to, but besides the box office, this movie had vastly better reviews than those other films.
Gary Ross was never the right director. They’re smart to re-hire.
Hopefully he leaves the franchise because that shaky cam nonsense is absurd.
And every review has said that the directing was weak, he should go. He’s arrogant and he has a big head just because he shakily filmed a movie that had millions of pre-built in tween/teen fans.
movie was good inspite of Gary. Not because of.
Jennifer holds that thing together. Get a director who elevated the material, not merely services it.