International Trailer: ‘Amazing Spider-Man’

COMMENTS (24)

• This movie looks……amazing.
  Had to do it! ;D

  Comment by Hobie Brown — Sunday April 15, 2012 @ 12:44pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Like Drederick Tatum’s rap album, this looks boastful and unneccessary.

  Comment by Taylor Kitcsh's Grittiness — Sunday April 15, 2012 @ 2:38pm PDT  Reply to this post

• This makes me want to re-watch Spider Man 2. The best super hero movie ever made.

  Comment by amirite — Sunday April 15, 2012 @ 3:39pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • Spider-Man 2 is the best superhero ever made? It’s good, but nowhere near that good!

    Comment by JehuIo — Sunday April 15, 2012 @ 9:27pm PDT  Reply to this post

    • Spider-Man 2 is the best superhero movie ever made. Hands down.

      Comment by yeshesrite — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 4:34am PDT  Reply to this post

      • ….no….

        Comment by shway — Tuesday April 17, 2012 @ 2:07pm PDT  Reply to this post

• YAWN. Looks generic and dull. For all the faults of Raimi’s films, at least the first two were FUN. The Nolan-esque serious tone is a serious mis-calculation.

  Comment by Anonymous — Sunday April 15, 2012 @ 4:17pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Enough already.

  Comment by Mike — Sunday April 15, 2012 @ 4:54pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Can’t wait for this movie. Looks superior to any bigscreen Spider-Man version ever made.

  Comment by Will — Sunday April 15, 2012 @ 6:18pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • The only people I know that excited for this been-there-done-that too-soon reboot are people who obsessed over the mechanical/organic webshooter “debate”.

    Comment by Jer — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 10:35am PDT  Reply to this post

• REVENGE OF THE NERDS.

  Comment by Ari — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 12:34am PDT  Reply to this post

• Certainly not as epic as The Dark Knight, but its pretty damn awesome. One of the best sequels ever. The fact that its a comic book adaptation makes it even more unbelievable.

  Comment by Farzan — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 1:03am PDT  Reply to this post

• Just looks so very, very cheap. A massive step back in production value from the Raimi films.

  Comment by John Brennick — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 1:23am PDT  Reply to this post

• Anakin Parker

  Comment by 4 year old penises!!! — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 1:54am PDT  Reply to this post

• The only hope for Columbia Pictures to return to its former glory is to hope that Sony is selling the studio to bolster its cashflow. SONY… sometime, only not yet.

  Comment by Anonymous — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 3:29am PDT  Reply to this post

• Too brooding and humorless. With Nolan’s Batman, you get why it is humorless as the character is a dark, disturbed man with power. Spidey is supposed to have snark and be a fun vigilante. Gwen is also a boring character unless you want to include her iconic death in the comics which I doubt they will do first film, Lizard is not in the top tier of baddies (one of the few good things about 3 was at least giving the character in pre-villianization growth as an ally to Peter), getting rid of characters like J. Jonah Jameson, MJ, and the Osborns is silly, and adding the parents to the canon was something the fans of the comics HATED.

  It is like Marc Webb and Steve Kloves want to go out of their way to make Spiderman a Batman type of character when people became fans for the opposite reasons.

  This may make money first weekend but having it between Avengers and The Dark Knight Rises is going to make people yearn for what came before and what comes after because at least those movies are giving what fans want.

  Comment by CMG — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 9:08am PDT  Reply to this post

• This looks awesome. The posters and trailers keep looking better.

  Comment by BowYonder — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 10:09am PDT  Reply to this post

• CGI City !

  Comment by sp — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 11:05am PDT  Reply to this post

• Having carefully re-watched this trailer I am excited to say I will absolutely be first in line to see this when it’s playing for free at the DGA theater.

  Comment by Bill Bailey — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 4:54pm PDT  Reply to this post

• What a bunch of crying jealous bitches on here.

  Comment by Cranky — Monday April 16, 2012 @ 8:21pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Looks cheap. Set the action in the dark to cover up poor special effects and save money just like Terminator 3 did – that movie looked cheap and was ‘lacking’.

  Comment by Chris — Tuesday April 17, 2012 @ 5:22am PDT  Reply to this post

• The Amazing Cheap Spider-Man

  Comment by Anonymous — Tuesday April 17, 2012 @ 5:23am PDT  Reply to this post

• The stunts look good. They’re clearly trying to accent ‘new’ plotlines, the Parker family history.
  They don’t show him having ‘spider sense’. It would be good if there were no actual effect enhancement when that happens, I guess we’ll see.
  Sally Field is still too foxy to play Aunt May. Aunt May should have been portrayed by Maggie Smith, in a Norman Bates old lady wig.
  They should have just picked up where the old ones left off and the actress should have stayed her natural sexy red to play MJ, but who cares really. America is at war with the entire middle east!
  The sound design is cool too
  Cheapo matinee for me!

  Comment by an AmrcAn — Tuesday April 17, 2012 @ 10:09am PDT  Reply to this post

• Come on, people. Lets not start hating on the film before it even hits theatres… Lets at least give this one a shot and if we’ve waisted our money we can at least warn our friends b4 they go out and waist their money.

  Comment by adam — Tuesday April 17, 2012 @ 2:13pm PDT  Reply to this post