April 6-8 Weekend Actuals
1. The Hunger Games (Lionsgate) Week 3 [4,137 Theaters] PG13
Friday $12.8M, Saturday $13.0M, Sunday $7.3M, Weekend $33.1M (-43%), Cume $302.5M2. American Reunion (Universal) NEW [3,192 Theaters] R
Friday $9.3M, Saturday $7.5M, Sunday $4.8M, Weekend $21.5M3. Titanic 3D (Paramount/Fox) NEW – Wednesday opening [2,674 Theaters] PG13
Friday $7.1M, Saturday $6.7M, Sunday $3.5M, Weekend $17.3M, Cume $25.6M4. Wrath Of The Titans 3D (Legendary/Warner) Week 2 [3,545 Theaters] PG13
Friday $5.4M, Saturday $5.7M, Sunday $3.7M, Weekend $14.7M (-56%), Cume $58.6M5. Mirror Mirror (Relativity) Week 2 [3,618 Theaters] PG
Friday $4.6M, Saturday $4M, Sunday $2.5M, Weekend $11.M (-39%), Cume $36.6M6. 21 Jump Street (MGM/Sony) Week 4 [3,009 Theaters] R
Friday $3.6M, Saturday $3.9M, Sunday $2.5M Weekend $10.0M (-33%), Cume $109.4M7. Dr Seuss’ The Lorax 3D (Universal) Week 6 [3,003 Theaters] PG
Friday $2.3M, Saturday $1.7M, Sunday $1.1M, Weekend $5.0M (-35%), Cume $198.2M8. Salmon Fishing In Yemen (CBS Films) Week 5 [524 Theaters] PG13
Friday $323K, Saturday $423K, Sunday $246K, Weekend $992K (-22%), Cume $4.7M9. Housefull 2 (Eros) NEW [121 Theaters] NR
FSS N/A Weekend $847K10. John Carter (Disney) Week 5 [1,015 Theaters] PG13
Friday $293K, Saturday $327K, Sunday $210K, Weekend $830K (-59%), Cume $68M
SUNDAY, 8TH UPDATE… Lionsgate’s The Hunger Games continues its
amazing run for the third weekend in a row for a new worldwide total past $460M. This gives the box office behemoth a 17-day total through Easter Sunday of $157.1M international and $302.8M domestic. In the U.S. and Canada, it overwhelmed both box office rivals Paramount/Fox’s Titanic 3D and Universal’s American Reunion. But the pair showed strength overseas. This weekend, The Hunger Games grossed $33.5M domestic and $25.5M foreign where it has been trying to stave off an onslaught from Warner Bros’ recent 3D entry Wrath Of The Titans. After a disappointing domestic start, this sequel is dominating overseas: over the holiday weekend it dropped just -43% from its opener with a gross of $43M in 60 markets from 13,540 screens. The international cume to date is now $152.5M and Warner Bros declared Wrath Of The Titans “#1 internationally”. It opens in Japan April 21st.
R-rated American Reunion finished in 2nd place with only a so-so $21.5M domestic but did surprisingly well around the globe with $19.3M from the 28 territories where it opened. That’s now $40.8M worldwide for the modestly $50M budgeted fourquel which set the highest grossing opening weekend internationally of all the previous films released theatrically in the American Pie franchise. It posted #1 openings in Russia ($5.1M), Australia ($5M), Netherlands ($1.1M), and Norway ($1.1M). “With schools closed for vacation this week, the good results should continue,” a Universal insider tells me. “We still have 30 territories to open including the major markets Germany April 26, France May 2, and Italy, Spain and the UK May 4.” Domestically, exit poll data showed audiences were almost evenly split between males and females (51% vs 49%) but predominantly aged 25 years and older (61%) vs under 25 (39%). As for the future of the $1.1+ billion franchise with 3 films that made $650M worldwide and 4 direct-to-DVD titles, Universal will try to keep it going to satisfy the foreign appetite for this kind of crappy raunch.
James Cameron’s $18M 3D conversion of his ocean epic met domestic expectations and, according to Paramount, made $17.3M this weekend. Titanic 3D reached $25.7M for its first 5 days in release despite a marathon running time. IMAX had 9 of the top 10 locations for the film earning $2.0M in 79 theaters. Exit polls showed that the audience was 51% aged 25 and under vs 49% aged 25 and older as well as 60% female vs 40% male. Amid reports of sold-out shows, Fox said the first international numbers steamed to $35.5M from 5,579 screens in 53 markets (84 countries). “That’s a per screen average of more than $6,300 per screen! It’s a fantastic start,” a Fox exec emails me. “We needed a $30M opening weekend to be on pace to $100M for international (not including China), and we exceeded that estimate by 18%.” Despite half the daily show times of the top competitors, Titanic 3D grabbed the #1 market share position in the UK, Germany, Italy, Austria and Sweden, while in a tight struggle for #1 in Russia with fellow opener American Reunion. Titanic 3D was the #1 MPA title in France, Japan, Hong Kong and Switzerland and #2 title overall in Holland, Belgium and Denmark. To illustrate how much the theatrical world has changed since the 1997/1998 release, the 2012 Russia opening weekend ($4.9M) is 97% of the lifetime theatrical result of what the original did in Russia in 1998 ($5.1M). China opens Tuesday, followed by the majority of Latin America (17 markets) including Mexico, Brazil and Argentina next weekend.
Here is the Top Ten this Easter Sunday:
1. The Hunger Games (Lionsgate) Week 3 [4,137 Theaters] PG13
Friday $12.9M, Saturday $13.1M, Weekend $33.5M (-60%), Cume $302.8M
International $157.1M, Worldwide Cume $460.0M
2. American Reunion (Universal) NEW [3,192 Theaters]
Friday $9.3M, Saturday $7.5M, Weekend $21.4M
International $19.3M, Worldwide Cume $40.8M
3. Titanic 3D (Paramount/Fox) NEW – Wednesday opening [2,674 Theaters]
Friday $7.1M, Saturday $6.6M, Weekend $17.3M, Cume $25.7M
International $35.5M, Worldwide Cume $52.8M
4. Wrath Of The Titans 3D (Legendary/Warner) Week 2 [3,545 Theaters] PG13
Friday $12.4M, Saturday $5.4M, Weekend $15.0M, Cume $58.8M
International $152.5M, Worldwide Cume $211.3M
5. Mirror Mirror (Relativity) Week 2 [3,618 Theaters] PG
Friday $4.5M, Saturday $3.9M, Weekend $11.M (-39%), Cume $36.4M
6. 21 Jump Street (MGM/Sony) Week 4 [3,009 Theaters] R
Friday $3.6M, Saturday $3.8M, Weekend $10.2M, Cume $109.5M
7. Dr Seuss’ The Lorax 3D (Universal) Week 6 [3,003 Theaters] PG
Friday $2.2M, Saturday $1.7M, Weekend $5.0M, Cume $198.1M
8. Salmon Fishing In Yemen (CBS Films) Week 5 [524 Theaters] PG13
Friday $320K, Saturday $417K, Weekend $975K, Cume $4.6M
9. John Carter (Disney) Week 5 [1,015 Theaters] PG13
Friday $290K, Saturday $322K, Weekend $820K, Cume $67.9M
10. Safe House (Universal) Week 9 [482 Theaters] R
Friday $212K, Saturday $229K, Weekend $580K, Cume $124.7M
FRIDAY PM, 6TH UPDATE: I’ve just learned that Lionsgate’s The Hunger Games has grossed $131.6M internationally and $269.3M
domestically in its first 13 days of release at the worldwide box office to cross $400M total. My sources say it’ll be the #1 movie again this Easter weekend with $12M-$14M for Friday at the North American box office and potentially $40M for the weekend. Universal’s American Reunion opening today is #2 with $8M-$10M today for a projected $25M for this weekend. Universal’s fourquel reunites the original cast of this raunchy popular franchise more than a decade later, including even that hot mess Tara Reid. (For those keeping score, there have been 8 releases total – but a quad went directly to home video.) In the U.S. and Canada, midnights at 37 locations opened with $660K. It pulled ahead of Paramount/Fox conversion Titanic 3D which opened Wednesday and is looking at $6.5M-$7.5M today for #3 and a possible 5-day cume of $20M through Easter Sunday.
Playing in the same 4,137 locations, Hunger Games grossed $6.3M Thursday for a new 13-day cume of $269.3M. In second place Thursday was Titanic 3D which grossed $3.6M playing in 2,674 theaters. “That’s a strong -16% hold given that Wednesday openers usually fall an average of -30+%,” Paramount, which is handling the domestic release tells me. Audiences gave it an ‘A’ CinemaScore. James Cameron’s epic new 2-day cume is $8.3M. There are still no foreign figures available from Fox. Universal reports that American Reunion opened as the No. 1 film in Australia, Russia, and Holland despite stiff competition at the box office there. It had the highest opening for the franchise in those 3 territories.
WEDNESDAY PM/THURSDAY AM: Paramount says Titanic 3D has now made around $4.7M domestic for today. But that number includes
sneak screenings. Turns out that Wednesday’s actual $4.3M opening wasn’t good enough to beat the #1 movie at the North American box office, Lionsgate’s The Hunger Games which grossed $4.6M from 4,137 theaters for a giant domestic cume of $262.9M. Then again, James Cameron’s epic had less runs and has a longer running time (194 minutes vs 142 minutes) so that meant less showings. Still it’s a great start, especially considering that about 30% of schools were out Wednesday, and 50% today, and 80% tomorrow. So now the world’s 2nd highest-grossing film officially embarks on another box office voyage for the five days through Easter Sunday. Paramount for domestic and Fox for international released Titanic 3D Wednesday with some previews Tuesday. (As if $1.8 billion theatrical gross for the original wasn’t enough already!)
I heard that Wednesday’s matinees were surprisingly strong, although last night’s North American midnights were expectedly negligible (and considering the film’s 194-minute running time): an estimated $250,000. Overall, the North American gross taken in so far is $425,000 primarily from the fan sneak screenings which Paramount released on just over 300 screens around the country. Some theater chains like AMC had a 6:30 PM screening Tuesday of Titanic 3D, and Pacific, Cinemark, and Arclight all seemed to have midnight shows. Today the film releases into 2,674 dates, including 79 IMAX theaters,Paramount is ”still feeling good” about its projection of $20M-$22M for the first five days of release. Rival studios are expecting $25M-$30M. That more than covers the cost of the 3D conversion, which was overseen by James Cameron and his producing partner Jon Landau, and completed by Stereo D, at a cost of approximately $18M.
But this Easter weekend will be a crowded U.S. and Canadian marketplace what with Universal’s American Reunion opening in 3,200 locations, Lionsgate’s The Hunger Games still going strong, and Warner Bros’ Wrath Of The Titans and Relativity’s Mirror Mirror trying for more ticket sales. Titanic 3D‘s tracking didn’t look radically different from other blockbuster movies which had 3D conversions. What will help this release is Cameron’s 3D authority. Audiences expected to attend include mothers taking their daughters and film technology geeks. But let’s not forget that teenage girls and their repeat business made the original Titanic successful – or that their one-time heartthrob Leonardo Di Caprio is now approaching middle-age.
Fox opened or previewed Titanic 3D Wednesday night in 17 of the 84 international markets that opened day and date with domestic. It will release in a total of 108 international markets. The studio tells me it’s incredibly difficult to compare this release pattern with the original 2D release 14 years ago because the international landscape has changed so much. For instance, those territories with the most dramatic increases in screen counts include China (2,400 today vs 571 in 1997), Russia (796 vs 23), India (230 vs 82), South Korea (232 vs 75), and Japan (463 vs 263). In 1997, Fox released Titanic on approximately 7,000 screens for all of international (adding up the screen counts at the widest point of release in every territory). Whereas Titanic 3D will be releasing total international (including non-day and date markets) on approximately 8,600 screens. Also it’s interesting to recall that Fox only released the original Titanic day and date in 8 markets back in ’97 (Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, and Taiwan). The majority of the international marketplace released in January and February of 1998. However Titanic 3D is releasing day and date in the majority of the international marketplace. China, Poland, Norway, and most of Latin America are releasing one week later.
Titanic 3D will play in a total of 100 international IMAX theatres: 83 of them opened Wednesday. Titanic also will open in 4DX™ theatres today. For civilians, 4DX™ bills itself as an all-five-senses immersive cinematic experience that puts audiences into a film’s environment with motion, wind, fog, lighting and even scent-based special effects, going way beyond 3D. Launched in 2009 by CGV, Asia’s largest theater chain, 4DX™ is currently available at 29 locations worldwide with 50 auditoriums slated by year’s end 2012. Titanic will open on the following number of 4DX screens: 12 screens in South Korea, 11 in Mexico, 2 in China, and 1 in Thailand.
For more estimates listed by title, see box office results here...Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Wow, 3D is definitely here to stay! I wonder if Google’s new high-tech glasses will also function as 3D glasses in the theater (and at home).
Since the movie is released in 3D in 2012, can I include it on my Ten Worst List for 2012 as I included it on the same list for 1997?
If it’s that important to you…I’d say yes
Oh, you’re just so much smarter than everyone else. It’s so cool not to like Titanic, isn’t it?
So now people aren’t entitled to have an opinion, if someone feels a certain way it’s because “it’s cool”?
Titanic had some great action and FX for the time but there’s a LOT of really bad dialogue to slog through before it even hits the iceberg. I wouldn’t be surprised if a fair number of people who liked it but haven’t seen it in years go back and find that it hasn’t aged particularly well.
Frankly they should go back and do a director’s cut that cuts out 45+ minutes, it could be a huge improvement.
Why not trash “Titanic” all over again? Such a nonsensical opinion will be just as easy to ignore today as it was then. Knock yourself out!
If by “nonsensical opinion,” you mean “accurate description,” then yes–most people *did* ignore that way of thinking, sadly.
Have you guys seen GONE WITH THE WIND? What a piece of crap! Also, Steven Spielberg is a no-talent hack, and Meryl Streep has the range of a squirt gun. Let’s not forget kittens, cookies, and rainbows: FAIL!
Got to agree about GWTW, but Spielberg and Streep not so much.
It was sarcasm…
It may have been sarcasm but the comment can hold up on its own. Never liked GWTW… (cookies are ok though)
More like hyperbolic generalization if you ask me. Just because someone hates Meryl as an actress doesn’t mean they think Jessica Alba is the greatest actress alive. Get a grip.
People are entitled to that opinion but it is CLEARLY trying to be snarky.
American Reunion will take the #1 spot this weekend with about 30 million.
I hope so, i hope it makes more, i’m really nervous that it’s gonna open bad because it’s april and easter weekend — all the other pie movies opened in august.
Saw it last night at midnight. Was absolutely hilarious. Audience was laughing and clapped at the end. Great trip down memory lane
Was it packed?
“American Reunion will take the #1 spot this weekend with about 30 million.”
I love people who are SOOO sure of themselves when they post things here.
And they are wrong.
Stay in the mailroom, kid.
no it wont
Original content beats retreads. Surprise, surprise.
Maybe in the States it does. BTW, international matters more in the end.
It would be a unique investment, but I’d love to see IMAX open up one flagship IMAX multiplex in Los Angeles. If it was successful, maybe they could open them selectively in their higher traffic cities. Given how risky it would be, I would say LA, Chicago, NY (if the real estate exists) and not much beyond that. Even if the theater had 3 IMAX screens, I bet it would become a moviegoer’s destination (like the ArcLight) and would allow them to run multiple movies in extended runs. They wouldn’t have to cut “Hunger Games” short with a one-week engagement, when movies like that could continue to do solid business. It would be an additional source of ongoing revenue for the studios (if it worked) and maybe they could even get a major studio to partner on it. The IMAX brand seems to be strong enough to make it work, and I bet the AMCs of the world are trying to expand their own large-scale theaters…
What a great idea, why don’t you email IMAX — worth a shot — although i don’t think theater chains are making new theaters or i could be wrong. But great great idea
Excellent idea!
They crank so many movies through IMAX screens nowadays you have to see it on it’s first or second week or it’s gone from IMAX.
The solution is to build a true IMAX multiplex. If done right, people would come from everywhere.
Do a google search for “Warren Imax” or “Moore Imax” Warren Buffet built a 100 foot wide 6 story tall beast of a theater in Oklahoma and another in Kansas, and they’re constantly packed. And these theaters are in small town middle America.
Now imagine if IMAX built these beasts larger cities. Hell I’d build a 4 screen monster (100 foot screens each) and offer amenities like the Arclight or Drafthouse.
How do you keep crowds coming during slow seasons? Easy. Re-release the classics during the September or February months. I’d love to see the original Star Wars trilogy, Indiana Jones, ID4, Blade Runner, The Matrix, Gladiator, and the Lord of the Rings on monster size 100 foot screens. Wouldn’t you?
God that would be my dream theater.
Since the movie is now almost 15 years old, I wonder if all the current 15 year old girls are going to go watch it a ton of times, just like back in 1998.
No, but their daughthers might.
So you’re saying that the daughters of 15-yr-olds are going to go the cinema repeatedly, alone to watch a PG-13-rated 3D re-release of a ’90s film. Riiiiiiight.
I wonder if Titanic 3D will have legs (obv on a smaller scale) like the first go-around.
Today’s 14-17 year old girls were infants or not even born when the first one was released.
Star Wars I 3D made about $44m total, but it also had to open against Safe House and Journey 2, and Chronicle and The Grey were still around. Oh, and it was a terrible movie with zero nostalgia value.
Unless you count the Hunger Games or Salmon Genocide in Yemen, there’s absolutely no romance-themed movie in the marketplace this weekend. Paramount is sand-bagging with $22m projections.
Also, wouldn’t $22 million be a record low pull for a wide release/IMAX/3D flick over the 1st five days?
Well, I don’t think they are playing in all imax theaters — i know my only imax theater is still playing wrath of the titans.
Curious thing about “Titanic’s” original B.O…it started around $30 mil, but never rose above the low to mid $20′s during subsequent weeks. However, unlike most movies, it just hung on steadily like that for months. What many seem to be overlooking is that this is a 3 1/2 hour movie…thus not as many showings are possible each day. So it could very well settle in again for a similarly long-ish run, with nothing amazing about its numbers each week, except their steady accumulation. “Titanic” was a repudiation of the massive opening weekend with massive drops then, and could be once more.
Yeah, everybody is totally overlooking the running time. Most theaters had to call in riot squads to deal with the millions of females turned away from Titanic showings today because of the dearth of available show times. I’m sure next week theaters will be better prepared for the hordes
I remember that. It just KEPT ON GOING and making $24 million week after week for like 3 months straight.
I was so upset that it was going to break the Star Wars record that I refused to watch it b/c I was bitter and angry and a stupid teenager.
I still haven’t watched it, but I’d probably enjoy it if I gave it a rent.
Interestingly, I recall Titanic was originally suppose to open in July the same week as Air Force One, but it got pulled for a December release b/c Fox thought they were looking at a disaster (it was the most expensive film ever, don’t forget).
I wonder what would have happened if they released it that summer…
Titanic wasn’t released that summer because it simply wasn’t finished (a blessing in disguise).
I’m pretty much looking forward to seeing this again in 3D. The romance part will be as soppy as it was even in 1997 – but I bet the rest of it will look superb.
Like it always did.
But for the actual weekend it’s a fight between Reunion and Hunger Games. Titanic will burn off a bit of interest with the Wed launch I reckon.
It all depends on if a whole new generation of young girls find out about Titanic and spread the word to their friends, because that’s how it got so big in 97. Then of course you have the people who want to see it again after seeing it originally when it was in the theater.
Well it’s not the best, but it holds up well. So much better than the teenage love story/epic crap that is hitting the theater these days.
Bridesmaids, Twilight, Hunger Games, Titanic… Not all to my taste, but great to see so many female-centric hits.
Why is it good if it’s “female centric”?
Political correctness ad nauseum.
Hey Dr. Flo, even Cameron admitted 15 years ago that he had “just made a 200 million dollar chick flick.” I would call that straight from the horses mouth, wouldn’t you?
Has nothing to do with being PC. In an industry dominated by men and with so many movies geared towards them, it’s nice for some women to have movies that star and speak to women. Imagine that!
It’s not political correctness. If I had a dollar for every news story that blamed a crappy movie’s box office on the fact that “men don’t want to see movies with strong female leads” I would be a rich woman. Having a strong track record of films with female leads puts these stupid, sexist opinions in their place.
Because for so long the studio heads have taken the female audience for granted. Last year we saw female-centric films like Bridesmaids, Bad Teacher, and The Help make money with minimal costs. This year we see a girl lead The Hunger Games to more money than most superhero franchises-again with minimal cost. There are still many men in Hollywood burying their head in the sand at this phenomenon, but the numbers don’t lie. A girl with a bow and arrow buried John Carter and Wrath of the Titans. Times have changed and it’s time for studios to change with it.
As a guy I immensely enjojed Hunger Games ( read all three books) but not interested in Bridesmaids etc. There’s a difference between a film with a strong female lead and one that seems to be exclusively made for women. Titanic is my all time favorite movie BTW, and I was a 30 year old guy when it came out – hardly the stereotype of a screaming teenage girl.
Because it’s so hard to get a female-led movie made at all. When one of them succeeds, everyone writes it off as a fluke and continues to go after the male audience. But with a bundle of successful female pictures coming out all at once, it’s harder for Hollywood to ignore us.
I don’t think it’s “political correctness” to wish I could go to movies that weren’t made for teenage boys.
Has anyone noticed the last three literary juggernauts, which have all become mega successful movie franchises, have all been written by women?
I’d make an exception toward Twilight though. At least the quality of the others is good and/or debatable. Twilight is awful period.
I can’t wait to see it on IMAX 3D in Century City.1
seriously? it’s barely an IMAX.
The 4DX movie experience sounds very innovative. Does anyone know what the price per ticket is at one of those theaters? I’m really curious.
Now that it’s in 3D, will the captain be able to see the iceberg coming?
With respect to SUPER-WIDE releases, I wonder if there’ll ever be a time where they “tier” the prices according to assigned seating.
Obviously it wouldn’t work for nearly all movies, but for something like Hunger Games or The Dark Knight, imagine how much more they’d make with variable pricing. Everyone in line for The Hunger Games is CLEARLY game for paying $10. What about $20? $40? So on?
Also, it’d make date night more fun knowing you have assigned seats.
What about stealing seats?
Have the seats folded up immovably, and a single swipe of your ticket opens your seat.
Do you honestly want moviegoing to be that complicated????
In Canada they have one theatre at the national Cineplex chain called “UltraAVX”. Reserved seating with roomier seats. You can even buy your tickets online and see which seats are already reserved and choose your seats accordingly. It’s not that complicated. Arrive just as the movie is starting and you avoid all lines and hassle. ArcLight has these features as well. Every multiplex in North America should have one theatre with this option. For some reason movie theatre reserved seating is rare in the US.
I’ve been arguing for variable pricing for years. Opening weekend should be 25% higher than the rest of the run.
Near us we we have Gold Class cinemas (now iPix?) which is roomier and nicer than your own sofa. They have at most about 40 seats in the theatre, you can reserve your seats well in advance, and they have waitstaff bringing you high quality food and drinks. Wish there were more of these, well worth the 2 to 3 times normal ticket prices, at least for tent poles. Arclight is a good alternative as well. Wish there were more of both and I bet people would start thinking movies are worth the hassle and price. Choosing your seats is well worth paying a little more.
FYI folks, online reserved ticket buying is becoming more of the norm in the States as well.
Reserve seating is fine and was done for a while in nyc but either did not work or i don’t know what happened. I don’t agree with variable pricing. It’s bad enough people complain that some movies are not worth the price of admission, you open up a whole can or worms and end up creating an opposite effect — people not wanting to pay a higher premium — ummm, didn’t you see the whole enormous backlash against those 3D surcharges which rose significantly from the first year it was big to the second — it went from like 2 dollars to close to 5 and that was only a few dollars more. So sorry, don’t agree with variable pricing.
In the UK it’s always been assigned seating in most major movie theatres because there is not the same theatre saturation as in America, so sometimes very widely released films have averages of £36,000 ($50,000) for the most popular films and they need to assign to fit everyone in.
I made the effort to see “Titanic” old school style at the single screen Village Theatre in Westwood (CA) at its midnight show. I detected a predominately UCLA crowd, with about 3 out of 4 being female. Film looks outstanding in 3D; and the digital print is so sharp. Of course it helps that the story continues to entertain and hold the audience’s attention. What surprised me was the good behavior of the viewers as a group — no talking or texting — which I greatly appreciated. No matter how large and state-of-the-art your home system is, ideally, “Titanic” should be seen in a theater. Kate appears luminous. Leonardo has the energy of a young James Cagney. Was wonderful to revisit the nice work turned in by Gloria Stuart and Bill Paxton. Finally, should Cameron ever offer us a revised version, I could do with a bit less Kathy Bates and a bit more Eric Braeden and Bernard Fox.
Your in westwood and detected a primarily ucla crowd? don’t you know where you are? You are right near the UCLA campus!
another superb job from James Cameron! Let’s all together pray for an Avatar 3DD to be re-released soon
No matter how many dimensions he adds to Avatar, it’ll still be a terrible film.
I saw it and it was really fun watching in a nostalgic sort of way. I was 9 when it came out and I honestly thought it holds up pretty well. Yes, the romance is still sappy and the dialogue probably could have been better but the images of the ship, the beauty of the sets and costumes, and the how well done the sinking was (hardly any CGI!) was great. And Cameron might be the only person I’ll ever be willing to spend money on 3D for. Say what you will about his ego, ect, but he knows how to do 3D. This was definitely the best conversion Ive ever seen, didnt really see any of the darkening so common with everything else.
An 18m dollar conversion???
Considering a good 3D conversion runs $150-200,000, the runtime would cost this film roughly 29M.
So with James C in charge are you telling us the 3D isn’t good??????
He said that they painstakingly redid every frame — this is the guy who did Avatar and basically started the revival of 3D — do you really think or maybe you want to spread negativity — that the 3D is not up to Par?
Also to note, there is an audience out there that was just a bit too young to see it come out in theaters at PG-13 the first time around and grew up watching it on video/tv/dvd etc. and wants to see it on the big screen for the *first* time…combine that with the nostalgia audience and the brand new 13-17 crowd (most of whom have already seen hunger games at least once) looking for something new, and bang = $30M
A CLASSIC SOME DAY? IT’S BEEN 15 years — you don’t think it’s a classic already?
Unfortunately, I have to agree because as boring as I found the film it is now a classic movie and will be shown to teens in thirty years the way the most popular movies of the ’7os and ’80s are just now.
Most definitely 3D has come to stay
I hope the town pays close attention and realizes the new tentpole strategy has arrived. Never ever create anything new (aka “risk”). Simply re-release every former hit in 3D (aka “risk free”). Then we can finally rid ourselves of of those irritating actor/director/writer non-MBA types who are screwing up our profit margins once and for all!!!
I’m looking forward to The Matrix 3D release. Seriously. And Blade Runner 3D.
I just love the movie..it never gets old .. 10/10..
Only Hollywood is in love with 3D.
It’s not strictly true that only Hollywood is in love with 3D. There’s still enough people willing to spend their money domestically and globally on it to suggest it does have appeal even if it’s settled down a bit.