Who owns the rights to Sorcerer and how much money has the 1977 thriller made? That’s what William Friedkin has asked the court to find out for him. In a five-page civil complaint filed today in LA Superior Court, the Oscar-winner claims that Paramount and Universal are not allowing him domestic rights to Sorcerer nor a full
accounting of how much the movie has really made. Friedkin directed and produced Sorcerer and contends he has profit participation in the movie. The suit, filed by lawyer Eric M. George of Century City-based firm Browne George Ross LLP, says both studios have “recently disclaimed rights to exploit the Picture in the United States, and admitted ignorance as to who, if anyone, currently has such rights.” The suit goes on to add, “Bafflingly, however, defendants persist in denying that Friedkin has any rights to exploit the Picture.” The director also says that he has not received a participation statement in “over 20 years” – which makes one think Friedkin should secure some new accountants while he’s at it.
While a critical success back in the late 1970s, Sorcerer was helmed by Friedkin after back-to-back hits The French Connection and The Exorcist. But it was not a big draw in theaters, grossing just over half its $22 million budget. Now 35 years after Sorcerer came out, Friedkin is asking the court to order a look at studio the books “to determine the true amount of revenue derived” from the movie and his “share of such revenue.” Friedkin believes he has the rights to the movie and to show the print he has, and is asking the court for a three-day hearing on the money matters and to “issue a declaration as to who has the right to exploit Sorcerer in the United States and abroad”.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.


This is puzzling, since “Sorcerer” was a carbon copy of the masterpiece “Wages of Fear.” Watch that movie. It is terrific.
Sorcerer was a remake of Wages of Fear. Nothing untoward there. Of course they are similar.
Both are awesome by the way. We need a beautiful print put on Blu Ray. Criterion has already put a beautiful print of Wages on Blu Ray.
SORCERER is Friedkin’s HEAVEN’S GATE.
lol
That is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard
Thanks for the tip. Will add it to my Netflix queue.
Why is it puzzling? I don’t think anyone is denying that it’s a remake of Wages of Fear, pretty much everyone on this board, hell every half-assed film geek on the planet knows that. Friedkin’s complaint is about the film HE made and whether or not he retains rights on it AND he’s questioning the amount of revenue Universal has made on it. I myself Netflixed it a couple times in the past 10 years so there’s a few pennies anyway.
And yes, Wages of Fear is a masterpiece… but I think the Scorcerer is an underrated jewel.
Imitation is the sincerest form of failure. Friedkin’s trace-job isn’t a patch on the original.
No…what’s puzzling is that Friedkin is married to Sherry Lansing who had a long tenure as chief of Paramount Pictures. Why now and not then?
Carbon copy? Not so! It is a remake, no doubt, but a very different take steeped in ’70s era realism. The original film is terrific, but that’s a bit boring to underscore. What is interesting to say is that Sorcerer is a superb remake — And that’s unusual!
SORCERER is a classic. Shame it’s not restored on blu-ray already.
Team Friedkin all the way.
Couldn’t agree more.
As with most things, I’m with Jesus Christ on this one.
SORCERER is a brilliant picture, not a beat-for-beat remake of WAGES OF FEAR. It would have been discovered if it didn’t go into the buzzsaw of a phenomenon like STAR WARS.
I wonder if Friedkin is really looking to see if he can shake loose the remake rights to the picture…
One of the few re-makes to improve upon the original. Hope Mr. Friedkin is compensated with whatever (if anything) is owed him and hope we can finally get a Blu-Ray of this incredible picture when all is said and done.
Hell yeah!!!!!
This is true. WAGES OF FEAR is a very good movie, but SORCERER is the real deal. I can recall seeing this when it was first released, and Friedkin’s post-FRENCH CONNECTION, post-EXORCIST power was such that he demanded the movie be shown with a six or eight minute “overture” of music, played over a black screen, as a prelude to the movie’s commencement. A great film that needs to be unleashed on a new generation.
That overture/black screen thing was done for the “Exorcist” too in its original run. The music was Krystof Penderecki, which to the 15 year old me was very unsettling. Too bad more films today dont warrant that type of setup!
Sorcerer is Friedkin’s best film hands down. Would probably be a hit today, but it had the misfortune of coming out about the same time as Star Wars, and it got killed. A great movie, saw it on the big screen at a Friedkin film festival, it looked great, and the audience loved it. Should be re-released today, would probably do very well.
One of the greatest films EVER MADE! if not the best remake, with John Carpenters THING being a close 2nd, and in 3rd is SCARFACE, opened against STAR WARS, no film could’ve survived this misfortune, the scene in the poster is one of the most beautiful shots in history, and quite possibly the greatest practical effect ever filmed, the soundtrack by the masters of electronic music Tangerine Dream, this film is “criminally” underrated, the WAGES OF FEAR is a wonderful film, but this is one of the best.
Those are all of the most awesome remakes, but you’ve neglected to include in your list Warner Herzog’s remake of Murnau’s Nosferatu, which is absolutely haunted by the original.
Oh yeah. Agreed. But nothing can beat Herzog and Kinski at their dark best.
A fantastic film, relentless, nerve wracking and a great score! It is a remake of Wages Of Fear. Please release it on Blu-Ray!!
“Sorcerer” was never a critical darling. It left viewers cold from day one. Its only claim to fame is that “Star Wars” was yanked from the Chinese Theater in Hollywood because the theater booker, before he saw “Star Wars,” thought “Sorcerer” was going to be the bigger draw.
Friedkin’s best move after Sorcerer was marrying Sherry Lansing. He put up with her and got a few gigs way past his sell-by date.
He should remake “Sorcerer” as a video game. Hire his old buddy Joe Eszterhas to write it.
I saw a beautiful archival print of this at the New Beverly a couple of years ago. It’s an absolutely remarkable film that deserves to be rediscovered.
Friedkin was at a retrospective film festival of his work at the Harvard Film Archive three years ago and he brought along a print that I believe that Paramount owns (I could be wrong on that). The print looked great and I thought the film was really good. I second the many calls for a Criterion release of this on blu-ray!
Go Billy! This film deserves to be seen. The studio staff is lazy and not at all forward thinking when it comes to anything that requires some effort untangling rights issues. It’s alway easy to say “no.”
Though I have no skin in this particular game, I know and have worked with Billy and I also do business — on occassion — with the people at Paramount and Universal that he is tangling with. I’m posting this under a fake name because I’m actually afraid of being blackballed by the studios by supporting the artist.
Nice reporting, Dominic.
Bill is going to win money.
VHS + DVD + time = $$$
Even THE BIG BUS is a profitable film now because of this equation.
That’s why the studios keep the library.
I love THE BIG BUS, but considering how it has been out of print for a decade (and was previously only available as a $70 rental VHS) I’m not so sure how profitable it really was.
I feature Sorcerer in the college “Overlooked Films” class I teach. It’s always a big hit with the students! I’ve gone from the VHS to the laserdisc to the current DVD, and a beautifully restored BluRay would be terrific!
Dear Mr. Friedkin,
Have you ever met anybody you didn’t sue?
See you soon,
Satan
Let me add to the chorus: this is an absolute masterpiece of film making. Character-drenched action and suspense doesn’t get any better than ‘Sorcerer.’ Hopefully Friedkin’s suit is just anticipating a forthcoming Criterion Collection restoration and re-release. Astounding movie.
Universal greenlit the film then asked Paramount for help with the cost overruns.
Universal still has the domestic film in print on dvd and with current SKUs.
Both the VHS and the laserdisc editions were also Universal Home Video.
-RnsW
This is really interesting news if you’re a fan. And I certainly am of both Friedkin and his films. I’ve seen/heard a number of interviews with him, and for years now he’s been trying to get Sorcerer properly remastered and released on video. Specifically on Blu-ray. It will be very interesting to see where this all goes. Hopefully the rights can get figured out and a great Bluray will come out of it. I’d love to have this on my shelf right beside The Wages Of Fear.
Lets just hope he doesn’t remaster it the way he remastered French Connection and started world war III with Owen Roizman.
BTW, even though the Fox blurray remaster is sitting on the shelves in that disgusting pastel “color” version, the one that made consumers think Billy is colorblind — Best Buy has an exclusive on the re-remastered and “cleaned up” version, without the pastel effect. And I think a video intro with Billy apologizing for what he had done.
Unfortunately, it’s always sold out when I go.
-Rnsw
What you’re omitting though is that he took a lot of flack for his first French Connection release, and he most certainly learned his lesson from the vocal fans (And Roizman). And while the first FC release was indeed very poor, he also had his aesthetic reasons for it looking that way. There’s no reason why he would suddenly apply that to all his films.
But lets look at what’s happened since then. He supervised the remaster of To Live & Die In LA Blu-ray, and it looks absolutely fantastic. Both he and Roizman supervised the remaster for The Exorcist, and it also looks fantastic (It was also made sure that both the theatrical cut & directors cut were included in the set). And most recently, both he and Roizman supervised the new remaster for The French Connection, and it also looks stunning.
When it comes to catalog remasters for blu-ray, 3 out of 4 ain’t too bad. Especially when #4 was a proper redo of #1.
In other words, I have no worries about Sorcerer looking great in HD if Friedkin is ever able to supervise a proper blu-ray release.
Friedkin needs to make another horror film.
Sorcerer is a brilliant, brilliant film, so well made and well acted. It’s among my favorites of all time. The existing DVD is a crummy pan-and-scan hatchet job. We need a Blu-ray — just work this rights crap out already!
Anything that sets a fire under the asses of the studios that continue to sit on this mini-masterpiece is fine by me. Considering all the catalog releases of absolute dreck that have been shovelled onto blu-ray in the last few years, perhaps now some consideration will be given to getting this a proper remastered blu-ray release with all the trimmings.
So, a brilliant movie is marginalized by the studios. No news there. The fact that a cinema icon reinvented a classic film to engender US audiences with a fresh take on a brofest moody action flick should not be lost on a crit aud. Sure remake, put Clooney and Al in it and Boffo, but you should pay the M-A-N who put his gonads on the line for this passion pix! What’s wrong with old school smarts, certainly cheaper than ‘Battleship’ mavens. Let him see the books, let him remake it with current crop and prime players, this ensemble is a gift for any actor; a credible piece. Billy p-l-e-a-s-e ! Be a hero. For what you’ve been and are go get ‘em. They’ve always had to be dragged to ‘their own’ success.
Wow, I am very surprised to see so much love here for this amazing film. I have always been a huge fan and hopefully movement on this will lead to a proper DVD release, the pan and scan I currently own is crap. I would implore anyone that likes gritty thrillers to check out this forgotten gem. I also share the sentiment that it is an improvement of the classic Wages of Fear. IMHO this really is Friedkin’s best film. Truly brave and bold film-making.
It’s an incredible movie that I have never forgotten. William Friedkin and Roy Scheider at the top of their game. I agree with other posts that it should be rereleased, limited or otherwise, and handed over to Criterion for the proper home video presentation it deserves. It’s a Gem. There are millions of people who would love this movie that have never heard of it.
Another vote for Team Friedkin, I hope he gets what he wants. Sorcerer is an amazing film with an even more amazing soundtrack, all I need this year besides the Jaws blu ray is a new HD print of Friedkin’s masterpiece.
Why oh why. Must be the money. Hated star wars only saw it because I was bored in Daytona beach. But il learned to adapt friedkin would do better having a panel on to live and die in la. Bring in a guest panel of all the tv stars he created charge 25 per head at every major theatre city chain. Never heard of this movie till now. How much can it be 250-1million. I thought the studios kept all the rights including derivative.
Huh?
Fantastic movie. Intense. Needs to be rediscovered. I think if Universal rolled out a modest release it would probably do good.
As Friedkin’s biographer, I should point out — as I did in my book — that “Sorcerer” was an uneasy co-production between Universal and Paramount at a time when such partnerships were new in the U.S., although long accepted internationally. There is also the overlay that Friedkin resided in France much of the time and probably enjoyed droit d’auteur. Plus Paramount had major corporate holdings in the Dominican Republic where much of “Sorcerer” was shot, further muddying the financial waters. Bottom line, this is a hell of a suit that both film companies will be best advised to settle out of the sunshine of court. Notwithstanding all that, “Sorcerer” remains one of the greatest movies ever made and is both a compliment to Friedkin and a complement to Clouzot. All of this means that the film must be seen because Billy was, is, and remains its moral custodian.
Further to Mr Segaloff’s posting, not only did Universal and Paramount finance SORCERER, Paramount handling foreign distribution (through CIC, owned at the time by Paramount, Universal and MGM) and Universal, in a dunderheaded move, “experimenting” with splitting domestic distribution between the two companies, designating which branches of each would service area exhibitors. It was seen at the time as a test of applying the CIC model to the US/Canada territories. It was also seen as a pissing match between Paramount’s Frank Mancuso and Universal’s Ned Tanen. Given the results, no one came out a winner.