EXCLUSIVE: Ever since I scooped the news a week ago about G.I. Joe: Retaliation moving from June 29th to March 29th, 2013, no one was buying Paramount‘s excuse that “adding 3D” was the only reason for the 9 month delay. Least of all me. So I did some snooping. And what I found out shows the difficult decisions which Hollywood moguls are facing in this challenging box office environment when even franchises aren’t sure things. (Witness last weekend’s Men In Black 3.) And at what point and at what cost do the top execs make changes in their films already shooting or in post-production or even five weeks out from release in order to head off a disaster?
Hollywood was gobsmacked that Paramount vacated the primo date this summer, especially because the studio blew a wad on a Super Bowl commercial and already was starting TV and outdoor ads for GI Joe 2. Not to mention the toys, warehouses full of them ready and waiting, already on shelves. Or the big screen trailer attacjed this past weekend to MIB3. But the fact is that Paramount became extremely concerned about G.I. Joe 2‘s box office prospects worldwide after its test scores were mediocre to
bad. Reshoots were needed. Plus, the moguls realized what a complete miscalculation it was to kill off Channing Tatum in the sequel. And even more so at the start of the film. You will remember that Tatum wasn’t a star when the first G.I. Joe was released. But since then his back-to-back successes in The Vow and 21 Jump Street have made him into a draw. And it turned out that the only bright spot for audiences as a result of the G.I. Joe 2 testing was the aborted relationship between Tatum and Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson. Plus look at the movie poster for Retaliation: you wouldn’t even know Tatum is in the sequel. Now the movie is being reworked — and reshoots don’t lose a valuable leading man like Tatum by killing him off. “The 3D is an excuse as to not reveal the Tatum of it all,” one of my sources tells me. Of course this June Tatum appears in Steven Soderbergh’s Magic Mike as a stripper (inspired by Tatum’s own experiences, pre-stardom). My sources insist Paramount didn’t want uniformed Channing to compete with stripping Channing on the same weekend. Not with those abs.
Related: Hot Trailer: Channing Tatum In ‘Magic Mike’
Related: ‘G.I. Joe: Retaliation’ Moving To March 2013 To Add 3D For Bigger Foreign Box Office
Here is how Paramount insiders explain to me what happened. And clearly it’s not just because “We’re going to do a conscientious 3D job because we’ve seen how it can better box office internationally” now that Russia and China are building new 3D theaters by the week, as the studio said a week ago:
“This was a case of letting a schedule to fill a summer slot dictate the film not being in 3D even though we knew that would be the most commercial version of the film. Then in the spring there were 2 big events. First John Carter lost $200M despite the best efforts of the Pixar brain trust. But the 3D film managed to gross over $200M overseas, nearly tripling its U.S. take.
“Also Channing Tatum had a breakout spring, starring in The Vow and 21 Jump Street. In our first screening of the film the reaction from audiences was good but with 2 big concerns: 1) They didn’t like the fact that Channing and The Rock really didn’t have any time to develop a friendship before Channing died, and 2) Why wasn’t it going to be in 3D? We went back and shot another week with Channing to develop more of his story with The Rock, which made the film play much better. But we didn’t have the time to be in 3D.
“Then a week ago Battleship basically had the same performance as John Carter – $60M-$70M U.S. and just over $200M international. That was just a wake-up call that said to us we need to offer the best version of the film irrespective of summer market share to ensure the best possible performance. And not being in 3D will cost us a ton of business internationally.”
But the big question is how much this deliberate delay of G.I. Joe 2‘s release will affect the pic’s cost. After all, the cost of MIB3 soared when the time travel elements of Etan Cohen’s script had to be re-worked by Jeff Nathanson who needed more time to pull off the tricky plot device while Cohen worked on another project. So the film shut down for about six weeks, which is a rarity for a major tentpole, and then Cohen came back to finish the movie. That caused the cost to skyrocket from a range of $225M (which is what Sony claims as the budget) to $300M (which is what rival studios say it really was). Between that and all the gross profit participants, that’s a lot of coin before Sony sees profit. Of course, Paramount had to talk its partners on GI Joe 2 into the extra nine months of carrying costs – MGM, which has 25%, and David Ellison’s Skydance, which has another 25%. Paramount sources claim to me that the budget for the $125M-budgeted actioner is stll under control. I’m not sure I believe their claim that the changes will result in just $5M more:
“Several 3D houses had already approached us about doing the film in 3D. This move gives us the time to do it right. We are having conversations with Stereo D and Prime Focus about doing the 3D work for a reduced fee in exchange for a piece of 3D upside. Also, interest rates are very low right now. So 9 months does not have a huge impact on budget. It should stay under $130M.”
Meanwhile, other sources tell Deadline that G.I. Joe 2 director Jon M. Chu is “shellshocked” over the release date move. Paramount kept him on a very tight leash from the beginning of the production. Among other things, they wouldn’t let him bring onboard David Nicksay, who has worked with Chu as executive producer on the Step Up movies and the Justin Bieber documentary. Even The Rock felt forced to calm fan fears about the film like in this Twitter exchange on May 23rd when the delay announcement came down: DwayneJohnson @TheRock It will be. Designing new scenes to enhance 3D. RT: @JimmyinGA: Was looking forward to GI Joe next month. Hope the 3D is worth the wait.
True, Paramount had luck delaying Martin Scorsese’s Shutter Island to give the director his biggest box office hit ever. Now the question is whether lightning can strike twice.
Related: Seth MacFarlane’s ‘Ted’ Moving Into June 29th Slot Just Vacated By ‘G.I. Joe 2′
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


dont get how mib3 makes 200 million on a weekend and is a miss or something… so it was off by 15 percent in the u.s. of what high end prognosticators wanted… big deal…
Loved the last statement comparing Paramounts decision for delay on GIJOE2 to SHUTTER ISLAND “giving Scorsese his biggest box office”. Yea, when I’m thinking cinematic comparative genius to a toy franchise there is the reason for a delay by this studio. A.
Channing Tatum is a shaved ape and this story epitomizes how ridiculously crummy the entertainment industry has become. I would never bring children into a world like this.
Great reporting NIkke…you dug deep to get to The Truth about this huge release for Paramount then offered a balanced account of the harsh realities of tweaking a major film for greater return.
Somewhere between pre-pro and wrap, Tatum became a bigger, broader star — and to be sure, it takes guts to fix a storyline just as it’s ready to go ‘out the door’ after all the P+A costs/ballyhoo.
Everyone makes mistakes except people on Comment boards. You’ve shown the power of fixing mere mistakes…before they’re disasters.
I don’t get it. The first one got lousy reviews and didn’t do well. Why would any idiot greenlight this ? That person should be fired
And here I was actually looking forward to G.I. Joe because there would be less Changing Tatum. Way to lower my expectations, Paramount.
Most guys felt this way. They were celebrating the first trailer’s Tatum death. This is a bid to draw in a female audience, but this silly action flick concept is inherently repellant to females, so it’s just a lot of wasted money.
You mean to tell me that after spoon feeding the movie going public bucket after bucket of slop unworthy of the name pablum that some of these stupid bean counters have finally had the “grain of wheat” bulb go on?
They have “discovered” what most of us already knew, and have gone blue in the face saying.
“Explosions and gimmicks are no substitute for plot and story, no matter who is staring in the picture.”
They pulled this one because they’re scared out of their wallets about another big budget compu-generated bomb. It does prove one thing that I freely admit I never thought possible:
They CAN be taught, after all…
The Rock says “They’re all dead” in the trailer, meaning Duke too. This is not a spoiler. Oh course, they are nixing the “death” storyline after the great year Tatum is having.
Actually duke is supposed to be the veteran team leader an e-8 enlisted soldier not some young punk. This property has been soo bungled.
If you thInk about it tho, almost any movie they put in July, will only have July as a good few weeks to make money. If they were to put GI joe in the weekend before dark knight, it’ll really only make big bucks that weekend and week leading up to dark knight, and then it’ll be bye bye GI joe and hello dark knight for the next couple of weeks. It’s even bad for movies coming out in weeks after its release. So to keep most of July open and not fill any slots close to batmans date is actually a smart move if they wanna even get close to making money
VP of Common Sense says when you are making an 80s cartoon into a movie, don’t kill the main character from the 80s cartoon in your movie. I’ll give you that gem for free Paramount – anything after that is gonna cost ya!
Get your facts straight. Paramount had no production investment in Hugo. They only distributed the movie for a fee.
saw MiB3 this weekend in Queens, NY and the GI Joe: Retaliation trailer was attached with the June release date. whoopsie!
I knew this was all about Channing and his character. I still don’t understand why they didn’t try to make the franchise on his shoulders. I guess they panicked when the first one didn’t go all gang busters and thought the Rock could do better? It’s going to bomb anyways now.
All this drivel for a terrible actor… I hope DUEK dies and I hope tatums career dies fast. Another model-wannabe-actor trying to steal jobs from well suited actors.
And, yes, Channing.. it’s me Dave Franco. Your arch nemesis.
Any chance the Channing angle is smoke on top of smoke and the thing’s just a mess that needs a total rehaul to be releasable? And if Magic Mike bombs (likely, this is not SS’s wheelhouse and it shows) is Channing and his total lack of ability to act back to the c- pile?
Yes. To all of that.
“…toys ready and waiting”??
After visiting my local Wal-Mart for a cheap roll of duct-tape, I can honestly say the toys from “GI Joe: Retaliation” are on the shelves NOW!
Hilarious!
This is such a boondoggle and so screwed up now.
StereoD is offering a reduced rate?? Damn, we’ll have to pay them to work there now— oh wait, that’s DD.
It will suck. Maybe they will do one of those triple DVD release packs and release it before the movie hits theaters.
go Joe 1; Joe 2 tatums dead, Joe 2 directors cut Tatum lives. For. 10 dollars more blueray with 4 free pair of luxury sunblock 3 d glasses.
Tatum is so HOT right now!
Someone who looks like the missing link is a “hot star” in Hollywood? The industry is doomed.
How on earth did this sequel get a green light? The first one really underperformed and this one doesn’t look any better.
The sequel did look better in trailers and was getting positive buzz… until they moved it and had to admit it was garbage. Now the buzz is toxic.
So true and so sad. I hated part 1 but was actually excited about this one from the trailers. Now that the studio has pretty much admitted it sucks, I have to thank them for saving my $12.
That’s because it’s not about the money but quality. You put together a story with good acting, good directing, good writing-you create something that is engaging to an audience. The Hollywood model of “we spent so much money on it and we can’t find the floor” just proves how inept they are. It ain’t about money guys-it’s about creating something of quality. Battleship and John Carter were both garbage and looked that way. Avengers has a talented cast, a talented director who understand the art of storytelling. It isn’t about the sizzle folks…it’s about the steak.
Well it should at least be interesting to see how a killed off character gets re-added to the film as a whole.
The first movie was unbearable. I tried three times to watch it and fell asleep every time …eventually stayed awake when it was on TV, and the commercials allowed for a glimpse at better filmmaking. I was really excited when I learned Tatum would be killed off. He was part of the suck of the first one. Bottom line, few people were going to spend their money to see this after Prometheus, Amazing Spider Man and before Dark Knight Rises…
With Mega corporations running the studios and their executive cronies put in charge, its no wonder they are all in the crapper. The only hope the industry will ever have is if people that actually know how to make a film, are put back in charge. But as long as they keep playing the stock game as a key source of income and creativity plays second or third to that biz plan, then this is what they are going to get.