That was the provocative question three newscasters debated this morning at the cable industry’s annual convention on the eve of what MSNBC‘s Chris Matthews predicted will be “the most exciting political season we’ve ever had” — in part because of the growing importance of cable news. As you might imagine, the boisterous host of Hardball With Chris Matthews sucked up most of the oxygen in the Cable Show panel that also included CNN‘s John King and Univision‘s Maria Elena Salinas. She lamented that people “now have designer news. They want to listen to people they agree with.” That’s dangerous, she says, because “they don’t know the difference between a news person and a commentator.” King says that while “there’s nothing wrong with advocacy journalism, there’s nothing wrong with objective journalism, too.” But Matthews says viewers understand what they’re watching. For example, when Fox News bills itself as “fair and balanced,” its audience knows that the slogan is “ironic and fun loving and they’re in on the joke.” He contrasted today’s sharp-edged approach to the old days when “people like Andy Rooney were always with the (government’s) embedded thinking…. Without cable it’s just network thinking and embedded thinking which is dangerous for democracy.”
Related: CNN Hits 20-Year Weekday Primetime Low
Matthews made the boldest predictions about the 2012 presidential contest, although he says it’s still “too early to call.” The public’s view of Obama will depend on the performance of the stock market, “and that’s a dangerous place,” Matthews says. But the three, hour-and-a-half debates between the candidates “will probably be spectacular,” adding that “we’ll have a 24/7 debate about each debate.”
In response to a question, King defended his controversial decision as moderator of a debate before the GOP presidential primary in South Carolina to ask former House Speaker Newt Gingrich about his ex-wife’s statement that he had once asked her to have an open marriage. Gingrich fired back at King, saying the question reflected “the destructive vicious negative nature of much of the news media (that) makes it harder to govern this country.” King says that the ex-wife’s charge was “the biggest story in politics that day….I don’t think there’s any debate it was a fair question and a relevant news question.” King also suggested that Gingrich was feigning his indignation. “He brought (current wife) Calista up after the debate,” King said, and they said to the newsman: ” ‘Wasn’t it a great debate?’ … A lot of people said that gave him the South Carolina primary.”


The closest thing we have to journalists right now are Jon Stewart and Rachel Maddow.
The fact that we are actually taking a presidential election between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney seriously is all the proof you need that America is probably irretrievably lost. There hasn’t been a statesman elected in this country in 30 years.
The fact we are even asking these questions is proof something is wrong. The scariest part is it happened in one generation.
Ludicrous. Jon Stewart and Rachel Maddow are the furthest things from journalists. You just like them because they support your point of view, which means you haven’t a clue what journalism is about.
Also, John King and Chris Matthews are jokes too…. total liberal ideology.
No problem with these people. They have their place.
But they are hardly objective journalists.
Maddow isn’t a journalist, she’s an opinionist.
And Stewart, though I love him personally, is a self-described satirist.
I go back to that study where Fox viewers were worse-informed than people who watch NO news.
There is a difference between MSNBC and Fox. MSNBC tells you when they’re commenting, and Fox does not. The Fox audience is too dumb to know that they’re being duped by their own favorite media outlet.
My friends that watch Fox news are definitely not “in on the joke.” They very loudly and passionately defend anything that comes out of that place as the “truth.” Perhaps well-informed people who like politics understand its a joke, but for many thousands of Americans it’s serious, Obama-hating business. It’s ridiculous and sometimes a step above pro wrestling in its believability.
The irony is that most Fox viewers completely buy into the propaganda they’re being fed by Fox, as if they were in Cold War-era Russia.
Yeah but MSNBC is just as bad. People that watch Rachel Maddow are just as biased but on the liberal side. Maddow is NO different than the wackjobs on Fox News but she has an LA/NY liberal left wing point of view that most people that read deadline agree with — so they don’t care if she is biased. As a staunch centrist, I can’t stand either Fox News or MSNBC. Neither are journalism. They just reinforce peoples already set opinions.
Easy question. Confuse, confuse, confuse.
To answer the question of the headline: It RUINS it!
The public is fed garbage from the top to bottom. The message is no clear, and will never be – regardless of who you vote for.
Doesn’t matter if you lean right or left – cable news is an abysmal joke, hijacked by absolute morons. Why would anyone watch Lawrence O’Donnell, or O’Reilly, or anyone on these cable channels to get news about politics? You’d have to be insane.
Chris Matthews is a pathetic hack! The country is worse off for having these cable news folks deliver the news/opinions. Nobody knows nothing!
Cable news today, whether its Fox, CNN or MSNBC, are like the record labels from the early 00′s – people don’t watch them anymore. Alternative media like Alex Jones, Reason.com and other places are reaching millions of viewers every day. Everyone knows that cable news is just a joke at this point.
It’s laughingly ironic that they brought on three of the biggest losers on cable news to be on the panel.
Whine all you want about Fox and make up all the lies you want about how uninformed its viewers are, but it’s the true powerhouse in cable news. It’s going to be around a lot longer than any of these blowhards because it does give both sides to the story.
Chris Matthews is one step above a game show host. I am a dem. and having to get my news from him is a joke. — HE IS NO JOURNALIST !!
Cable news is mostly dross. Don’t know what that is? Turn the TV off and pick up a book without pictures that actually tells a story.
It’s true that people only watch what they want to see. But with 24 hour news, it’s pretty pathetic that they only touch a superficial level when it comes to world events. Newspapers are crying over lost readership. Well they deserve it when they’ve reduced themselves to trying to do a print version of what is seen on TV. I could care less if they all go under because they’ve failed to inform the public appropriately.
The news media brags they are the forth branch of government. A branch that has no accountability and no checks and balances. They should be ashamed of themselves especially in regards to international news that they hide behind democracy and the Constitution.
If I wanted knee-jerk instant reaction to the minutiae of the non-issues of the day – not of the day, of the half-hour – I’d go to the place where they really make a difference : a bar! The shows where people have an opportunity to elaborate – the Sunday morning network shows, all of them; “Morning Joe;” PBS NewsHour; BBC World News America; Anderson Cooper has been slammed a lot recently but he is really very good; Imus and Stern are even good at this in their own way; as well as the morning news shows – where if the guests have an agenda it can be analyzed or taken apart. It’s particularly good news that “Face the Nation” is now an hour.
Stewart and Colbert deconstruct this question every night of the week.
Who wants to be yelled at all of the time? And made to feel bullied and dumb? Count me out.
you’re all LAME. chris matthews is The MAN.
I neglected to mention Andrea Mitchell’s mid-day program, an informative way of tracking congress’ preoccupations around mid-point daily. Knows what she’s talking about, asks intelligent questions, cuts to the chase with polite alacrity.