Neely Swanson is an adjunct professor at the USC School of Cinematic Arts. She was formerly SVP of Development for David E. Kelley Productions. For the 3rd year, this is from her Baseline blog:
Women Writing Pilots – Nice Work if You Can Get It
By the time you read this, the networks already have announced the pilots they are picking up to series from among the ninety or so that were produced this year for ABC, CBS, CW, FOX and NBC. Certainly the relative success that CBS had with its schedule, and the more limited slots FOX has available, influenced their rationale for picking up fewer pilots to production than ABC and NBC. This year, the CW ordered 8 pilots, up from 6 in years past, an increase of 33%. But more to the point, or the point for the last few years, is how did women fare in the process this year after a banner 2011? It fit the good news/bad news scenario, or if you prefer a food metaphor, it was sweet and sour.
Last year (2011 Much Better For Women Pilot Writers) was indeed an anomaly as compared to the horrendous example of 2010 (Women Can’t Create, White Men Can’t Jump). Overall in 2010 (comedy and drama combined), women, which the industry counts as women writing alone or with another woman or with a man, represented a mere 20% of the pilots picked up to production. That number soared to 35% in 2011, and the greatest gain overall, with the exception of CBS, was in comedy writing. Women, who had written a mere 16% of the 40 comedy pilots in 2010, were credited on 45% of the 40 comedy pilots written in 2011.
The percentage of pilots written by women in 2012 only fell 3%, to 32% of the overall pilots produced, still well above 2010, the year the bottom fell out. The CW continues to remain the high watermark with 50% of their pilots written by women (a number that has not changed in the last three years).
For purposes of analysis only, and as a concession to the so-called industry standard, women shall be considered as women writing singly, with another woman or with a man, although I have not made peace with a man and a woman equaling a woman, and I doubt that women and men agree with that assessment either.
As in years past, it’s interesting to look at the scorecard for each network and compare it to the previous year.
ABC, which had fewer pilots produced by women in 2011 than 2010, a clear anomaly, was back in a leadership position. 36% of their 25 pilots were written by women. Women writers at this network are still funny, having written 42% of the comedy pilots, and are reasonably serious as shown by their 31% representation on drama pilots. For the last 3 years, ABC has taken a leadership position in attempting to be gender-blind.
CBS, is a bit more problematic, having slipped back to 2010 numbers. Of the 17 pilots produced, only 24% had women writers. Breaking it down further, women wrote only 11% of the 9 comedy pilots and 38% of the 8 drama pilots, both of which represent significant declines from 2011 (-11% in comedy and -22% of dramas). CBS is the most successful of the broadcast networks and has a woman as its president, but this kind of backsliding was totally unexpected. If Chuck Lorre were writing all or most of their comedy pilots, that kind of number might be expected, but he’s not and the ones they picked up to production were some of the weakest comedies out there. It’s a good thing that CBS doesn’t need anything because it looks pretty much like they’ve got nothing new and viable going into the 2012-2013 season (with the exception of Golden Boy, a drama that may be too character-driven for their brand).
CW continues to be a leader, both in the quality of their pilots and how many are written by women (holding steady at 50% for the last three years). Always on the bubble as a viable network, the CW usually has the clearest vision of their brand in scripted programming. It is hoped that Mark Pedowitz will be able to find the magic necessary to keep the netlet afloat.
FOX, like CBS, belly flopped this year, regressing to numbers as bad, and in some cases worse, than those of 2010. Only 19% of their 16 pilots were written by women (18% of their 11 comedy pilots and 20% of their 5 drama pilots). This represents an overall decline of 17% from 2011 (including a -20% decline in comedies written by women and -13% of the dramas). Not only are they unwilling to accept that women can write the kind of fire-breathing, adrenaline-pumped action that they believe is their trademark, but despite evidence to the contrary, they don’t think women can write the gross-out adolescent comedy that they think they excel at. They are wrong on both counts. I presume they forgot that New Girl (their one new comedy hit) and Alcatraz were written by women. Unlike CBS, scripted success (outside of animation) has so far been elusive.
NBC, like in several years preceding, is, once again behind the eight ball and took a shotgun approach to pilot season, hoping that some of the pellets will stick. Even if, as in years past, the pellets don’t stick, they, like ABC, have shown little gender bias. Of their 24 pilots, 42% were written by women, essentially the same as last year; 46% of their 13 comedies (a decline of 12%) and 36% of their 11 dramas (an increase of 16%) were written by women. A true hodgepodge of choices, ranging from awful to pretty damn good, at some point their fortune will improve.
Overall, it wasn’t a bad year; certainly not as bad as others originally led me to believe. CBS was disappointing this year but, as a consolation, it is likely that very few pilots will be called up to the Show this year because they already have a deep bench (to misuse a couple of sports metaphors). It is FOX that is particularly troubling because they have neither the bench nor the originality to justify shutting out (again with the sports metaphor) an entire gender from the line-up (you see the trend). 20th Television, one of FOX’s primary suppliers, is definitely not to blame as they produced a total 16 pilots for all the networks, almost 50% of which were written by women.
Mulling the failure of CBS and FOX to adequately consider women writers as a source of creativity for their networks is a low point for the 2012-2013 pilot season. But there is a high point, even though it seems snarky, because this year, more than most in the past, women wrote pilots that were every bit as awful as the men. For the first time in recent memory, or at least in my reading of pilots, women were allowed to be as bad and as mediocre as the men and that is the best measure of progress. So onwards and upwards (or downwards as the case may be) and let’s keep an eye out for everyone. And, as has been asked many times in the past, WHAT ABOUT WRITERS OF COLOR?



What about female directors? This is the ultimate boy’s club in Hollywood. Even the female-skewing shows are horrible about this, and forget it when it comes to David Milch and Don Bellasario.
A perpetual problem with only lip service from the DGA…
You should look at the female representation on a network’s development slate. The pitches & specs networks choose to develop is where the bias really is. Once something has been purchased, it’s the quality of the writing, not the gender, (one would hope) that allows it to be picked up to pilot (although politics clearly come into play). Regardless, both stages should be evaluated.
The bias you have ignored is that, in the end, only one person at each network makes the call on which pilot will be picked up. There are women executives, but they do not have green light power, Nancy Dubec at The History Channel is the only one. Given how many women watch TV, it’s absurd.
It’s the bias I’m protesting against. The concept of “one person has the power” should be anathema to the USA, much less the Industry. Do we roll over and take it like altar boys or stand up and voice our opposition to the obvious discrimination? I choose the latter.
Anne Sweeney is one of the most powerful people in television, doofus.. she runs the entire disney tv group reporting directly and only to Iger.
-RnsW
Yeah, there’s obviously no problem. The most powerful woman in television only has to report to one man!
THANK YOU!!!
Forgive me for being ignorant about the broader issues here, but is it possible that CBS and FOX did look at female writers, but were just — not good? How not good they are versus how not good a male writer is I am not sure how to quantify.
How do the female writers get shut out? Simply because of gender?
Should a female writer have a show picked up and shepherded through just because she is a woman, even if the show is awful? Or is this just a larger issue of females being held out of the big game altogether and not given a chance?
Please don’t bring logic into the conversation. We can only feel better for our (lack of) careers if we have someone else to blame.
Well, misogynist derby, shall I start naming the countless male writers who were picked up, shepherded, and went on to make shitty shows?
Your comment would be offensive were it not so poorly written that it’s laughable.
I am a young writer who was told my sample was one of the best they’d read, I was brought to CBS by producers wanting to hire me on staff. CBS told them they had to hire a young male writer instead because the show is about young men. I know I was good enough. Funnier than probably the young man they will hire. They wanted me not because I was male or female but because I was good. CBS sadly thinks a man can write for male & female characters but that a female writer couldn’t possibly know how to write for male characters.
We live in a world where women still don’t receive equal pay for equal work and yet you question the fact that women experience discrimination? WOW!!! I have no idea what to say to you.
What a bunch of drivel. What a non-story. People aren’t stupid, they know when an idea has a chance and they don’t care if it’s from a woman or a man. These power lists, tabulations and celebrations of women in film are tedious and antiquated. Have any of you sat in a network pitch meeting the past 5 years? There are women everywhere and many of them have female reports. Please stop the endless madness that is creative PC.
Dear Anonymous,
You miss the point entirely. You must be a white man over 40 in Hollywood. Best of luck to you in the future with that level of insight and empathy. Karma is a bitch
Clearly, there is a problem with the lack of hires for diversity and women. To all the naysayers who have nay-sayed me, please read this article and expand your narrow misogynistic minds.
Thank you, Neely!
It all begins with staffing, where the usual ratio of men to women is ten to one. Execs and agents mention “the woman’s slot” without a thought to how appallingly sexist that is. Less women rising to the top means less women creating pilots or running shows. There can be five high-level guys on a show but God forbid there’s more than one high-level women. It’s been this way since the dawn of TV and looks like it will never change.
Female showrunners make staffing decisions, which means the current sexist system CAN evolve if only they would be brave enough to advocate for women writers. The percentages may be low, but the women who do run their own shows hold the power to create the change that is desperately needed. And perhaps it goes without saying, but the argument that there aren’t as many talented women writers out there is complete and utter bullshit.
Totally agree.
CW hires women writers, and CBS doesn’t. Let’s take a look at the ratings. Ahh, makese sense now.
32% seems about right. i would say that the female to male ratio of ASPIRING TV writers isn’t much higher than 32%, or at least those who are putting in the grunt time in writers offices to get their shot. i would also say that the female to male ratio of TV writers who are high enough up the food chain to actually sell pilots or have showrunner experience is lower than 32%. there are plenty of jobs where it skews much higher female than male, costumes, casting, publicity, and even TV studio & network execs. i don’t get all this outrage at the split not being 50/50. it’s not black and white like the birth rate, people.
Aren’t there less women tv writers overall? What is the point of this?
I am a minority female who watched two of my favorite white guys lose jobs on a great show because they couldn’t let go of the only woman on staff. This is the first time I saw the other side of the situation…they literally lost jobs to quotas, nobody was shy about saying so…that woman, a great writer herself, knows it, and so does everyone else.
The thing is, if they didn’t have to have a woman/diversity hire, it’s clear that they wouldn’t…and there is no shyness about this fact.
This token mentality isn’t good for anyone.
Token mentality IS NOT good for anyone, but the other extreme of only hiring white men IS NOT acceptable either. Until the heads of studios, prod-co, and shows expand their thinking beyond the white male dominated world, then NOTHING will be done.
With all due respect, JM, those fave white guys are more likely to be staffed again than the woman writer. Check the stats.
So what should ALL writers do? SPEAK THE EFF UP!!! Even if it is just writing comments on a website. But to protect the discriminatory (even racist) hiring practices like I’ve encountered on this site is just supporting discrimination (even racism).
I don’t know enough to judge whether or not there is gender bias at FOX and the other networks (there probably is at the development stage), but it might be relevant to mention that 67 percent of the comedies FOX eventually picked up were written by women.
*to series, I should add.
This piece, and most of the responses, do a huge disservice to women. I’m embarrassed to be a working woman in Hollywood when these kind of pieces come out. I get jobs (staff or pilot development) if someone responds to my writing or my pitch. If they pick a guy over me, tough shit for me. Reality is, it means they liked his writing/pitch better. It’s about money, bottom line. What they think will sell and bring in big advertising dollars. For better or worse, the studios don’t care the gender of the writer, they care if it will be a profitable show or not.
Stop living in the Victim mentality. It’s bad for all of us.
No one said anything about being a victim. I certainly don’t see myself as a victim, but I’m not going to live in denial about sexism either. I’m glad that you live in a Utopian world were no one experiences discrimination, but that is not where the rest of us live.
Dear Dr. Dre,
I have a feeling you’re not a woman. It’s 1952 in the entertainment business. Your response makes no sense.
There are more aspiring male TV writers than aspiring female TV writers, just like there are more aspiring TV actresses than aspiring TV actors. Simple as that.
So we should allow this discriminatory, racist practice. Is that what you’re saying? Just roll over and take it?
Or maybe we should speak out, raise our voices. What do you think, Ms. Simple As That?
I feel like you misinterpreted my comment as some sort of “poor white men” rally cry, Elia.
To the contrary…I was merely saying that this was the first time I saw the tokenism from their perspective…they lost jobs because of quotas, not talent, and the woman who “benefited” from the quota is now openly positioned as having gotten to keep her job because of the quota. That sucks, breeds resentment, and solidifies the theory that if the tokens were not required/paid for, that show would have chosen to staff only white males.
Ugh.
The numbers for Black writers are so bad, even the WGA isn’t talking. The numbers are not out for this year because Blacks are usually the last ones hired but a friend told me that last year’s number for all the broadcast nets was somewhere between 1-2%.
This is always a touchy subject because everyone is either ensconced in privilege or in false equivalency. But logic frees us from these prisons if we give it a chance.
If we think TV is shit, then it stands to reason that the writers’ talent pool is shallow and we can all agree that a change is in order.
If we think TV is good, then the writers are fine and maybe we ought not mess with things too much.
The idea that all minorities and women are better than most or all white men defies logic. The truth is most writers are average. The problem with Hollywood is we have a system that protects and rewards mediocrity if the person is connected by a strong enough personal relationship. And the only reason that this does not topple the business is that EVERYONE practices this particular unfairness. Women and minority executives feel they can only advance their careers by acting like white men and adopting their biases.
1-2% people.
We should all be ashamed.
Does anyone really believe getting a job as a writer, on staff or otherwise, is based solely on merit? Let’s pull our heads out of the sand and speak truthfully for ten seconds.
Systemic discrimination is rife throughout the industry – that’s why there are quotas. The quota system was not created so that bad or mediocre writers could be hired. The quota system ensures that diverse writers who are AS TALENTED as non-diverse writers get a shot. A shot they might otherwise be denied due to nepotism, sexism, racism – or, to put it euphemistically, “FIT”.
It’s not a perfect system but we’re living with the consequences from years of doing nothing.
It’s an open secret that networks and studios maintain lists of writers — and most of the categories make sense: funny, action, drama, currently hot, mid-level, producer-level, etc.
But once in a while, you’ll get your hands on a list and realize that people who are ethnically diverse or female do NOT appear on any of these lists. Those are all funny white male writers, mid-level white male writers. Because all the non-white-male writers are grouped together on “women” and “diverse” lists, regardless of level or strengths.
That’s how women end up not getting jobs — or only getting a handful overall. They’re not in the same pool with everyone else, competing for the same jobs & opportunities. They’re on a side list, being considered for the one “woman” slot in a room or on a schedule.
Does everyone use these lists? Look at the above article — notice anything odd about how some networks have a statistically implausible gender distribution of showrunners? While others are significantly more balanced? If I were a betting woman, I’d have a pretty good guess how that happened.
“For the last 3 years, ABC has taken a leadership position in attempting to be gender-blind.”
This assumes that if gender were never taken into account the outcome would be that 50% of scripts would be written by men and 50% by women, but there’s no reason to think that’s the case. On top of that this statement makes it seem as though specifically making an effort to hire women is gender-blind, but in actuality choosing to make gender part of the decision process is by definition be the opposite of gender-blindness.
I’m not saying that women should not be better represented in writers rooms, I just think this is a poor argument to make that case.