It’s Official: WME-Silver Lake Announcement
BREAKING… EXCLUSIVE… UPDATED: WME held a mandatory staff meeting this morning to announce internally that a “strategic equity partner”, techno-savvy Silver Lake Partners, is taking a 31% non-controlling minority
interest in the agency. Ari Emanuel and Patrick Whitesell stressed to the tenpercentery that the investor will have no ability to acquire an additional stake or to force a sale/IPO on the agency: “WME’s day to day operations will continue to be run by its current leadership team and management board.” The internal announcement was made on the 3-year anniversary this week of Endeavor merging with the William Morris Agency. Egon Durban, a Managing Partner of Silver Lake, will join
WME’s Executive Committee along with the company’s Co-CEOs and will also help create a new Technology Advisory Council that “will identify technology related growth opportunities which would benefit WME’s clients”. Emanuel, Whitesell and the entire management team have all renewed long-term contracts with WME. In a statement, the WME Management Board said: “Our partnership with Silver Lake will accelerate WME’s transformation into a technologically innovative entertainment and media company and ensure we can best support our clients across all digital media channels. This investment will give WME access to Silver Lake’s expertise, resources and relationships across the global technology industry, ensuring our clients and the content they create are strategically positioned for the future as the convergence of technology, entertainment and media accelerates.”
Insiders tell me the primary reason for the cash infusion is to take to the next level for clients those digital space initiatives (like “direct-to-consumer” release of content by talent)
which WME has been self-financing up to now. “We needed this real Silicon Valley expertise and relationships and background to build out these things for our clients,” Patrick Whitesell tells me. Today’s announcement caps a 2-year discussion with Silver Lake Partners, the Silicon Valley-based private equity firm focused on leveraged buyout and growth capital investments in technology and technology-enabled industries and founded in 1999. Headquartered in Menlo Park, it has a global presence with over 100 investment professionals and value creation specialists across offices in New York, San Francisco, London, Hong Kong, Shangai, and Tokyo, and manages approximately $14 billion. The Silver Lake portfolio includes or has included technology industry leaders such as Alibaba, Allyes, Ameritrade, Avago, Avaya, Business Objects, Flextronics, Gartner, Gerson Lehrman Group, Groupon, Instinet, Intelsat, Interactive Data Corporation, IPC Systems, MCI, Mercury Payment Systems, MultiPlan, the NASDAQ OMX Group, NetScout, NXP, Sabre, Seagate Technology, Serena Software, Skype, Spreadtrum, SunGard Data Systems, UGS, Vantage Data Centers and Zynga.
I’ve learned that veteran Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, who was involved with Silver Lake on the Skype investment, made the introduction with WME, and the agency’s Silver Lake point person is Egon Durban. Silver Lake Partners ”are not Hollywood guys who make Hollywood investments,” Emanuel tells me. “Instead, they are going down a path offering a lot more opportunity than just on a balance sheet.” As Emanuel added, “They talked with us about converging worlds. Everyone got comfortable with each other. Then all of a sudden there was an ‘aha’ moment: ‘These stupid idiots from Hollywood were already in tech.’” WME claims it had no shortage of capital wanting to be in business with them. “But money was the least requirement. Here was private equity that was digital related and that now would allow the agency to move faster, supercharge initiatives, synthesize thought processes,” Emanuel said.
Here’s an internal talking points memo distributed by WME today to explain its need for digital expansion:
The Convergence of the Technology, Media and Content Industries
The technology, media and content industries are increasingly converging: Across the global media and entertainment landscape, digital forces are disrupting and transforming how content is produced, distributed and monetized. Technology has already transformed the music industry and is reordering the print media and publishing industries, and will ultimately influence all forms of digital content.
• Music – For the first time, digital music sales are larger than physical sales, accounting for 50.3% of all U.S. music purchases in 2011. After a downward slide for several years, album sales were up in 2011 for the first time since 2004 due to growth in digital music revenue. Physical sales of CDs are on the decline (down 5% in 2011).
• Books – The publishing industry is being transformed through the online disintermediation of retail chains by internet distribution (e.g., Amazon) of both traditional books and electronic books. E-books have grown from negligible market share in 2008 to 6.4% of the market in 2010 , and this upward trend is expected to continue: E-books: $4.6 billion in 2011; will grow to an estimated $10.0 billion in 2015 (+21% CAGR). Printed Books: $26.8 billion in 2011; will shrink to an estimated $18.9 billion in 2015 (-8% CAGR).
• Television – “Over the Top” (OTT) channels (e.g., Amazon, Hulu, Netflix, YouTube, Amazon Prime, iTunes) are driving a new paradigm – increasingly both buying and creating original content, and have already surpassed traditional cable providers in audience reach. Netflix today has 23 million domestic streaming customers, compared with 22 million subscribers for Comcast, the largest cable system. Hulu has four new original series in development and plans to spend $500 million on TV shows and films in 2012. YouTube: More video is uploaded in one month than the 3 major U.S. networks have created in 60 years. Sixty hours of video are uploaded every minute.
• Film – The film industry has experienced a decline in traditional distribution (e.g., DVDs) as digital distribution increases: U.S. DVD: $11.2 billion in 2011; estimated to be $5.5 billion in 2015 (-16% CAGR). U.S. Digital Distribution: $3.5 billion in 2011; estimated to be $9.2 billion in 2015 (+27% CAGR). Social media is used for cost-effective advertising of new film releases.
• Traditional distribution channels are also increasing their expenditure on content: Over the past decade, the top 10 cable networks have tripled their expenditure on content and have doubled the number of original primetime programs. Cable operators are beginning to purchase digital and TV distribution rights in order to roll out their own OTT offering (“TV Everywhere”).
WME cancelled its normal all-company meeting for this hush-hush town hall meeting with Ari and Patrick. All offices were watching at the same time via video conference. There is still no public statement about Deadline’s scoop. Today’s news follows two big investments made by WME with experienced partners creating new businesses: a worldwide marketing business, and separately a global media fund. These strategic partnerships demonstrate how Hollywood agencies want and need to reinvent themselves. Hollywood agencies recently have had mixed success bringing in outside investors. At ICM, Chris Silbermann’s goal over the past year has been to take over the tenpercentery and obtain more ownership of the agency from its major investor: Connecticut-based Rizvi Traverse Management which has owned 40% of ICM since 2005. At CAA, TPG Capital made an investment tantamount to hundreds of millions of dollars in equity and debt based on a huge valuation of the agency more than double what’s been previously estimated as its worth. CAA disclosed that the agency and TPG created a $500 million pledge fund, providing “access to significant capital for future investments” in exchange for a 35% non-controlling minority interest in CAA with the private equity investment firm. At Paradigm, owner Sam Gores is backed by his billionaire investor brothers Alex and Tom Gores.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
ITV Pays $30M For Controlling Stake In ‘Hatfields


“Given Ari and Patrick’s track record with taking risks…if anyone is going to be successful at something like this, its them.”
AE does it again!
Sounds like some people just got a whole lot richer.
Bailout? Where did you go to business school? WME has their pick of private equity companies to partner with. Something tells me picking one of the most prestigious with one of the strongest tech backgrounds is indicative of WME arming themselves to battle in the digital age. It’s a great move.
Are you kidding? Most PE firms want a 20 bagger. An investment in an agency wont turn anywhere near that in five years. It’s just more Hollywood spin trying to play like they’re a substantial business. The crappiest sitcom is worth more than the biggest agency. An agencies assets are transient and can walk out the door at any time. They own nothing. Sounds like someone just wanted to be near some Hollywood flash and the adjacency to the White House.
Not entirely true; agencies with substantial TV packages (such as the old WMA) have stronger accounts receivable (an asset, and a rather important one) that are fairly predictable and can better assist in a valuation.
hmmm… Let’s see 5% on a package vs 75% ownership of a show. Sure the ICM stake was bought by collateralizing TV packages but its fleeting. There is still no there there. A handful of TV packages don’t a billion dollar business make, even Cosby or Friends.
I never said that was the only asset these companies had, just that it was one that did not depend on the agents who made the deals (nor the ones currently employed by the agency) showing up every day and with a firm like ICM, the combination of the Broder packages and the old ICM ones (plus some MP residuals; I hear ICM still gets checks for Star Wars since Berg repped Lucas at the time) you can at least have more of your revenue be more predictable than an agency only relying on tomorrow’s deals.
this is going to be fun to watch
Silver Lake is making an investment in a non-technology based, un-scalable company that sells products they don’t make or own to a very limited and shrinking pool of buyers.
Agencies are not growth capital businesses.
So that means this is about a future LBO or they would have kept their money.
Hate all you want, I’ve worked at all the big agencies and WME is by far the best. We have Ari and Patrick – they seem to be able to get anything done they want. With money behind them nothing can stop us. GO WME.
Kool-aid
So, you’ve worked at all of the big agencies and yet you’re still an assistant… Listen kid, it’s time to brush up your resume and start thinking about an industry switch.
Believe it… Don’t forget the hefty payouts to Wiatt, Ferriter, Kaplan et al, plus the whole real estate debacle.
you dont think Silverlake did their diligence? get back to answering phones, you are clueless
Not really… anytime outsiders like this invest in Hollywood they always lose their shirt. Why are these guy’s gonna be any different?
It’s fun to attend all the parties and take pictures with with Bruce Willis but it’s just smoke and mirrors — these dudes are gonna wake up from their TMZ hangover and realize their investment just went upside down.
Maybe, or maybe they learned from others’ mistakes. Don’t forget, many of those who have previously considered such investments were more traditional PE/LBO shops without an industry focus like Silver Lake’s. They undoubtedly understand the digital space and hopefully made the deal tight enough so that the money can only be used for certain purposes.
Calling a talent agency part of the digital space is delusional.
After the Chernin deal and now this, seems like everyone is looking for ways to get bigger these days
the same one who found Skype…and then sold it to Microsoft for $8B. Seems like they know what they’re doing.
Don’t fool yourself haters. Silverlake is an elite global PE fund that invests solely on growing, profitable, market leaders. They invested in Skype, GoDaddy, Yelp among many other interesting businesses. This is a huge vote of confidence for WME. I’d expect an IPO sometime in the next few years as well, as they’ll need an exit at some point. Massive stamp of approval for WME and oppt’y for BIG employee liquidity over time. This is not a bailout by any means.
I don’t see an IPO in the company’s future. “Hollywood agency” and “disclosure” are rarely found on the same page… Now, if they’re preparing the company to be acquired by one of the media Goliaths (like an IPG, with whom Endeavor had a partnership) then it makes more sense. Just like Instigram, you do a pre-acquisition raise to get everything in order (polish the turd, if you will) and then unload it. But I just don’t see the public market in WME’s future.
wme’s got balls…let’s see how this one stacks up against caa’s! (ps what’s happening with their cash infusion? haven’t read anything about it lately)
How does this conflict with their Raine partnership? Is this a byproduct of it? Also, Ari’s not afraid to take risks and spend money — and if something hits, that’s great for them! But let’s not forget he managed Endeavor with the same mentality and drove them into the red.
As one of Kleiner Perkins’ senior partners used to say: “When they pass around the hors d’oeuvres, take two” meaning when capital is available, take more than you need since it may be unavailable when you next really need it. Financing is cheap right now so it’s the right time to do this.
So we’re supposed to believe that WME gave up 31% of their company to raise money for “digital initiatives?” That’s absurd. This clearly was a nine figure investment. How much does an agency need for “digital initiatives?”
I call BS. They are over leveraged and clearly cash strapped. I’m sure this is good for partners 1-5. 6-15 can’t be happy, and 15-30 are screwed.
exactly. 31%. Silver Lake is sharp alright.
The statement probably refers to investments in clients’ digital initiatives. We’re not talking about some mid-level TV actor client’s digital short; more likely their corporate clients’ forays into digital branded entertainment (or perhaps producer clients’ new digital channels). There are also rules prohibiting agents from being producers/financiers of client movies/TV shows but no such rules (that I know of) governing digital. And nobody knows better than an agent to always gamble with someone else’ money!
Makes sense. If you read the press release, they’re taking a non-controlling stake and employees were told that there is NO mechanism in the deal for Silver Lake to acquire an additional stake or to force a sale/IPO, etc.
It’s really only a matter of time before WME overtakes CAA. WME is the future, CAA was the past.
If Marc Andreessen is involved in this, it’s most likely a good strategic move for WME and not just a “bail out” as a lot of people would think. Marc is one of the best VC’s not because he can spot a deal at 5 to 10 cents that is worth a dollar, but because he MAKES the nickel and dime companies he invests in worth a dollar. He has done this with more companies than anyone in Silicon Valley in the past decade, and he has the same kind of aggressive strategy perspective as Emmanuel. I for one will expect a lot of the plans which Ari has announced over the past few years that never quite got rolling (remember the advertising spin-off L-verage?) to really take off with Marc on board now. This is a very powerful partnership, and the guys at CAA should be paying attention to what happens at WME in the next 12 months, because things are going to change in a very big and permanent way.
Perhaps you can answer the question I’ve had ever since I first saw Andreessen’s name attached to this: Why is AH not investing in this themselves if they think it’s such a good move? Is there some conflict, or is this just more in line with SL’s strategy than AH’s?
More in line with SL’s strategy. There is not one company in AH’s profile which is not pure tech. Conservative money goes traditional, the valley goes “aggressive” or what they see as aggressive ie. pure tech, but only a handful of people have the balls and the power to back crossovers which are actually the most aggressive investment because they never have as well-defined a business model as either pure tech or traditional — in fact by definition they have two seemingly conflicted business models. So crossovers rely almost solely on the talent and connections of the executive team to justify the investment. Another reason this would be considered an ultra aggressive investment is because it is based 100% on prospective revenue ie. this shit hasn’t been done before. Ever. Only a cowboy would ever go into this territory, no matter how glamorous the opportunity may appear. Great investment in my opinion, but not on paper.
Thanks, that makes a lot of sense. I don’t know exactly how Marc is connected to the agency business, but someone once told me that he and Horowitz modeled their firm in some respects after CAA, hence my assumption that he knows the space. Incidentally, that’s also what brought up my other question; if someone knows the space that well and chooses to pass then what does that really signal?
This deal seems a lot like the old SR71 Blackbird spy plane: it employed some of the most advanced technology to ever fly but it had only a small window between stall speed and breakup speed. Operate within that window and it was a work of art; fly slightly outside the window and you were dead. In short, you really need to know what you’re doing and there’s very little margin for error on this kind of thing.
In Ari’s dreams…
These guys will be comparing dick sizes till we’re all gray in the face. But it still won’t matter. Powerhouse agency days are behind us. Guy’s like Ari gotta grab the money while they can and get out. You don’t think he wants to be an agency head forever do you?
ari and patrick now have their exit money when they are ready to abandon ship…..bail out for sure…
How else would you have them engineer an eventual exit? I don’t see this as a candidate for an MBO unless there was some serious seller financing and I’m not sure that would really work. Business owners using PE as an exit strategy doesn’t equate to “bail out”.
Brilliant strategic move by both parties. It’s been a while since I’ve given a fuck about agencies. I’ll try to break the deal down as I see it.
Digital media is taking over, Silver Lake understands this and realized that in order for the transition to happen in a way that favors them they’d need access to A-list talent and tastemakers, or at least a way to control the decisions of those who represent A-list talent and tastemakers. This has nothing to do with a future LBO opportunity or a belief in the revenue generating potential of an agency. It has everything to do with Silver Lake having the necessary strategic partnerships in line for the benefit of its other portfolio companies, present and prospective. This is the fundamental reason why PE shops and hedge funds get involved with agencies and prod.cos: they provide an opportunity to control those who manipulate the media, maybe not officially or directly, but through the notion of mutual benefit by both parties.
On the other side, WME is losing clients and agents to other firms at an alarming rate, but Ari & Co. being as prescient as they are, recognized that the easiest way for them to come out on top in the digital age is to 1.) identify and facilitate relationships with relevant parties interested in taking a pioneering role in a nascent digital entertainment industry and 2.) acquire capital to put themselves in a better financial position both immediately and in the long term. WME can offer more to existing and future clients if their balance sheet is fatter, and they can directly fund (and subsequently own) innovative new media ideas themselves with this new source of liquid cash. Sure, they have a new entity to please and align their interests with, but as agents they’re used to that and will gladly take orders if it makes them money.
Bottom-line: Silverlake x WME is probably one of the cleverest partnerships the industry will see for the next few years and is clearly what they’re banking on to put them in a position to keep up with (or possibly surpass) CAA in years to come. Anyone who can’t see the angles here needs to stop posting reflexive Ari/WME hate and start thinking like…well, an agent.
Very well put. And, as I mentioned up a few posts (I know, there are several “Anonymous” to sift through) digital is a place where agencies can take advantage of the fact that digital wasn’t even conceptualized yet when regulations barring agents from producing came to be so it’s a way to control a larger part of what the clients are doing.
WME is not losing clients at an alarming rate. On the contrary, you could perhaps say they’re signing clients at an alarming rate without the manpower to service them all! WME sold 2x as many pilots as CAA this year, and really has the best young motion picture actors & filmmakers. Not to mention no other agency matches WME in books (with the exception, possibly, of ICM), music touring, non-scripted/syndication (in 2012-2013, WME will have 11 first-run syndication packages on the air…ICM [runner-up] will have 2), etc.
Does JF = John Ferriter?
You could be onto something; WME is one of the few (2, I guess) agencies that can “sign” big name talent by buying up the agents with that talent. And that’s a very expensive game, particularly when any previously-inked deals go to the previous agency. Therefore there is a lag time between when they have to start paying the agent and when the client will be available to do projects negotiated by the new agency. And that’s assuming you don’t have a Megan Fox, whom ICM has probably not even broken even on (not that Chuck wasn’t a good hire anyways).