UPDATE, 12:45 PM: Here’s Yahoo’s response to Daniel Loeb: “As we have previously said, the board is reviewing this matter and, upon completion of its review, will make an appropriate disclosure to shareholders.”
PREVIOUS, 12:11 PM: Third Point CEO Daniel Loeb, who owns 5.8% of Yahoo‘s stock, made his demand following the revelation yesterday that the company’s proxy and web site inaccurately described Thompson’s college credential. Yahoo said that he had a bachelor’s degree in accounting and computer science from Stonehill College. But it acknowledged that it made an “inadvertent error” after Loeb checked and discovered that the school didn’t offer a computer science major when Thompson graduated. Loeb says today, in a letter to the board, that the company’s response was “the height of arrogance” — belittling the likelihood that Thompson misrepresented his qualifications, and that the board didn’t double check his information. “Mr. Thompson and the Board should make no mistake: this is a big deal,” Loeb says. “CEOs have been terminated for less at other companies.” He wants the board to fire Thompson “for cause immediately given his demonstrable unsuitability to remain Chief Executive Officer and a director of Yahoo!” If that’s not done by noon ET on Monday, then ”Third Point will consider it grounds for further action.” Loeb has been lobbying for the company to offer board seats to himself and three allies — corporate restructuring expert Harry Wilson, media consultant Michael Wolf, and former NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Zucker. “We are prepared to join immediately,” Loeb says. They would help to “find Yahoo! a new leader with the qualifications and integrity to lead the Company and install best practices of corporate governance.” He adds that Yahoo “can ill afford to continue this misguided fight with its largest outside shareholder while it has so many other fires to put out. There has been enough damage already.”


Buh-bye Scott.
Thanks for playing.
Something needs to be shaken up at Yahoo. Who cares about the guys “bio”, but Yahoo sucks and Daniel Loeb knows that he owns 6% of a stinker and wants shit to change so is trying to come up with anything to shake shit up.
Short term gains without any real insights into is long term gameplan, that’s Yahoo’s shitty tech acumen. Yahoo Social Read sucks. They’re the only company that doesn’t take you to their article when you opt-out of their stupid reader app on facebook. Dumb, dumb, dumb. Google has already made them obsolete in nearly everyway. They need someone with vision, or they are just going to eventually die. Might be what needs to happen.
Anybody who wants to include Jeff Zucker in the mix clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about. If this guy really wants to fix Yahoo!, then he’ll forget the name Jeff Zucker. You bring Zucker in to ruin a business, not fix it.
Yahoo is a mess right now with an inept CEO, a board of directors who are also questionable in scope and allowing that turd Zucker to be a part of this firm after what he did to NBC in his last years there. Get new leadership at Yahoo immediately or this company is going to be mired in utter chaos.
If anyone needs to go, it’s Zucker. That bullet-headed dwarf took NBC from 1st to 4th and in the process, wrung billions of dollars of value out of the network. Whatever he says is crap. And more crap.
As far as Scott Thompson, so what he misstated what he had a degree in from back in 1979. Computer Science from Stonehill College? What? Where?
It’s not like he lied about having graduate degrees in computer engineering from a real school that someone’s actually heard of, like MIT, RPI, Cal Tech, Stanford.
Who f’ing cares? Anybody? Bueller?
Either he can do the job, irrespective of what he has a degree in, or he can’t. What school did Bill Gates graduate from? Oh yeah. He’s a dropout.
Oh, Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling…
Manipulation of a security’s price or volume Manipulation is intentional conduct designed to deceive investors by controlling or artificially affecting the market for a security. Manipulation can involve a number of techniques to affect the supply of, or demand for, a stock. They include: spreading false or misleading information about a company; improperly limiting the number of publicly-available shares; or rigging quotes, prices or trades to create a false or deceptive picture of the demand for a security. Those who engage in manipulation are subject to various civil and criminal sanctions.