JK Rowling and Harry Potter studio Warner Bros have been fiercely protective of the boy who lived, so it will be interesting to see what they make of graphic novelist Alan Moore’s new book. Over the course of his career, Watchmen, V For Vendetta and From Hell author Moore has summoned fictional characters including Captian Nemo, Dr Jekyll and Dracula. He’s also had fun with Wonderland’s Alice, Oz’s Dorothy and Neverland’s Wendy. But his latest borrowing may take the cake: an Antichrist character who’s got a fair bit in common with Harry Potter — and reportedly shoots deathly lightning bolts from his nether regions. Details of The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen: Century 2009, the latest installment in the series, have been kept close to the vest, but reviewer Laura Sneddon has provided her take on the tome that’s out this week. The boy wizard’s name never appears, but references are made to a hidden scar, a magical train between platforms at London’s King Cross Station, and the magical school to which it leads. There’s also a mentor called Riddle — although the Tom Riddle in Rowling’s books ultimately became Harry’s archnemesis, Lord Voldemort. According to The Independent, “Characters resembling both Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger also appear and, at one point, the Potter character kills someone with a lightning bolt from his flaccid penis.” Copyright infringement or acceptable parody? Rowling and Warner are expected to take a wait-and-see approach.
Sneddon, who had the only copy of Century 2009 for nearly a month, says Moore’s depiction of the Antichrist is “a commentary on a perceived degradation of society, both in our world and the fictional. As the publishing industry takes less risks, originality is visibly dwindling, while major franchises and celebrity biographies are relentlessly pushed upon us.” She also notes that “Moore is always keen to point out that the League books are satire and that he has respect for all characters that he uses and hints at, expressing hope that people will look beyond the Harry Potter connection to appreciate the whole.”


This from the man behind Watchmen?
I’d be more interested in this if the Alan Moore of today was a sliver of the writer Alan Moore was even twenty years ago. His material has grown more impenetrable and he, like fellow comics icon Frank Miller, has grown more egotistic as he’s began to believe his own hype.
Moore’s finally flipped.
Moore flipped a long time ago. Even his fellow writers have turned on him. It all started about the time that he decided it was a good idea to do a porno version of Dorothy and Alice from from Oz and Wonderland.
Sure, there are people who like that kind of stuff. They’re generally regarded as creepers and pedos.
Well, the entire skeleton of Joe Hill’s “Locke & Key” graphic novel storyline is essentially borrowed from Harry Potter (in my opinion). For crissake, his villain, Dodge, is now using memories like horcruxes. So is it surprising that his hero, Alan Moore, should go and do this? NO. But at least Joe created his own characters.
In Moore’s case, this is embarrassing. Obvious infringement, to which I expect Rowling’s lawyers to come out swinging.
Actually, Moore DOESN’T always “respect” the characters he uses, or the intents of their creators.(Consider the trio of spies who appear in BLACK DOSSIER: Emma Peel is treated very respectfully, in accordance with Moore’s fondness for THE AVENGERS; Bulldog Drummond’s racism is played up and criticised, but he’s still depicted as brave and competent as “Sapper” had intended…. but not only is James Bond depicted as a bumbling coward, but Ian Fleming’s books are explicitly referred to as “lies”).
I love Moore’s work, and I totally understand his bitterness towards Hollywood in general and Time-Warner in particular… but he’s NEVER played fair. Geniuses rarely do.
“Before The Witchmen”
Is Moore deliberately playing tick for tack with WB and DC Comics? Fun!
s
Um, it will be interesting about legal actions since Potter’s look reminds too much the main character of “The books of Magic”, a comic by Neil Gaiman prior to Rowling’s novels.
Totally agree. And interesting to note that Books Of Magic was distributed by DC… who are owned by WB who in turn own Harry Potter.
I know for a fact that WB are aware of the resemblance, and didn’t want to develop Books Of Magic as TV/Film at least until Potter’s films were done, but probably never, to avoid hurting the more profitable franchise.
Anything to cleanse the myth of Potter out of our neurons is gladly welcome. That was a myth to keep England in the dark ages in more ways than one. Welcome back, Alan Moore. Time to slay the dragons of the next millennium.
The first two volumes of LoEG were brilliant, the last two were garbage. I’d expect this one to be crap too.
LOL.I had to check the calendar to make sure it wasn’t April 1st. Can’t wait to read it.
So Harry Potter can fire lightning bolts from his flaccid harry potter? Big deal, Abraham Lincoln hunts vampires. And cowboys fight aliens. Now that pretty much everybody regards comics and graphic novels as totally worthless garbage, maybe the writers and artists can try doing something, ummm, good?
Hey, don’t blame COMICS for Hollywood’s crap.
Especially when you’re citing stuff that comes from NOVELS.
If anything, Moore’s deliberate trashing of modern pop culture should be PRAISED by someone who, like you, hates it.
Why don’t you try this: Read FROM HELL- actually READ it- then watch the dumbed-down film version, and THEN tell me the “comic” is the “worthless” one.
Until you’re actually willing to learn what you’re talking about, maybe you should just shut up.
From Hell came out 20 years ago. The movie was over 10 years ago. If you’re going to paint with a broad brush, you might want to pick something a little more relevant.
There are just as many crappy comics out there as movies, more in fact. That vast majority of comics suck. The whole “comics are pure (and therefore I am pure, for being a comic fan), movies are trash” line is getting really, really boring.
Actually, I don’t disagree.
I’m just tired of COMICS getting the blame for the current state of Hollywood- except, of course, when somebody LIKES a movie based on a comic; then it’s all credit to the “brillant” filmmakers, who somehow made a good film IN SPITE of the source material.
When Heath Ledger won his posthumous Oscar (and frankly, we all know he WOULDN’T have if it HADN’T been posthumous), a lot of fans made a big deal about it somehow “vindicating” comics. As if it mattered.
But they were looking in the wrong direction ANYWAY, because there’s been a steady stream of Oscar noms for comics-related movies… but those fans are just as narrow-minded as their Hollywood counterparts, because NOBODY on EITHER side considers things like ROAD TO PERDITION or A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE as “comic-book movies”. BOTH sides are fixated on the men in tights.
THAT’s why I mentioned FROM HELL as my example:
A)because the book is an unquestioned masterpiece;
B) because the movie is NOT;
and C)because if it hadn’t been written by a famous writer of “superhero” comics, nobody would have THOUGHT of it as a “comic book” movie at ALL.
I agree with Con Job–
Neil Gaiman & John Bolton’s BOOKS OF MAGIC predated Rowling’s POTTER series, by at least a couple years, and the similarities are *profound*. He *looks* like the boy wizard, he’s got an owl familiar, he’s whisked away to faraway lands to hone his dormant magical talent, which, he’s told, will someday make him the most powerful magician in the world. Also, Rowling would definitely have had access to Gaiman and Bolton’s four issue series, which was later collected in a complete graphic novel. I’ve heard that since Warner owns both DC and Potter, they’ve pretty much swept this under the rug, as an in-house fight will only diminish the brand.
And did you all know that Moore himself is an ordained, card carrying wizard? No, seriously. Don’t know that he shoots bolts from his dick, but you get the idea. Rowling and company know who they’re dealing with. They know his reputation. Now, do they REALLY want to start something?
I’m over Alan Moore. Haven’t read his stuff since Promethea and the early League of Extraordinary Gentlemen books (early 2000s).
Tired of his negativity re: adaptations of his work, all the while cashing DC Comics/Warner Bros. checks and freely adapting OTHER PEOPLE’S characters (but they’re in the public domain, so it’s OK, right?).
Also read how he tried to dick Dave Gibbons out of his share of Watchmen, although I don’t know how true that is.
He did some great stuff back in the day, but Warren Ellis, Grant Morrison and Mark Millar have taken his spot.
Enough already.
Dude , a little fact checking…Moore signed away his financial interests in “Watchmen” over to Gibbons. At least as far as the film was concerned.
Nearly everything you just wrote is the *exact* opposite of the truth, Fluffo. Moore has actually refused royalty checks from Warner Bros for Watchmen, Constantine, League, etc., and has even stipulated that Gibbons is to receive his half of the payout. The man, if nothing else, stands up for his convictions.
Are you serious? Doesn’t everyone, by now, already know that:
Harry Potter IS the antichrist!
YAY! HAHAHAHAHA! Go on w/ your anarchist bad self, Alan! Fight the power!
This isn’t the first time Moore’s riffed on HARRY POTTER. Check out SMAX, his TOP 10 spin off. It’s only a few panels and he calls the boy wizard “Trotter,” but it’s the same tongue-in-cheek tone. No one called him out on it then, why should they now? Both seem like cut and dry cases of legitimate parody.
So the moral of the story is this: Alan Moore demands creator’s rights to be respected when it’s his characters, but has no problem at all abusing someone else’s characters whether or not the creators of those characters feel their rights are being disrespected.
Sounds hypocritical to me.
Comics are for kids.
You are very misinformed. Go read The Preacher, The Walking Dead, Scalped, Y: The Last Man, or Transmetropolitan and you will see how truly wrong you are.
Hey, I’m both: a comic book fan, and a movie fan. I saw the movie “From Hell” first, loved it, then many years later realized it was a graphic novel, read it, and loved it more. Movies don’t ruin the books, in my opinion. I personally have to regard them independently and for nothing more than what they are. Yeah, I’d love to do a movie that finally does a book justice, but someone will have a differing opinion and think it’s garbage.
Harry Potter and Timothy Hunter are both drawn off archetypes from Le Morte De Arthur. Gaiman’s been quoted as saying this himself, and has no issues with Harry Potter.
Yes! I’ve been saying that for years. i.enjoy the HP books and movies but the similarities with the Books of Magic are hard to ignore.
The Books of Magic did not predate Harry Potter by “a couple years.” It was more like a decade.
As for the resemblance, Harry Potter as Rowling wrote him doesn’t resemble Timothy Hunter all that much, physically (read her description of him in the first book). But the artist who drew the covers of the first few novels sure did draw him to resemble Timothy, who, being a comic book character, had a visual representation right from the get-go.
I agree with Gaiman that the similarities are coincidental.
As for Moore, his best early work was Marvelman (published in America by Eclipse Comics under the name “Miracleman” for fear of a trademark lawsuit from Marvel Comics, even though the original British character Marvelman predated Marvel Comics by a decade), but it turned out that the company he originally did that for (Warrior Magazine) never legitimately held the rights to the character — ironically, Marvel now owns the rights. Watchmen was good, but much of what he did with that he’d already earlier done with Marvelman.