Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey will have its world premiere November 28 in New Zealand — two weeks before its U.S. debut and on Jackson’s home turf. Warner Bros bows the film in the states December 14, 2012; the second film in the series, The Hobbit: There And Back Again, is set for domestic release December 13, 2013. New Line Cinema and MGM teamed on the movies, the prequels to the JRR Tolkein novels that begat Jackson’s The Lord Of The Rings trilogy. Filming on the Hobbit movies is taking place at Stone Street Studios in Wellington and on location throughout New Zealand.


That’s a dangerous strategy: that allows 2 weeks for the news to spread around the world about how bad 48 frames per second looks.
Out of respect for the man who created the work that’s made Jackson a very wealthy man, does it not occur to anyone that premiering one of these films in England (or even South Africa where Tolkien was born) would be a nice homage? We get it. They’re filmed in New Zealand. Been there, love it, beautiful country; but come on, let at lease of of them premiere somewhere else.
Ok. Why would 48fps look any different than 24fps? He is shooting it in 3D which means when the film is processed for final delivery, every frame is isolated for each eye so each eye will still be sing 24fps. Since people have 2 eyes, you double up the fps. Meaning you’ll have much more detail on screen. How can that be a bad thing?
There’s a simple and obvious answer to your question: NOT EVERYONE WILL SEE IT IN 3-D!
It does look different; it’s designed to eliminate the motion blur of 3D. And early footage responses say 48fps is strange to watch.
Seems like they want to get a couple of weeks previews just in case there’s a bad reaction to the new look and need to tweak the movie.