Assistant Managing Editor for Arts & Entertainment Sallie Hofmeister has been the person most responsible for the Los Angeles Times‘ lazy and irrelevant coverage of Hollywood. The good news for the newspaper is
that she’s now been forced out by the recently installed new editor Davan Maharaj who has a history of hating on her. But the bad news for the newspaper is that it’s lost too much momentum under her tenure to ever get it back. Hofmeister guided arts and entertainment coverage for the last three years. According to today’s bullshit announcement, “She says that, after 25 years in newspaper journalism, she wants a summer off before embarking on a new career challenge.” The truth is she was given a grace period to look for a job. Her last day will be June 22. Maharaj in a note to staff says, “an announcement of her successor will be forthcoming”.
Hofmeister joined the LAT in 1995 from The New York Times to cover the business of television. In 2006, she became an editor overseeing entertainment and technology coverage. She was named business editor in 2008 and, less than a year later, joined the masthead as an assistant managing editor responsible for arts and entertainment. Hofmeister succeeded in dumbing down the newspaper with blogs like the Ministry of Gossip and another devoted to American Idol. And now the paper’s Envelope is a Red Carpet joke. Meanwhile, the LAT‘s film advertising is down 25% below even the most modest of projections, and now many movies and now suddenly entire theater chains are no longer advertising there. ”Display advertising generally is way down at the paper, but the movie ads have declined the most. And that’s important because film is the LAT‘s largest advertising category,” a source tells me. “In general the movie industry is advertising less in newspapers, but they seemed especially adverse to advertising in Sallie’s diminished Calendar section. It’s disastrous.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
NBC Sets Oklahoma Tornado Benefit Concert For May 29


As usual, you’re absolutely right Nikki.
Having NO editor on the Calendar section should mean readers will get the same amount of non-coverage as it was with Sallie “at the helm”.
It’s amazing how far the Times Calendar section has slid in the last 15 years or so. Hell, they used to routinely scoop Variety back in the day… Or at least offer additional coverage that made waves and really mattered.
Thankfully, we have Deadline.
I dropped my Variety sub over a year ago. They still send me daily email updates. I have had the urge to hit on their links only TWICE in twelve months.
Actually, the Envelope section is quite informative (if you’re interested in awards info).
Sadly, the LAT has little original reporting. Mostly wire reports and advertising. So sad, I love newspapers!
Wow! This may just be the “Classic Nikki” article of the year.
According to today’s bullshit announcement
LOL!
If newspapers had that kind of sass they might not be an endangered species right now.
I never understood why they chose to move the calendar section to Thursday when it should be on Fridays with the movie times for the following week
Because movies open at midnight.
Jake go eat a brain for breakfast. The day the calendar drops is the least of print media’s problem for LA Times or any.
Nikki, you’re the best and besides, Tribune will probably unload the LA Times after they get out from bankruptcy next month and a brand new board of directors will be appointed, ousting that field marshall Sam Zell and his cronies and start selling off assets like nobody’s business.
And yet again, it is time to remind Nikki: It is not kind to speak ill of the dead.
It’s not kind to speak ill of the living either, but that doesn’t stop us all from snarking @ Jeff Sucker and Ben Silverman.
[also doesn't stop me from opining that Kevin Reilly ISN'T the greatest thing since sliced bread, despite occasional reports to the contrary. After all, under his watch, Fox's scripted campaign is third and sinking fast, and Idol won't cover that decline forever, especially after this year]
Honestly, I’ve been throwing that section away for about 5-years now…….
I can get all my ent. news right here and elsewhere without having to read insulting stories about idiots i don’t care about….and stuff obviously the Times arrived, “late to the party.”
Remember when Sunday Calendar was the beast of newspaper sections?????
There’s a lesson here: Do not hire an editor from New York to cover the industry. It needs to be someone who lives in the L.A. area who has built up a contact list to get the scoop on stories, or at least know what’s relevant. It’s not enough to hire someone from a ‘respectable’ newspaper. That doesn’t matter any more. Hopefully the Calendar section can get back a fraction of its appeal.
Really? It seemed to work perfectly well when The New York Times brought Bernie Weinraub to Los Angeles. He was an outsider who had covered Washington and his coverage of Hollywood was exceptional.
Used to get LA Times delivered to house, then switched to online, now don’t bother to read it at all. Stale, safe content. Sad.
The unfiltered commentary you find in a personal blog, but backed by the high quality of someone who knows what they’re talking about and has reason to keep it that way. Plus concise and insightful.
Love it. I sat up bolt upright starting at “lazy and irrelevant.”
I can tell you wrote that story with a great big smile
If Nikke Fink were editor of the Los Angeles Times, the property would be solid gold.
Quit kissing up to her, Bob. This shrew censors any suggestion that she isn’t the seer of Tinsel Town, the Sage of the biz. Can’t be corrected (and she’s wrong, A LOT), petty, childish, vindictive. Wait til her sugar daddy’s deep packets empty, and she’ll be singing a different shrill tune.
Craven, and not Wes.
Orlando, you miss the fact that not only is NF eminently readable and entertaining, she’s RIGHT a great deal of the time, and reports with a healthy dose of take-no-prisoners sass not seen since Hedda and Lolly ruled the streets.
I always appreciated the fact that Times’ stories had to be verified. Here anything counts as news.
It’s amazing that a newspaper that is located in Hollywood does not cover the entertainment industry. There is a movie premiere, party and/or festival every single day in this town and there is absolutely no coverage. The entertianment section should be the newspaer version of Entertainment Weekly.
She deserved to be fired.