
EXCLUSIVE: As Darren Aronofsky’s Noah gets ready to set sail and iconic directors Ridley Scott and Steven Spielberg forge ahead with epics about Moses leading the Israelites out of Egypt, faithful Biblical epics are flourishing in Hollywood. It looks like there is even room for one that takes the most controversial look at the life of Jesus Christ since Martin Scorsese’s The Last Temptation Of Christ.
I’m told that Muse Productions’ Chris Hanley, whose credits include American Psycho, has stepped up to finance development of a film about Christ. It will be based on Jesus Of Nazareth, a book that director Paul Verhoeven co-wrote after immersing himself in the history and researching the subject for nearly two decades. Verhoeven plans to direct the film, which will be written by Roger Avary. Avary shared the Academy Award for Best Original Script with Quentin Tarantino for Pulp Fiction.
Verhoeven’s take on the life of Jesus Christ discounts all the miracles that inform the New Testament. That includes the virgin birth and the resurrection. Verhoeven doesn’t believe any of them happened. I wrote about Verhoeven’s ambitions in spring 2011, as he and his reps at ICM first tried to find funding — no small feat given some of the theories he put forth in the book.The most controversial: that Jesus might have been the product of his mother being raped by a Roman soldier, which Verhoeven said was commonplace at the time, and that Jesus was a radical prophet who performed exorcisms and was convinced he would find the kingdom of Heaven on earth, and did not know he would be sentenced to die on the cross by Pontius Pilate. That, and the discounting of the miracles that pepper the New Testament, has made this a daunting project to set up. But while Verhoeven’s film credits include Showgirls (as well as hits like Robocop, Total Recall and Basic Instinct), he isn’t trying to tantalize here. He is fixated on Christ not for the miracles depicted in the blockbuster film The Passion Of The Christ, but rather in the enduring power of the message Christ preached which has kept him first and foremost in the minds of Christians for 2000 years. Verhoeven feels too many take Jesus’ sacrifice for our sins as a free pass to misbehave, because they think they don’t have to take responsibility for their actions. He feels that the value of Christ’s journey is the opportunity to emulate his life and the values he held dear, like forgiveness.
“If you look at the man, it’s clear you have a person who was completely innovative in the field of ethics,” Verhoeven told me last year. “My own passion for Jesus came when I started to realize that. It’s not about miracles, it’s about a new set of ethics, an openness towards the world, which was anathema in a Roman-dominated world. I believe he was crucified because they felt that politically, he was a dangerous person whose following was getting bigger and bigger. Jesus’ ideals are about the utopia of human behavior, about how we should treat each other, how we should step into the shoes of our enemy.”
Elsewhere on the movie Bible belt, Prometheus director Scott and his Scott Free have become attached to Exodus, a project that had already been set at Fox with Chernin Entertainment. It’s from a script by Adam Cooper and Bill Collage, the Tower Heist scribes who reinvented themselves with this project and a version of Moby Dick that Timur Bekmambetov has been developing.
That puts Fox and Warner Bros in competition on Moses movies, as Steven Spielberg continues to circle Gods And Kings, the Stuart Hazeldine- and Michael Green-scripted epic. Now, both directors have more films than they know what to do with, but I’m told this has become a real race. Scott is prepping his next film The Counselor, the Cormac McCarthy-scripted drama with Michael Fassbender, Javier Bardem, Brad Pitt, Cameron Diaz and Penelope Cruz for Fox. Spielberg, who is in post production on Lincoln, is readying Robopocalypse at DreamWorks as his next film. There seems a great opportunity to update The Ten Commandments, but I doubt there is room for more than one.

The other major ancient religious-themed project, the film about Judah Macabee that Mel Gibson set at Warner Bros with the intention of directing a Braveheart-style film about the events that are commemorated at Hanukkah, seems to have imploded because of discord between Gibson and the screenwriter he hired, Joe Eszterhas. They had a falling out, one I’ve heard stemmed from Eszterhas showing up without having put in the work to transfer Gibson’s ideas for the movie to the page. Eszterhas, in turn, taped Gibson getting angry and yelling at him, and the formerly highly paid scribe has turned the controversy into what seems like a plea for attention, even publishing an e-book about his experiences with Gibson. But if Gibson said even a portion of the things Eszterhas claims he said about Jews, Gibson should find another subject for his next directing assignment because he is missing a sensitivity chip, along with more than a few marbles.
Verhoeven doesn’t have that kind of baggage coming into the Jesus Christ project, but he is treading on territory that Christians universally would label as blasphemous. The film seems to have landed in the appropriate place, as a gritty and controversial independent film. Both Verhoeven and Avary are repped by ICM Partners, which did not comment, nor did Hanley return my call.


Id like to see a more nitty gritty historical story of Jesus. One that puts what He preached and stood for within the context of the culture of the time he lived in. When the Christtards go on and on about He is the only path to heaven, they are missing the point on what He was talking about. Jews and the Romans, did not have a concept of Heaven, Jews went to Sheol and Romans went to teh underworld, which was not a place of suffering, but an eternity of sitting in the doctor’s office reading the same Highlights issue over and over again.
Actaully Gary, you are very much missing the point here. And so are the filmmakers. While people who deny the spiritual importance of christ often try to find a silver lining by claiming that his teachings make him a moral leader. To call this historical is diluting the truth as there is absolutely no evidence of any rape or other “re-interpretations” of what his miracles may have been. While it is fair to question the biblical accounts, we know they were written by real people who existed and their accounts while varying slightly tell the same story and there is no question of what words he used during them. Over and Over again he claimed to be the son of GOD. Which means there are only two possibilities here. 1. that he truly was the son of GOD and the offer of salvation he was preaching was real. or 2. that he was in fact crazy. You cannot say he was just a great teacher. Because a psychotic claims to be the son of god.
Just wait for the Jesus picture in the same vein as Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.
i love (?) that hanley is doing this.
Everyone in town is skimming a bible and tapping out a “Jesus” treatment. Miracles in 3-D, I have foreseen it…opening domestic of at least 65 mil.
It sounds like Verhoeven has a genuine interest and enthusiasm for the subject. As has been said, the debate on the historical Jesus vs. the divine Jesus has been going on for centuries. It’s commercial prospects may be limited, but it appears they want to make a thoughtful film on a fascinating subject. Where’s the crime?
Rumors re Jesus’ paternity including rape by a centurion are at least as old as Josephus and were part of the plot in Robert Graves’ historical novel KING JESUS many moons ago. Revisionist accounts of Jesus from various angles are likewise abundant and of longstanding, going back to the Koran, various rabbinical commentaries and so on. Either you believe he was the Son of God or you don’t. But the usual dodge about him being some great ethical innovator has always been rubbish, as C.S. Lewis and many others have pointed out. The Golden Rule is common to most ethical systems. Verhoeven is rehashing a lot of hackneyed business here.
Gordon, there is nothing like this in Josephus. The description of Jesus as the son of Panthera is Talmudic (textually, at least about 500 years after the death of Jesus). I imagine that Verhoeven got this rape idea from Barbara Reid, a biblical scholar who presented the idea to the Jesus Seminar. If memory serves me, she has argued that the virgin birth stories were a cover up for illegitimacy — but illegitimacy doesn’t necessarily indicate rape. There are simpler ways to explain the use of the virgin birth story, mainly that Jesus is a messianic king (=son of God). Kings in the Ancient Near East, including Jewish ones (see psalms), were considered ‘gods’ of a sort — so were Roman emperors.
Saw Jesus Christ Superstar on broadway last week. Brilliant, radical interpretation of Jesus’ life. And the music is immortal. Rather this than another Adam Sandler comedy or some mind-numbing thriller.
Did all these filmmakers go to the same event seminar where Jesus and religious subject films were researched as the next big ‘theme’ for Hollywood?
It cannot be just coincidence that all this activity is going on simultaneously.
Until religion transforms into hugely successful video games to appeal to the Transformers, Avengers, Iron Man, etc. market…these religious films will have to rely on storytelling for older demographics.
Good luck!
The good point is that verhoeven doesn’t write the script himself!
To all the people crying about “why don’t they do something like this on Islam?”, do you ever think about why movies like these get made? It’s because these filmmakers were raised with Christianity (or Judaism) and like most subjects, they question it.
I’m having trouble thinking of a single practicing Muslim that has broken Hollywood’s wall, let alone somebody with clout that can do the project they want.
I guess you can try to imagine yourself as the persecuted minority but quit kidding yourself.
Ummm….I’ve been working on a script about Mary Magdalene. Anybody?
Jesus said:
“I did not come to bring peace to the world, I came to bring the sword.”
Matthew 10:34
-
It’s interesting with ‘Prometheus’ (and a possible ‘BLADE RUNNER’ PREQUEL, right NOT sequel).. and all these other films.. Hollywood is asking questions about Heaven and our Creator(s). Why so introspective all of a sudden, old director/producer dudes?
As I’ve written before, Verhoeven’s conclusions about Jesus were largely in direct contradiction to the majority of the Jesus Seminar scholars he likes to associate himself with. When he presented his ideas to members of the Seminar, he was told so.
His view of Jesus as a violent revolutionary has no support among the major Jesus scholars who treat the sociopolitical situation of Palestine as a subjugated “colony” of the Roman empire. His depiction of Jesus as the result of a Roman soldier’s rape of Mary is sheer fantasy, roughly analogous to the utterly unsupportable nonsense about Jesus and Mary Magdalene as lovers, or Judas as the secret ally of Jesus. There is one minor scholar who raised the THEORETICAL possibility of rape, but she herself denied that one could clearly conclude this from the evidence (or her scholarship). This fiction of a Roman soldier “Panthera” is based on anti-Christian vitriol from Jewish quarters long after Jesus’ death, and some verbal wordplay. Verhoeven also argues for the rape from the fact that military routed a revolt led by Judas ben Hezekiah at Sepphoris, about AN HOUR’S WALK from Nazareth. This is children’s logic. His claim that the scene in the Temple courtyard occurred early in Jesus’ career, and that Jesus thus spent the significant part of his career on the lam from angry priests is found (to my knowledge) nowhere in the vast literature of Jesus studies; it’s part of Verhoeven’s make-believe version of Jesus.
As early as 1980-81 I had been studying N. Perrin and J. D. Crossan and attended a mini-course on the Historical Jesus with John P. Meier, now the author of the magisterial Jesus scholarship, “A Marginal Jew.” More recently I have attended courses at Yale Divinity School in Historical Jesus and related biblical studies and exegeted gospel material myself. I have personally consulted some of the most influential biblical scholars on the planet, including scholars associated with the Jesus Seminar. And I am member of the academic Jesus studies forum, crosstalk. I find Verhoeven’s claim to be making a movie about the Historical Jesus a deceit. Verhoeven MAY have SOME exposure to the scholarship, but his desire to do a remake of Spartacus, dressed up as Jesus, and to force-fit the rape story, overrides his knowledge of the material. And his conclusions (as above) are based on very bad “moviemaker logic,” not critical thinking about history.
I, for one, am sickened at the thought of this movie. By even doing this, Paul Verhoeven, whose last GOOD film happened to be “Total Recall”, seeks to destroy every foundation Christianity was based on…which, themselves, came from eyewitness accounts…including the Virgin Birth AND the Resurrection. I have a feeling that, if this movie does somehow get made, it’s gonna be a HUGE bomb. I can’t wait to see a film about Christ that sticks to the truth of the Bible, and not other writings about Him.
Revelations 22:18-19
18For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
when you take away the vifgin birth of Jesus, his miracles and his ressurection from the grave you are taking out of the Bible what God had men write in the Bible which is the truth from the Lord God Almighty.
John 8:32
32And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
Paul will have to answer to God for this movie and what he has done to the life of our risen Saviour.
Free speech in the USA does allow you to be disrespectful, and to denegrate what is sacred to nearly half the world’s population. Of course, you obviously don’t care about insulting a whole group of people to create a sensation. Your movie will not do well, and it will be well-protested, more than any anti-Christian movie before. What did Jesus do to you? Jesus, and his teachings have made the world a better place. What is your purpose of presenting such an unholy portrait of the man who has given mankind hope for two mellenia. Shame on you. You are doing NOTHING to improve the world with this piece. It reflects the hatred in your heart for those who believe.
I just think it’s an awful shame that even Verhoeven can’t think of an original story. Whatever happened to the days where movies told stories of truly amazing and original content, not seek to regurgitate some base essence of story and character that we’ve all seen before (another reboot of Spiderman or the Fantastic Four anyone?). It’s lazy and patronizing, particularly given the attempt to muster some level controversy by choosing a religio-grit theme. Leave the bible alone for those that choose to set their own moral compass by it and concentrate on something new, life changing, thought-provoking and/or brilliant.
Go ahead spend millions making a movie that no one will see.
I hope the non-biblical hatchet job tanks at the box office, why can’t he keep his own little interpretations to himself instead of lose his shirt over it and waste our time with it?
So this is a movie about ethics. . . That then devalues the Bible? It’s an oxymoron.
Jared,
What’s so controversial about living God’s will? Love of your neighbor & your enemy, praying for others, being charitable, kind, gentle, taking care of the poor, the sick prisoners, living a chaste life, embracing life from conception to death. I’d say say these are honorable & good.
80% of movie houses will not show this film. Expect tremendous number of boycotts of the film industry. These investors will lose their shirts, but they won’t care. Publicity will come but this director/producer will find himself anathema in the USA and world in his lust to put some HATE on JESUS and Church folk.
It’s sad that a pauper thinker becomes a king and produces a movie that fits his own thibking and in turn misleads so many so powerfully
Isaiah 7:14 — “Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel (God with us).”. That was written about 650 years before Jesus Christ was born.