Aaron Sorkin provided a glimpse into his thinking behind The Newsroom in a recent interview with NPR. Reaction to the show, starring Jeff Daniels as anchorman Will McAvoy, has been polarized, earning criticism of its portrayal of journalism and complaints of sermonizing, as well as praise, but Sorkin tells Fresh Air’s Terry Gross, it’s fantasy. ”I like writing about heroes that don’t wear capes and disguises”, he said. ”I think that the critics and the audience who are reacting as hostilely to the show as they are, part of the reason is because they think that I’m showing off an intellect and an erudition that I don’t have”, Sorkin said. He said he spent two days on the set of Countdown With Keith Olbermann to get the feel of a newsroom before he started writing. ”I realized I could set the show in the recent past,” he says. “My big worry was making up the news — writing fictional news — because it was just going to take us too far away from reality. … But [setting the show in the recent past] became the gift that kept on giving. Because you have the fun of the audience knowing more than the characters”.
(Photo: Getty Images)


“it’s fantasy”? Give me a break. This show perfectly mimics liberal reality. The main characters talk incessantly about how their broadcast is fair in presenting both sides of every story. Just like most of the mainstream media, they truly believe they are balanced. It’s not their fault that those darned conservatives are just so stupid and evil…
Its hard to fathom serious criticism of the show. Its bright and engaging, two attributes generally lacking in popular fare. Daniels’ performance is a breakthrough, on a par with Kelsey Grammar’s on Boss. As to being too erudite, one can hope against hope that long term exposure may actually bring the audience’s intellectual level up, as apposed to the traditional reverse phenomenon.
Spoken like a true studio/liberal shill.
“Its hard to fathom serious criticism of the show.” Really? Do you anyone, anybody at all, that speaks like every single character of every single Sorkin script? It grows wearisome so quickly for me.
Now, while I enjoy the Newsroom, I do think there are a number of issues with it that prevents it from really taking hold, the fact that nobody talks like that is, I’m sorry to say, one of the most ridiculous. NOBODY talks like they do in any movies or television shows. Nobody. Have you actually listened to how people speak? If people talked how they really did on TV it would be excruciatingly annoying and not at all entertaining. And that’s the crux of the issue. Dialogue, at it’s best, is supposed to be entertaining, not realistic.
I’m not a writer but I’m guessing that if different characters had their own distinct voice as opposed to the sharing the same one as every other character in every other script it would be stronger artistically and more entertaining.
Setting it in the recent past also allows him to annoyingly have his characters so amazingly smart and right all the time.
There is no doubt that Sorkin is a talented writer. I’m a fan, but the budding romance between Alison Pil’s and John Gallagher’s characters feels tacked on, and the performances labored. Maybe it’s a casting issue. Also, they should give Dev Patel something interesting to do. Bigfoot, really?
Right on Aaron!!! Keep doing your work.
If idiots don’t get your work as a writer; storyteller; taking the mask off of all of us…then they’re just fucked up.
Screwed up and over in their families.
Dysfunction junction a rollin’, while brewing their tea bags.
I really am a Sorkin fan with West Wing, Social Network and a Few Good Men being real favorites. But most of the crtiticism I’ve heard, and really do agree with, is the show is just flat, void of dramatic interest and not particularly interested in storytelling. The sermonizing is also tedious as hell even though I generally agree with the point of view. Maybe it’s also that this is now Aaron’s third series about TV and he’s just out of ideas.
I have never been a billionaire internet entrepreneur nor have I ever worked in the West Wing, but I did spend a career as a Marine Corps JAG officer and I can tell you that Speilburg’s War of the Worlds was more grounded in reality than was a Few Good Men, which was in almost every way absolutely absurd. The dialog, the plot concept, the characters – in short, everything created by Sorkin – was as realistic as the Easter Bunny.
Even as someone who has never set foot in a broadcast television newsroom, I have a feeling that it’s as tethered to reality as a Few Good Men was tethered to the reality of an actual military courtroom, which is to say not in any way at all.
Hollywood, rewriting history is their Forte’.
Why is there such an obsession with criticizing these shows because they “aren’t like real life”? As I said above, there are plenty of real criticisms, but the fact that it’s not realistic is just stupid. It’s TV. It’s supposed to be entertaining. You want realistic, go and sit in a newsroom for a couple of hours. I’m sure you’ll realize very quickly why you can’t make a show realistic and entertaining at the same time.
I do believe, Aaron, you are a very, very smart man. Like your non-costume wearing hero thing. But I’m not getting into your show… There’s not one character I don’t find annoying. Not one. And in the third episode there was a reference to Gomer Pyle, Gypsy, Rocky 2 and… crap don’t remember the last one. May have been more, but those are such a writery references. Really took me out of the show. My two cents. From a nobody.
I love this show and think it’s only going to get better and better with time.
Is it me or is his real talent finding finding a million different ways to write a courtroom drama?
Love the show. Please keep giving us more. I get it. It is fantasy. If only we could have people who stand up for good ideas instead of giving kudos to those who shoot them down. It is idealistic but that’s ok. Look at CNN. After not watching for a few months I turned it on and it looked more like Access Hollywood.
Casting, aside from Jeff Daniels, is across the board terrible for this show. It just goes to show how talented Allison Janney (sp?) and Bradly Whitford and the rest of the West wing staff was to sell the sermonizing without seeming (ridiculously) preachy because for the most part, I think the writing is about par for Sorkin. I don’t like any of these “Newsroom” people and I’m a liberal West wing/The Social Network fan. There is zero gravitas in any of these characters minus Daniels. I mean, how do you make Sam Waterson and Jane Fonda look like they’re reaching? This thing’s salvageable but it had better happen soon. I’m rooting for this thing to play — it’s not the craziest thing to try but how about some straight up drama?!
The whole tone is confusing…
Weakest links on the show for me are Emily Mortimer and the girl who looks like she has Down Syndrome. It’s ok to make casting mistakes, just fix it the way you sent Moira Kelly packing on West Wing when it was clear she wasn’t working. AND just because you work in news off camera means no one is attractive?
For the naysayers on Sorkin…again…grow up and listen…when you expect a tv show, a movie to be filled with and sounding and acting exactly like normal people do in reality? You’re on a losing trip. Turn off the tv and get a grip on reality outside your own life. Sorkin’s a storyteller. Accept it; deal with it and grow up. Or…just don’t watch.
I’m sure “HOUSEWIVES from whatever” are dying for your support.
Same with RUSH and FOX NEWS.
That’s helpful Mark, thanks.