“There is no way to sugarcoat this: broadcast has taken a beating,” Nomura Securities’ Michael Nathanson says this morning in his quarterly report on primetime TV viewing. He assesses the market the way most networks and advertisers do — folding in DVR views of a show up to three days after a live broadcast (known in the industry as C3). He finds that the major networks were down 9.4% among the target 18 to 49 year olds vs the same period last year while cable networks were only off 0.4%. It’s the second consecutive quarter of substantial declines for broadcasters. And it’s worrisome for them because many now want to count DVR eyeballs — even though lots of users skip over ads. Live viewing in the demographic has declined for 15 successive quarters; in Q2 it fell 15.2% for the broadcast networks and 4.3% for cable. Fox was hit hardest with C3 ratings -18.7% followed by NBC (-11.8%) and ABC (-9.7%). CBS, however, was up 8.4%. Over in cable, companies with meaningful increases in year-over-year C3 ratings were Disney (+25.8%) and Scripps Networks (+8.8%) — results were gloomier for AMC Networks (-8.2%), Viacom (-7.7%), and Time Warner (-6.6%). Still, Nathanson has some encouraging news for networks concerned that ad skipping will become a lot more commonplace as the number of DVR households grows from 40% now to 47% expected in 2015. New users don’t appear to be as fast on the trigger: The percentage of broadcast commercials skipped by DVR users dropped to 46.7% in the 2011/2012 season from 58.8% in 2007/2008. For cable, 50.4% of the ads were skipped this past season vs. 52.8% in 2007/2008.
Broadcast Ratings Hammered In Q2, Even With DVRs Factored In: Analyst
By DAVID LIEBERMAN, Executive Editor | Monday July 16, 2012 @ 10:25am EDTTags: DVR, TV Ratings
This article was printed from http://www.deadline.com/2012/07/broadcast-ratings-hammered-in-q2-even-with-dvrs-factored-in-analyst/
COMMENTS (28)
-
SUBSCRIBE TO DEADLINE NEWS
Marketplace
-
‘Fast & Furious 6′ Montage
News/Opinion Poll
Loading ...By The Numbers
Title Network Index 1 NCIS CBS 138 2 NCIS: Los Angeles CBS 133 3 La Patrona TELMUN-B 127 4 Criminal Minds CBS 127 5 CSI: Crime Scene CBS 126 6 The Good Wife CBS 125 7 The Mentalist CBS 124 8 Por ella soy Eva UNIV-B 124 9 Blue Bloods CBS 122 10 Amor bravio UNIV-B 121 SOURCE: RENTRAK.COMBox Office Poll
Loading ...Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Twitter @DeadlineNY
Cannes: Fleming Reflects And Finds Trio Of American Talent A Breath Of Fresh Air http://t.co/a3ToAqVQoQAbout 40 min. ago

Many nights I will look at the schedule of what is on TV and find nothing of interest. Repeats, people selling people stuff and “reality” shows. The TV goes off, out comes the books, go on line or go out into the real world. Except for the rare exception programming has become garbage. And then they wonder why, oh why, have the ratings fallen. Give us a break.
I agree whole heartedly to your comments and would like to add, for every 5 minutes of shows their is 4 minutes of advertising. That is my main reason to “PVR” all shows.
If people own a dvr and are not skipping commercials, its because they are doing other things and just have the show playing in the background. They still aren’t watching the commercials
I completely agree. The truth is that more people are now watching TV with a tablet (or smartphone) on their lap — and so while they may not be as quick to pull the trigger to skip commercials, they’re still not paying attention to them. You’ll notice that the downward trend in skipping commercials began in 2007 — when the iPad was introduced.
I meant “…2007 — when the iPhone was introduced.” The iPad didn’t come out until 2010. I don’t know why I’m going back to correct this, I doubt anyone will read it, but it just makes me feel better to have the correct information in my anonymous post.
Funny how Viacom and AMC are screaming and squawking about not getting their increased fees from certain satellite companies, while their ratings are down considerably.
Its not rocket science. If U look at the downward trend in viewers you will also notice an up-ward trend in reality programming. If you dig deeper you will notice that the reality programming being produced is constantly dumbing down. Network TV reminds me of local cable access. Case in Point “Wipe Out” They get what they deserve, after years of trying to skimp on production budgets by producing reality crap, its finally caught up with them.
Or it could be that networks are pandering to the 18-49 crowd, look at the numbers Disney is UP Scripps (Food Network, DIY, HGTV) is UP and CBS is UP, the rest are down.
Maybe viewers are just tired of the shows that are on broadcast TV less CBS. Look into the numbers deeper and see who has what on their network. It just isn’t reality, its scripted shows too, maybe if writers could actually write something interesting it would change. Obviously viewers aren’t watching what writers are writing. Reality shows are mostly in the summer what about the fall when the schedules except for FOX are loaded with scripted shows?
Yes, it’s the writers. That’s why there is quality over on cable. Because it’s the writers.
Tv is all old people. So why is everyone shocked no one watches.
Ad skipping is the #1 advantage to owning a DVR. Once someone realizes their program content is 44 min they’ll never sit through another hour again. For networks to even consider DVR in their advertising models makes zero sense. They can keep looking through rose-colored glasses, but what’s clear is a broken revenue model.
It’s this simple: it’s difficult to be a generalist in a marketplace increasing dominated by specialists.
Bingo.
I don’t understand why the broadcast networks are surprised by the downtrend in A1849 numbers. The younger end of that demo does NOT WATCH TV THE SAME WAY THE OLDER END OF THAT DEMO DOES.
It’s simple as that.
Plus, there’s a lot of crap on the air because the broadcast networks are too cheap to invest in productions more worth the viewers time than inane reality shows.
Fire 3/4 of the execs. Give writers a smaller budget and 6 episode orders. Take some chances on new writers. Don’t let execs make all the creative decisions.
It’s not hard.
My guess is that Fox, ABC and NBC fared worse than CBS because they skew younger and have higher concentration of DVR users. I also wonder if the C3 ratings really tell us much because it usually takes my wife and I a week or more to watch the things we’ve taped. Of course, we also skip through the commercials so from an advertiser point of view doesn’t make much of a difference.
Why don’t the broadcast nets come up with another cop show, or a show about lawyers, or maybe doctors? Surely those hackneyed concepts haven’t been used enough over the decades. You could have the cop/lawyer/doctor have some personality quirk that makes him weird or hard to get along with, but because of the character’s incredible genius at their respective field, it’s put up with by all. Yeah! that’s the ticket! And ALWAYS make sure the ‘good guy’ wins in the end because that’s true to life! Also, make sure all the roles are filled by men and women who could be models, I know in my own life, everyone looks like a model! The cops, the scientists, the garbage men…..
…the network execs, their development staff, their marketing team…
…many of them eager young go-getters with Ivy League degrees who think they know how to creatively build a TV show…
…or at least need to APPEAR as if they do by giving a lot of notes, lest someone wake up and realize their job doesn’t really need to exist…
…and who worship at the altar of the network’s #1 Commandment:
“THOU SHALT NOT INNOVATE – ONLY IMITATE!”
Not exactly the target audience but I recently noticed that my kids (7 & 11 y/o boys) don’t watch TV anymore. They watch youtube or play video games. Which is fine with me because I can’t stand commercials.
Why don’t the broadcast nets come up with another cop or doctor or lawyer show? Surely those concepts haven’t been used much over the decades. You could have the doctor/lawyer/cop character have some strange personality quirk that makes them hard to get along with but because of their incredible genius in their respective field, it’s put up with by all. Yeah, that’s the ticket. Also, make sure the ‘good guy’ always wins cuz that’s true to life!
Broadcat’s lineup is TERRIBLE. It’s not worth watching even without ads. Networks need to realize that niche programming/no ads is the future, which only works with a much larger audience for free content OR subscription revenues.
American TV already has a global audience – they just pirate a lot of it now. But make that content safer, quicker and easier to obtain, and they could monetize some of that piracy. Another point – why does a paid subscription to Hulu still have ads? Lose the ads, and it might be worth $8/month.
That’s why I didn’t bother with HuluPlus. I knew there would still be ads. Hulu placed the value of the subscription service on the fact that you could a) have access to more shows and b) have access to them sooner.
I just wait a week.
Lose the ads and it will cost $20 per month!
Fine by me. I pay $15/mo for Netflix streaming + DVDs. Of course, that covers all TV and movies I’d ever want to watch. But I won’t pay a dime for a service that isn’t what I want. No ads and completeness are the two elements that aren’t negotiable.
But isn’t Univision way up in prime-time ratings this year?
It’s the top-ranked network this Summer among adults between 18 and 34, and very competitive in the 18-49 demo this Summer as well.
It may be part of a demographic shift: The Hispanic population is rapidly growing.
There is a reason “reality” TV and competition shows are all over the airwaves – you’re watching them. It’s ridiculous to blame the networks when The Voice, The Bachelor and Survivor are pulling in millions and millions of viewers every night. What are they supposed to do? Networks aren’t charities for the sake of art…they are in the business of putting out content their viewers want, and those viewers have spoken: they want “reality” and competition shows.
If viewers made better choices for better content, the trend would shift. So shut off the latest dating game or karaoke contest and turn on something someone actually wrote. Until that happens, you’ll continue to get more of the same.
My thoughts exactly!
This isn’t about networks being charities, it’s about networks being viable businesses. The way things are going, it’s not looking good.