Ray Richmond contributes to Deadline’s TV coverage.
In 1995, Fox premiered a new sitcom entitled Partners that starred Tate Donovan and Jon Cryer as architects and best pals who have an offbeat secretary. In the pilot, one of them gets engaged, tossing their friendship and partnership into jeopardy. That pilot was directed by top sitcom helmer James Burrows. Seventeen years later, CBS this fall will premiere a new sitcom — also entitled Partners — starring David Krumholtz and Michael Urie as architects and best pals with a zany secretary. In the pilot, one of the guys gets engaged, threatening their friendship and partnership. Like its namesake predecessor,
it was directed by James Burrows. The similarities between the two projects were front and center at TCA this morning when Partners creators/exec producers David Kohan and Max Mutchnick appeared with their stars to promote their new show. Kohan and Mutchnick essentially dismissed the parallels between the two shows’ premises as, with Mutchnick calling the identical titles as an “unfortunate coincidence.” Quipped Krumholtz, “Is it also an unfortunate coincidence that my character’s name is Tate Donovan?”
Jeff Greenstein, who created and ran the Fox series, has been vocal about his displeasure over the new show on Twitter. “So I guess it’s OK to rip off the title, premise, pilot story, characters’ jobs and pilot director from a colleague’s series and claim it as your own,” he wrote on Twitter. “Have fun!”
Related: Related: CBS’ Nina Tassler Skewers Rivals, Says She’s “Optimistic” About ‘HIMYM’ Renewal
Complicating the situation are a couple of factors. One is that Greenstein worked for years as a writer, producer and exec producer on Kohan and Mutchnick’s Emmy-winning comedy Will & Grace. So there is already a history between the men — and, previously, a working and positive one. Another mitigating issue is the fact that the new Partners has been framed as the story of the personal and work relationship between Kohan and Mutchnick — as friends since high school and business partners since their early 20s — and represents their third attempt to get such a story to series. The first was a 2007 CBS pilot that was also called Partners and starred Jay Mohr and Brian Austin Green. The second pilot was made the following year at ABC and was titled Fourplay, with Alan Tudyk, Josh Cooke and Ty Burrell starring. It was finally got picked up to series this time as Partners. The main difference in the new show from the original Fox Partners is that one of the two lead characters is gay, reflecting the real-life orientation of Kohan (who is straight) and Mutchnick (who’s gay). As for Burrows, who will stay with the CBS show as a director/executive producer, he has a long history with Mutchnick and Kohan and has directed most of their pilots, including Will & Grace and the 2007 Partners.
Related: CBS Keeps ‘Elementary’s “Secrets” But Teases Moriarty: TCA
At the session, Kohan and Mutchnick were asked this morning why they didn’t just change the title of the show or profession of the leads. “They weren’t architects initially, they were writers,” Kohan replied, ”but we felt there was something about writing that’s a little insular.” Regarding the title, he added, “We started thinking about our titles and said, this is what this is.” Added Mutchnick, “We thought (Partners) was perfect for this show.” As for Greenstein’s Fox show, “I obviously knew that Jeff had done this show called Partners,” Kohan said. “I was not very familiar with it. And it was not something that we were even thinking about.” Added Mutchnick: “Jeff is a great writer, he worked for us for many years and it was a wonderful working experience. I’m not really sure why this is interesting to him. It’s just such a different world.” He said he’s never seen Greenstein’s show, “but it’s just kind of been a surprise to us because this is the story of the two of us (Kohan and Mutchnick), and my husband, and his wife, and that’s the show that we’re doing,” Mutchnick said. “That’s where we’re coming from.”
Related: CBS’ ‘Made In Jersey’ Aims To Confront Stereotypes: TCA
Asked to expand on the subject after the panel, both Kohan and Mutchnick seemed genuinely surprised and a little bit flustered that this was turning into an issue. Kohan admitted that Burrows had told them they needed to change the title, he was overruled because “everyone agreed that (Partners) was the right title. “We’d thought of a few other things, like Significant Others,” he said. Mutchnick made the point that in fact the two shows in question “have nothing to do with each other.” “We don’t even have a defensive posture about it,” he said. “I hope (Greenstein) does very well in his life. It’s just odd to me that he wants attention, he knows us very wel … That’s why it’s surprising. We’re just kind of trying to lower the temperature of this thing because it’s not really a story.”


even a first year lawyer could tell you there are enough similarities between the two shows to make a copyright infringement a slam dunk. I predict the show will be retitled before it starts broadcasting.
And with all that it still will not make it past Season #1.
Why come up with a new idea when you can just re-use an old one that didn’t work?
Re-developing a pilot that has failed to make it to series in the past isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Look at The Middle on ABC.
It was originally developed for 2007-2008 and starred Ricki Lake. A year and a half later, the show was re-developed and is now entering it’s fourth season – which will take it very close to syndication meaning Warner Brothers will make even more money from it.
Sometimes shows just need a little extra polish to get them over the edge. It worked with The Middle, so why not wait and see if the same thing will apply with Partners?
Boy would I like to be Greenstein right now. Bet he could walk into any bank with a handful of news clips from the TCA and get a pre-litigation loan of a million or two, at rock-bottom interest.
Too many coincidences for any of this to feel genuine. Journalists are writers (duh) so of course they asked lots of questions because there is clearly a story here and no one likes to be plagiarized, TV writers or journalists.
Could be this writing team was given story notes by CBS or Burrows that reflected Greensteins script while in development.
Did they have to be architects and did one of them have to get engaged? That’s the really weird part.
Two guys who are writers pen a story about themselves and their flaky secretary only make it about architects because writers are insular and the only career areas they can think of are writer and architect and if their premise sounds similar to another show where the writers are architects and the secretary is flaky it is mitigated by the fact that they once worked with someone who wrote a similar show on another show altogether? Am I getting this?
“I hope (Greenstein) does very well in his life. It’s just odd to me that he wants attention.”
Attention?
This pilot has the same title – Partners, same pilot story – a team of architects and one gets engaged, same director – Jimmy Burrows… and Greenstein, “wants attention?”
I’d want a sincere apology and a large check. I hope his lawyers settle this quickly.
Eerily similar tone to the now infamous Michael Patrick King discussion at January’s TCA. Perhaps hyper-extreme narcissism is rejected by the TCA panel??
MPK and Max are birds of a feather. Super rich, super gay, super obsessed with winning tv writers that have a cluelessness about how terrible their shows are …
both were involved in signature shows — SEX AND THE CITY and WILL AND GRACE.
and both will spend time attempting to recreate that success. Money can come — clearly TWO BROKE GIRLS will make King fabulously rich all over. Perhaps PARTNERS will.
but when you try too hard, as both of these entries do, you will not achieve that magic quality that made W&G and SATC so special.
CBS seems to embrace these folks, which is odd considering how genuine 2.5 MEN, HIMYM, and BBTheory play to the audience.
Significant Others is a WAY better title. Partners makes me think cops and tennis players. The only more generic title would be “TV Show.”
I agree with the tweet. “Good luck!”
They are trying to “lower the temperature of this thing” because they are crooks who can not think of their own ideas. These roducers in particular are a pair of crooks who only have positions because of their nepotistic connections. They fail repeditly and continue to get more chances, I hope the network and the show fails.
I have a great idea for a new series. It’s called “Will & Grace.” It’s just like the old “Will & Grace” except the men are straight and the women are gay. James Burrows would be perfect to direct.
Great idea! But can the male characters be gay instead? Not because it’s the same as the original Will & Grace, but just because it seems less “insular”.
It figures that the other title they thought of has already been used, too. “Significant Others” was a series starring Jennifer Garner.
Why do people in Hollywood constantly think a job like being an architect is somehow less insular than being a writer? I know zero architects, but quite a few professional writers.
In the WGA annual survey THEFT was one of the top four problems writers cited in the business. Five years ago, theft didn’t make the cut. Why is is a bigger problem now? Because of guys like this, arrogant privileged hacks who think fear of being blacklisted and their buddies will allow them to just steal from another writer.
They may be hacks but at least they’re pricks.
Right on, JK5000…never a truer statement said on this site. You nailed it.
Toxicity is my new hero.
Forget the 1995 show. This pilot feels like 1975.
What is happening with $#*! My Dad Says?
Everything you need to know Max Mutchnick and his completely nonexistent sense of right and wrong exists in this article. I like so many look forward to this rehashed messes complete failure. When Jeff Greenstein redoes Union Square perhaps Mutchnick can pucker up and kiss his ass for a job over there. Oh wait–Jeff Greenstein has moved on to bigger and better things. That’s right!
As excited as I am about this series, I do have to agree that the one thing they needed to change was, AT LEAST, the jobs as architects. I mean seriously! Shows and movies always have the same names. And always have similar storylines (in this case about the best friends working together etc). But something needed to be changed. Let’s be honest here.
James Burrows comes off like the sleazebag here because he directed and developed both pilots. It’s inexcusable. He was the only person who worked on both. I also can’t help but believe Greenstein’s cancelled show PARTNERS helped get him the WILL AND GRACE job.
Something is rotten in Denmark and Studio City.
I never leave comments on here but felt someone had to say it – I’ve worked with Max and David, they are incredibly talented writers and showrunners. Is everything they do a hit? No. Was W&G a groundbreaking hugely successful show? Of course it was. They are rich beyond belief and don’t need to work. They do it because they love it. And they don’t need to rip off anyone, let alone Jeff. There are clearly similarities but this is a different show with completely different characters and dynamics. It’s like saying any show set in a bar is Cheers or any show about family is Roseanne. There’s nothing new under the sun people, it’s all about execution.
No, it’s like saying that any show set in a “Cheers”-like bar, with the same director and essential pilot story as “Cheers,” that you then decide to call “Cheers,” might just be, for all practical and copyright-infringement purposes, you know….”Cheers.”
Where was Nina on all this? Problem could have been mitigated.
Get Real, it’s only like saying every show set is a bar is a rip-off of Cheers if…the new show is also called Cheers and is about a former ball player who runs a bar.
Dear Get Real,
Execution does make or break it and no one posting here is that big a moron not to know that. Ask Shakespeare who stole most ofthe ideas for his plays from less successful ones. No one could execute an idea like him. But let’s face it we all know an idea is huge. An idea is where it begins and what it’s based on forever. The relationships, the world, the characters even though written differently sound eerily the same with both versions of “Partners” in a detailed paragraph. ‘Partners” even has the fingerprints on both of James Burrows as a director producer. The idea also originated with a writer who worked for these two people who are now claiming it to be completely original from their creative brains.
Even if the Universe actually allowed such a detailed and serendipitous creative coincidence to happen I’m not sure execution is the issue. It looks like idea theft and that stinks.
They should do what Chuck Lorre does which is share a created by credit.
Oh, you really do need to “get real.” Witness: “I’m not really sure why this is interesting to him.” “…it’s not really a story.” Arrogant, out-of-touch pricks. The same show is the same show!
No the issue is they’re making a show called ‘Cheers’ after another show called ‘Cheers’ was on the air. With all the same elements. Yes, the addition of the (tired by now) ‘gay’ third wheel is a twist, but honestly, Jon Cryer never read that ‘straight’ to me in the original. The original was a really good show. Tate Donovan kind of sunk it by not being a comedic actor. There is a reason for JG to be upset and for his grievances to be addressed. “Hope he has a nice life” is passive aggressive high handed baloney. Lawyers.
I agree that there’s relatively nothing new out there and I agree a hundred percent it’s all about execution… but the arrogance… just change the title and the professions and they’re wouldn’t be a discussion. That’s a very easy fix… but they didn’t. They knew this other show was out there but they probably thought we are Max and David and everyone else can go fuck themselves.
My partner (and I’m not stealing that word) and I worked with Max and David on several pilots including Partners. EVERYTHING came from their lives and imagination. The show is about a close relationship between a gay man and a straight man, i.e.: Max and David. They are two of the most creative writers out there. They have no need to use anyone else’s material.
P.S. There has been a wedding or engagement in every pilot since the beginning of TV. And Jimmy Burrows, god bless him, has probably directed them all.
Ummmm… even if all of the stuff they obsessed over came straight from Larry David’s life, I’m pretty sure Larry can’t do another “new” show called “Seinfeld,” about four friends, three male and one female, who… yeah, I’m pretty sure we all know he can’t “create” that again.
Seriously, even if everything about this show “came from their lives and imagination” have we all lost the ability to practice common courtesy?!?! And even if Max & David had never heard of JG’s Partners are you telling me that NO ONE INVOLVED HAD EITHER and didn’t mention it to them at which point shouldn’t someone have said “Hey, let’s just make a few minor tweaks that REALLY have no bearing on our/your completely original idea of the show and NOT make them architects, you know, since this show is about us/you are we/you are not architects and perhaps give it a different name just so we could avoid any, let’s just call them, misdirected comparisons that could might pop up…”
Yes, Get Real, it’s true, there’s nothing new under the sun. There’s no denying that. But how can you defend two guys who claim to have never seen the original show, yet in 1996 they said they loved it so much that they hired part of the writing staff the following year on Boston Common? True, there’s nothing new under the sun. Theft and lies have been around since the dawn of man.
So let’s just say for the sake of argument… I have this new series I created called “Will and Grace” (can’t copyright a title). The characters Will and Grace live across the hall from one another (they do in every sitcom). It’s a love affair in every way but sexual(like all sitcoms). There are two crazy best friends and Jim Burrows directed the pilot (like every sitcom).
The team that wrote the first “Will and Grace” and I used to work with but this show is all about me. And if they point out the similarities on Twitter I’m going to tell the entire community of entertainment journalists that those other writers just need “attention.”
That’s a responsible and mature way to handle this don’t you think?