Luke Y. Thompson is contributing to Deadline’s coverage of Comic-con.
The good news for Lionsgate is that Comic-Con fans of the pen-and-ink Judge Dredd accept this new Dredd as the real deal, unlike the Stallone version. Karl Urban, standing with costar Olivia Thirlby, introduced the screening by asking, “I hope you like your films dark and gritty. Do ya?” After that, he took a slight dig at Stallone by saying that fans of lycra and gold codpieces would be disappointed.
Related: Fox Sets ‘Fantastic Four’, ‘Daredevil’ Reboots; Puts Joe Cornish On ‘Rust’
The not so good news may be that wider audiences won’t be in on the joke. Dredd in the comics was a British parody of what the typical American action hero was perceived to be, and Urban’s exaggerated Clint Eastwood-style line readings fit that mold perfectly, but it may not be obviously satirical enough to those who won’t see past Dredd melting a guy’s head from inside, machine-gunning perps in super-bloody slo-mo, and casually dropping one villain off a balcony (this audience cheered and laughed at each one, which is the intended response).
Related: Comic-Con – Getting A Head Start
Considerably lower-budget than the Stallone film directed by Danny Cannon, Dredd jettisons the Blade Runner-esque heavy sci-fi, creating a futuristic mega-city (stretching from Boston to L.A. with a radioactive desert outside) that’s more like a believable future slum built to the sky — a favela on steroids. No, fans, Dredd never takes his helmet off, although you do see him put it on, in shadow.
The prevailing wisdom in the ’80s among fans was that Robocop stole much of Judge Dredd‘s thunder, pre-empting it at the time with its similar satire of the action hero as fascist enforcer. The new Dredd, directed by Pete Travis, nods to this by quoting Robo-foe ED-209′s “ten seconds to comply” at one point. As for criticisms that it resembles The Raid: Redemption mdash; some cinephiles will still say that (similar building, both very violent films), but it’s different enough to merit assessment on its own terms.
Mostly, it brings back memories of another Lionsgate adaptation of a grim and morally suspect hero: The Punisher: War Zone. That portrayed the character well, but mainstream audiences didn’t go for it. It’s hard to say that this will play much beyond the base unless they start playing up the satirical side in the marketing.


I liked 1st J’dredd film, I thought it was funny! Was it ment 2 be funny tho? Lookin 4ward 2 new version bein more like comic x
“The prevailing wisdom in the ’80s among fans was that Robocop stole much of Judge Dredd‘s thunder, pre-empting it at the time with its similar satire of the action hero as fascist enforcer. ”
Robocop was based on Judge Dredd. The designer of Robocop created a model of Judge Dredd’s helmet for reference purposes. Judge Dredd was created in 1977 for 2000AD comic. Robocop was made in 1987.
2000AD’s Judge Dredd is a clever, unique mix of satire, cop vs robbers action, comedy, sci-fi horror, and covers political idealogical concepts such as democracy vs oppression. The filmmakers decided to make ‘Dredd’ a simplistic, very hard action film to appeal to the R demographic. Time will tell if they’ve made the right decision.
I doubt a very satirical or overtly comedic Judge Dredd film will appeal to the US audience. The success of Judge Dredd is because it’s aimed at a British market. It’s a British comic-book view of how America could be in the future. I don’t know if Americans get the ‘joke’ or would want to get the ‘joke’. They might find it slightly offensive. The land of the free subverted to the land of the oppressed where the hero is a fascist mega-cop, and you can get five years in the iso-cubes for dropping litter or insulting a Judge.
One of the best-written comments I have ever read on Deadline. Well done. And thank you for the information.
As an average 26 year old, none of my friends outside the industry know or care about the Dredd franchise let alone its inside humor. Hell, I don’t even know or care about Dredd and only vaguely remember seeing a picture of Sly in a helmet. That said, I hope the movie do well upon release.
Dredd is not a mainstream property, that’s why you do the smart thing and make this picture on a budget (reportedly 45M) and release it in September. Low stakes with a nice upside, go to bat and try to hit a single. Not ever movie has to try to be the Avengers, that is where you can get into trouble.
The 3D will help international numbers. I could gross 40M international with a 3D version of my wedding video.
Saw it. It’s violent and silly. I doubt very much a mainstream audience will pay to see this. It’s low budget to the point where it feels like it was made in 1987… for TELEVISION.
Cheering is polite. Movie may be good but a photo of Stan Lee picking his nose draws cheers from comic-con nerds as well.
Nope. People may VOD/Rent. Theatrically no. I heard its god awful.
Just what we need, another comic book movie. But wait this one is “dark” and “gritty”, how exciting, haven’t seen anything like that before!
The audience won’t know or care about the difference between an over-the-top sci fi movie and a parody of over-the-top sci fi movies (and Westerns, and cop movies). Sci fi movies are parodies of themselves at this point, and people enjoy it.
Far more worrisome: the “low budget.” A healthy budget for eye candy is just the cost of doing business nowadays. Also not sure how the uninitiated will respond to the notion of a lead character who never shows his face.
Lionsgate may have had a successful, but they REALLY blew it by burning 100′s of fans waiting in line for over 3 hours! Roughly only the first 50 waiting in line since 4pm even got in and NO one came out to let all the 100′s in line until 10 mintues after show time.
By this account Lionsgate gave out 1,000 of pairs of free screening passes and only let the first 50 fans using the remaing seats for VIP’s involved in the movie. Great Job Lionsgate!
I saw the first dredd flim and it took months to forget the whole film, and told myself to never watch it again. The Previews looks great but I’m not going through that experience again. So I’m not going my hopes up anytime soon sorry.
this film will do what the stallone one couldnt do. Make Dredd a hardcore individual you dont want to mess with.
Stallone’s portrayal was jokey when it shouldnt have been – the gold studded cod piece – the versace designed unitard and armor. Slys slurry voice. his puffy pidgeon chest. his “”Hilarious”" sidekick. They got alot wrong in the movie when it came to characterisation. What they did get right were the Angel Gang, The bikes and the ABC Warbot. The city wasnt bad
When I first saw the new Dredd trailers – I hated the barren look of MegaCity One. Then when I started to learn Judge Anderson was in it. I hoped Judge Death would be in it….I looked at the Megacity landscape again and it reminded me of a giant cemetery.
The city blocks were like tombstones. Was this a kind of foreshadowing of whats to come? As more and more rumors and so-called plot details appear – I hope they are proven right.
Cos if what I think they are going to do actually happens it will make the final reveal really pay off.
With the new Dredd you have a more hardcore action movie sure, but while stallones version dwelled on crap spectacle and melodrama. This movie gives you a dark and gritty future that may become darker if they introduce the horror element from the comicbooks.
It would make the emphasis on this “drug” everyone’s using make total sense. If anyone is familiar with the first silent hill game plot and how engineered drugs were used in that. Hopefully youll undertsand what i mean