As expected, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), was rejected by the European Parliament today. An overwhelming majority voted against the treaty designed to establish international rules for cracking down on piracy and copyright infringement. Concerns raised over the agreement included a perceived lack of clarity and a window for misinterpretation that could jeopardize citizens’ rights. The Motion Picture Association was active in developing the treaty, but MPA Europe president, Chris Marcich, tells me that while the outcome is a disappointment for the studios, the result does not “substantively” change anything. “Certainly we’re disappointed with the vote, but I don’t think it was based on the treaty itself, it was based on politics and institutional issues. For Europe, ACTA didn’t mean any change at all in the current legal framework.” ACTA was negotiated by the EU and its member states along with the US, Australia, Canada, Japan, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Switzerland. Thousands of EU citizens have protested the agreement fearing it would place limits on freedom of speech. The European Parliament also received a petition signed by 2.9M people worldwide calling for it to reject the agreement.
Related:
Will Hollywood Acknowledge That Anti-Piracy Legislation Is Dead In 2012?


No biggie. When the Euro fails (and it will eventually) all bets are off anyway.
Good. Now get to work on ACTUAL piracy preventing initiatives.
Nope, Hollywood just needs to look at Valve’s Steam platform and duplicate it. Unfortunately, they’re still trying to reject the internet rather than fully embrace it.
People need ease of use, accessibility ANYWHERE, reasonable prices, and frequent sales to keep them interested. If they’re given these, they will gladly fork over their money. Otherwise they’re just gonna keep pirating or using alternatives like netflix and redbox (which Hollywood is also rejecting).
Like making good movies so people will pay to see them in theaters.
If by “good” you mean “comic book superhero 3D extravaganzas,” Hollywood already has that figured out. Expect more empty visual spectacle going forward – the kind of movies where waiting for DVD or streaming at home makes no sense.
When actors can earn as much as $75million a year, those that pirate stuff aren’t the ones committing a crime, it’s the Media giants.
If an actor says they won’t work for less than $xxmillion, they should be told, “well don’t work then, we’ll find somebody else”.
You know when a media giant has got too big, when they get the government working for them to pass new laws.
“For Europe, ACTA didn’t mean any change at all in the current legal framework.” – Uh huh. So why did you put all the time and effort into getting a treaty?
As long as copyright issues are measured on different scales… movie studios have to count on being overruled.
Copyright is all about big business so far, and not about individual copyright owners. We need a court that specializes in these kind of breaches, and which is accessible to all no matter how big or small the company is (just like the small claims courts).
So far, Hollywood movie studios are just making audiences angry with their copyright dance (even those who are very supportive in this issue).
I mean: you buy a DVD, and right at the start you are being threatened with FBI symbols as if you were a common thief – and you can’t even fast forward to this bullshit. What a great welcome to tonight’s entertainment.
Movie studios need to grow up and get out of their big brother act. And support copyright protection that does not only work for them.
They need the sympathy of their clients – of the audience.
ACTA was not the way to go, Hollywood. Try something more people-friendly and you might be surprised.
Your consumers don’t respond well to their rights and privacy being trampled upon so you can make a buck.