
UPDATED: I have learned that today’s table read for ABC‘s hit comedy Modern Family, scheduled for 11:30 AM, has been abruptly canceled at the last minute. The move comes as there was speculation that multiple cast members of the show wouldn’t show up for the read as the cast of the Emmy-winning comedy is in difficult salary negotiations with series producer 20th Century Fox TV. I hear of the six adult cast members only Ed O’Neill showed up. Shortly after the table read cancellation, word started leaking that the cast members of the show are filing a lawsuit against the studio seeking to void their current contracts. The complaint was filed by Ty Burrell, Jesse Tyler Ferguson, Eric Stonestreet, Julie Bowen and Sofia Vergara. (You can reed it here.) I hear O’Neill may end up being part of the lawsuit too. The contracts “violate the ‘seven-year rule’ under California Labor Code section 2855 (a),” the lawsuit says. “That provision dictates that contracts to render personal service ‘may not be enforced beyond seven years from the commencement of service under it.”
I hear the legal maneuver caught 20th TV by surprise as the studio expected the actors to show up for the table read and work while talks continue. The two sides have not being able to agree on a salary increase for the six adult stars of Modern Family who are largely negotiating together. The move resembles the strategy employed by the Friends cast who in the summer of 1996 threatened to boycott production of Season 3 of the hit NBC show unless they received salary increases to $100,000 each per episode. It worked, and the sextet got what they wanted. (Their paychecks eventually rose to $1 million an episode apiece.) In contrast, The Big Bang Theory cast kept working on the show as scheduled last summer while representatives secured big salary increases for the three stars.
Related: ‘Modern Family’ Cast Faces Renegotiations
The Modern Family actors had scaled back promotional appearances on behalf of the show after the upfronts, though that is considered standard practice during salary renegotiations. But very few such renegotiations lead to disrupting a series’ production schedule as actors are under long-term contracts that call for them to show up for work. It happened with the supporting cast of Everybody Loves Raymond and Jane Kaczmarek on Malcolm In The Middle, often under the disguise of medical issues. (In the case of Raymond, the profit participants in the the show ultimately gave a piece of their back end to the striking supporting actors, ending the standoff.) I hear that Modern Family‘s Burrell, Ferguson, Stonestreet, Bowen and Vergara, the five who filed the lawsuit against 20th TV, most recently made about $65,000 an episode, while O’Neill, who started much higher from the get-go and also has back-end participation, was just over $100,000. Word is the five have been looking for Big Bang-size paychecks (the three stars of the CBS/Warner Bros. TV show, Johnny Galecki, Jim Parsons and Kaley Cuoco, landed $200,000 an episode for Season 5 and built-in big increases for the following seasons.) At one point it looked like the two sides could settle in the $150,000-an-episode range, but that has not happened, and there is an impasse in trying to close the money gap — which sources say is not that big. Modern Family was sold in first-run broadcast syndication and has a rich off-network deal with USA Network, the latter netting some $1.5 million an episode. The cast of the show and 20th TV first approached the subject of salary increases last summer, immediately following the deal with USA, but ultimately tabled the issue til this summer. While not a part of the current negotiations, ABC is monitoring closely the situation because: 1. It needs Modern Family for fall, 2. It will take over the show’s deficit in a couple of years, so what salaries are negotiated now will affect what the network will have to pay the actors down the road.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


Stay classy!
I love these comments. I’m sure when your own contract negotiations come up you’re eager to take less than you’re worth so the corporation you work for can make bigger profits.
I love these comments… When you invest millions of dollars and take a huge chance on something that has no guarantee of return, and it starts to pay off, I’m sure you’re eager to share all the profits with your employees who have guaranteed paychecks at a sum they agreed to for a set period of time, when they decide not to honor their original contracts and demand more money.
You’re misinformed. They production company entered into this negotiation freely. They did so because they want more as well– add’l seasons so that they can make multiple, multi-million dollar syndication deals, like the one they already made (that, incidentally, they’re not sharing the wealth). 20th is playing hardball. Just like the actors. This is the game.
Per reports the studio is asking to add two years to the actor deals, which have not been pre-negotiated and are never guranteed as a network can cancel a show at anytime. Therefore your argument falls flat, business affairs exec.
You really want to go down that road? Every test deal an actor signs is signed under what I would consider to be immoral, if not illegal, inducement. Services must be promised exclusively to the potential employer before even applying for the job. Before even getting to meet the the real potential employer – meaning, the studio head. Therefor, an actor can never sell his/her services to the highest bidder, as an actor can never test for two projects simultaneously. This is why it’s accepted business practice for actors and studios to renegotiate when a show becomes successful and long running. If it wasn’t understood as reasonable, studios would never do it. I’d speculate that, as cranky as you feel, on some level you know all this.
sure you can sell your services to the highest bidder – it’s called “passing”. or being offer only.
Your quote: “when they decide not to honor their original contracts and demand more money”
Obviously, you don’t know how the business work especially when your show goes into syndication or new media area… you better re-negotiate a new deal to get that money from start. This is normal and yes their taking a chance but this shows has continuous high ratings and awards.
The B*tch in Apt 23b is the best comedy on the air now, ABC stay strong
B in 23 is a RIOT!
And the rule in TV…is get the money while you can. One hit show…can set you for life even if you never work again.
“The B*tch in Apt 23b is the best comedy on the air now” I am going to go out on a limb and say you work on this show. Because The B in Apt 23 is not even remotely as funny as Modern Familly.
Agreed!! APT 23 is the funniest comedy on ABC!
The bottom line is that actors and actresses are all overpaid especially compared to the average american who is struggling to put food on their table to feed their family. It is also important to realize that these actors are also under CONTRACT.
I’m sorry but for a huge hit series that stands to make ABC a crapload of money both in original airings and syndication deals, I do not think $200,000 an episode is unreasonable.
Fox stands to gain a lot from syndication, not ABC.
Wait, aren’t ABC and Fox co-producing? Don’t they both gain from syndication?
They certainly deserve even more than that — for the number 1 sitcom for the network, the number one DVR show, the best comedy show for years running and emmys for the cast.
But how many times does a network crap out before hitting with a show like this? Hopefully both sides settle on a middle ground.
love the games… so silly… what i dont get is 1130am? that’s too early to be funny. should be like 2. after lunch. everyone’s content. relaxed. though you might have to deal with people running to the bathroom.
I completely disagree.
I do my best work on an empty stomach.
I guess I might be in the minority on this issue, but I think “Modern Family” is a terribly overrated TV show.
+1
Agreed. That doesn’t make it any less of a hit.
Personally, I prefer the more down-to-Earth reality of The Middle (although I live in a city). I just have less appreciation for the over-the-top humor of Modern Fam.
I’m in the minority with you. I’ve tried to watch it a few times but I give up due to the fact that it’s not making me laugh.
You probably need a laugh track (like the CBS comidies)….so you’ll know when to laugh.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Well said.
Sure it’s overrated, but it’s still a hit and the actors should get all the money they can.
Don’t feel bad. That’s how I feel about most shows on TV. “Mad Men” is also overrated, as were “Friends” and “Cheers” back in their day. Many TV shows are overrated and thrive due to many factors that have zero to do with the quality of what you see onscreen.
Cheers was overrated!? How DARE you, sir!
Shall we step outside?
I think “Modern Family” is VERY overrated, too.
THE MIDDLE is a better and braver show.
I find most of the characters so stereotypical and annoying that I can’t stand watching it for more than a couple of minutes, even though the show in general would be quite decent without them.
of course it’s overrated – 100% on-the-nose cliched characters and jokes but seems just “edgy” enough for Amurrrrca to think it’s getting something fresh. that said it’s huge and these guys hit the lotto – time to get paid.
Most actors get one shot at this kind of payday. The show has already closed a massive syndication deal and it sounds like they are asking for what similar ensembles have gotten on other hit shows recently syndicated. How is that biting the hand? Seems like a reasonable position to take by actors and reps.
A massive syndication deal that begins airing on USA… oh… I dunno… NEXT YEAR! C’mon 20th. C’mon ABC. Give up the money.
Would any of these actors be where they are today without this show? No.
hilarious. and where would the show be without the actors? its a mutual relationship, two way road. One couldn’t be without the other so how is it fair that one gets huge profits and the other doesnt?
reality check buddy.
hilarious. and where would the show be without the actors? its a mutual relationship, two way road. One couldn’t be without the other so how is it fair that one gets huge profits and the other doesnt?
reality check buddy.
Would this show be anywhere without these actors? No.
Would the ground be as bright if the sun didn’t shine on it? No.
Equally absurd statement.
Where would the show be without these actors? The elusive combination of the actors, their roles and the chemistry between them is rare and will generate over a billion in profit. You might think what they do isn’t valuable, but market rates are what determine salaries — whatever the companies are willing to pay them and what the actors are willing to take is the definition of their market value. Like it or not, actors also operate under the rules of capitalism as much as anybody else who provides a good or service.
….they, writers, directors, cast had NOTHING to do with their success…they need to thank the rest of us…per the Prez…millionaires fighting billionaires….why should we care again?
FOX and ABC should tell the cast they are all expendable and will be replaced if they don’t report to work tomorrow. No holding the production hostage.
ABC feels differently. They support the actors.
Really? Comedy is chemistry in this format. You would be the executive who would be fired right after you fired the cast… share the pie.
You’re quote: “FOX and ABC should tell the cast they are all expendable and will be replaced if they don’t report to work tomorrow.”
…and what do you do for living? …how long have you been in this same position? Oh, never mind I see why… you feel expendable.
So recast everyone?
I applaud the cast for sticking together for a raise given the network is making a ton of money on the show and ranking in the awards but I think the last season was soft. My kids and I love watching the show on wednesday nights as a mid-week treat (no TV allowed on school nights) but I didn’t think the writing was as strong and funny as the first season. Would love to see Kevin Hart as a regular though and maybe get a spin-off!
The friends cast negotiated a 1,000,000 pay per episode, not 100,000. Important zero!
Not right away, they didn’t. $100,000 was their first joint negotiation.
maybe abc should try that fox simpsons trick and try the pretend recasting… would be kinda funny to do a funny or die recast modern family video or auditions
Everyone deserves to be paid proportional to the revenue that their direct contribution generates. If you can make an argument that the actors of Modern Family don’t make a significant contribution to what has become one of the most profitable shows on television, be my guest.
They’re not asking for ALL of it, just a share. Just because it’s more than YOU make doesn’t make it greedy.
to the armchair: how do you know that MF is the most profitable show on tv?
And they should ask until their hearts are content… And hopefully get huge bumps…
When their actual contract they already agreed to expires.
No, nobody deserves that — if they agreed to a contract that says otherwise. All of the cast members are under contract. Contracts they signed, with nobody pointing guns at their heads. Now they are BREAKING their contracts. Are people here too stupid to understand that? If the show was doing poorly and the studio said “Sorry, you have all fallen short of our performance expectations, so even though we are contractually obligated to pay you a certain amount of money, we are are going to only pay you 50% of what your contracts say we owe you,” lawsuits would, quite properly, start flying fast and furious.
And when a show gets picked up to series the cast usually signs five year deals, but do the studios pay all five years of those deals if a show is cancelled a year or two in? No.
TV contracts are very akin to the NFL — Non guaranteed. NFL teams can cut their players and void deals without having to pay a vast majority of the amount they agreed to pay those players. Same with Networks who can cancel a show at anytime.
It why you see holdouts in the NFL, but not in MLB or the NBA where they have guaranteed deal that make the owners pay every cent of those deals even if a player is cut.
So like the NFL, TV actors have to hold out to get more money when theyve outperformed their contracts — cause you can bet your ass the network would cut their asses if they underperformed.
Your asking the cast to honor contracts that the studio wouldnt honor if the show was a bomb. Two way street, friend.
You realise that their contracts almost certainly say they don’t get paid if the show gets cancelled, right? Meaning that if they weren’t a success, the studio wouldn’t owe them anything for work not done. They’re just saying they took the risk, now they want some of the reward.
I say they go with replacement players, like the NFL. Just shoot 7 or 8 episodes with those guys, then plug the other guys back in when the deal gets done. Never acknowledge it, just keep moving forward.
Dumb comparison… most of the football players are not even recognizable when placed in front of people. When on tv… you see just the play happen with bunch of people with covered with helmets. This is not the same thing.
WOW bud… Wow.
Did you type this from a Gas n’ Sip in Bumpkintown, USA? Let me guess…Mountain Dew and Copenhagen between your cheek and gums?
Nice grasp of reality.
I hope new Lily gets a raise. Hold out for longer map times kid!
A good actor (usually with over ten years of training and who knows how many years of experience) is NOT expendable. Corporate executives with a business degree? You decide.
The show got horribly unfunny during season three. Hopefully season four is much funnier, if not, I’m done.
Sofia Vergara should have a much higher salary -and profit participation- than any of the rest Ed O’neil included. Try to do the show without her or replace her and see what you are left with!
Seeking to void their current contracts, on what basis? That $60K/episode is somehow unfair?
A hit show, is a hit show! The numbers don’t lie!
cbs was able to give BBT’s cast raises to 200k because
1)the 3 leads asked for raises in SEASON 5 NOT SEASON 3
2)the 3 leads worked through negotiations
3) and BBT has 3 leads not 5 like MF. I know you all will bring up friends as an example but that was in the 90s when pppl watched tv. MF hasnt got anywhere near the ratings that FRIENDS got. Friends lowest rated season ( 1) was watched by 14mill and it highest rated season by 24mill. MF ratings are season 1 9mill, season 2 11mill, season 3 12mill.
Technically there are 7 adults on the show. The actress who plays Haley the eldest daughter is 20. Other than Ed ONiell and maybe Jesse Tyler Ferguson she was as much a name as the relative unknowns that make up the cast at the outset.
I had heard of and seen Ed O’Niell and Julie Bowen, both great actors IMO. Bowen was on 3 pretty popular shows, Ed, Boston Legal and ER. I’d never heard of any of the others and certainly not JTFerguson. I don’t see why you would think he was a bigger name than Bowen.
@ Anonymous. Really?? When production gets in front of the camera to read lines………..
Cast has the upper hand. Happens like once every few years. They have to capitalize now. It’s just business. Shows get coldly canceled every year. The execs and corporations don’t care. They still cash their paychecks while cast and crew scramble for more work.
So, when the cast finally gets a bit of leverage, they MUST capitalize. Welcome to Business 101.
PAY UP! These actors are not “expendable”; it’s not a crime procedural.
As another poster observed, it’s just business and it’s not likely these actors will be in this type of position again once the show is done..so get it while you can!
I do not have any proprietary interest in this, nor am I a talent manager/agent.
You honor the contract first, because you signed it. You don’t hold the rest of the cast and crew hostage. If you weren’t going to honor the contract then don’t sign it. The language should have been in the contract that increases pay with the various outcomes…yeah, yeah I know they rarely do that, but they should. When you negotiate your next contract then you can either sign or not. I hate p9olitics, but everyone points to the Repubs as the corporate raiders and non-negotiators, but no one makes more off of their employees and outsources and has higher CEO pay than the Dems’ entertainment companies.
These actors rightly deserve more. This — And Suburgatory — are the funniest comedies on TV right now. There hasn’t been any truly great comedies on Network TV since Seinfeld ended. If they can pay the actors on those horrible CBS comedies that NO ONE watches, then they can pay these true talented actors at ABC!!
And that’s why The Big Bang Theory is the most watched comedy for last season and most valuable show right now.
Someday, people are going to look back at Modern Family and realize that it is to great comedy what Titanic is to great drama.