It’s up to Barry Diller‘s company to chart a course for the Tina Brown-run print and Internet publication. The family of one-time audio pioneer Sidney Harman decided to pull back from the joint venture with IAC. Harman was actively involved in the operation, but he died in April 2011. As a result, “the Harman trust has indicated that it does not intend to make further capital contributions to the venture,” it told Reuters, which broke the story. Harman’s wife, former California Rep. Jane Harman, will remain on the board. The big question now is how long Diller’s IAC/InterActiveCorp will be willing to stick by Newsweek/Daily Beast. Word has it the board doesn’t like the business, although Diller’s control of 42.8% of the company votes means he usually gets what he wants. The print publication had an operating loss of about $39.5M in 2009; the Washington Post sold it in 2010 to Harman for $1 along with his assumption of liabilities. But its circulation has continued to fall: It was down 31.6% in 2010 and then 3.4% last year to 1.5M. Meanwhile, the ad-supported online publication is estimated to be losing about $10M a year.
IAC told Reuters that the publication is “one of the many small areas of investment for IAC and is not material to the overall business, which is largely driven by search and Match.” We’ll see whether the question comes up tomorrow when IAC talks to analysts following the release of its Q2 earnings. If things fall apart, there’ll be no need to worry about Brown. The former editor of The New Yorker has plenty of powerful pals who’ll make sure she continues to be a player on the media stage.

The Harmon Trust which I’m assuming is his family, who are already richer than God, wants more money.
it appears, in this case that the family isn’t looking for more money, but has decided not to lose anymore on the daily beast.
Is anyone surprised that IAC (finally) took over Newsweek? You could see this coming a mile away.
IAC has always been run like a cult of personality, never living up to its true potential. And I expect it to continue to be run this way.
Maverick? Are you supposed to be Tom Cruise? Are we supposed to believe that you’re Tom Cruise?
The bottom line though is that the weekly news magazine is obsolete. Unnecessary. Just like TIME. But TW has more dough for the time being. And a weekly VANITY FAIR isn’t gonna fly. Diller has painted himself into a corner basically. All smart people (the staff;) they’ve done some great things; and I hate to say this because I know a couple of people who work there. The theory I suppose is that the new Diller/Rudin E-book venture can dovetail with Newsweek’s interests. There are many, many problems but the problem potentially ORIGINATES with the name of the magazine which is as relevant to the way people take in news today as it would be if they called it the Saturday Evening Post or the Saturday Review. Reeks of moldy.
So you get analysis and forecasting in the guise of news because the form is obsolete because of the new media’s opportunities for personalized news collection on your own terms. From hereonin newsweeklies will always be…a day late and a dollar short…I mean in terms of critical mass circulation appeal.
It’s very problematic. With facts such as these the Republican C.I.A.(using Democrats) can continue to stage their takeover of American media, entertainment, news reporting. Concentrate their efforts through blogs, etc., terrorizing converts to their way of thinking – and threatening – along the way.
My thoughts and prayers this week are with the victims and their families in Aurora, CO.
hadn’t thought of it before. good point about the name.
Hence no talk of the book publishing aspect of his business. Portends all types of propaganda agenda publishing. From some psycho government warrantless wiretapping scumbag to Murdoch’s ears right up your Kindled Nook!