July 6-8 Weekend Actuals
1. The Amazing Spider-Man 3D (Columbia/Sony) Week 1 [4,318 Theaters] PG13
Friday $20.5M, Saturday $23.7M, Sunday $17.9M Weekend $62M, Cume $137.0M
International Cume $201.6M, Global Cume $338.6M2. Ted (Universal) Week 2 [3,256 Theaters] R
Friday $10.6M, Saturday $11.9M, Sunday $9.7M, Weekend $32.2M (-41%), Cume $119.8M International $15.0M, Global Cume $134.8M3. Brave 3D (Pixar/Disney) Week 3 [3,891 Theaters] PG
Friday $6.3M, Saturday $7.8M, Sunday $5.5M, Weekend $19.6M (-43%), Cume $174.0M, International Cume $36.6M, Global Cume $210.6M4. Savages (Universal) NEW [2,628 Theaters] R
Friday $5.7M, Saturday $5.6M, Sunday $4.7M, Weekend $16.0M5. Magic Mike (Warner Bros) Week 2 [3,120 Theaters] R
Friday $6.1M, Saturday $5.6M, Sunday, $3.9M, Weekend $15.6M (-60%), Cume $72.8M6. Madea’s Witness Protection (TPerry/Lionsgate) Week 2 [2,161 Theaters] PG13
Friday $3.5M, Saturday $4.1M, Sunday $2.6M, Weekend $10.2M (-60%), Cume $45.8M7. Madasgascar 3 3D (DreamWorks Anim/Paramount) Week 5 [2,861 Theaters] PG
Friday $2.4M, Saturday $3.1M, Sunday $2.1M, Weekend $7.5M (-37%), Cume $195.9M8. Katy Perry: Part Of Me 3D (Insurge/Paramount) Week 1 [2,730 Theaters] PG
Friday $2.7M, Saturday $2.5M, Sunday $2.0M, Weekend $7.1M, Cume $10.2M9. Moonrise Kingdom (Focus Features) Week 7 [884 Theaters] PG13
Friday $1.4M, Saturday $1.9M, Sunday $1.2M, Weekend $4.5M (-8%), Cume $26.8M10. To Rome With Love (Sony Classics) Week 3 [806 Theaters] R
Friday $865K, Saturday $1.4M, Sunday $867K, Weekend $3.1M (+350%), Cume $4.9M
SUNDAY AM, 10TH UPDATE: This big $200M moviegoing weekend is bringing out crowds post Fourth Of July and looking +28% from last year. Sony/Columbia’s The Amazing Spider-Man is an easy #1 with a $65M first weekend.
That gives the 3D reboot a 6-day total of $140M through Sunday and $341.2M cume worldwide. The film opened last weekend in 13 countries and this weekend is open in a total of 70 territories. It grossed an estimated $129.1M this weekend, bringing the overseas cume to $201.6M. In North America, the film sold $20.6M in tickets on Friday, then went up 15% on Saturday to $23.8M, and is expected to do approximately $20.5M today. ”In the world of relaunched franchises, this is a spectacular success by any measure,” Sony gushed. For example, Batman Begins relaunched with $48.7M in 2005 and $79.5M in its first 6 days. For the Spidet reboot, 75% of the audience for the opening were general moviegoers aged 12+, and 25% were families (parents with children under 12). Of those 12 years old or older, 58% were male and 42% female, 46% were under age 25 and 54% were 25 and older. Of the children who attended under 12, 65% were boys and 35% were girls, while 73% were under 10 years old. The film received an ‘A-’ Cinemascore “and that strong word of mouth is also supported by our own exit scores with very high definite recommend numbers across all demos,” Sony said. Approximately 44% of the weekend’s gross came from 3D with IMAX accounting for 10%. IMAX took in $14.3M for the 6 days ($47K per screen). All in all a nice haul, but only middling when it comes to top moneymakers for any first 6-day time period. Especially considering Spidey is Marvel’s most popular character. Little wonder that Sony is fast-tracking the next installment of its new trilogy with fresh villains and storylines that should spark more interest and box office in this too-soon reboot that was just a retread of the original origins saga.
Meanwhile, Universal’s #2 holdover Ted is still strong domestically with a $32.5M domestic weekend and a fantastic 10-day cume of $120.2M. Audiences were starved for a smart laugher. It’s now eclipsing Hangover as the biggest R-rated comedy. Both Mark Wahlberg and Seth MacFarlane can write their own ticket by Monday. (I still can’t believe Fox passed…) The foul-mouthed teddy bear also will be the #1 film in Australia this weekend after opening against the web-spinner. Ouch! Overseas total from just Down Under and Taiwan is $15M.
Related: ‘Ted’ Opens ‘Off The Charts’ In Australia
The newest major studio film, Oliver Stone’s adult crime drama Savages, is looking like $16.1M for the weekend. That’s a better than expected opening for a violent ‘Hard R’ pic with no proven stars. As you know, Universal made the decision to move this R-rated actioner from the safe harbor of a September 28th release (where The Town, a similar R-rated crime film, performed so well in 2010) to this very crowded summer slot. As a result, Savages could only release on 2,627 screens. Dumb move? Those better-than-average trailers made this look like a perfect fall movie. But the studio felt midweek numbers would be better and Savages could counterprogram Ice Age 4 next weekend. On the other hand, audiences gave Savages only a ‘C+’ CinemaScore, which will result in poor word-of-mouth. Good thing it was made for only $45M.
Struggling is the $12M low budget Katy Perry’s Part Of Me which will do around $7.1M for its first weekend and $10.2M for its first 4 days in release. “I guess it will take 5 days to gross its budget,” a Paramount exec joked about the Insurge pic’s cold reception at the box office. Earth to Hollywood: no one cares about Katy beyond a handful of tween/teen girls. Not even Russell Brand anymore.
Meanwhile, Woody Allen’s critically panned To Rome With Love from Sony Classics exanded into the Top Ten based on weekend estimates. Refined numbers in the morning along with analysis of the 10-day holiday box office:
1. The Amazing Spider-Man 3D (Columbia/Sony) Week 1 [4,318 Theaters] PG13
Friday $20.6M, Saturday $23.8M, Weekend $65M, Cume $140M
International Cume $201.6M, Global Cume $341.2M
2. Ted (Universal) Week 2 [3,256 Theaters] R
Friday $10.5M, Saturday $11.8M, Weekend $32.5M (-49%), Cume $120.2M
International $15.0M, Global Cume $135.2M
3. Brave 3D (Pixar/Disney) Week 3 [3,891 Theaters] PG
Friday $6.2M, Saturday $7.7M, Weekend $20.1M, Cume $174.5M
International Cume $36.6M, Global Cume $211.1M
4. Savages (Universal) NEW [2,628 Theaters] R
Friday $5.6M, Saturday $5.6M, Weekend $16.1M
5. Magic Mike (Warner Bros) Week 2 [3,120 Theaters] R
Friday $6.1M, Saturday $5.5M, Weekend $15.6M (-60%), Cume $72.2M
6. Madea’s Witness Protection (TPerry/Lionsgate) Week 2 [2,161 Theaters]
Friday $3.4M, Saturday $4.1M, Weekend $10.2M (-60%), Cume $45.8M
7. Madasgascar 3 3D (DreamWorks Anim/Paramount) Week 5 [2,861 Theaters] PG
Friday $2.3M, Saturday $3.0M, Weekend $7.7M, Cume $196.0M
8. Katy Perry: Part Of Me 3D (Insurge/Paramount) Week 1 [2,730 Theaters] PG
Friday $2.7M, Saturday $2.4M, Weekend $7.1M, Cume $10.2M
9. Moonrise Kingdom (Focus Features) Week 6 [884 Theaters] PG13
Friday $1.3M, Saturday $1.9M, Weekend $4.6M, Cume $26.8M
10. To Rome With Love (Sony Classics) Week 3 [806 Theaters] R
Friday $860K, Saturday $1.3M, Weekend $3.5M, Cume $5.2M
THURSDAY PM, 7TH UPDATE: Sony Pictures says The Amazing Spider-Man (in extra-wide release at 4,318 theaters) made close to $15.8M on Thursday. That gives the reboot $75M with its 3D premium after three days of release on the eve of the start of the pic’s first official weekend. Thursday’s result was -30% from the 2nd biggest Fourth Of July at the domestic box office on record. “The first two days, fanboys went to see the film. Now we have to see if girls and everybody else want to see it,” a Sony exec worried to me. Still, the pic is expected to earn at least $140M during its first 6 days of release. That would put the new Spidey only 27th in the record books of six-day grosses.
Related: Raunch Rules! R-Rated ‘Ted’ $52.5M And ‘Magic Mike’ $38M Weekends
Opening today was Paramount’s concert movie Katy Perry: Part of Me (2,730 theaters) produced under the Insurge label at a cost of just $12M. The studio was expecting $3M to $4M today headed to the low- to mid-teens for the weekend, consistent with tracking projection. Sources tell me that the film performed on the low end of expectations today — $3M — but should gross its budget over the next 4 days of release. Audiences gave it an ‘A’ CinemaScore so great word of mouth may help widen the appeal beyond tween/teen girls. “I’ll admit Justin Bieber’s fans are fanatical and rushed out opening day. But this movie should have much longer and better legs,” a Paramount exec tells me. On Tuesday the pic sneaked with $200K from the 100 screens and just 2 showtimes it screened.
One of Thursday’s phenoms was the +67% jump from Wednesday to Thursday for Warner Bros’ Magic Mike. (Because women couldn’t say they were attending book club on July 4th?) Universal’s Ted keeps holding #2 place. For that studio, Oliver Stone’s action drama Savages (2,627 theaters) opens Friday but Universal doesn’t have big hopes for it despite moving it from later in 2012 to this crowded summer weekend.
Here are the Top Six tonight beased on Thursday’s grosses:
1. The Amazing Spider-Man 3D (Columbia/Sony) Week 1 [4,318 Theaters]
Tuesday $35.8M, Wednesday $23.4M, Thursday $15.8M, Cume $75.0M
2. Ted (Universal) Week 1 [3,239 Theaters]
Thursday $8.0M (+2% from Wed), Cume $87.8M
3. Brave 3D (Pixar/Disney) Week [3,966 Theaters]
Thursday $4.9M (-22% from Wed), Cume $154.7M
4. Magic Mike (Warner Bros) Week 1 [2,955 Theaters]
Thursday $4.5M (+51% from Wed), Cume $57.6M
5. Katy Perry: Part Of Me 3D (Insurge/Paramount) NEW [2,730 Theaters]
Thursday $3.1M, Cume $3.3M
6. Madea’s Witness Protection (Tyler Perry/Lionsgate) Week 1 [2,161 Theaters]
Thursday $2.1M (-32% from Wed), Cume $35.6M
THURSDAY AM, 6TH UPDATE: It’s now official – Sony Pictures says domestic gross for its The Amazing Spider-Man is $59.2M. Wednesday’s $23.4M was the 2nd biggest Fourth Of July at the box office on record, not surprising because of the 3D premium. The studio’s estimate for Tuesday has increased to $35.8M with an additional $850K from Canadian pre-shows. Based on the performance of the Spidey reboot the past two days, Sony is revising the 6-day estimate upward from the expected $110M-$120M to $120M-$130M or more. According to MovieTickets.com, domestic box office ticket sales for The Amazing Spider-Man accounted for over 59% of all transactions for Wednesday, with 11.6% coming from moviegoers who want to see it in IMAX 3D. Universal’s Ted accounts for nearly 10.5% of all transactions, showing strength leading in to its second weekend.
WEDNESDAY, 4TH UPDATE: More fireworks at the North American box office on the eve of the Fourth Of July. Sony Pictures’ superhero reboot The Amazing Spider-Man opened with $35M Tuesday. (Of that $35M, IMAX took in $4 million.) It easily set a new domestic record for a Tuesday opening – helped by its 3D premium pricing – and is ahead of the original 2D Transformers ($27.8M) that debuted on Tuesday July 3rd, 2007. ”That is one huge number,” a Sony exec gushed to me last night. “Unbelievable start to what should be a very exciting 6 days.”
TUESDAY 10 PM, 2ND UPDATE: No grosses yet. But I’m told Sony’s The Amazing Spider-Man received an ‘A-’ Cinemascore from audiences (an ‘A’ from under age 18 moviegoers) which should spur good word of mouth.
TUESDAY 6 PM UPDATE: Usually if a movie is opening well in 4,318 North American theaters, the Hollywood studio wants to shout the results. For some reason Sony Pictures today is “trying to keep a lid” on the North American grosses for its 3D The Amazing Spider-Man, in the words of one exec to me. “At the end of the matinees we still have an incredible story to tell, especially knowing its a Tuesday night and not a Friday night. But the numbers don’t lie.” Frankly, I don’t get all the secrecy. Especially because, after claiming $7.5M in midnight shows and another $9.3M in matinees and pre-sales so far, the studio already has put $16.8M in the bank. “Is it crazy to hope to get $9M or $10M more out of a Tuesday night?” a Sony exec asks me. No, but what’s crazy is to keep it to yourselves. But the studio’s extreme nervousness reflects concerns over how this rebooted franchise will go over just 10 years after the original, even more so because of what Sony’s rivals have characterized as flat tracking even though this is Marvel’s most popular character.
The Marc Webb-directed superhero actioner starring Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone opened with $7.5 million in midnight showings from 3,150 theaters. (IMAX took in $1.2M on 300 screens for $4,000 per screen). That’s the same result as such blockbuster films as Iron Man 2, Pirates Of The Caribbean 2, and even Spider-Man 3 (playing in only 3,031 venues). “We’re right up there with big boys, giving us a great hand-off,” a Sony exec told me this morning. But none were 3D pics with its premium ticket prices. Its early international box office also has been stellar and so is this U.S./Canada debut. Last weekend The Amazing Spider-Man opened foreign with $50.2M, which was bigger than Marvel’s The Avengers in some of its 13 international markets. It swept the Asian box office this weekend as the much-anticipated actioner opened early in a handful of overseas territories.
For more estimates listed by title, see box office results here...Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.





True Marvel fans, we need Spidey to go back home to Marvel Studios. In order to make that happen, Sony needs to be pushed. So DON’T see this movie today, or over the 4th!
Disappointing B.O. for Sony = Spider-Man fighting side by side with Iron Man, Cap, and the rest of the Marvel Universe.
Sony will loan out Spider-Man, if it comes to that. Moolah is moolah, wherever it comes from.
I’m coming back next week when the message board isn’t saturated with moronic fanboys arguing and whining and crying over which awful version of Spiderman is best. (Yes, they were all CGI crapfests, sorry.) Y’all sound like 10 year-olds on the playground.
Nerd 1: This Spiderman is GREAT!
Nerd 2: Is NOT! Raimi’s are better!
Nerd 3: You kidding?! Did you even SEE Spidey 3?!
Nerd 2: Okay Spidey 3 sucked, but #2 was like the best thing EVER!
Nerd 4: I watch the Avengers!
Nerd 5: Girls scare me!
OMGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!
So…a thread discussing the new Spider-Man film shouldn’t contain any discussion of the previous films? Also the trope of these movies being limited to nerds is painfully cliched. You don’t make billions of dollars from these movies by playing to a small audience.
Your post trying to slap 5 nerds sounded incredulous!
On the July 4th weekend, Savages, a hard R film with no stars, grossed $16.2 million on only 2,600 screens against a multi-billion dollar franchise, one of the highest grossing comedies of all time and the new Pixar film.
I wonder what it would have grossed on the original September 28 release date it had without summer competition and playing on 3,300 screens?
If you really knew your Avengers, you’d know that Spider-Man doesn’t REALLY belong.
Are you seriously trying to suggest Spider-Man doesn’t belong in the Marvel Universe? He’s their flagship character!
And Spidey has not only had multiple encounters with the Avengers in the comics, he’s actually been a member.
Dude, he was in the Avengers in 2010-11, and is currently in the New Avengers. It may be recent, but that shouldn’t mean that he doesn’t belong.
No way. Spidey deserves his own adventures, and Avengers should have guys like Triathlon and Ant-Man Scott Lang. The only cross-studio character that needs to be in Avengers is THE BEAST!!!!!
Thank you, Brian! Spidey is NOT an Avenger. Neither is Wolverine, for that matter. I don’t care what new-school Bendis garbage they throw at me.
Spidey’s just fine at Sony, thanks.
I base my support of a movie on the quality of it, not fanboy nonsense. Thankfully, this ended up being great and, in my opinion, the best Spider-Man film yet.
Of course, I want nothing more than for Sony and Disney to come to some sort of agreement and allow this to be part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. There’s always a VERY slight chance of that. But there is NO chance that Marvel Studios gets the full rights back. Even if this movie were a disappointment at the box office, Sony isn’t giving up one of their biggest money makers. From merchandise to Blu-ray and DVD sales, they have too much to lose by losing Spidey.
As an FYI, Sony receives zero monies for merchandise, that all goes to Marvel. On the flip side, Marvel receives zero revenue from box-office or DVD.
That’s not true.
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!! That boycott really worked.
LOL… Spiderman suxs. Even the Raimi ones. Spiderman 2 was most over-rated film since The English Patient.
All you fanboys crying out there need to get a life. You know, that thing going on outside, in the world.
Let’s just wait and see what the drop off looks like, Chuckles.
Looks like not so good numbers to me. Lets see how it stacked up with other Spiderman movies.
SpiderMan – 114 mill Friday-Sun total. 10 day total of 223 mill. Ticket price $6-10
SpiderMan 2 – 88 mill Friday-Sun total. 6 day total of 180 mill. Ticket price $7-11
SpiderMan 3 – 151 mill Friday-Sun total. 6 day total 258 mill. Ticket price $9-15
SpiderMan re-boot – 60 mill Friday-Sun total. 6 day total of 140 mill. Ticket price $10-20
Let’s not forget these numbers for ASM would be even lower if it weren’t for the severe heat wave going on across the country right now. People are heading to the theaters seeking relief from the heat, not because they think this reboot is the greatest thing ever.
Is it true that as recently as a month ago Sony execs were giddy anticipating ASM would open bigger than the Avengers, because Spider-Man is the most popular Marvel character? If so, talk about delusional!
I think Sony talking about churning out sequels to this movie is like Warners talking about fast tracking a Green Lantern sequel — a way to cover up disappointing news. Let’s just think about how viable more Spider-Man retreads are going to be in the future.
The future of superhero movies is clearly going in the direction of films that create a larger, shared universe. Avengers proved there’s a goldmine to be had in this approach, and Warners is rushing full speed to try and get their own DC cinematic universe going.
Yet in this kind of environment where audience expectations are going to be for superhero films to deliver more and more, Sony’s going to keep churning out more and more rehashes of the original Spider-Man films? Green Goblin again? Doctor Octopus, again? Venom again, even?
Sorry, Sony. It’s time to be grateful that you had a good run. But the writing’s on the wall, if you’ll choose to see it. Sell the rights to Spidey back to Marvel Studios and Disney, now. They’re the ones who really know how to make these superhero blockbusters, the right way.
Must be easy to sound chipper about that Katy Perry movie being lackluster when you don’t have to worry about 2,700 35mm prints arriving on your doorstep in 7 days.
The fact is people LOVE Spidey. Seeing this tomorrow, and I’m pretty excited.
Sony originally rebooted Spiderman to get marketing and production costs under control. In the end they’ve spent slightly less on production and more on marketing for a smaller opening than Spiderman 3. Only in Hollywood.
They should not have rebooted this franchise it should have been a sequel with or without Toby, and Kirsten.
I don’t need to watch the Uncle Ben s**t over again, and Spiderman getting use to his new abilities for an hour.
Ohh he can hold onto a basketball while someone is trying to take it away from him, and throw a football so hard it bends the goal post oooh I’m so impressed I didn’t know he could do that.
I thought they rebooted Spiderman because the rights would have reverted to Disney/Marvel.
I thought they rebooted it because they wanted to do S4 in 3D and Sam Raimi wasn’t going to let the studio browbeat him into rushing out another sub-par SM movie like they did with #3.
They had Raimi, and maguire all set to go but then decided to scrap it in favor of this reboot.
Horribly mediocre film.
Saw it at midnight last night … the acting is fine, but the story is dreadful and the action is disjointed, poorly shot and edited.
If this goes on to be a big success for Sony, then people’s standards truly have dropped. It’s a completely forgettable rental at best.
spoken like a true film student working as a waiter
My thoughts exactly. Notice the biggest haters are the ones who can’t even get their scripts read by anyone who matters?
Anyone who makes their living in the film industry should welcome a big box office Summer like the one we’re having. It’s good for all of us, whether we’re writers, producers, actors, whatever. In my experience, the most chronic haters are those untalented hacks who haven’t been let in the park.
Amazing Spider-Man’s a hit! I love it!
Heh. Spoken like a true Sony putz. Anybody with even a morsel of taste will hate this.
I’m betting you’re just a hater who hasn’t even seen the film yet. Go on, keep hating while the new incarnation introduces a whole new generation to the web slinger. I love the juicy irony that people who are obviously way less talented than you are making a fortune on a product that’s beneath your pay grade. LOL!
So let me get this straight, anyone who finds faults with Amazing Spider-Man, must be a writer who cant get their own script read, so they dislike AS-M because they are envious?
Riiiiight, go right on ahead and think that, look film like all art, is subjective just cause you enjoy something doesnt mean everyone else has to also as well. There are plenty of movies, I love that the general population didnt go out in throngs to see, and there are plenty of films that I dislike that millions of people enjoy.
Does it make me wrong? Does it make you wrong? NO, and do you want to know why cause its SUBJECTIVE, films would be pretty boring quick if everyone liked and loved the current popular film.
Um….well…really?
Someone wrote “Abe Lincoln Vampire Hunter” “That’s My Boy” “A THousand Words” ” “Wrath Of the Titans” “A Little Bit Of Heaven” “Battleship” “What To Expect When You’re Expecting” “For Greater Glory” “The Three Stooges” “The Vow” “Ghost Rider: Spirit Of Vengeance” “Project X” “Hangover II” “One For The Money” “This Means War” “John Carter” “Gone” “Seeking Justice” “Journey 2: Mysterious Island” “Act Of Valor” “Underworld Awakening” “Jack and Jill” “Contraband” “joyful Noise”"Larry Crowne” “Conan The Barbarian (remake)” “Country Strong” “No Strings Attached” “Arthur (remake)” “Just Go With It” “Green Lantern” “THe Change Up” “Mars Needs Moms” “The Dilemma” “Zookeeper” “Trespass” “New year’s Eve” “Red Riding Hood” “Bucky Larson” “I Don’t Know How She Does It” “Dream House” “Something Borrowed” “Sucker Punch” “The Son Of No One”
I’m at 2011 and still have a long way to go….
Are you on something? Do you have ANY idea how this business works? Absolutely not. If you want to move up the ladder in this system, you better change your attitude pretty quickly or you will be holding the bag on the next “Ishtar” (yeah, look it up or ask your boss)
Lesson 1: Read a script (do NOT look at the writer’s name) Lesson 2. Decide if YOU think the script is good writing/marketable OR bad writing/still marketable OR good writing/you will champion it to the doubters Lesson 3: Don’t let choosing the 2nd option above come back to haunt you. Lesson 4: Now read the writer’s name = you’ll be shocked at how many A-listers are on some of the crap above.
Did you know Ron Howard (Oscar Winner) directed “The Dilemma?” That’s a start.
Learn to think. Oh wait, you can’t. That’s why you’re in the “biz” side of things
Yeah, or I’m just a movie fan who went to a midnight show because he wanted it to be good.
It wasn’t.
So true, I like how these students find themselves to be experts in cinema just because they saw a b/w foreign movie and some indy masterpiece.
Agreed.
I really want this film to be successful, b/c I was rooting for Web and the cast, but it’s just not very good, and Webb was just WAY too far out of his element (as I’ve said elsewhere: Not as far out of his element as Cambpell was on Green Lantern, but still).
The directing was very flat, the 3D added nothing to the action sequences, most of which were awful and predictable (with the one exception being the Stan Lee cameo), and major plot points — such as the closeness Peter & Gwen suddenly achieve and the choice for Connors to *Minor Spoiler, non-fanboys* experiment on himself — are completely skipped.
I’m a huge fan of Spidey since I’m very little, and I couldn’t get out of the theater fast enough. I was bored and frustrated with the lack of joy and excitement in the picture.
Completely disagree. I thought it was wonderful. Sony really hit the jackpot with Emma Stone. Loved it, and glad it’s doing great guns and should have pretty good legs until Bane breaks Bats back.
Yet twilight made millions of dollars, people knocking this film. SMDH!
Saw the film last night, audience was mixed but most seemed to say it was better than Spiderman 3 but no where near 1, 2 or Avengers. I agree that it’s time for Sony to let Marvel buy back the rights to Spidey. For me the movie felt like the product of a focus group about how to make Spiderman more appealing to Twilight fans than a movie for the fans (like Avengers)
You hate the film so much but yet you saw a midnight show…..what a clown.
He didn’t know he was going to dislike the movie BEFORE he went to the midnight showing, clown.
You’re not too good with basic logic, are you Matt?
Saying a movie is better than Spider-Man 3 is like saying I’d rather not having a hot-fudge sundae with excrement on it.
That’s how bad this movie is. I just rewatched Spider-Man 3 on FX and it puts this one to shame.
Saw the movie last night. It was AWFUL. Who hired these writers for a 200 million dollar movie? I’ll be interested to see how fast the numbers drop after the first week.
Bingo.
I’m actually going to go and see it precisely FOR the reason Watcher doesn’t want me to.
The last thing MCU needs is another one to cram in.
This movie is AMAZING. Hope people get out and see it. Fantastic performances and chemistry from Andrew and Emma. Wonderful direction. An all-around great time.
Saw it yesterday…..I’m not sure…
It was ok. Nowhere near as good as Spidey 1, 2, Avengers or Thor.
It was better then Captain America and Spidey 3
Watch this for Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone. The kids knock it out of the park with their chemistry. Other than that, the story was pretty meh. I am so glad the sequel will have different writers.
V, I didn’t buy Andrew Garfield & Emma Stone’s chemistry. They had very little. I am tired of Stone giving the same performances in all her movies. Most of Emma’s performance seem forced. In ” The Help,” she stuck out like a sore thumb because all the of thespians out-acted her. It is time for Emma to get out of her comfort zone, and purse complicated and edgy roles that have very little box-office appeal .
I saw this last night at a free screening in IMAX 3D.
The 3D is totally unimpressive, and while IMAX looks clearer I would not waste money on the extra expense.
The lizard still looks fake to me no matter how much time, and money they put into it. It can not compete with actual special effects makeup in my opinion.
The movie is not bad but really over-hyped, and takes too long for any action to start. I closed my eyes a couple of times it was so boring in some spots.
No one clapped at the end at my screening which usually happens if they like it if that tells you anything.
I clapped at the end of my screening…I was glad it was finally over!
This is why one should not use Sony Imageworks for their creature effects.
You look at the films they’ve worked on in the last 3 years and not only are their effects behind the curve, but each film ended up with higher production budgets than comparable titles.
I think it’s great. Andrew’s version of the spidey is way better than tobey’s. Story is more or less similar with spiderman one but overall the movie is great so I don’t mind that
I absolutely agree. He had much more personality than Tobey, the chemistry between him and Emma was great. Actually it’s truer to the cartoon thn original. Great family movie. I enjoyed it.
I saw it and loved it. Thought the more gritty and grounded take on Spidey was the perfect direction for this to go. If it were huge and bigger than life it would play like a rip off of the others and might as well be Spider-Man 4. So I liked the simple nature of it. Hope audiences don’t need Spidey to jump off screen and shake them just to get them to feel something. Just go in and enjoy this back to basics, more faithful to the comics version. And no I’m not a studio plant. I wish I were though. I coulda made some money off this post! Haha
Fact is, reviews from people who saw it last night have not been favorable, and when you adjust it for venue numbers and inflation, it made less than Spidey 3. None of that is anything to brag about, and I’m predicting the week over week tumble is going to be spectacular.
The most dry, uninspired, boring, risk less, unimaginative, paint by numbers experience I’ve had I’m the cinema in a long time. Nearly a scene for scene copy of the original spidey without the style or grandeur raimi brought. A complete and utter mess that plays feels and looks more like a cw pilot than a 200m blockbuster. Makes spidey 3 look downright brilliant. The amazing spiderman is exactly what’s wrong with Hollywood cinema today and why audiences are turning to tv video games and anything else to experience something fresh and new. Shame on Sony. The fact that I’ve seen some kind reviews for this is sad because it shows how low taste level and expectations for filmmaking have fallen. Anyone reading this please go see Ted moonrise kingdom or geez even magic mike and help make the statement that we want at least semi original ideas and aren’t going to suffer through this stuff anymore
Total waste of time money opportunity and the chance to actually reboot spideys story into something interesting (or god forbid continued the story that raimi so wonderfully started – even if you recast Maguire with a new guy – would have much rather seen that story continue).
That’s EXACTLY what I thought. I was sitting half way through the film thinking to myself… holy shit… I want to watch Spider-Man 3, it was fucking good. And I only saw it once opening night and booed it. This was so bad it made Spider-Man 3 good. THAT’S HOW BAD THIS WAS. And seeing these comments make me think, holy shit, as a society we must be retarded if people actually accept this as their entertainment. I want to boycott this. WHAT A PIECE OF CRAP.
Absolutely couldn’t agree more. And, did anybody think the 3D was completely unnecessary? Even the special effects were disappointing. This movie accomplished or thing: it made me appreciate the previous Spiderman series.
The only thing I can’t decide is whether it was worse than the lost recent Super Man.
My thoughts precisely. Not one inspiring or emotionally involving scene, no character to root for or latch onto, and a by-the-numbers, literally seen-it-all-before script/story. A waste of time and money. Just boring, too long, and very, very CW.
$230m for this and they couldn’t come up with one never-before seen special effect or story plot point?
Not to shit completely on it, Martin Sheen and Emma Stone were great.
MOST BORING MOVIE EVER! DONT WASTE YOUR $$$
If u dont like the spidey movie then stop commenting.let those who love it do so.i will go and watch it 10 times.
You’re not a 12 year old boy at all.
We can’t warn people about this bad movie? Worst comic book I’ve seen since Batman & Robin (although, I have to say I haven’t seen Green Lantern…LOL).
I think you should go watch it 100 times…
It was kinda bland, script and tone wise. It had everything you’d expect with pretty much zero surprises. They didn’t take it anywhere new. Webb’s approach was too similar to Raimi’s, and it actually lacked the latter’s energy. What this one had over Raimi’s was naturalistic and relatable acting from the two leads. Garfield and Stone had great, great chemistry and their scenes together actually save the film. The effects were very well done, but that’s expected. You could tell James Horner tried with his score, but it just ended up sounding like most modern Marvel superhero scores. It’s sad that he failed to create a theme that we can hum in the vein of Elfman’s Batman or Williams’ Superman. Seriously, where the hell are the hummable themes for these billion dollar grossing superheroes? Overall, it’s a very well made film with a bland script. And they show you everything in the trailers. That shot of the collapsing tower? Yea, that’s the end of the big finale. Thank you Sony marketing for ruining that (btw you NEVER show the last fight in the trailers. The audience likes to see something they didn’t see in the trailers, especially at the end. It’s like the studio is saying- “hey, we saved the best part for last!” When that doesn’t happen, it’s disappointing and you never want the audience to leave disappointed. That leads to ‘meh’ word of mouth and a 70% second weekend drop
I disagree with you only one point — Horner’s score is really good, and actually has a THEME. So many of these Marvel films have nondescript, lame scores (even The Avengers) without a strong push forward thematically. Horner did a very good job IMO. Otherwise, I think you are right on target. The film is well made, well acted — and I liked the fact that NYC looked like NYC, it wasn’t a cartoony CGI city like a lot of these films — but the main story was meh.
And they never gave you a reason WHY the series needed to be “rebooted” with another origin story. Amazing how James Bond changed actors and lasted for decades without having to have the slate wiped clean. Ridiculous.
Good call on Bond.
“Amazing how James Bond changed actors and lasted for decades without having to have the slate wiped clean. Ridiculous.”
Bond and Spider-Man are entirely different properties, with distinct story demands. Bond is a more superficial character, whose arc doesn’t progress from film to film (with the exception of a few films, including the reboot). Parker, however, has an emotional arc from film to film, with the character trying to fulfill his uncle’s words over the course of each film. You can’t just shove another villain at Parker each time, like you would Bond, and expect for a story to magically appear that challenges Parker emotionally as well as physically.
Actually your logic here doesn’t make much sense. Spider-Man is based on a comic that has been running for 50 years. There are a wealth of stories and experiences to draw from, much more so than James Bond’s legacy. If anything, James Bond should be “rebooted” before the Spider-Man franchise should ever feel the need to.
THAT is why most everyone is saying the reboot is unnecessary and came much too soon.
Huh? That doesn’t go into the actual demands of the story, though: Peter Parker is a more complex character than Bond. You can throw a new villain at Bond each time, and the audience will go see it because you don’t really care about Bond: you admire him. Peter is a more vulnerable character, is part of a serial format and has more careful story demands, so you can’t just throw another villain at Peter each time and hope that the story will accomodate Peter’s arc, MJ’s arc, Aunt May and the rest of the supporting characters.
I thought James Horner’s score sounded exactly like his score for A Beautiful Mind. In fact, distractingly so. I really wanted to like the film. I’ve liked both Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone in other things, but the movie was so bland. If I had a watch on, I would have been looking at it. And maybe I’m the only one, but I saw very little chemistry between the leads. I definitely won’t be recommending it to anyone I know.
Bingo. I actually went into the film thinking that Newton Howard had done the score for whatever reason but about 2 minutes in I was thinking “This is exactly like A Beautiful Mind”.
Horner’s reputation for plagiarising his own works is well deserved.
I cannot praise ‘The Amazing Spider-Man’ enough. It’s not afraid to take its time setting up characters and stories.
Yes, Webb has recycled some of the visual style of Raimi’s films, but he doesn’t rely on it. In fact, he makes the movie his own. My favorite of the new techniques is the first-person swinging perspective. For the first time, we see what it’s like to soar across the city from inside the mask.
Love
I agree. Different twist, not sure what people were expecting, so many say it was boring, That must mean I’m boring. It was a reboot. Oh well!
Color me surprised…I didn’t think there was much appetite for a rebooted Spidey so soon after the Maguire films.
I know! Courageous, right? Maybe DC can reboot Batman immediately after Nolan’s run. And Instead of Avengers 2, maybe we can get an Avengers reboot with Spidey and the Fantastic Four? I would much rather keep watching variations of the origin stories over and over, instead of the soap-opera meandering of subsequent story lines. Apart from Raimi’s Spiderman 2, how often is a sequel as good as the original, anyway?
DC is rebooting Batman after the Nolan run in 2015. And once there are 3 Avenger movies, everyone is going to be too old, so they probably will reboot all the separate franchises and start again. I like how some people think Sony is the only one of the studios who does shit like this to make money.
Also, this one was still better then the first of the original series and the 3rd. Spider-Man 2 is still the best, but Garfield and Stone are ten times better then watching Dunst and McGuire try to act in the originals.
Very true. Actually, the whole “comic-based reboot” concept CAME from Batman. First Burton’s late 80′s/early 90′s take, then the awful Joel Schumacher mid-2000′s movies, and now Nolan’s trilogy (not counting the original 1966 film).
What’s amazing about doing numbers similar to blockbusters that are FIVE YEARS OLD that didn’t have the benefit of the exorbitant 3D prices? It’s a pretty good start but like the movie itself, it’s nothing special.
I saw this at the 10:30am show here. Very good stuff.
Remember how Christopher Nolan’s Batman was such a relief compared to, say, Tim Burton’s Batman, so much better? That’s what this re-boot does. It has seriously given new life to the whole Spider-Man story.
Really good stuff. I thought the early re-boot was a bad idea. Then I saw the film. It’s great seeing a film like this with real human characters.
Are you serious? Burton’s Batman’s are solid in their own right. Very solid. Nolan’s are amazing. But this isn’t Nolan’s Batman to Burton’s Batman. This is more akin to Schumacher’s Batman to Burton’s Batman. This movie was horrible. Please just say Fuck The Amazing Spider-Man 2 and make Raimi’s Spider-Man 4. You won’t regret it. People still love Tobey. Word of mouth on this one will be baaaaaaaaad which I predict will lead to lower than expected box-office numbers. Raimi’s Spider-Man’s had amazing word of mouth so maybe.. i dunno. call him? make another good one. THIS WAS SHIT.0/10 bad. Marc Webb is a HACK.
Burton’s Batman films are high-cost snoozefests, minus Jack Nicholson and Michelle Pfeiffer, both of whom saved their respective films. Sorry, but Burton doesn’t know what’s good. Keaton tried his best but he’s just not Batman OR Bruce Wayne. I generally like Michael Keaton’s acting …. just not in those. You can tell he’s trying really, really hard to find his motivation.
Some of the IDEAS Burton came up with in those films are interesting, and Bruce Timm applied them near-perfectly in the animated series. See, Bruce Timm knows what’s good, whereas Burton has some great artistic ideas but doesn’t know how to execute. He’s a terrible storyteller, generally speaking. Also, those were only his third and fifth films. You can see the confidence come through better in Batman Returns, but it’s a boring film. Batman is an action hero and detective who fights hand to hand and uses a plethora of imaginative gadgets to defeat his foes. Burton is fascinated by the villains, only, because they are outcasts. He misses the point. Most of us prefer the hero’s tale to the villain’s.
You do realize this is entirely your own opinion right? The fact you fail to even mention DeVito’s Penguin character, or even Catwoman, shows just how oblivious you are to the success and legacy of Burton’s Batman series. These were career-making roles for some of those actors!
Don’t listen to the haters about this film. Granted, it’s not as good as Spider-Man 2, but then few things are. This film is quite fantastic all on its own, and worth the money to see. Garfield and Stone are ELECTRIC. And the action sequences are worthy of comparison to the panels we see in a Spider-Man comic book. There are flaws aplenty in the film, but it doesn’t detract from a fun experience. Hell, the people in the theater I saw it in gave the movie a standing ovation when it finished. I think that bodes well.
I agree to an extent. I think the major problem is that the film doesn’t have a very clear idea of who Peter is: science wiz? Lost soul? Everyman? Martyr? Vigilante? Investigator? Ray of hope? Rebel? The film hints at any of these readings, but doesn’t sustain them, which makes the structure unsatisfying. With ‘Spider-Man 2′, Raimi had a clear conception of Parker (an everyman with the potential for greatness). On the other hand, Garfield and Stone are extremely engaging, and their scenes are the most powerful and interesting in the film.
It wasn’t bad. Could’ve been worse. The story sucks, but the acting was pretty good. Garfield was ways better than that poker bum Maguire. The action was pretty thrilling in 3D.
I saw this movie today.It’s good,not great as the Avengers.I hope Spiderman makes enough money before The Dark Knight Rises debut.Those who are Spidey fans will enjoy this film.But if you want to see a megablockbuster then save your money for the Dark Knight Rises.