UPDATE, 5:59 AM: DirecTV says that it doesn’t want to drop the Viacom channels but the company “sent a letter to us late last night,
forcing us to take these channels down by midnight tonight if we don’t come to an agreement….They are using this tactic to try and leverage over a 30% increase (that’s an additional one billion dollars) from our customers for the exact same Viacom channels they receive today.” As for Viacom’s claim that 26 channels are at stake — that’s only correct if you count the SD and HD feeds of a channel separately. The deal involves 17 unique services.
PREVIOUS, 4:17 AM: This would be a huge disruption for both companies. But Viacom says in a blog post that DirecTV’s 20M subscribers could lose its 26 channels — including Nickelodeon, MTV, and Comedy Central — at midnight tonight unless there’s more progress in their talks for a new carriage deal. DirecTV says that Viacom wants a 30% boost in the payments it receives, and the satellite company is “working to keep your bill low.” But the programmer says that “our negotiations have reached an impasse” after DirecTV made a counter-proposal to Viacom “that included a lower rate than Viacom receives from any other distributor in the industry.” It adds: “Our agreement with DirecTV is seven years old – ancient by the standards of the ever-evolving media industry – which means that DirecTV has enjoyed way below market rates for Viacom’s networks for a very long time.” Viacom says that it’s the most watched programmer on DirecTV, accounting for 20% of all its viewing, but only receives 5% of its programming payments. Last month Bernstein Research’s Todd Juenger dropped his price target for the media giant saying that with the steep ratings declines at Nickelodeon and MTV, “it is no longer inconceivable that a distributor would drop Viacom, or at least engage in a public battle with them over price increases.”
Related: AT&T U-Verse Reaches Deal With AMC; Dish Feud Still Unresolved


Now I really feel like s**t for helping get my parents switched over to Direct from Dish after Dish dropped AMC.
When are these companies going to grow up? Seriously. Just let people watch their Comedy Central and VH1.
DirecTV is NOT going to win by dropping popular channels like Comedy Central, MTV, VH1, Nickelodeon, BET, TV Land, Spike, CMT. You can’t even convince me that DirecTV is even seriously contemplating a programming lineup that doesn’t include those channels. What will be left? 10 versions of Discovery channel and a host of crappy shopping channels?
Viacom is NOT going to win by having those channels dropped. Whatever reduced carriage fee they have to accept from DirecTV is probably still better than losing millions of potential viewers. How can you even sell advertising space when one of the largest satellite companies doesn’t carry any of your channels? It’s not like you can just hope that everyone immediately jumps ship from Direct. Most of the customers are on some sort of contract that they aren’t likely to break for Spongebob Squarepants.
Neither company wins in this situation…so why go through the drama of pretending?
This is not right we have been going threw direct tv for over 11 years. My son loves his Nick Jr. Why now? This is not right if these chanels get cut off ima have to switch companies.
i want nickelodian back
i agree my kids love spongebob and dora and i think its ridiculous that my kids wont get to watch this stuff anymore.. im sure by tomorrow morning they will be balling because no spongebob is on:( i hate this i think viacom likes making little kids cry.. they need to get over themselves and let us have our channels..
I think this whole thing is a crock. MTV has sucked for the last 10 years. The LOGO channel’s programming is disgusting and attrocious. I cant stand that dang degrassi show either. Why would you put that kind of trash on a kids channel anyway. Do I have to even mention Tosh.0?? Filth! You should be ashamed of yourselves. On the other hand Direct TV’s Customer service totally sucks!!!!!! Totally totally totally sucks! I’ve been a customer for 14 years and every, I mean EVERY time I had some kind of problem it always works out in favor of Direct TV and I end up getting the shaft, or I spend 3 days on the phone to try to fix it. Viacom has good programming like the tv land and nick toons daytime stuff, but their programming is starting to suck. Peroid point blank. They don’t consider decency or the concerns of parents. They hide behind the fact that they put it on later at night and thats supposed to make it ok????? It’s still trash weather its on late at night or not. They now are using extortion to raise the price and Direct Tv is using manipulation, were just a bunch of puppets on a string and everybody if fighting for the strings. I’m going to cable. I’m done with all of you!!!!!!!!!
You sound really mad bro.
we’ve paid you good money for 12 years,we enjoy these channels,especialy having children in the house.you’re all greedy
direct TV had to drop the channels or face legal action. I don’t blame direct TV at all. why pay more for channels that aren’t worth it.
things like this will continue because networks need to replace the money lost from advertising plus rising costs for producing shows or airing those reruns that people love.
Get rid of Viacom and its strong arm tactics, yes I will miss a few things but, stuff gets cancelled all the time. I remember when there were only 7 channels! the only way a deal should be cut, is if we can choose as a customers to drop Viacom from are programming. Can’t wait until we can pick and choose all the channels we want and don’t want.
Amen. Quit feuding, come to an agreement and give me my channels back!
Here is a wild guess a deal will be struck and consumer prices will increase. The only question is how much?
This process happens all the time and the results are always the same..rates go up.
I may need to go back to reading books, my one splurge in this economy has been DTV. If I lose any more channels it won’t be with it.
Viacom seems to want to make the rich even richer in my opinion.
Exactly! F-YOU VIACOM!
We don’t watch shopping, religious, most of Viacom and a slew of other channels because they lack content, quality, and value. I see a lot of PI’s on these channels meaning that their air time hasn’t been sold or is worthless. There’s nothing to see overnight either. So, I am paying Direct TV a lot of money for junk programming. It’s time to clean house and give me the value that I deserve. There are too many marginal or bottom bfeeding networks on as it is.
First, they came for AMC – but I did nothing, for I was not a Dish subscriber. Then they came for Viacom, but still I remained aloof, for I was not a DirectTV customer…
Nicely put!
This really is getting ridiculous. Using consumers/viewers in these battles is not the way to go. Wasn’t there some bill floating around Congress about this? I hate regulation aimed at media companies but if everyone is going to keep doing this – something needs to be done. It’s a bit nuts.
This is why congress needs to step up and force providers to allow a la carte programming as opposed to these bundles. I probably watch 10 channels out of the 100+ I have.
Sports channels in particular reap the biggest profits for something most don’t even watch.
Let’s actually let the free market work
I cut the cable and satellite cord months ago. More and more people are doing the same, and I hope it continues to be that way. I was paying almost $100 for DirectTV to just watch a few shows and channels in HD. So glad I got rid of it. I agree that a la carte is the way to go. I don’t see myself getting service again until something similar to a la carte is offered. A Direct TV rep told me they are not worried about a la carte because
1) they can make more profit with bundling channels
2) they have contracts that prohibit any type of a la carte options
Unlike you, all I want is the sport channels and maybe two others. Encourage more people to cut the cord until profits drop low enough to force these billion-dollar profitable companies to offer customers only the channels they want to pay for.
So nice of your Direct TV rep to be letting out trade secrets. Its heresay I believe.
Another cord cutter here, purely for economic reasons, but – even if I were rakin’ in the big bucks, why would I put up with this kind of chaos? I don’t care if it’s DishTV or Viacom or Comcast or ScoobyDoo and the Scooby Gang…I don’t want to have to worry about whether a show I like will be on the service I happen to have. Nobody wants to bother with that BS. People will cut cords just to have less BS in their lives.
why can’t they make the shows themseveles
Newsflash: When the congress steps up, you won’t have a free market anymore.
Exactly. Government making the rules = not a free market.
Giving the customers free choice is free market.
If you were forced to buy mayo everytime you bought bread that wouldn’t be free but rather abuse by the powers that be.
Why buy channels we don’t want
yeah!
If you think a la carte will save you money you are delusional.
Wtf is wrong with viacom do they know how many f***ing people watch their shows. They are going to lose alot
Viacom is 20% of DirecTV’s viewership, and only 5% of its programming costs. What Viacom is asking for is only pennies a day for the 26 channels they offer to DirecTv. DirecTv is making a killing off of these channels from customers. I think that Viacom is only trying to get their fair share.
The article says its over a billion dollars. If DTV has roughly 20mm subs, that’s $50+ each. That’s real money, especially for programming that for the most part seems advertiser supported, often promotional in nature, and rarely big budget.
Good then Viacom wont mind losing that 20% market. Or its money from advertisers.
I have Direct scheduled to come out tomorrow for installation. I’ve been wtih Dish for YEARS but lost AMC and thought it was probably time to switch over. Well, at least I’ll know by tomorrow morning what the outcome of this deal is. At least I’ll have time to cancel installation if need be.
I have it scheduled to be installed tomorrow as well. This situation has me frustrated. I thought I was able to find way to get the television we enjoyed while saving some money. So much for that idea. The kids channels are much off what we watch. Both parties need to give a little and make a deal to satisfy their customers.
ok so if they are going to take a million dollars a year in all of everybody and they have like 6 billion user they would probably end up only raising our price 0.50 or maybe a 1$ so what the big deal if people dont like in they can switch to dish!!! Im just saying!
Seriouslly, this is getting to be BS. I remember having a carriage dispute MAYBE once a year, if that. Now it seems like every TV carrier is in at least one dispute with at least 1 distributor at any given time. As a fan of TV it makes me almost want to just wait for DVDs and iTunes copies of all cable shows, because I’m tired of having to remember which stations I don’t currently get, eventhough I paid my monthly fee.
I even had to buy BUNNY EARS in 2012 to watch the series finale of “One Tree Hill”…
Take from all DirecTV’c customers and give to their own employees? Now they can just drop those channels. I no longer feel any respect for Viacom.
I REALLY hope this doesn’t happen! Why won’t these companies with their billions leave us poor folks alone?!?! Times are hard right now…
I am very upset, these channels are most of the channels my family watches, if these are dropped I will be switching my service to DISH NETWORK
You don’t get most of these channels with DISH network anyway
A la carte programming, congress needs to make it the law of the land. Then this wouldn’t be the issue it is today.
I watch about 10 channels of the 100+ I have. Why am I subsidizing all these sports channels, OWN, Bravo just to name a few that I never watch
My Viacom channels have already been replaced with a message by the DirecTV CEO playing on an endless loop. I applaud DirecTV for looking out for their customers, they’re the ones that send out the bill, not Viacom.
If Viacom had to actually charge consumers directly for the content then they would see how much their programming is worth.
As Deadline has already reported.
Last year’s $84.5M package made Dauman one of the highest paid CEOs in the U.S. — and a target for a lot of scorn. But much of his bonanza came from one-time stock awards. Without them he’s still a candidate to be one of the most richly compensated media execs in 2011, based on the data in Viacom’s just-filed proxy. For the fiscal year that ended in September, while Viacom stock was up 7.7%, Dauman’s compensation includes: salary of $3.5M (+33% vs last year), annual stock award of $10.2M (flat), $3.1M in one-time stock (-90.1%), $6.0M in annual option award (flat), and $20M in non-equity incentive compensation (+77.8%).
Exactly! Dtv is making the money! I have had Dtv for almost eight yrs & they have raised rates; not even basing the raises on disputes like this. Customers will lose. Meanwhile Dauman they will get richer. If they don’t keep the Viacom channels & if we have to watch our favorites on the internet, will our rates go down? I don’t think so.
This is so true. I Have had Dtv since they were a company and my bill has tripled, even though I have made minimal changes to my service. They should pay Viacom and not pass the costs on to their customers. I think all of this ado is just to make them (Dtv) win favor with the customers. They are making bank. Think about it. Pay up Dtv, as your customers do monthly!!
I have to say you raise a good question. I also think that we should get a prorated bill for the month of July. Considering that we have had most of the channels we watch taken away from us. I seen that they are giving us encore, who wants encore?? I don’t. They are the worse than most of the sucky channels that I already pay for.
let us decide what to pay 4. I don’t want 10 channels of espn! There are only a handful of channels on cable that I watch. Let me decide!
Anyone who switched to Direct tv was, at best, shortsighted. It was actually a ridiculously stupid thing to do if one looked at the history of these companies.
You bought the AMC spin and that’s on you.
Haven’t watched cable TV in nearly 2 years. If it wasn’t for watching 30 minutes of internet TV I don’t even bother.
Viewers need to protect themselves get both, have Dish pointing one way then Direct pointing the other, after all Disney is probably up soon and the fight for the real prize will continue, ESPN, Disney Channels etc., then wait for the locals to want more. In Seattle a few years ago our ABC affiliate was off of Dish for over 9 months.
One thing to note that may dont know. With my dad working for NBC i learned an intersting fact. Local networks, such as ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX are requrired to provide SD and sometimes HD signal to the cable company(cox, timewarner, comcast, etc) and sattelite companies (DISH, DirecTV) free of charge. They get no financial gain, but they do have a liability to provide service of these channels 100% of the time. IF there is a blackout it is because of some fault on the sattelite company or cable carrier, many times my dad was in a battle of cable subsribers when the cable company would play the cat and mouse games and blame it on the local networks when programming would go out.
There is maybe ONE show on Spike that I watch. MTV and VH1 stopped being watchable a long time ago. I think my kids watch one or two shows on Nickleodian, but they’d live without them with Disney channels and netflix streaming. There ARE the old Dick Van Dyke reruns, but again netflix would take care of that.
Nope, I don’t think anyone in my household would really miss the Viacom channels that much at all.
Stay strong, DirecTV.
Those of us subscribing to either Dish or DirectTV pay a pretty penny to receive our programming. We expect the best that is offered (Breaking Bad – Daily Show, anyone?). That is changing. These satellite companies will lose customers. Cable companies, if they play things smartly, will benefit greatly.
Well if they do NOT reach an agreement, prices should go down! Make the Viacom channels … pay channels. If you want to watch Jersey Shore or Sponge Bob that badly you will pay for it!