
EXCLUSIVE: With Biblical epics the rage in Hollywood, here’s another. Will Smith is eyeing a film about battling brothers Cain and Abel as his directorial debut. The project is set at Sony in development and is being produced by Overbrook Entertainment. This has been in the arsenal for some time, and won’t be Smith’s next film, but it is an intriguing development for the actor and producer. The project has gone under the working title of The Redemption Of Cain, but I’ve confirmed that it’s now being developed as directing vehicle for Smith, who’ll likely star in the film as well.
This comes as Darren Aronofsky starts production with Russell Crowe on Noah, and both Steven Spielberg and Ridley Scott have Moses projects percolating.
Related: Paul Verhoeven Finds Backing And A Writer For Controversial Jesus Christ Movie


What redemption did Cain get? He sealed his doom when he murdered his brother.
God marked him,but also said for no one to harm him, he became a builder of cities. It’s based on Envy which we need to understand the Evil of Envy.
Thanks for clearing that up Anita, I mean “Sister” Anita.
Envy is the root of all evil. And our politicians use this tool with surgucal precision.
you are forgetting that this is Hollywood, which is basically run by lucifer himself. cain was lucifers first born while able was adams first born. cain killing able was redemption for lucifer. interesting to see what the movie portrays.
That’s right…as Abel’s sacrifice was accepted and Cain’s wasn’t because Abel understood that it was a sex act in the garden, NOT an apple and that’s why it took life blood to cover up for the life that you were supposed to lose. Do you see it now? God said “The day you eat thereof you die”. Satan, in the serpent, which was an upright being not unlike a man, had sex with her, thus “eating therof” and starting this whole mess. Oh, it’s a long story but it’s Glorious indeed. Enough said…….
This is not a topic for Will to do because it will be his supporters who have their say in it. This is definitely at topic for Mel Gibson. Maybe that’s why this push to get ‘er done is publicized to stop Mel. Jokesters. Markie you are wise. Satan was handsome, knew Eve’s weakness was to gain more power. She was the first human with that ol’ jealousy, and it is in the character of all women through today unless they unload it through redemption by Christ. Eve believed that cutie that she could be god-like in smarts and power and she went for it. Satan had her and thereby dinged every one of her eggs which was all future humanity… except for one that God said he reserved and hid. That hidden egg was passed down through generations to little Mary, who also was given a choice (God is big on free will and rights) and she chose to do what God asked through the messenger Angel Gabriel. She accepted to conceive, carry, and deliver the Saviour of the world, the NEW Adam, to humanity. Eve brought DEATH to humanity, Mary brought The Way The Truth and The LIFE to humanity. All women choose their role model. Eve or Mary. Anyway… just where was Adam while Eve was smooching Satan? Golfing with the Gorillas?
Why do you intend on reading into the Genesis account? What sources do you have about Lucifer introducing his seed into Eve? And where do you have the account of any child of this supposed relation when it states that Adam knew Eve and she conceived Gen. 4.1 Please respond.
LifeShort, read the scriptures. Sin is passed down through the seed of the man, not the woman. “As in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.” That’s why Christ was without a sinful nature like ours, it is passed through the seed of man, and Mary was not made pregnant by the seed of man but by the power of the Holy Spirit who can bring life out of dust! And Adam was not out “golfing with the gorillas,” Genesis 3: “She also gave some to her husband, who was WITH HER, and he ate it.” He was passively there, watching as the whole thing happened and never stepped in to intercede with or for his wife.
Several posts I’d like to respond to and since many of my replies would be similar, I’ll try to catch what I can in this and just a few other replies. There are some incredibly thoughtful messages here and regardless of their view, it shows that many of us have that little voice/trigger that gets our attention regarding who we are how we got here what we are supposed to do and where we are going. It’s a fantastic beautiful experience we are all in, regardless of our circumstances, health, abilities or disabilities. Life.
Roscoe, Oh No! Never meant that Satan had the ability to father or produce a child. Angels and Demons cannot reproduce themselves and certainly not humans. Only God the Creator can do that. Because they cannot do that, they both are closely entwined with humanity for different reasons! Good Angels are “transformers” under direction from God to help humanity and each of us has been assigned a “guardian angel” that we can ask for help, that people can ask specific help of another person’s guardian angel to help the child/person they are assigned to guard. Angels are transformers in that they can take the form of a human for a specific event, increasing their ability to help/warn their charges. Scripture warns us to be good to others as we may be “entertaining” or engaging with Angels, and be unaware or not knowing it. We will see our Guardians and the good guardians will be with us throughout our eternities in heaven. Scripture tells that humans will judge the angels… we know that all guardian angels either don’t fight for us or give in to the opposition attacking us. The Fallen Angels which are Satan’s troops, are working hard to capture our lives and use us for their purposes which is to own our souls after death. The reason the dark angel demons work to capture us is that there will be a final fight for power that they want to win and they try to build their troops, their army, their legions of evil by adding humans to do evil on earth and to stand with them at the end. We all experience flexing of our choice muscles every day. Since childhood, many of us who have seen old cartoons, have seen this conflict represented by a little angel on the shoulder whispering in a human’s ear to do good things, and a little red devil with horns and pitchfork on the other telling the human the opposite choice. Choice.
No child is of, or belongs to, Satan or anything evil. Babies are born innocent and pure souls, as close to perfection as we can get here on earth, much closer to God than you and me, and scripture puts them on that level saying that their Angels (guardians can be in many places at the same time) are constantly before the face of God. Human babies do carry the ding that Satan stained on every human by his contact with Eve, which is erased by Baptism through a parent’s choice performed by a Christian minister, or later in life by their own choice to be Baptised. By whatever means Satan managed to damage us, it was accomplished through Eve. We know he damaged her seed (eggs) which passed on to all females because Scripture tells that God “reserved” one of Eve’s seed/egg and that one was passed on through generations and born as Mary who was NOT stained by Satan’s smear, which made Mary’s egg/seed pure, without stain and that baby was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born without stain as Jesus the Christ. More to say but want to put these views in smaller packages that I hope are of interest, and you can strengthen or prove too fragile. Hope they don’t close the Comments on this article, it’s getting very interesting.
Sex act??? What are you talking about?
That is so STUPID! Good Grief
The story of Lucifer (Light Bringer) is just a retelling of the story of Prometheus (who brought fire i.e. light to man), who was then punished for defying the god(s).
Same story, rewritten and retold by different cultures through the centuries.
Unfortunately, some people give it all the credence of reality instead of realizing it is the oral culture of a neolithic nomadic people.
This is in reply to Capt Liberty.
Cain and Abel are not a retelling of the Prometheus myth. The Bible story was recorded hundreds of years before the Prometheus myth came about.
Lucifer was not “light bringer.” He was, originally, the angel of light, who became the father of lies; if anything, he is the “darkness bringer.”
The Bible is given credence because it is proven to have been written outside of time; history written in advance. The hundreds of detailed prophecies written hundreds of years before they became true give all the credence that is needed. It is the myths and false gods who counterfeit the stories recorded in the Bible.
Will this be called: “I am Myth” If so… then great.
Then it wouldn’t be right, considering the lives of Cane and Abel actually happened.
Friend your theology is horribly flawed. God gave Eve to Adam and told them to multiply before they ever faced the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Sex was not bad and had nothing to do whatsoever with the fall of man. Read the bible, it tells you Eve was deceived. Paul the apostle later tells you that while Eve was deceived Adam was not. Adam chose to disobey God by letting Eve be deceived. Adam betrayed his wife and God. That is the fall of man. Choosing personal knowledge, the ability to discern right from wrong without God. In effect placing themselves in the seat of God. That is their downfall. The tree of knowledge was real, its just as real as the other tree that they were allowed to eat from but chose not to. The tree of life. That tree exists to this day in heaven. It is on both sides of the river of life.
Thank God! I finally have found someone who speaks the truth about what happened in the garden!! I might also add that there were flourishing civilizations at the time of Adam/Eve/Cain/Abel .. Adam & Eve WERE NOT the first people created (Read Genesis Chapter 1, verse 26 for details) .. I hope that this movie will contain some of these truths.
Nice try, LifeShortEternityLong but- swing and a miss!
The recorders of the word(in this case Moses)did not tiptoe around the subject of sex. It was covered graphically in every subject including conception, consumation, rape, incest, adultry, prostatution, homosexuality, and even contraception. There would be no reason to hide the “truth” in this story alone.
Not once is it ever metaphored as a tree, fruit, or the act of eating. In fact ‘eating’ is used as acceptence of the word, fruit is the “work” of the holy spirit, and tree is generally a personage as in “the cedars of Lebanon”
First of all Lucifer is not the name of this Fallen Archangel in the Garden of Eden who decieved Eve to get to Adam. There are several names that have been used to identify this fallen Angel, but in the the Garden he was referred to as the serpent, Adam died Spiritually in the GARDEN the moment he disobeyed the commmandment of GOD not to eat of the tree of knowledge knowing good and evil. Satan is his name on earth,the name Lucifer was his name in Heaven, before inquity was found in him, that caused him to fall. Secondly Cain was not Satan’s first born, it was Adam because he inherited the same sinful nature that Satan had and it was passed down to all generations, but Yeshua is called the second Adam in the new testament because in him was created new man he was born again, or the first born from the dead spiritually, he was separated from his father spiritually so he was the first born from the dead. But in the second Adam all are made alive, that is whosoever believes on Yeshua will not perish but have ever-lasting life. Also Cain murdering his brother Abel could not redeem Satan this is not true, Cain was the one who needed redemption. (1 COR.15:45,46)
Brian, you are correct on the progeny sir. I wonder how they will strech the dialog into a 2 hour movie.(maybee this will help)—> “Mat 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
Mat 23:36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.”
Yep, it’s Hollywood, so expect the story to only vaguely follow the Biblical text.
Lucifer?
Where was that in the Bible.
The devil’s name is Satan.
Lu`ci*fe”ri*an\, n. (Eccl. Hist.) One of the followers of Lucifer, bishop of Cagliari, in the fourth century, who separated from the orthodox churches because they would not go as far as he did in opposing the Arians.
Isaiah 14.2
Text was interpreted by Christian readers as referring to the first fallen angel.
Lucifer means the Light Bearer in Heaven and when that angel fell it was given the name Satan/Devil and a host of other names.I use the pronoun “it” since angels are spirits without a sex.
Isnt Bielzubub another one of Satans name?
But anyways, the most important of all names is found in Psalms 83:13 KJV.
If Satan is to have a name, what of the One who created everything.Shouldnt he have a name also?
Isaiah 14:12
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
heh? where did you get that from? I know you so called religious types like to interpret the babble anyway you see fit but i’d like some evidence please.
“heh? where did you get that from? I know you so called religious types like to interpret the babble anyway you see fit but i’d like some evidence please.”
If I show you the accuracy of the bible you will find some other way to mock it. Are you really objective? We shall see.
Was there really a man named Cyrus that founded the Persian empire? Answer is yes. His edict is considered the first declaration of basic human rights in history. A copy of this sits between the general assembly chamber and the security counsel chamber in the UN building.
Cyrus conquered Babylon in 539 B.C. He was met by a man named Daniel and handed a scroll. Daniel had been a counselor of sorts to the kings Nebuchadnezzar, Belshazzar, Darius the Mede. This scroll was over 139 years old. In this scroll the prophet Isaiah, that you just doubted, calls Cyrus by name and tells him what he is going to do and what he has done. It is actually God speaking Isaiah is merely writing it down. Isaiah 45 says this,
Isaiah 45:1 (HCSB) The LORD says this to Cyrus, His anointed, whose right hand I have grasped to subdue nations before him, to disarm kings, to open the doors before him and the gates will not be shut:
2 “I will go before you and level the uneven places; I will shatter the bronze doors and cut the iron bars in two.
3 I will give you the treasures of darkness and riches from secret places, so that you may know that I, Yahweh, the God of Israel call you by your name.
4 I call you by your name, because of Jacob My servant and Israel My chosen one. I give a name to you, though you do not know Me.
5 I am Yahweh, and there is no other; there is no God but Me. I will strengthen you, though you do not know Me,
6 so that all may know from the rising of the sun to its setting that there is no one but Me. I am Yahweh, and there is no other.
7 I form light and create darkness, I make success and create disaster; I, Yahweh, do all these things.
Isaiah 45:1-7 (HCSB)
God tells him that even though Cyrus doesnt believe in him God is going to use him anyway. The point is that before this man was ever born God had his prophet write down exactly what the man would do, how he would do it and call him by name.
Is that specific enough evidence for you? Probably not.
The 24 foot long scroll of Isaiah that was found in Qumran in 1948 is older than any previously known source for Isaiah. It is also the only complete copy in existence that we know of.
Daniel himself predicted and announced the arrival of Greece Alexander the Great, the four generals, The Persians, and the Romans specifically all hundreds of years before their time.
Only God can see into the future. He tells the prophets what to write. The thing that separates the bible and Christianity from every other religion in the world is that the bible has fulfilled prophecy and no other religion does. The bible has never missed. Everything it says happened has happened and everything that is still unfulfilled is going to happen soon.
Doubt away my friend.
Where do you people get your information? Cain was Lucifer’s first-born?
Show me in the Bible where this is stated or insinuated, or try to even spin this story in this manner.
Cain was Adam’s first born. The first of many first-born disappointments in the Bible.
You really don’t know the story, do you? As a matter of fact the biblical story is much more than just Cain killing Abel.
The Cain and Abel story is an allegory concerning the transition from hunter-gatherer society to agricultural. From free people to slaves tied to one place.
No, it has nothing to do with societal transitions. But, it has everything to do with man’s decision to disobey God and substitute his own wisdom, thinking it far greater than God’s. In that respect, man has not progressed at all. God may be forgotten or ridiculed, but He’s still there. He’s still watching and still wanting obedience from His creation.
Umm…Go Atheist! no ones going to want to see Bible movies. Passion killed that and I still havent seen that movie. I may be a minoroty on this issue but sounds like these projects are going to bomb.
What a stupid comment, Justin. From one atheist to another – get over yourself.
Passion brought in more than half a billion. I guess nobody went to see it, right?
If this movie is made it will be huge. People are getting tired of the comic book movies and big budget movies. The last movie made based on the Bible did extremely well. To state that this movie is going to, before it has even been made, speaks volumes. As a former Atheist I can say that an Atheist’s life is normally strange because they spend a large amount of time denying and explaining why they believe God doesn’t exist. It was apparent to me that some Atheist want to believe in God and are hopeful that someone else can explain things to them. My opinion here is that Atheist are egotistical and expect others to explain why God exist or want God to show himself to them. I say egotistical because the burden of proof is not on the believer. I was created by God. God owes me nothing but he gives anyways. Someone who thinks or feels they are owed something by God is someone who is probably doing something wrong. Again, my own opinion.
Cain is the founder of civilization. After being marked he was banished to the land of the Canaanites, yes, I know it doesn’t make sense that htere is a whole other land filled with people if Adam, Eve, and the kids were the only humans but, I digress
. Once there he became the builder and founded the first city, according to the bible. Married, had a family, was quite successful from what I understood.
your right” as the word of the lord states’ cain was a son of ”’thee evil one.
Oh please. Like we really need someone who was the “Fresh Prince” of “Bel Air” interpreting scripture for us. You deranged development people should do a film with Pam Grier as Bathsheba. At least, I would pay to see that one.
A better Cain & Able would be from the book by Jeffery Archer than the book by God.
Get your facts straight. Able offered a sacrifice of animals, Cain’s sacrifice was the best of his garden. He knew there was no forgiveness of sins without the shedding of blood (thus the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ). He offered the best of “his world” God rejected it.(no shed blood) God will also reject anybody/everybody else’s best of their world. You can not be good enough, you cannot offer God the best you have to offer etc etc (it will fall short of God’s way) It is only thru the shed blood of a substitute sacrifice that God will except you(Jesus Christ, God’s way) not “the way of Cain”!
You know whats really Funny and Weird about it, That God knew the outcome. Thinking about that can make you crazy.Dont you think? Talk about free well…Lol
it’s all just BS anyway.
The big question is who will Jaden and Willow Smith play in the movie?
original title of HOUSE OF CAIN is infinitely better than “Redemption” of Cain
I like “Tyler Perry’s House of Cain” better.
Well done.
Make it a comedy, cuz with Will smith , it will be…He’s so full of himself! Jeez
Smith to play a dual role, in a fat suit as Abel.
Will Smith is such a good actor, he’s going to play BOTH Cain AND Abel in this movie.
Nope, In order to make it ethnically neutral, one will have to be straight and one gay, one white and one black.
Yeah, as the lib-luciferians would have it, Abel was the fat boy who was eating Cain’s food, and Cain had to put a cap in Abel to keep him from eating his lunch. You know Fresh Prince is gonna get this all wrong and bass-ackwards – not by mistake or stupidity, but by design, as dictated by those who pull his strings. They will rewrite Genesis for the “powerpuff girls” generation.
All these religious Bible Bumper films…. Where is an Atheist film when you need one!?
You have thousands of atheists films to choose from, all day, every day. It’s about time this segment of the population was served in epics. As for being a “Bible-thumper,” thump this.
No small wonder your namesake Matthew is the first book of the new Testament. Plenty of secular action on Hollywood, or if not secular, Scientology influenced.
Woo! I offended a Christian or whatever you call yourself. Goal has been achieved.
You must be a very lonely man.
Atheists are much more thin skinned than Christians… As a rule. I seriously doubt u have enough truth in you to offend anyone.
Wow. What high goals you have.
You are assuming these films will be kind to the “source” material.
Never said it was educational material. I referred to what it was based upon. Plenty of religious people claim to know the Bible, but fail to realize it all written by man’s ideas/design not God himself.
Ideas are not of man’s design, but God’s. Man is bestowed the gift of perceiving into the spiritual realms and the folly of not recognizing it. We take from this world our thoughts and, like fools, believe that we’ve created them. It is nothing other than the gifts of imagination, inspiration, and intuition that we may possess. We interact with the spirit without truly understanding it.
Yep, the Bible was not written by God himself. It was written by several followers, believers, and the occasional Disciple.. Paul for instance, in his letters. Anyway, it’s a given that God didn’t write the words. God never came to earth, setup a desk and got busy writing. That is even more ridiculous than most of your comments. He could have just spoke the Bible into existence if he wanted. That’s not how God rolls. He gave some folks the words to write it. BTW, only the letters in red are his Son’s words , and they are probably not verbatim, there are way to many translations for that to even be possible. Tom Cruise can’t even quote L. Ron Hubbard Verbatim and he died in the 50′s right? Jesus died about 2012 years go.. and several years before any biblical manuscript was penned, think about it.
The Bible is the Word Of God, Divinely inspired to intelligent beings of the time. Reading the book of Revelation one comes to realize that a person of the time, given a glimpse into the future could not fully comprehend what he saw. Still all scribes of Gods Word did a remarkable job.
As to the comment about “where is an atheist film when you need one?”Just look at the box office busters. Not a Single one has reference to the God of the Bible. So what do you mean by “where are the atheist films?” We are surrounded, nay, SATURATED with them!
…just because something is *secular* does not mean it is atheistic.
Magic Mike. How about that buddy
The reason there are no “Atheist” films is because vocal atheists tend to be soooo boring. All they do is rant. An “Atheist Epic” would be a film about the aclu and would consist of minimal plot carried by enormous tedious monologues against the usual tedious subjects they like to bring up.
R u kidding?! Most films take on secular and atheistic overtones. There is no recognition of God in Hollywood.
90% of films are atheist..from the amount of sin and violence and gratuitous sex..there is no God in the minds of those who right,direct act and film these movies..your watching films that reflect a Godless society where there is no morals or set laws but rather an anything goes mentality..so there you have it..your atheist films voila Hollywood.
I dont belive in athiest movies
This is the worst idea of all time. It’s beyond stupid. Cain was the original villain he murdered his brother Abel. Let me guess Will wants Cain to be an action hero like Gladiator or Cain will lead an army like in 300. Bible traditionalists will hate this. Nobody else will understand why it’s necessary. There are some great heroes in the Bible that Will could portray but Cain ain’t one of them.
Exactly.
Agreed.
Hope we are missing the idea here and it’s better than that.
The idea is great–forgiveness and redemption is a major bilblical theme.
But I wouldn’t put much faith in a film about religion by Hollywood elites who find Scientology as valid as the Bible.
“Trust not in man” –King David
Right on the money Anonymous! It cracks me up how miopic and uneducated this neaderthals are. They approach a topic knowing absolutely nothing about it, and come up with their own “freestyle” interpretation – neophyte idiots remove their own mask revealing the distant disconnected glare in their eyes reflective of the emptiness of their own captive minds. He could’ve picked David, Joseph, c’mon! Solomon! Adulterous, magi, etc. But instead he goes and pics the first villain in history as the image he wants to portray. I’m sure reading comments like this would not erode his determination one bit, but rather steel his determination to do something that he knows will be met with reproach from the dwindling moral majority “Bible thumpers.”
That in and of itself speaks to a sort of vengence mentality that is prevalent in segments of our most disaffected communities. Also, Cain killing Abel is a blood sacrifice to Cain’s god, who is not the God of Abraham, Noah and Moses, but rather Baal/Molek.
Dan Knauf wrote the original one for Will Smith, which was awesome. House of Cain!
How could smith be in it,Cain and Abel were white.
Hmmm, I think more likely Semantic peoples.
Not sure about their linguistic choices, but I’m sure they were Semitic.
“but I’m sure they were Semitic”. NOPE. Too early in the narrative for that. Any guess skin color would be speculative. Perhaps a quick glance at the book now and again would be instructive. Rekin?
I would venture a guess that that Adam and Eve were neither white nor black but of a middle eastern color like that of today. Color of pigment is irrelevant, if Hollywood is beginning to look at epic stories in the bible to put on the Big screen, perhaps it is Gods doing and won’t be some blasphemous interpretation of it. ( I suspect Spielberg will have the most accurate portrayal. ) Smith will probably think Satan is a “thean” evil alien that entered all humans and will screw it up royally.
Since when?
They were living in the Middle East over 2,000 years ago…they were definitely brown. Not white.
The characters Cain and Abel were not *actual* people. Their story is a myth intended to mourn the passing of the hunter-gatherer lifestyle in favor of humanity’s settling down into the agricultural lifestyle, and eventually, cities.
Of course, Adam and Eve were real people who committed the first sin. Why else would God need to send his only begotten son to Earth to be crucified (a truly barbaric act) for our sins?
A forensic pathologist type of dude used clay on a million year old skull, and the face resembled Patrick Stewart… What??????????????
you don’t know they were white. babylon (iraq) is where it all started…… they aren’t white.
Omg, the original inhabitants of iraq
Some people believe the mark of Cain was the change of his skin color to black. Not saying it is true, but that is one idea out there of what the mark of Cain was.
Actually, Adam isn’t a proper name in the original language (Hebrew) it’s a word that means “man” and implies a ruddy complexion. So “Adam” was not black, white, or whatever shade you prefer, he was “ruddy”. Kind of the color of the clay from which he was made?
HA HAAHA HAAAH AHA HAA HA HAHA AHAAAAAHA AHAAAAAAAA!!!!
It sounds great,the story of the creation ,the first human beings after the fall. I will definitely go and see it. It’s good to see good,moral movies.
What makes anyone think this will be a “moral” movie? Hollywood is anti-religious and mostly aetheists. I know… They are Jews by birth but that’s where it ends. The bible really doesn’t say much about Cain and Able. So… making a full length motion picture will require about 90% conjecture and speculation. My guess… They will attempt to show how absurd these old fables really are.
#1 Cain and Able were not Jewish. The Jewish nation did not start until 2000 years later.
#2 Semites came from Shem which was Noahs son
#3 There were no blacks then. Blacks started from Ham which was Noahs other son.
Whatever. Leave it to Hollywood to make sure you got an Asian and an African somewhere in there
hey moron.. when he said “They are Jews by birth but that’s where it ends” he’s talking about the vast majority of directors, producers and entertainers in Hollywood. Pull your head out
First human beings? Then why did God say to Adam and Eve “replenesh the earth”? What happened that required repleneshing the earth with humans? Which implies that there were humans before them. wtf???
No where did God say “replenish”. He did say multiply though. According to Josephus Adam and Eve had 50+ children.
I think this movie is going to be way off Biblical base. Sad it will be viewed as “Biblical”.
Bzzzzt wrong! Look again @ Genesis 9:1 & 9:28 King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
Obviously you not quoting from the Bible, but instead from other “sources”. There are many translations of the Bible… The true translation does not say “Replenish”… It says “FILL” the earth. Quit quoting that which you do not understand.
See Genesis 9:1 & 9:28 King James Bible (Cambridge Ed), American King James Version, American Standard Version, English Revised Version, Webster’s Bible Translation, World English Bible. True translation? Which is the one you understand?
Thank you, Christian for that comment and clarification. You are far more tactful than this Christian. For me, Peanut Gallery unbelievers are like gnats or a really frustrating Meisner exercise, but God loves them anyway. He really is long suffering.
@Christian , I curious which is the true translation? The Bible says “replenish” twice in in O.T., Gen 1:28 to Adam & Gen 9:1 Noah after the flood.
Emil Your are correct The Bible does say “replenish” in Genesis 9;1 & 28. But if you would pay attention to what it says He is talking to Noah’s sons which would be correct, so why does this apply to Cain?
Translators are not always accurate. A simple Google search shows the original Hebrew word that some translated as “replenish” does not have that meaning at all. It means “fill.” This link, http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?strongs=H4390, gives the Hebrew word (????? – male’) and all its meanings. It also shows a number of other verses that use the same Hebrew word. Read them and you will see that “replenish” is never in mind in the usage of that word.
I’d be a bit concerned about these. These are well known and loved stories, and these directors and producers all seem to be very ideologically Liberal so these people doing these stories as movies may be a question as to their truthfulness.
Because all Liberals are liars and all Conservatives are pure-as-the-driven-snow truth tellers?
Is the soundtrack going to be laid down by “Big Daddy” Kane?
Biblical theme movies made by ungodly liberal democrats
Hey, WHY NOT?? I’m sure they’ll either trash the idea or make an action thing out of it, as the simple morality of “fictional murder” isn’t all that thrilling when you can get that anytime anywhere in technicolor-3D with all the requisite cool firearms and ordnance, so, I’m curious to see where they take it having not read Knauf’s treatment of HOUSE OF CAIN. But then,…I LIVE THERE!! LOL!
BTW- nobody will come close to David Cross’s Cain in the Jack Black vehicle YEAR ONE. Now THAT was hilarious!!!
So how many black characters are there going to be? A black king? Black Adam? No matter, I’m sure Cain will be white…
Talk about raw material.I’m not much of a movie guy.I perfer baseball,football and cheap novels,but I have brothers….”Oh Brother”….When I read the title I thought of Ernest Hemmingway. It would make a great Play.
I would like a fresh prince of Beverly Hills flavor to the story, I mean you know. Or he could set the scene for ancient times where all are speaking sumerian. Or set it for 6000 BC when the earth was created. No wait….
truth and bible? lolz
Sorry Will Smith can’t play the part their wasn’t any different sects of people till a few hundred years after Cain an Able when the people built the tower of Babel built by Noahs decendents. and God separated all the people into different parts of the earth an changed their languages an nationalities from one to many.
people are really convinced that Cain and Abel were white?? seriously where do you come up with that? are you certain, beyond certain, that it shouldn’t be an all black/brown cast?
Maybe there weren’t white but if you believe the Bible to be the journal of record, the first black man was Cain’s great grandchild Canaan son of Ham. This is the story that Smith should be directing.
Isaiah 14:12 the name Lucifer appears. “oh how you have fallen from heaven o lucifer, son of the morning. But surely as a Christian I’m
“reading into that and it really doesn’t appear.
That’s right, weren’t the sumerians called the black headed ones? And was not Noah’s son, Ham, Black? I think so.
why do you assume brown? One theory as to where all the water came from in the flood was that it was a large shield around the earth protecting the planet from radiation. As a result people now live shorter lives and perhaps now have the mutation of melanin to pigment their skin.
So if Cain and Abel (Adam’s immediate descendants) weren’t white, where’d all the white folk come from?
Steinbeck already redeemed Cain in “East of Eden”.
Proving once again that while the state of California goes belly up bankrupt there is some studio willing to shell out millions of dollars for a silly concept to make a movie out of.
Awesome. I love science fiction movies.
That was good. Funny stuff.
The term Semitic is derived from Shem, a son of Noah, who arrived some 1500 years after Cain and Abel. So Semitic he was not.
Nuh Uh. Geez. Thou readeth and comprehendth not. Thou truly Knowest that Verily, Hollywood Writers and Screenplay writers Minds are devoid of ideas for fresh movies. Yea they resort to the best written book that has stood the test of time. IF it were not so why have they re-booted Batman, Spiderman, The Hulk and more.
Will Smith, James Cameron and Ridley Scott are good for fresh ideas. Entertaining.
Where is his background in directing? Do they think that he sees people directing he must be able to do it as well. Being an actor doesn’t make you a director. Why would anyone risk millions of dollars on someone with no experience let him put up his own money and then I would say go for it otherwise get some experience first before you want to play in the major leagues.
But it’s Will Smith! He can do anything, man, ANYTHING! Just look at that wife of his, and those two extremely talented children of theirs!
*Anything!!!*
Just the fact that this movie is starting all these different conversations is an indicator that it may be a success. Anything that gets people to talk that may not normally, I think is what films should do.