Room With A View filmmakers Merchant Ivory are suing the distributers behind the Criterion Collection series for copyright infringement. In a 16-page complaint (read it here) filed Monday in Manhattan federal court, Merchant Ivory claims Janus Films is distributing 25 of
the company’s movies despite an expired licensing deal. “Defendant Janus, without the permission, authorization or consent of Plaintiffs, has licensed and copied, distributed, reproduced, modified, performed and/or displayed the films in the Film Library, or have permitted others to do so, without the permission or consent of Plaintiffs, and continue to do so recklessly, willfully and maliciously in an attempt to damage the Plaintiff and enrich itself,” says the complaint. Wanting a jury trial, Merchant Ivory is seeking the court to stop Janus from further distribution as well as statutory damages of $150,000 for each infringement plus legal fees. Merchant Ivory is also seeking well any profits Janus many have made from the films in question and any losses it might have incurred in not being able to distribute them.In late 1999, Merchant Ivory and Janus entered into a 10-year license agreement that gave the latter distribution rights to 26 of the former’s films. That agreement was amended in 2009 with rights to 21 of the films extended to December 31, 2010, the rights to The Bostonians, Maurice and Heat and Dust extended to December 31, 2011 and the rights to Howard’s End extended to March 13, 2014. Even though the complaint admits that Merchant Ivory was allowing Janus to further distribute the films that permission could be “terminable at will.” What made the whole thing even more complicated is that Merchant Ivory was engaged in an arbitration with a company called ACKMA Recovery that gave them approval rights over any future distribution of the company’s films. Correspondingly in mid-2011, HanWay Films had approached Janus for a deal on U.S. distribution of the Film Library. A deal that Merchant Ivory says Janus had no right to engage in and would not cease despite Merchant Ivory’s insistence. Hence this lawsuit. Merchant Ivory is represented by the New York law firm of Merle, Brown and Nakamura P.C.
Deadline's Dominic Patten - tip him here.


Merchant and Ivory are infamous for ripping off the little people — crew and suppliers. They
also do not share the Profit with the Talent as promised. Real Cheats. Notorious. Now
they attack Criterion — the last great distributors — PLEASSSSSSSE! give me a Break!
They are Hucksters for sure! Merchant and Ivory — Fine Films — But Mean Cheapskates and Snobs.
MIP are the final great filmmakers of ARTHOUSE — Sadly Janus must cease this distribution irregardless of Merchant or Ivory not properly paying others!
The final great filmmakers of Arthouse?
What planet do you live on?
It seems odd that a company like Hanway that has been around a long time and has a solid reputation would enter into an agreement with Janus although Hanway purportedly did not have the right to do so (according to Merchant Ivory). Hanway not only negotiated an agreement, but sent an invoice for payment. Should they be the party being sued? Secondly, if Janus is distributing the titles, taking fees & costs and remitting the remainder to MI, then what’s the damage as some other distributor would just be doing the same thing
Can’t say for sure, but it sounds like MI is trying to rum some sort of scam. And it sounds like Hanway is the infringing party. As you say, if MI is getting profits from Janus, what’s there to complain about?
I would be honored if I was a filmmaker and my films were included in the Criterion Collection.
If nothing else (all legal matters aside), it proves the value of genre films in the romance, historic adaptation and Victorian corset and closeted sexuality category –which still have ample marketable value today. They seem to be timeless, and can be rediscovered by new generations. I can’t imagine how many times “Room With A View” has been re-licensed over the years. And that is saying something for indie producers who seek to fulfill an niche and find profits in repeat business with new viewers… or readers of the literature these films were based upon. Historic romance and tragedy… Works well internationally and in the Americas.
Merchant Ivory never really had impact on the film going audience in India. They were great
disciples of Satyajit Ray and they profited immensely from his largesse.
The Merchant Ivory legacy sadly is tainted by the unfair treatment of the above and below
the line talented who worked their tales off for this filmmaking team.
Who cares if Merchant Ivory rip everyone off and cheat everyone financially — they
made great movies in the Room with a view , Howards End, Remains of the Day and
Mr and Mrs Bridge run of gold!!! Who cares that they were not honest individuals –
you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet!
Merchant Ivory were leaders of real art historical dramas. They went down hill over last 15 years, but
they once were so gooooood! Why does Hanway even bother with this — give them their films
back and move on. Leave these dinosaurs alone. Let it be.
Ismail Merchant campaigned for years for the Oscar — he worked it more than anyone –
Harvey Weinstein studied at his feet. PLEASE JANUS — Give Mr. Ivory a break and set free
his films — Time to reward the talented Jim Ivory and forget about all of the
people Merchant Ivory NEVER paid for their contribution to these films
Seems odd that so many comments obsess on the terrible behavior of Merchant as Ivory as Individuals, forget it! Get over it! they made 4 great films — enough said!
They were once very fine movie making team. But if they were dishonest and did not pay agreed
amounts to crew — they should be called out on it. We are in a post Financial Crisis USA
and Merchant Ivory seem like the Fat Cat Bankers more than dedicated artiists of cinema……!
Studi, Did they really make that much money anyway on those little art house movies?
Janus Films / Criterion Collection do a wonderful service for our industry. They are a company to respect and behold. John is the nicest guy you could want to distribute your dvd. Please let this get settled, out of court perhaps. Discontinue the MI box set and move on.
I cant speak to the licensing agreement or lack thereof, but leave Janus Films alone!!!!
Merchant IVORY WERE THE LAST OF A BREED! An independent cinema more fueled by talent than moxi. Merchant was always one step ahead of the law : but great cinema was created. Criterion should let these old classics out of the contract. what is hanway doing with Howards End: biZarre
so they treated the workers like dirt! very ugly process to make very fine movies. Sad
Maybe they made a few nice movies. BUT They are like fat cat bankers Madoor — they are no darn good. Hurting the working man even for a nice film IS UNACCEPTABL:E.
The stately filmmaking is not the excuse for ugly dishonest behavior. C’mon they made some nice
movies but they were not fair employers. I still say Criterion should just hand these tired old films back and call it a day.
Merchant Ivory always held a snob appeal — but in the end boring movies — mean spirited
snobs: both Ivory and his crooked accomplice, Merchant. Bad People: full stop.
LEAVE Criterion alone and stop hunting for more ill gotten gains.
Funny that you signed Adolf(ph) — I think these comments focusing on Merchants corrupt
business practices are not the issue. The Focus should be: Why would HanWay want these
tired relics.